Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

Nigel's is flying over to kiss him better.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...esperate-hour/

Clacton's potholes can go swivel.

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

The tin foil hat brigade are in full flow on X formally known as Twatter. :LOL:

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

Way too early to extrapolate motive, also i wouldn’t be too confident in statements on social media. “Demolition Ranch” is not a “Far Right MAGA Militia”, it’s a you tube channel about guns.

---------- Post added at 17:54 ---------- Previous post was at 17:52 ----------

It was tongue in cheek, yes. But Trump also never said to storm the Capitol on Jan 6th………..

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

Conspiracy Bingo

1. It was the CIA
2. It was the FBI
3. It was his own supporters
4. MAGA wanted to start a civil war
5. It was Biden
6. It was Putin
7. It was Ukraine
8. It is a publicity Stunt
9. The shooter was not working alone.
10. There was a second shooter
11. The secret service wanted him dead.
12. It was Aliens
13. Payback by long suffering Melania (or Marla or Ivana)

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

You missed payback by long suffering Melania (or Marla or Ivana).

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

Edited :LOL:

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

14. Trump tried to shoot himself and missed.

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

Nigel only looking at a different hole.....

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

The classified documents case has been dismissed with the judge ruling that the special counsel was improperly appointed.

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/15/p...-aileen-cannon

Likely to be appealed.

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

Absolutely certain to be appealed, and also likely that Smith has been waiting for an excuse to go over Cannon’s head. She has been obstructing this case for months but until now has avoided doing anything to give Smith an opportunity to go to the appeals court and get her replaced.

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

At least he’s kept up the idea of being respectful.

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

I’m struggling to understand the timing around this though. Cannon has until now been careful not to give Smith anything to appeal. It has seemed as if she was very keen to drag the thing out and limit its scope as much as she could but not actually risk losing control of the proceedings. Why suddenly so careless? The timing, right after Saturday’s events, is highly suspicious. Does she think that Smith won’t appeal it under these circumstances? Or that the Federal appeals court will be less sympathetic to Smith if he does? On the other hand, I’m reading that she has not dismissed with prejudice, which allows the case to be restarted, and because in any case it had yet to come to trial Trump doesn’t have an acquittal so re-starting it woudn’t be double jeopardy. Is she perhaps suddenly wanting to distance herself from anything to do with Donald J Trump?

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

I didn't watch, I'm not insane, but the write up seems to be his speech was an hour and a half stream of consciousness pure drivel.

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

That ear bandage gets bigger all the time! Does he genuinely need it or us it just being used for effect?

Re: Trump’s Troubles
 

So the Trumpanzees said we looked stupid wearing masks, but they don’t look stupid sellotaping a gerbil pillow to the side of their heads? Riiiiiight.