Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

jonbxx 01-05-2021 12:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078473)
Reduced trade friction between the UK & EU is not an attractive proposition because it means that they make the rules. As OB said, the majority of the UK didn't want that and the EU's current behaviour militates against any reconciliation.

Threatening to turn off the vaccine tap was, effectively, a potential death threat to many Brits. Enemy comes to mind.


But the very fact that the EU have not switched off the tap is a friendly act, is it not? If preventing vaccine exports is an unfriendly act, how do we stand with the USA? Is India being unfriendly by stopping Serum Institute manufactured vaccine exports?

Carth 01-05-2021 12:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Russia hasn't nuked us . . . I guess that means we're friends? :D

1andrew1 01-05-2021 13:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078511)
[COLOR="Blue"]
That's rather one sided, don't you think?

Eh? Not at all. "They" refers to the UK and the EU.

---------- Post added at 12:07 ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36078515)
Russia hasn't nuked us . . . I guess that means we're friends? :D

It means we're alive! :D

Poisoning a British police officer in Salisbury with novichok is not the most friendly of gestures.

Chris 01-05-2021 13:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36078514)
But the very fact that the EU have not switched off the tap is a friendly act, is it not? If preventing vaccine exports is an unfriendly act, how do we stand with the USA? Is India being unfriendly by stopping Serum Institute manufactured vaccine exports?

This is nonsense on stilts. Respect for rule of law isn't a deliberate friendly act. It's neutral. We don't decide each morning whether we're going to follow the rules today. Normal behaviour is simply to do so, and nobody should expect to get a pat on the back for it.

Following the financial crisis of 2008, the UK made bilateral loans to the Republic of Ireland that allowed that country to access finance on more favourable terms than it could secure by going to the money markets directly. That's an example of a deliberate, friendly act. It went over and above the normal rules (while not breaking them) in order to help a neighbour.

Sephiroth 01-05-2021 13:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36078514)
But the very fact that the EU have not switched off the tap is a friendly act, is it not? If preventing vaccine exports is an unfriendly act, how do we stand with the USA? Is India being unfriendly by stopping Serum Institute manufactured vaccine exports?

Beg to differ. If they were threatening us and didn't then carry out their threat doesn't make them friendly in any sense.

The USA is a red herring. They haven't threatened us and vaccines are now being exported by American company. https://www.reuters.com/business/hea...th-2021-04-29/ (paywall but the headline says it all + the quote below):

Quote:

The vaccine shipment, produced at Pfizer's Kalamazoo, Michigan plant, marks the first time the drugmaker has delivered abroad from US facilities after a Trump-era restriction on dose exports expired at the end of March, the source said.


---------- Post added at 12:21 ---------- Previous post was at 12:19 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078516)
Eh? Not at all. "They" refers to the UK and the EU.

---------- Post added at 12:07 ---------- Previous post was at 12:02 ----------


It means we're alive! :D

Poisoning a British police officer in Salisbury with novichok is not the most friendly of gestures.

Nor is the EU threatening to withhold exports of the vaccine to the UK.


---------- Post added at 12:22 ---------- Previous post was at 12:21 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078521)
This is nonsense on stilts. Respect for rule of law isn't a deliberate friendly act. It's neutral. We don't decide each morning whether we're going to follow the rules today. Normal behaviour is simply to do so, and nobody should expect to get a pat on the back for it.

Following the financial crisis of 2008, the UK made bilateral loans to the Republic of Ireland that allowed that country to access finance on more favourable terms than it could secure by going to the money markets directly. That's an example of a deliberate, friendly act. It went over and above the normal rules (while not breaking them) in order to help a neighbour.

... who then royally tried to stiff us over Brexit.

Chris 01-05-2021 13:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Further to the point about the USA, the American decision to invoke emergency defence laws to prevent drug exports was known and understood from a very early stage and was factored into the purchase agreements HMG signed with drugmakers with facilities there. There was no arbitrary, unfriendly attempt to intervene in a privately negotiated contract after the fact.

The EU's behaviour has been quite different. It has, in essence, alleged breach of contract, for which they ought to seek remedy in the courts. However, instead of going to court, they have acted as judge and jury and made regulations allowing them to intervene directly, effectively making a judicial ruling in their own favour.

---------- Post added at 12:24 ---------- Previous post was at 12:23 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078523)
.. who then royally tried to stiff us over Brexit.

Well, to be fair to them, that Anglophobe Varadkar didn't become teeshirt until 2017.

1andrew1 01-05-2021 14:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078526)
However, instead of going to court

??? That's exactly what the EU is doing.
Quote:

European Union lawyers on Wednesday demanded AstraZeneca (AZN.L) immediately deliver COVID-19 vaccines from its factories in Britain, in a move that risks reigniting a spat with London over scarce vaccine supplies.
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe...rt-2021-04-28/

---------- Post added at 13:05 ---------- Previous post was at 12:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078523)
Nor is the EU threatening to withhold exports of the vaccine to the UK.

False equivalence.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36078523)
... who then royally tried to stiff us over Brexit.

A Telegraph op ed writer doesn't fully appreciate that the UK is now a third country, I get that. But it doesn't mean anyone's being royally stiffed over.

jonbxx 01-05-2021 14:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
OK, so if I understand, preventing vaccine exports AND preventing the export of materials that allow other countries to make vaccines is all cool but suggesting that you might do similar is not.

If the EU just stopped exports without threatening to do so beforehand, that would be OK? I guess that is how the UK prohibits exports of lifesaving drugs..

Chris 01-05-2021 14:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078528)
??? That's exactly what the EU is doing.

Having already taken extrajudicial measures, as you well know. Australia has been denied a shipment, others have been threatened.

Carth 01-05-2021 14:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

European Union lawyers on Wednesday demanded AstraZeneca (AZN.L) immediately deliver COVID-19 vaccines from its factories in Britain
Says it all doesn't it, and lawyers 'demanding' something isn't (to my knowledge) the same as 'going to court' :p:

papa smurf 01-05-2021 14:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36078533)
Says it all doesn't it, and lawyers 'demanding' something isn't (to my knowledge) the same as 'going to court' :p:

Correct, stamping your feet and shouting demands isn't quite the same as a judicial hearing.

1andrew1 01-05-2021 15:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36078533)
Says it all doesn't it, and lawyers 'demanding' something isn't (to my knowledge) the same as 'going to court' :p:

It depends upon the circumstances in which you say it. In the bath, possibly not :D but at a court hearing like this one, yes.

---------- Post added at 14:48 ---------- Previous post was at 14:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078532)
Having already taken extrajudicial measures, as you well know. Australia has been denied a shipment, others have been threatened.

You said that the EU ought to seek remedy in the courts. I pointed out that they are doing exactly this. Hopefully we can concur on this.

Chris 01-05-2021 16:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36078536)
It depends upon the circumstances in which you say it. In the bath, possibly not :D but at a court hearing like this one, yes.

---------- Post added at 14:48 ---------- Previous post was at 14:44 ----------


You said that the EU ought to seek remedy in the courts. I pointed out that they are doing exactly this. Hopefully we can concur on this.

No, because if their intention was to abide by the rule of law this would have been their first and only action. What they’re doing now is giving themselves political cover - they’re aiming for exactly what you’re far too eager to give them, which is to get people to forget their heavy-handed and clumsy foray into foreign policy and to fix their attention on the subsequent PR effort.

Regretfully you’re sounding a bit like a regime apologist today.

Sephiroth 01-05-2021 17:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078539)
No, because if their intention was to abide by the rule of law this would have been their first and only action. What they’re doing now is giving themselves political cover - they’re aiming for exactly what you’re far too eager to give them, which is to get people to forget their heavy-handed and clumsy foray into foreign policy and to fix their attention on the subsequent PR effort.

Regretfully you’re sounding a bit like a regime apologist today.

I've been saying that about Andrew for months.

1andrew1 01-05-2021 20:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36078539)
No, because if their intention was to abide by the rule of law this would have been their first and only action. What they’re doing now is giving themselves political cover - they’re aiming for exactly what you’re far too eager to give them, which is to get people to forget their heavy-handed and clumsy foray into foreign policy and to fix their attention on the subsequent PR effort.

Regretfully you’re sounding a bit like a regime apologist today.

You're crediting the EU's actions on vaccine procurement with more respect than they deserve, Chris. They've blundered along like a drunk in a dark alleyway and eventually have reached the correct route with this week's court hearings.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:55.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum