Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

ianch99 03-08-2023 16:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36157873)
I’m currently in Turkey, when I went through passport control they couldn’t care less what colour our passports were, we have a mix.

Same for Mexico last year.

The EU is but one destination, in a very big world.

Yet when I last checked, Turkey and Mexico are not in the EU so this is a pretty useless anecdote for the Brexit thread :p:

Sephiroth 03-08-2023 16:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36157876)
Yet when I last checked, Turkey and Mexico are not in the EU so this is a pretty useless anecdote for the Brexit thread :p:


Naughty Pierre.

1andrew1 03-08-2023 17:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36157873)
I’m currently in Turkey, when I went through passport control they couldn’t care less what colour our passports were, we have a mix.

Same for Mexico last year.

The EU is but one destination, in a very big world.

The EU is where most Brits travel to and holiday in. I'm in Bilbao, Spain. EEA nationals breezed through the e-gates, UK nationals had to queue up for manual inspection and stamping.

Anyway, happy holidays one and all.

ianch99 03-08-2023 20:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36157881)
The EU is where most Brits travel to and holiday in. I'm in Bilbao, Spain. EEA nationals breezed through the e-gates, UK nationals had to queue up for manual inspection and stamping.

Anyway, happy holidays one and all.

Very nice! Hope you are "Basquing" in the sun where you are :D Don't tell anyone about the queues, they really don't exist do they? Wait until ETIAS & EES come along, that is when the real complaining will start.

Pierre 03-08-2023 21:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36157881)
The EU is where most Brits travel to and holiday in. I'm in Bilbao, Spain. EEA nationals breezed through the e-gates, UK nationals had to queue up for manual inspection and stamping.

Anyway, happy holidays one and all.

Strange, I was in Bilbao last November and suffered no such problems prohibition must be a seasonal thing.

---------- Post added at 20:01 ---------- Previous post was at 19:55 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36157876)
Yet when I last checked, Turkey and Mexico are not in the EU so this is a pretty useless anecdote for the Brexit thread :p:

They’re not, but if you view the EU as one homogeneous bloc, then it is only one destination out of hundreds. Preferential passport queues at certain airports in the EU, are in my experience, haphazard and certainly not a hill to die on.

I travel a lot, in and out of Europe, I’ve never faced a delay due to my passport. I accept that is subjective and anecdotal, but it is my experience.

richard-john56 03-08-2023 21:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
The big question to ask is are we better off now than when we were in the European Union.

Sephiroth 03-08-2023 21:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36157890)
Very nice! Hope you are "Basquing" in the sun where you are :D Don't tell anyone about the queues, they really don't exist do they? Wait until ETIAS & EES come along, that is when the real complaining will start.


…. AndSpain will suffer for it, I reckon.

BenMcr 03-08-2023 21:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36157894)

…. AndSpain will suffer for it, I reckon.

Or not

https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/new...iest-airports/

Quote:

Under the new rules, citizens of the United Kingdom will now be permitted to use the EU e-gates at some airports in Spain that have seen mass delays due to staff shortages.

The Spanish airports that will implement the new passport rules for UK citizens include Alicante, Barcelona, Bilbao, Girona, Gran Canaria, Ibiza, Madrid, Lanzarote, Malaga, Menorca, Mallorca, Valencia, Sevilla, Fuerteventura, and Tenerife Sur.

Pierre 03-08-2023 21:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard-john56 (Post 36157893)
The big question to ask is are we better off now than when we were in the European Union.

Define “better off”

Give examples, and comparisons, bearing in mind the answer can be wholly subjective, thereby rendering your evidence useless.

Good luck!

tweetiepooh 04-08-2023 11:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I think the argument can be summarised thus:


Pro-Brexit : We are better of as evidenced by ... but we are being hampered by "Remoaners" who are ....


Pro-EU : We are worse of as evidenced by ... and it's made worse by "Xenophobes" who are ....


There you go, clear as .....!

ianch99 04-08-2023 13:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Most people would use the term "better off" to apply to their personal wealth and experience. There is no subjective dimension to this. Objectively, using the above definition we are not better off. The only discussion is the amount we are poorer and how/when this is mitigated.

Pierre 04-08-2023 16:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36157926)
Most people would use the term "better off" to apply to their personal wealth and experience. There is no subjective dimension to this. Objectively, using the above definition we are not better off. The only discussion is the amount we are poorer and how/when this is mitigated.

If it applies to their “personal” circumstances, then it is wholly “subjective”

ianch99 04-08-2023 16:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36157931)
If it applies to their “personal” circumstances, then it is wholly “subjective”

The price I pay for my food has only increased "subjectively" since we left the EU.

When I queue for hours at Dover Ferry Port, I am only queuing "subjectively".

The fruit not on the supermarket shelves due to lack of farm labour, is only not there "subjectively".

And so on ...

:dunce:

Pierre 04-08-2023 17:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36157932)
The price I pay for my food has only increased "subjectively" since we left the EU.

When I queue for hours at Dover Ferry Port, I am only queuing "subjectively".

The fruit not on the supermarket shelves due to lack of farm labour, is only not there "subjectively".

And so on ...

:dunce:

How it affects you is subjective.

I didn’t notice how much the price of the food items affected me, as the food items I bought weren’t affected.


I didn’t queue at Dover, went from Hull, no problems at all.

The fruit in supermarkets due to producers planning accordingly is also ………….there …..objectively as they planned ahead.

And so on

:dunce:

ianch99 04-08-2023 17:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36157934)
How it affects you is subjective.

I didn’t notice how much the price of the food items affected me, as the food items I bought weren’t affected.


I didn’t queue at Dover, went from Hull, no problems at all.

The fruit in supermarkets due to producers planning accordingly is also ………….there …..objectively as they planned ahead.

And so on

:dunce:

The question was are "we" better off .. jeez. If you want to deny reality then I can't stop you. Seems a common theme for some in this day and age: "This is my reality and I'm sticking to it"

.. don't forget, don't look up :D

Pierre 04-08-2023 23:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36157935)
The question was are "we" better off .. jeez. If you want to deny reality then I can't stop you. Seems a common theme for some in this day and age: "This is my reality and I'm sticking to it"

.. don't forget, don't look up :D

Who’s “we”?

Define “we”

Am I “better off” or “worse off”, no idea. I haven’t felt any economic pressures due to brexit. But that’s me. As it’s my personal experience and therefore subjective.

Sephiroth 04-08-2023 23:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 

I'm definitely better off. Through my own efforts. Brexit, Schmexit - it would have been the same for me.

Everyone - work hard and don't go on strike, which is counterproductive and gives the likes of Ian the meat and drink on which Remainers thrive.

jfman 04-08-2023 23:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Don’t strike, eat your gruel, lick boot as energy companies and banks trouser billions in profits.

Hugh 05-08-2023 01:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36157952)
Don’t strike, eat your gruel, lick boot as energy companies and banks trouser billions in profits.

"I’m all right, Jack*"

Solipsism in action…

*subjectively

TheDaddy 05-08-2023 04:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36157952)
Don’t strike, eat your gruel, lick boot as energy companies and banks trouser billions in profits.

Which was their plan all along, why people ever vote tory is beyond me, they're not the party of old and are only interested in the wealthy and making them and themselves richer

Sephiroth 05-08-2023 08:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36157956)
Which was their plan all along, why people ever vote tory is beyond me, they're not the party of old and are only interested in the wealthy and making them and themselves richer

There's no decent party at the moment. Labour is mad, with their VAT on private schools policy which will backfire big time when classes swell etc. The Lib Dems will tax the cars t buggery, - they already do that in the local authorities.



denphone 05-08-2023 08:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36157956)
Which was their plan all along, why people ever vote tory is beyond me, they're not the party of old and are only interested in the wealthy and making them and themselves richer

June 23, 2016, will go down as the day of the big lie and ever since the big lies have kept coming.

Sephiroth 05-08-2023 08:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36157958)
June 23, 2016, will go down as the day of the big lie and ever since the big lies have kept coming.

Gollox. The people spoke then and it's just that you didn't agree. They wanted out of the EU - as simple as that. We'd not be in a better state had we remained in the EU. Try to prove otherwise.

denphone 05-08-2023 09:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36157959)
Gollox. The people spoke then and it's just that you didn't agree. They wanted out of the EU - as simple as that. We'd not be in a better state had we remained in the EU. Try to prove otherwise.

l don't need to prove otherwise as events since then have proved it in spades.

Sephiroth 05-08-2023 09:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36157960)
l don't need to prove otherwise as events since then have proved it in spades.


You’re just a moaning Remainer. A bad government would have screwed everything up and it’s not on Brexit. It’s not unreasonable to ask what, had we remained in the EU, would have been so much better than the state we are now in.


denphone 05-08-2023 10:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36157961)

You’re just a moaning Remainer. A bad government would have screwed everything up and it’s not on Brexit. It’s not unreasonable to ask what, had we remained in the EU, would have been so much better than the state we are now in.


It says much about the weak paucity of your arguments that calling some members moaning remainers is practically all you have got left.

Sephiroth 05-08-2023 10:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36157962)
It says much about the weak paucity of your arguments that calling some members moaning remainers is practically all you have got left.

That’s the trouble with you Remainers. Everything that’s gone wrong is down to Brexit. The paucity of argument rests with you. What beneficial state would subsist in the UK had we remained in the EU? My position is that we’d be suffering from bad government just as now.

All you’re interested in doing is to deflect away from the question by dwelling on the sentiment I’m expressing about moaning Remainers.

We left the EU so that we could fully govern ourselves. That government has big time screwed up has nothing to do with Brexit.

Hugh 05-08-2023 11:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36157963)
That’s the trouble with you Remainers. Everything that’s gone wrong is down to Brexit. The paucity of argument rests with you. What beneficial state would subsist in the UK had we remained in the EU? My position is that we’d be suffering from bad government just as now.

All you’re interested in doing is to deflect away from the question by dwelling on the sentiment I’m expressing about moaning Remainers.

We left the EU so that we could fully govern ourselves. That government has big time screwed up has nothing to do with Brexit.

Except for the small, but extremely relevant fact, it was mostly the same people…

The people who promised the sunlit uphill lands couldn’t deliver what they promised - that’s what happens when you have an ill-defined, non-costed deliverable - everyone loses.

Pierre 05-08-2023 11:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Not sure I remember “sunlit uplands” being promised.

GrimUpNorth 05-08-2023 13:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36157965)
Not sure I remember “sunlit uplands” being promised.

I recall OB repeating it ad infinitum so it was probably on a briefing note from central office.

Edit: A quick Google found the Minister for The 18th. Century said it at the dispatch box. And here's a clip of him saying it https://youtu.be/OlR1R_vxBB8.

Hope that helps.

Sephiroth 05-08-2023 13:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36157964)
Except for the small, but extremely relevant fact, it was mostly the same people…

The people who promised the sunlit uphill lands couldn’t deliver what they promised - that’s what happens when you have an ill-defined, non-costed deliverable - everyone loses.

You mean the "person" who put forward the Sunlit uplands ......

That has nothing to do with the fact that we're no tangibly worse off due than we would have been had there been no Brexit.

I'll put it to you Remainers again:

Quote:

What beneficial state would subsist in the UK had we remained in the EU?

Hugh 05-08-2023 14:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
No, all the politicians who supported Brexit, then went into Government and didn’t deliver on their promises

ianch99 05-08-2023 14:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36157951)

I'm definitely better off. Through my own efforts. Brexit, Schmexit - it would have been the same for me.

Everyone - work hard and don't go on strike, which is counterproductive and gives the likes of Ian the meat and drink on which Remainers thrive.

Seph, the new membership of the cult of woke has changed you. You used to be open to rational argument and be able to be persuaded when presented with objective evidence. The new Seph is more likely to just respond with childlike retorts and not debate the points in hand.

This approach is actually quite representative of the nation as a whole in recent times.

---------- Post added at 13:15 ---------- Previous post was at 13:13 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36157967)
You mean the "person" who put forward the Sunlit uplands ......

That has nothing to do with the fact that we're no tangibly worse off due than we would have been had there been no Brexit.

I'll put it to you Remainers again:



https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2023/08/1.jpg

Sephiroth 05-08-2023 16:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 

I am totally rational at all times. I also like to place focus when people like Den can only attack my description of certain Remainers rather than address the actual challenge put forward.

That rather oversize, Hughesque image contains some truths in the sense of describing what’s gone downhill since Brexit. I just challenge what negative effect on that list has been caused by Brexit.

CRASHED CURRENCY - is that where we sit now? It certainly has had crashed moments, especially after the Brexit vote, but right now I’m seeing levels similar to 2016.

PRICE RIUSES - is that entirely due to Brexit? Costs of doing business with the EU have risen, and the costs have been passed on to consumers. What’s should be happening, under a decent investment friendly government, is to work sufficiently hard to increase our wealth. The price rise component due to Brexit has not been unaffordable.

NORMALISATION OF LYING - the expressed hopes of the Leave Campaign should not be relegated to LYING. Only Remainers do that. I’m disappointed at the slow pace of growth - mainly due to government incompetence.

WORSENING TRADE GAP - Yes, that’s true and it is not beneficial to us. That’s the price of regaining sovereignty from a nasty regime in Brussels that only wants to punish us. Why would we want to be a member of such a regimen? As a member, we could not undo this.

THE UNDERMINING OF PARLIAMENT - What’s that got to do with Brexit? If EU federates, then Parliament would be undermined. If you are referring to that clown Boris and that fool Truss, then that’s got nothing to do with Brexit. Self-inflicted (by the Tories) wounds, they were.

THE SPLINTERING OF FAMILIES - I never like to see this (in the EU context) and I didn’t know this was a big issue.

LOSS OF HIGH INCOME JOBS - Loss? Or non-growth of high income jobs? The latter is due to government incompetence,, not Brexit.

THREAT TO PEACE IN IRELAND - what threat? That was a confection created by Varadkar just to make life difficult for the UK. The stupid government swallowed that hook, line and sinker and we now have the ridiculous situation of a North Sea Border. That’s one side to it; the other side is that with wise investment, NI can have the best of both worlds and if I was the NI SOS, I’d be working on that with fervour.

THE SHORTAGE OF FARM WORKERS - yes, that’s true; but is that a big reason to have remained in the EU? This problem needs a structural solution that still needs a lot of design.

FURTHER ALIENATION OF SCOTLAND - We either have a UK or we don’t. 52/48 represents the democratically expressed view of the UK on a Brexit ticket. Personally, I would have preferred a stronger mandate but there was no constitutional mechanism for the government of the day to have set any margin whereby governing taking forward the Referendum result. The ALIENATION is purely a manipulation mechanism cionfected by the SNP in their stupid pursuit of power.

WEAKENING OF OUR SCIENCE BASE - I want to see the government taking a sensible road in rejoins the European science institutions.

THE LOSS OF HEALTH COVER IN 27 COUNTRIES - really? What’s the GHIC about? And we can negotiate reciprocity.

HIGHER PHONE CHARGES WHEN TRAVELLING - not for O2 users.

LOSS OF GDPR PROTECTION. - What loss? GDPR still applies (and it’s far too onerous in some respects).

UNCERTAINTY IN GIBRALTAR - there is no uncertainty. Spain is trying it on again and those bustard in Brussels are lending Spain a hand. Why would we want to be in such a corrupt union?

LOSS OF INFLUENCE IN THE WORLD - nothing to do with Brexit. The EC wants greater control over foreign policy (VdL’s first speech) which would reduce our influence. What’s happening now regarding our influence is nothing to do with Brexit and a lot to do with world events on which the EU also has no influence.

SOARING DEBT - nothing to do with Brexit. All to do with world circumstances made doubly worse by government incompetence.

We are where we are due to incompetent government which has imperilled the NHS and it’s nothing to do with BREXIT beyond what I’ve iterated above.

Pierre 05-08-2023 16:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36157968)
No, all the politicians who supported Brexit, then went into Government and didn’t deliver on their promises

If the purpose of Brexit was to leave the EU, which I believe it was, then that objective has been delivered and therefore delivering on the referendum was a success.

There were no other promises on the ballot paper.

ianch99 09-08-2023 11:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36157976)

I am totally rational at all times. I also like to place focus when people like Den can only attack my description of certain Remainers rather than address the actual challenge put forward.

That rather oversize, Hughesque image contains some truths in the sense of describing what’s gone downhill since Brexit. I just challenge what negative effect on that list has been caused by Brexit.

CRASHED CURRENCY - is that where we sit now? It certainly has had crashed moments, especially after the Brexit vote, but right now I’m seeing levels similar to 2016.

PRICE RIUSES - is that entirely due to Brexit? Costs of doing business with the EU have risen, and the costs have been passed on to consumers. What’s should be happening, under a decent investment friendly government, is to work sufficiently hard to increase our wealth. The price rise component due to Brexit has not been unaffordable.

NORMALISATION OF LYING - the expressed hopes of the Leave Campaign should not be relegated to LYING. Only Remainers do that. I’m disappointed at the slow pace of growth - mainly due to government incompetence.

WORSENING TRADE GAP - Yes, that’s true and it is not beneficial to us. That’s the price of regaining sovereignty from a nasty regime in Brussels that only wants to punish us. Why would we want to be a member of such a regimen? As a member, we could not undo this.

THE UNDERMINING OF PARLIAMENT - What’s that got to do with Brexit? If EU federates, then Parliament would be undermined. If you are referring to that clown Boris and that fool Truss, then that’s got nothing to do with Brexit. Self-inflicted (by the Tories) wounds, they were.

THE SPLINTERING OF FAMILIES - I never like to see this (in the EU context) and I didn’t know this was a big issue.

LOSS OF HIGH INCOME JOBS - Loss? Or non-growth of high income jobs? The latter is due to government incompetence,, not Brexit.

THREAT TO PEACE IN IRELAND - what threat? That was a confection created by Varadkar just to make life difficult for the UK. The stupid government swallowed that hook, line and sinker and we now have the ridiculous situation of a North Sea Border. That’s one side to it; the other side is that with wise investment, NI can have the best of both worlds and if I was the NI SOS, I’d be working on that with fervour.

THE SHORTAGE OF FARM WORKERS - yes, that’s true; but is that a big reason to have remained in the EU? This problem needs a structural solution that still needs a lot of design.

FURTHER ALIENATION OF SCOTLAND - We either have a UK or we don’t. 52/48 represents the democratically expressed view of the UK on a Brexit ticket. Personally, I would have preferred a stronger mandate but there was no constitutional mechanism for the government of the day to have set any margin whereby governing taking forward the Referendum result. The ALIENATION is purely a manipulation mechanism cionfected by the SNP in their stupid pursuit of power.

WEAKENING OF OUR SCIENCE BASE - I want to see the government taking a sensible road in rejoins the European science institutions.

THE LOSS OF HEALTH COVER IN 27 COUNTRIES - really? What’s the GHIC about? And we can negotiate reciprocity.

HIGHER PHONE CHARGES WHEN TRAVELLING - not for O2 users.

LOSS OF GDPR PROTECTION. - What loss? GDPR still applies (and it’s far too onerous in some respects).

UNCERTAINTY IN GIBRALTAR - there is no uncertainty. Spain is trying it on again and those bustard in Brussels are lending Spain a hand. Why would we want to be in such a corrupt union?

LOSS OF INFLUENCE IN THE WORLD - nothing to do with Brexit. The EC wants greater control over foreign policy (VdL’s first speech) which would reduce our influence. What’s happening now regarding our influence is nothing to do with Brexit and a lot to do with world events on which the EU also has no influence.

SOARING DEBT - nothing to do with Brexit. All to do with world circumstances made doubly worse by government incompetence.

We are where we are due to incompetent government which has imperilled the NHS and it’s nothing to do with BREXIT beyond what I’ve iterated above.

Seph, just to let you know that I am not ignoring your reply. I do plan on circling back to this when I get the time.

OLD BOY 09-08-2023 13:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36157979)
If the purpose of Brexit was to leave the EU, which I believe it was, then that objective has been delivered and therefore delivering on the referendum was a success.

There were no other promises on the ballot paper.

That is correct. It’s implementing the benefits of Brexit that has not yet materialised. We’re still encumbered by EU legislation and nothing will start to change until that is done.

BenMcr 09-08-2023 15:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158189)
We’re still encumbered by EU legislation and nothing will start to change until that is done.

Which specific EU legislation are we still encumbered by?

Hugh 09-08-2023 16:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36157979)
If the purpose of Brexit was to leave the EU, which I believe it was, then that objective has been delivered and therefore delivering on the referendum was a success.

There were no other promises on the ballot paper.

If the purpose of the next General Election is to choose a Political Party to govern the country, which I believe it is, then when a Party gets a Majority that objective has been delivered, and therefore delivering on the Election was a success.

By that logic, whoever has a majority won’t be held to task for anything, as there are no other promises on the ballot paper at Election time?

Pierre 09-08-2023 16:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158193)
If the purpose of the next General Election is to choose a Political Party to govern the country, which I believe it is, then when a Party gets a Majority that objective has been delivered, and therefore delivering on the Election was a success.

By that logic, whoever has a majority won’t be held to task for anything, as there are no other promises on the ballot paper at Election time?

There were no other promises on the ballot paper.

It wasn’t a general election, were each party puts forward a manifesto.

The question was in or out, regardless of any other consequence.

But you know that anyway, as does everyone else.

ianch99 09-08-2023 17:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36158195)
The question was in or out, regardless of any other consequence

Here is the essential point in the whole clown show. Thank you Pierre.

In a sane world, the politicians who wished to change the macro economic & societal dna of a G7 country, would bring to the table a cogent plan, providing coherent reasoning why this was good idea for the population as a whole.

Yet, as Pierre has so eloquently pointed out, they did none of this. All they focussed on is trying to persuade sufficient floating voters to get over a very low bar. This they did by promising no downside and a lot of upside. They lied ... and here we are, with the diehards now claiming it was not the project's fault but rather the (flawed) implementation.

You see for those who always saw this as a holy, religious crusade, the facts & evidence cannot matter. It is the fundamental definition of faith.

Hugh 09-08-2023 18:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36158195)
There were no other promises on the ballot paper.

It wasn’t a general election, were each party puts forward a manifesto.

The question was in or out, regardless of any other consequence.

But you know that anyway, as does everyone else.

Manifesto, you say?

http://www.voteleavetakecontrol.org/why_vote_leave.html

There are no other promises on the ballot paper.

The General Election vote is Labour or Conservative, regardless of any consequence.

But you know that, anyway, as does everyone else…

Pierre 09-08-2023 19:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158201)
Manifesto, you say?

http://www.voteleavetakecontrol.org/why_vote_leave.html

There are no other promises on the ballot paper.

The General Election vote is Labour or Conservative, regardless of any consequence.

But you know that, anyway, as does everyone else…

Do we have to go over this again and again 7 whole years after it happened, and pretend we were all stupid and tricked into something?

The amount of information out there was gargantuan.

The government paid for information on what it meant to leave to posted through every door in the nation.

To say people didn’t know what they voted for is, and has always been an insult to those that did. The fact that the government has not managed the outcome as they should or could have is no reflection on the wishes of the people.

They voted out, not because of sunlit uplands, but because they wanted British issues to be dealt with by the British parliament not the Brussels/Strasberg one.

The referendum question was not vote out and get this or vote in and get that.

7 years on and we’re still whining about it, pisses me off.

Hugh 09-08-2023 19:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Rebutting simplistic sophistry isn’t whining, it’s pointing out fallacious arguments.

Many years ago, I stated in another thread "we’re all leavers now", and I still believe that - doesn’t give people a "get out of jail" card to talk bolleaux, though…

ianch99 09-08-2023 20:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36158208)
Do we have to go over this again and again 7 whole years after it happened, and pretend we were all stupid and tricked into something?

The amount of information out there was gargantuan.

The government paid for information on what it meant to leave to posted through every door in the nation.

To say people didn’t know what they voted for is, and has always been an insult to those that did. The fact that the government has not managed the outcome as they should or could have is no reflection on the wishes of the people.

They voted out, not because of sunlit uplands, but because they wanted British issues to be dealt with by the British parliament not the Brussels/Strasberg one.

The referendum question was not vote out and get this or vote in and get that.

7 years on and we’re still whining about it, pisses me off.

The fact that 7 years later you are still misrepresenting the truth probably pisses off more people than just me. People voted out for a whole set of reasons and many did not do any research at all before voting. Some just believed the lies they were told.

Like this splendid chap:

https://inews.co.uk/news/world/brexi...-house-2508493

Quote:

A British couple in their sixties have bought a bargain €15,000 (£13,000) three-bedroom house in Italy for their retirement – but they cannot get a visa to live in it because of post-Brexit travel rules.

Greg Walter, from Winchester, says he voted for Brexit, but now feels betrayed.

“We were told Brexit was not going to impact our life abroad, that it would be just a matter of formality,” Mr Walter, who used to work in construction, told i.

“People who had second homes in Europe, or planned to buy one, were never given the correct information on the vote outcome.”

He and his partner, Steph Appleton, purchased an old dwelling in the picturesque town of Latronico in the Basilicata region of southern Italy last year and want to relocate to the quiet village, surrounded by lush vegetation, to enjoy a laidback lifestyle.

OLD BOY 09-08-2023 21:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BenMcr (Post 36158192)
Which specific EU legislation are we still encumbered by?

That’s been answered more than once before. Try the GDPR, Acquired Rights Directive, Working Time Directive, Agency Workers Directive just for starters. Did you not appreciate how bureaucratic the EU is? You should try setting up and running a business. Nightmare!

https://www.gov.uk/government/public...ness-taskforce

Hugh 09-08-2023 21:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Fatherless EU laws protecting the employees’ rights and not letting multi-national corporations do what they want with our personal data…

I’ve never understood the whining about Working Time Directive - if employees want to work longer hours, they can just opt out; what the employer can’t do is make them work those hours without agreement.

Pierre 09-08-2023 23:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36158214)
The fact that 7 years later you are still misrepresenting the truth

Really? Me? Like what exactly?

TheDaddy 10-08-2023 15:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36158214)
The fact that 7 years later you are still misrepresenting the truth probably pisses off more people than just me. People voted out for a whole set of reasons and many did not do any research at all before voting. Some just believed the lies they were told.

Like this splendid chap:

https://inews.co.uk/news/world/brexi...-house-2508493

They did, we had people on here who thought they were voting to leave the echr and as a protest and they're just two of the knuckle heads I remember and there were others even amongst our small sample pool

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158220)
That’s been answered more than once before. Try the GDPR, Acquired Rights Directive, Working Time Directive, Agency Workers Directive just for starters. Did you not appreciate how bureaucratic the EU is? You should try setting up and running a business. Nightmare!

https://www.gov.uk/government/public...ness-taskforce

People aren't so stupid that they don't realise a cut in regulations means a cut to their rights and protections and aren't in their best interests it's the same with tax cuts, they're not meant for the little people

jfman 10-08-2023 15:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158220)
That’s been answered more than once before. Try the GDPR, Acquired Rights Directive, Working Time Directive, Agency Workers Directive just for starters. Did you not appreciate how bureaucratic the EU is? You should try setting up and running a business. Nightmare!

https://www.gov.uk/government/public...ness-taskforce

Pray, tell, OB how much experience do you have setting up a business?

OLD BOY 10-08-2023 18:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158263)
Pray, tell, OB how much experience do you have setting up a business?

Did you read the link? Do you really not appreciate how much bureaucracy surrounds EU laws?

---------- Post added at 17:44 ---------- Previous post was at 17:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36158261)
People aren't so stupid that they don't realise a cut in regulations means a cut to their rights and protections and aren't in their best interests it's the same with tax cuts, they're not meant for the little people

As mentioned more than once before, the rights of UK citizens can still be protected, but in a less bureaucratic way.

---------- Post added at 17:45 ---------- Previous post was at 17:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158224)
Fatherless EU laws protecting the employees’ rights and not letting multi-national corporations do what they want with our personal data…

I’ve never understood the whining about Working Time Directive - if employees want to work longer hours, they can just opt out; what the employer can’t do is make them work those hours without agreement.

Because if you read it, the Working Time Regulations goes beyond just the 48 hour week.

Hugh 10-08-2023 19:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I have read it (many times in the past, having run large teams/departments) - can you give examples of what the actual problems are (besides your stock answer of "too bureaucratic")?

These all look eminently sensible to me…

Quote:

the maximum weekly working hours, and how someone can work more hours if they choose

rest during the working day, week and year

young workers' maximum working hours and rest breaks

night work

special arrangements when there's an emergency or if someone is not able to take their rest

holiday entitlement
https://www.acas.org.uk/working-time-rules

TheDaddy 10-08-2023 20:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158282)
Did you read the link? Do you really not appreciate how much bureaucracy surrounds EU laws?

---------- Post added at 17:44 ---------- Previous post was at 17:43 ----------



As mentioned more than once before, the rights of UK citizens can still be protected, but in a less bureaucratic way.

---------- Post added at 17:45 ---------- Previous post was at 17:44 ----------



Because if you read it, the Working Time Regulations goes beyond just the 48 hour week.

Call me a mad old fool but I'm not interested in can where my conditions and rights are concerned, I'd like the new plan set out before the old one is surrendered, we've been here before with trusting to hope and we held all the cards then too

OLD BOY 11-08-2023 01:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158290)
I have read it (many times in the past, having run large teams/departments) - can you give examples of what the actual problems are (besides your stock answer of "too bureaucratic")?

These all look eminently sensible to me…



https://www.acas.org.uk/working-time-rules

Jesus, how many times have we been through this before? You are playing games.

---------- Post added at 00:18 ---------- Previous post was at 00:17 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36158299)
Call me a mad old fool but I'm not interested in can where my conditions and rights are concerned, I'd like the new plan set out before the old one is surrendered, we've been here before with trusting to hope and we held all the cards then too

And that is a fair point. The government needs to get on with it to prove the doubters wrong.

Hugh 11-08-2023 01:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158320)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh View Post
I have read it (many times in the past, having run large teams/departments) - can you give examples of what the actual problems are (besides your stock answer of "too bureaucratic")?

These all look eminently sensible to me…



https://www.acas.org.uk/working-time-rules
Jesus, how many times have we been through this before? You are playing games.

---------- Post added at 00:18 ---------- Previous post was at 00:17 ----------



And that is a fair point. The government needs to get on with it to prove the doubters wrong.

That’s a "no", then…

Here’s a handy hint - if you’ve answered it before, why not just link to those posts?

jfman 11-08-2023 07:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158322)
That’s a "no", then…

Similar to my question about his experience running a business.

GrimUpNorth 11-08-2023 09:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158322)
That’s a "no", then…

Here’s a handy hint - if you’ve answered it before, why not just link to those posts?

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158324)
Similar to my question about his experience running a business.

I seem to remember OB once letting slip he worked for the council.

Wonder if he walked to work, put his sandwiches in a Sunblest bag and if the children called him Bogie?

Hugh 11-08-2023 10:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Careful - He takes no lip off nobody…

Pierre 11-08-2023 10:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158330)
Careful - He takes no lip off nobody…

I get the reference.

ianch99 11-08-2023 11:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36158334)
I get the reference.

Said with Dignity :D

OLD BOY 11-08-2023 12:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36158299)
Call me a mad old fool but I'm not interested in can where my conditions and rights are concerned, I'd like the new plan set out before the old one is surrendered, we've been here before with trusting to hope and we held all the cards then too

Fair enough, that’s sensible.

---------- Post added at 10:51 ---------- Previous post was at 10:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158263)
Pray, tell, OB how much experience do you have setting up a business?

I have had plenty of experience in advising managers how to comply with employment legislation while remaining solvent, and the legislative burdens on businesses are pretty clear when you actually see the implications by dealing with real problems.

Honestly, jfman, this point about bureaucracy and how it drags down industry are plain to see. You don’t have to be doing it yourself to see how EU bureaucracy impacts businesses negatively unless you are walking around with eyes closed.

---------- Post added at 11:04 ---------- Previous post was at 10:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158290)
I have read it (many times in the past, having run large teams/departments) - can you give examples of what the actual problems are (besides your stock answer of "too bureaucratic")?

These all look eminently sensible to me…



https://www.acas.org.uk/working-time-rules

It depends what kind of business you run. If, for example, you employ staff who are also sometimes caring for people who may need it overnight, the practice used to be that at those times you could actually sleep, but if you had to wake up to deal with a problem, you’d be expected to deal with it. For that, you would be paid an allowance plus an hourly rate for the hours you were dealing with the emergency. This arrangement worked perfectly well until the Working Time nonsense came in and employers were faced with claims that we had to pay the hourly rate at overtime rates for the whole night while on ‘waking duties’.

Another example - where manual workers signed up for emergency call-outs (for example, to clear snow on the roads) led to all sorts of problems with the additional hours worked on those days and nights, and also the costs involved compared with before.

We managed to find ways of making this work after a lot of work, but this effort would not have been necessary had it not been for these regulations, which many employers still find an encumbrance.

---------- Post added at 11:06 ---------- Previous post was at 11:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158322)
That’s a "no", then…

Here’s a handy hint - if you’ve answered it before, why not just link to those posts?

Because I’m not trawling through my previous posts when you could do exactly the same.

---------- Post added at 11:08 ---------- Previous post was at 11:06 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36158328)
I seem to remember OB once letting slip he worked for the council.

I have worked for more than one employer in my working life, just like most people. The examples I have given are, in fact, council examples, which show that it’s not only profit-making businesses that are affected.

jfman 11-08-2023 18:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158339)
I have had plenty of experience in advising managers how to comply with employment legislation while remaining solvent, and the legislative burdens on businesses are pretty clear when you actually see the implications by dealing with real problems.

Honestly, jfman, this point about bureaucracy and how it drags down industry are plain to see. You don’t have to be doing it yourself to see how EU bureaucracy impacts businesses negatively unless you are walking around with eyes closed.

Ah yes, advising from the sidelines how to steamroller workers rights in the name of extracting further profits. Not actually running a business yourself.

Much like your climate change denial approach - there’s been an ice age more than once it can’t possibly be human - how do you explain the many successful companies that operate within the parameters of the EU, often steamrollering their British counterparts in the global markets?

Failed by Government(s) perhaps?

---------- Post added at 16:56 ---------- Previous post was at 15:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158339)
you employ staff who are also sometimes caring for people who may need it overnight, the practice used to be that at those times you could actually sleep, but if you had to wake up to deal with a problem, you’d be expected to deal with it. For that, you would be paid an allowance plus an hourly rate for the hours you were dealing with the emergency. This arrangement worked perfectly well until the Working Time nonsense came in and employers were faced with claims that we had to pay the hourly rate at overtime rates for the whole night while on ‘waking duties’.

Sleep in your workplace and only be paid if you are required to wake up. :rofl:

If that’s the kind of exploitative working practice the EU directive prevents then I wholeheartedly support it.

---------- Post added at 17:02 ---------- Previous post was at 16:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158339)
Another example - where manual workers signed up for emergency call-outs (for example, to clear snow on the roads) led to all sorts of problems with the additional hours worked on those days and nights, and also the costs involved compared with before.

Scandalous. Manual workers getting overtime. :rofl:

Life outside the EU sounds like a South Sudan sweat shop more than sunlit uplands.

OLD BOY 11-08-2023 21:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158358)
Ah yes, advising from the sidelines how to steamroller workers rights in the name of extracting further profits. Not actually running a business yourself.

Much like your climate change denial approach - there’s been an ice age more than once it can’t possibly be human - how do you explain the many successful companies that operate within the parameters of the EU, often steamrollering their British counterparts in the global markets?

Failed by Government(s) perhaps?

You are making points I have not made. Typical of you.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158358)

---------- Post added at 16:56 ---------- Previous post was at 15:12 ----------

[/COLOR]

Sleep in your workplace and only be paid if you are required to wake up. :rofl:

If that’s the kind of exploitative working practice the EU directive prevents then I wholeheartedly support it.

I said they received an allowance for this. However, payment at full rate for hours spent sleeping is ridiculous. They were paid normal rate for hours actually worked.

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158358)
W

---------- Post added at 17:02 ---------- Previous post was at 16:56 ----------

[/COLOR]

Scandalous. Manual workers getting overtime. :rofl:

Life outside the EU sounds like a South Sudan sweat shop more than sunlit uplands.

You have made an assumption here. There was not a problem with paying plain time + an allowance, as agreed with the unions.

Hugh 11-08-2023 21:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

I said they received an allowance for this. However, payment at full rate for hours spent sleeping is ridiculous. They were paid normal rate for hours actually worked.
So they had to be on-site and available, so couldn’t be doing any other paid work, but shouldn’t get paid for this?

jfman 11-08-2023 21:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158381)
You are making points I have not made. Typical of you.

I said they received an allowance for this. However, payment at full rate for hours spent sleeping is ridiculous. They were paid normal rate for hours actually worked.

You have made an assumption here. There was not a problem with paying plain time + an allowance, as agreed with the unions.

So not being paid to attend the workplace in a permanent state of on call?

You really are a piece of work, OB. I hadn’t fully comprehended your hatred of this country, it’s people and it’s history until tonight. I genuinely thought your support for Brexit was some deluded fantasy about a genuinely “Great” Britain.

But it wasn’t. You’d just pawn the lot off, raze it to the ground of some venture capitalists could offshore slightly more profits we’d never see again all the while living standards and working conditions go through the floor.

OLD BOY 11-08-2023 21:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158382)
So they had to be on-site and available, so couldn’t be doing any other paid work, but shouldn’t get paid for this?

They received an allowance for all the time spent on the premises. The unions were very satisfied with this arrangement. What’s your problem?

jfman 11-08-2023 21:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158386)
They received an allowance for all the time spent on the premises. The unions were very satisfied with this arrangement. What’s your problem?

Slavery?

GrimUpNorth 11-08-2023 21:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158386)
They received an allowance for all the time spent on the premises. The unions were very satisfied with this arrangement. What’s your problem?

Putting my union stewards hat on, I could agree with paying an allowance for the time the staff spent on the premises. I think paid by the quarter hour with the allowance based on 1.5 or 2 times their basic rate of pay, plus expenses either car allowance or taxi fares especially if the start or end of the shift were at an unsociable hour. I might be willing to forgo the enhanced rate in return for straight time with time off in lieu, but would need to consult with members to find out what they want.

OLD BOY 12-08-2023 14:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158382)
So they had to be on-site and available, so couldn’t be doing any other paid work, but shouldn’t get paid for this?

The requirement to be on-site was why they were paid an allowance. How could they be doing other paid work when it was beddy-byes time?

Hugh 12-08-2023 15:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158449)
The requirement to be on-site was why they were paid an allowance. How could they be doing other paid work when it was beddy-byes time?

Shift work at another place of work?

Chris 12-08-2023 16:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158449)
The requirement to be on-site was why they were paid an allowance. How could they be doing other paid work when it was beddy-byes time?

The law quite rightly says that if you are required to be at your place of work you are at work and must be paid. That is, actually paid, not given an ‘allowance’. If the employer stipulates that the employee may sleep unless certain activities are required to be carried out then that’s the employer’s business. There’s nothing stopping them organising a night shift with activities throughout the night. Of course the reason they didn’t do that was to try to avoid paying people for being on the night shift. It was a scam that has been rightly stamped out.

If I am required to report to a location stipulated by my employer, as part of my contract of employment, and remain there for eight hours, so its no longer my own time and I am no longer free to choose where to go and who to spend time with, then I am at work and my employer must pay for my time and then has the luxury of giving me tasks to perform. Great if they want to tell me I can sleep on the job but that’s their choice, not mine.

1andrew1 12-08-2023 19:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
No one has explained the benefits of the Working Time Directive to me better than Old Boy has done here! :D
If he's looking for a job, I'm sure Rejoiners would be keen to have him pontificate on other "unnecessary" EU red tape.

OLD BOY 17-08-2023 09:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36158454)
Shift work at another place of work?

If you can point to an opportunity to get paid for shift work during your sleeping hours, I might be interested in that. Let me know if you find such a job, that would be perfect!

Hugh 17-08-2023 10:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36158767)
If you can point to an opportunity to get paid for shift work during your sleeping hours, I might be interested in that. Let me know if you find such a job, that would be perfect!

shift work instead of sleeping…

Having done many many night shifts, no sleeping was done.

As Chris succinctly stated

Quote:

If the employer stipulates that the employee may sleep unless certain activities are required to be carried out then that’s the employer’s business. There’s nothing stopping them organising a night shift with activities throughout the night. Of course the reason they didn’t do that was to try to avoid paying people for being on the night shift. It was a scam that has been rightly stamped out.

jfman 17-08-2023 10:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I can’t believe it took CCHQ 5 days to come up with that reply.

denphone 17-08-2023 11:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158781)
I can’t believe it took CCHQ 5 days to come up with that reply.

:D

Hugh 17-08-2023 11:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158781)
I can’t believe it took CCHQ 5 days to come up with that reply.

tbf, they’ve been busy trying to locate Nadine Dorries…

1andrew1 17-08-2023 23:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36158781)
I can’t believe it took CCHQ 5 days to come up with that reply.

That's due to their staff having holidays. ;)

The sooner that we can take advantage of our hard-won Brexit freedoms by dispensing with such anti-competitive luxuries, the better.

1andrew1 29-08-2023 13:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
British farmers won't be too happy but many of us will be pleased that the government is kicking this inflation tin can down the alley.
Quote:

The UK government has confirmed a fifth delay to the implementation of its post-Brexit border controls on food and fresh products, as ministers admitted the new regime on EU imports will push up prices.

Ministers also confirmed a move, first reported by the FT last week, to push back the launch of new paperwork requirements at the border to January and delay new import checks until April, following Treasury concerns over the inflationary impact of the incoming regime and a request by traders for more time to prepare.
https://www.ft.com/content/7ae83ce4-...8-9b98ee01c39e

However, others fear the lack of checks will promote the UK as dumping ground for poor quality food.

Quote:

Maggot-ridden meat among illegal products seized by officials in Dover crackdown

Port security found 21 of 22 lorries searched were carrying illegal food destined for shops and markets

Port officials at Dover seized illegal products including maggot-ridden meat in a series of raids.

The 24-hour crackdown earlier this month targed eatern European food lorries entering the UK.

They searched 22 vehicles from Romanian, Moldovan, Ukraine and Poland with illegal meat imports found in 21.

Inspectors discovered raw animal products stashed in carrier bags and tissue without temperature control, refrigeration or labels.

The items were not separated from products such as cheese, crisps and cake.

Other foods were found in holdalls, cardboard boxes or cool boxes, to be sold at markets and independent stores across Britain.

In one case raw, unlabelled, loosely-wrapped pork had been placed in the bottom of a taped-up wheelie bin filled with other products intended for free circulation in the UK.

The details were revealed by Natalie Elphicke, the Conservative MP for Dover, in a debate in Westminster Hall on Tuesday. She said “None of this food meets EU requirements and shouldn’t be coming in. It is illegal for the UK market. It highlights why it is wrong to outsource our food and biosecurity controls to the EU.”

“Some drivers said the meat had been home slaughtered. The inspection began after concerns that African swine fever was being spread in imports of illegal meat from eastern Europe.”
https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crim...-b1033827.html

Pierre 29-08-2023 13:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36159422)
British farmers won't be too happy but many of us will be pleased that the government is kicking this inflation tin can down the alley.

https://www.ft.com/content/7ae83ce4-...8-9b98ee01c39e

However, others fear the lack of checks will promote the UK as dumping ground for poor quality food.


https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crim...-b1033827.html

well thank god there are checks, as if we were still in the EU those lorries full of rotten meat would have come through unchecked.

1andrew1 29-08-2023 13:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36159423)
well thank god there are checks, as if we were still in the EU those lorries full of rotten meat would have come through unchecked.

There aren't regular checks, these were just a one-off.

Pierre 29-08-2023 13:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36159424)
There aren't regular checks, these were just a one-off.

So you agree there should be more checks then? Even if it was just a one off. Just think how many tons of rotten meat has come across the channel before Brexit or freely travels across the EU now because there are no checks.

1andrew1 29-08-2023 13:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36159425)
So you agree there should be more checks then? Even if it was just a one off. Just think how many tons of rotten meat has come across the channel before Brexit or freely travels across the EU now because there are no checks.

If it's marked for UK consumption then it looks like any old stuff is getting through to us. Why should the EU do all the hard work for the UK? I'm pretty sure that this is not the standard of checking given to meats sold in the EU including when the UK was a member.

Based on the evidence in the Standard article, the benefits seem to outweigh the costs of not doing checks but the government has obviously calculated differently.

TheDaddy 29-08-2023 16:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
21 out of 22 lorries contained food unfit for consumption, I don't remember this brexit benefit being on the side of a bus, has there ever been a country in the whole of history that has imposed sanctions on themselves?

Pierre 29-08-2023 16:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
The point I’m making is with freedom of movement of goods pre-Brexit, this could have been happening on a massive scale.

You both are making the case for checking of goods coming in from the EU.

OLD BOY 29-08-2023 17:29

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36159430)
The point I’m making is with freedom of movement of goods pre-Brexit, this could have been happening on a massive scale.

You both are making the case for checking of goods coming in from the EU.

It’s not that they can’t see it, Pierre - they won’t see it.

Hugh 29-08-2023 17:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36159432)
It’s not that they can’t see it, Pierre - they won’t see it.

Strange - Andrew said
Quote:

However, others fear the lack of checks will promote the UK as dumping ground for poor quality food.
and

Quote:

the benefits seem to outweigh the costs of not doing checks
So I’m pretty sure he saw it…

ianch99 29-08-2023 17:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Loving the knots being tied here :D Securing control over the UK's borders was the dominant theme of the Leave campaign so we want control except when we don't!

Sums up the cake and eat it philosophy perfectly ...

1andrew1 29-08-2023 19:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36159434)
Loving the knots being tied here :D Securing control over the UK's borders was the dominant theme of the Leave campaign so we want control except when we don't!

Sums up the cake and eat it philosophy perfectly ...

It's most amusing! Let's take back control on our sixth attempt!

---------- Post added at 18:53 ---------- Previous post was at 18:52 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36159433)
Strange - Andrew said
So I’m pretty sure he saw it…

Indeed. It seems to be a post-first-then-read-the-posts-to-which-you're-replying afterwards style of debate. ;)

Sephiroth 29-08-2023 21:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36159440)
It's most amusing! Let's take back control on our sixth attempt!

---------- Post added at 18:53 ---------- Previous post was at 18:52 ----------


Indeed. It seems to be a post-first-then-read-the-posts-to-which-you're-replying afterwards style of debate. ;)

My household calls that post ad-hoc nocter proc.

Hugh 29-08-2023 22:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Do you mean "Post hoc ergo propter hoc"?

Pierre 29-08-2023 22:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36159444)
Do you mean "Post hoc ergo propter hoc"?

Remind me not to accept invites to dinner parties at yours and Sephs…………..I’m sure they’re a blast.

Sephiroth 29-08-2023 22:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36159444)
Do you mean "Post hoc ergo propter hoc"?

Possibly - but no. Post ad-hoc nocter proc is my invention to cover various after the event situations.

The "possibly": Maybe subconsciously I've heard your excellent saying and *******ised it somewhat. I've no recollection of that but it's too close a resemblance to fully deny.

Well before Brexit I coined a German sounding phrase Gestrugenes Abgeschlossigskeit. That one fools all but the Germans/Austrians


---------- Post added at 21:51 ---------- Previous post was at 21:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36159445)
Remind me not to accept invites to dinner parties at yours and Sephs…………..I’m sure they’re a blast.

I cook curries and my party piece is to speak Polish (such as I can) in a South African accent.

Hugh 30-08-2023 00:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36159445)
Remind me not to accept invites to dinner parties at yours and Sephs…………..I’m sure they’re a blast.

Erudition is optional, but good red wine is compulsory…

If you’ve not spent a night on the booze with a failed medic (5th year, who then went on to get his B.Sc, M.Sc, and a D.Phil in Computing) and corrected him on his Latin, you haven’t lived… ;)

1andrew1 06-09-2023 15:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
The truth is starting to come out
Quote:

Boris Johnson ‘buried head in sand’ on Covid to sort Brexit, ex-Tory health minister says

Speaking to the Institute for Government as part of its ongoing series of in-depth interviews with former ministers about their time in office, Lord Bethell said: “No 10 didn’t want to prioritise the pandemic in early 2020, even though the evidence was mounting – there was a post-election, ostrich, head-in-the-sand mentality, which I saw again around the invasion of Ukraine.

“Its priority, and what we were told many times, was Brexit and levelling up. ‘We have to deliver Brexit, so could your pandemic quietly go and mind your own business, please,’ we were told.

“So we had several weeks of this brushing off, and then they switched into it eventually. After that, we got a lot of erratic dipping in. In Yiddish, it’s called ‘kibitzing’: erratic and ill-informed interference.”

Lord Bethell said the government’s coordination got “a lot better” after Mr Johnson’s former top advisor Dominic Cummings left Downing Street in November 2020.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...a804d5e0&ei=14

denphone 06-09-2023 16:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36159728)

To be perfectly honest Boris Johnson could not organise a piss up in a brewery, let alone sort out anything substantive.

He is pretty good at driving a trolley from side to side through.

TheDaddy 06-09-2023 17:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36159729)
To be perfectly honest Boris Johnson could not organise a piss up in a brewery, let alone sort out anything substantive.

He is pretty good at driving a trolley from side to side through.

Funny, they seemed to have more than a few piss ups whilst the rest of us weren't even allowed to go to funerals...

Hugh 06-09-2023 17:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36159730)
Funny, they seemed to have more than a few piss ups whilst the rest of us weren't even allowed to go to funerals...

They were ambushed by a cake, OK!

https://media.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2l...TJxo/giphy.gif

1andrew1 06-09-2023 20:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Great news!
Quote:

UK to re-join EU's Horizon science programme

The final deal is set to be agreed within hours and could be announced on Thursday or at the weekend's G20 summit by Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, as first reported today by Bloomberg. Sources have confirmed the report to Sky News.

The issue has been on the prime minister's desk for weeks while he attempts to negotiate a higher sum for British scientists to ensure they catch up after the two-year absence.

There had been fears the deal between the UK and and the EU may stall over the sums involved.

Sky News understands that Mr Sunak has authorised the deal in principle and is likely to speak to Ursula Von der Leyen, the European Commission President, to finalise it within hours.

Britain benefitted more than any other EU country from grants handed out under the Horizon programme which offered funding and leadership of pan-European research groups and access to equipment and facilities.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...me/ar-AA1gl0Ga

TheDaddy 06-09-2023 22:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36159742)

Is it? We didn't vote for this


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 14:09.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum