![]() |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
It is unclear, I never saw that list referenced anywhere else in the document so I have no idea what it is for. Badphorm are equally puzzled on this.
Alexander Hanff |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Regarding that post, how easy is it to change ""careful handling" to: "special handling"
Historians will know what I mean. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
http://del.icio.us/sirusx |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
digg: I suspect they have some kind of sandboxing going on to prevent spammers manipulating the site.
unfortunately it looks as if rapid digging emanating from one link source (say nodpi or here) incurs a penalty. Far better to post a link to the digg article from many different sites rather than dozens here clicking the same link and then digging. --- Further to the above just found some more suggestions: * Mail users the link and get them to dig it via the mail link * Locate the story from the Digg/Upcoming queue and tell people to digg it from there. * On your page use the official "Digg This" icon. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Anyone get in touch with hackeron (Roman G) who was involved in getting the kit installed @ BT for the trials ?
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
:) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
the last time they answered a question on those forums about BT Webwise, was 2nd April. I've tried to make the document accessible to those who haven't the stamina to read right through it. Emma Sanderson has accused me of having a "voracious appetite for detail" so I don't like to disappoint her. I just wish it had some publicity outside of our own campaign. that's been very disappointing. Who in the media HAVE ben told about this (of those who have already shown an interest in the past)? Maybe we should just do a check list to make sure we haven't missed any obvious contacts. Guardian (Charles Arthur)? Click? Gadget show? Cable News? And official bodies - anyone referencing it in an ICO complaint? (I've got a pending complaint so will definitely be referencing it) Obviously Alex is adding it to his Charing X police file for the 16th July. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Dave. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
I am trying (and I guess failing) to educate you in the difference between ownership and control of a legal entity, rather boring and technical but important nonetheless. Your mother as an owner of BT shares could never suffer any liability (just financial loss of the value of her shares) as a result of these actions of BT as she is just an owner. The Board, the controllers could however suffer personal loss for criminal activity, just as members of the BAA board have recently been held by the US government for questioning and the NatWest 3 went to prison. Wiki on Corporations http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporation and on ownership and control http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpora...ip_and_control What can happen to you if you are an officer of a company and are found to break the law. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NatWest_Three The NatWest Three, also known as the Enron Three,[1] are three British businessmen - Giles Darby, David Bermingham and Gary Mulgrew. In 2002 they were indicted in Houston, Texas on seven counts of wire fraud against their former employer Greenwich NatWest, at the time a division of National Westminster Bank.[2] After a high-profile battle in the British courts they were extradited from the United Kingdom to the United States in 2006. On November 28, 2007, they each pleaded guilty to one count of wire fraud in exchange for the other charges being dropped.[3] On February 22, 2008 they were each sentenced to 37 months in prison. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BAE_Sys...bian_contracts On 19 May 2008 BAE confirmed that its CEO Mike Turner and non-executive director Nigel Rudd had been detained "for about 20 minutes" at George Bush Intercontinental and Newark airports respectively the previous week and that the DOJ had issued "a number of additional subpoenas in the US to employees of BAE Systems plc and BAE Systems Inc as part of its ongoing investigation".[118] The Times suggests that, according to Alexandra Wrage of Trace International, such "humiliating behaviour by the DOJ" is unusual toward a company that is co-operating fully.[118] |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
I've contacted my MP (EDM signatory) asking for her to alert Don Foster I've sent a further email to MEP's for my region (second one on this topic) (using writetothem.com ) |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
283 Proxy Servers 31 Chanel Servers 314 Total servers on about .5Kwh of leccy each. That is an additional 157KWh of leccy a day for the servers, plus the additional cooling requirements in the DC etc. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
peter |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:23. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum