![]() |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
btw ,
BT GROUP PLC TRANSACTION IN OWN SHARES - VOTING RIGHTS AND CAPITAL http://www.londonstockexchange.com/L...650&source=RNS |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Wikipedia updated: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phorm
Alexander Hanff ---------- Post added at 05:11 ---------- Previous post was at 04:30 ---------- It is now on WikiLeaks front page with a link to here: http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Britis...idation_report Alexander Hanff |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Aren't Terms and Conditions a pain? But never mind we can get round them, although darn it-we do feel our effectiveness has been constrained. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Again, I go on holiday and come back to find 40 pages I need to go through.
This news about the ICO is appalling, and I'll be writing to my MP again and quoting select chunks. While I'm there I'll be mentioning, and probably giving the link to, that leaked document. I am frankly sickened by that article, Alex. Sickened and terrified. Keep up the good work! I won't be happy until I see the people responsible in jail for this, and massive fines levied against BT and Phorm. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
Hank |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
That's where this whole scenario is so surreal. If you take the FIPR line, the whole thing is illegal so the details are just details of which bit of illegality was which. all of it was illegal. I think BT were less interested in legality and more in deniability which is really the name of the game now in our contract ridden, outsourced sub-contracted world. I serously think these executives have got to the point where they regard themselves as either above or immune to the law. They seem to think that it is something that only applies to the little people who pay their salaries. Having spent a tedious amount of time on BT internal newsgroups being told by other customers that we had no proof, no evidence of wrongdoing, that we were scaremongering, I have to confess a certain amount of satisfaction in posting Alex's no DPI link there last night. And even more satisfaction emailing details to Emma Sanderson, Adam Liversage, Ben Verwaayen (sort of parting gift) and Ian Livingstone. Hope they enjoy their breakfast. It will not the day at the office that they were expecting. I'm in London for 24 hours so expect I'll miss about 40 pages of this stuff! |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
http://www.wikileaks.org/wiki/Britis...idation_report Also, anyone with a /. account please vote this one up in firehose (already Yellow) by clicking the + button: http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=705657 Alexander Hanff |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Just goes to show how much isp's value the customers now, when i read that couldnt belive what i was reading tbh i bet the second trial lasted much longer involved more people and was still just as bad if not worse.
Sad day when you cant trust your isp especially when there in bed with crooks. |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
the debate is warming up over on the bt page at iii
just seen this take a look at the list of acts possibly broken, seem to be a few i have not seen before also we need to focus on how do they know the age of the person and do not show unsuitable adverts to a 8 year old if they only know a random number? do websites come under the jurisdiction of advertising standards? or would BT as they are in effect serving the ads from THEIR servers? peter ************** leo said: "Don't know what all the fuss is about over Phorm. I'd rather see adverts that are tailored to me than adverts for products I have no interest in. There is a precedent - Google already responds to people's web searches to deliver adverts. " the information is out there Leo if you want to read it, basicly Phorm/Webwise is using Deep Packet Inspection/Interception Hardwre kit that sits directly on the other side of your ISP payed for Broadband connection. this special DPI kit has every single bit of your PCs web comunication (if your browser can see it, so can the Phorm interception for profit kit) sent through it, every single web page even password protected HTTP pages you request/click are then fully scaned/collected into their kits ram, processed. and under UK and EU law, an unlawful derivative work is made without consent of the website content owner, or the ISP end user (should they refuse to take part in any trials, their datastream is still collected.and processed, but dont see the ad's onscreen apparently)for commercial profit. apparently these are some of the laws broken by not getting Express/Explicit, and informed consent of both partys (end user AND the website content owners)or paying the profits of this unlawful derivative work to the owners. Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003 Computer Misuse Act 1990 Torts (Interference with Goods) Act 1977 Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1998 (see derivative works) Data Protection Act 1998 (IP addresses are legally defined as personally identifiable data) this basic laymans copyright might be helpful to outlines the problems BT have placed themselves in during the prior trials without getting consent. and dont forget may websites already have explicit terms against commercial use of the sites webpage content in their notices (including this very site infact http://www.copyrightservice.co.uk/co...opyright_myths *********** |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
We don't have to worry about stress analysis of Emma's voice..most people have a "telltale" when they tell porkies (touching the tip of the nose, etc..), and Emmas is when she lies, she s s s s stammers.
She's being lined up to take the fall on this one, I suspect. Emma? The phrase you're looking for is "turning Queen's evidence". |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Just a quick reminder cos the thread is moving at a bit of a pace at the moment:
Digg - http://digg.com/tech_news/BT_commite...acts_in_8_days Slashdot (vote up please) http://slashdot.org/firehose.pl?op=view&id=705657 Alexander Hanff |
Re: Virgin Media Phorm Webwise Adverts [Updated: See Post No. 1, 77, 102 & 797]
Quote:
peter |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:45. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum