Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   UK & EU Agree Post-Brexit Trade Deal (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33708171)

Pierre 02-10-2019 14:40

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36012527)
leavers crying again because parliament proved it was sovereign all the time when they said it had none

I'm not a Leaver, I'm a democrat.

Carth 02-10-2019 14:42

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36012533)
And the poor Leavers, only have

Arron Banks*
Crispin Odey*
Jeremy Hosking*
Peter Hargreaves*
Robert Edmiston*
Lord Bamford (gave 673k)

and not forget JRM (worth £55 million)


*contributed £15 million in the 5 months leading up to the referendum

No idea mate, haven't seen any of those rush to the Supreme court (or lesser) to block a proposal from *insert name here* about staying in :p:

Dave42 02-10-2019 14:54

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36012535)
I'm not a Leaver, I'm a democrat.

so am I and except the law that the democratically elected sovereign parliament made

jfman 02-10-2019 15:07

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36012526)
Rumours that if BJ doesn't write the letter to the EU, that it could be done either by the speaker or the Supreme Court in his name.

Instead of all these shenanigans why not just call a vote of No Confidence and get a General Election done.

Parliament has well and truly disappeared up it's own bumhole.

Why doesn't Boris extend then call an election? Works both ways.

denphone 02-10-2019 15:08

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
1 Attachment(s)
No 10 publishes Brexit plan for alternative to backstop.

[ATTACH]28081[/ATTACH]

pip08456 02-10-2019 15:37

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
3 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36012539)
No 10 publishes Brexit plan for alternative to backstop.

[ATTACH]28081[/ATTACH]

Woulldn't it be more truthful to post the entire document?

denphone 02-10-2019 15:40

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36012541)
Woulldn't it be more truthful to post the entire document?

Nothing to do with the truth at all as l just posted what l could as l did not see the second part of it.

Its as simple as that..

pip08456 02-10-2019 15:41

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36012542)
Nothing to do with the truth at all as l just posted what l could as l did not see the second part of it.

Its as simple as that..

And I screwed up and missed page 3, post edited.

denphone 02-10-2019 15:43

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36012543)
And I screwed up and missed page 3, post edited.

Lets just say we both had a senior moment.:D

pip08456 02-10-2019 15:46

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36012544)
Lets just say we both had a senior moment.:D

Agreed!:D

spiderplant 02-10-2019 16:31

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
I still don't see page 2 here.

Meanwhile the BBC seem to have only managed to post pages 1 and 2
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49909309

Hugh 02-10-2019 16:31

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 36012536)
No idea mate, haven't seen any of those rush to the Supreme court (or lesser) to block a proposal from *insert name here* about staying in :p:

Just because you don’t know about them, doesn’t mean they don’t exist... ;)

Angua 02-10-2019 16:31

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36012538)
Why doesn't Boris extend then call an election? Works both ways.

With all the adverts and promises over leaving on 31st October, Johnson cannot be seen to acceding to this law without a lot of squirming. Then it still needs a 2/3 majority in parliament to approve an election.

The opposition can see what a poisoned chalice Brexit is, so are steering the Government into doing the deed that they seem so keen on, but only on the oppositions terms. Corbyn wants Brexit, but not the responsibility of delivery.

pip08456 02-10-2019 16:35

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 36012547)
I still don't see page 2 here.

Meanwhile the BBC seem to have only managed to post pages 1 and 2
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-49909309

All 3 pages are attached to my post above.

jfman 02-10-2019 16:47

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Angua (Post 36012549)
With all the adverts and promises over leaving on 31st October, Johnson cannot be seen to acceding to this law without a lot of squirming. Then it still needs a 2/3 majority in parliament to approve an election.

The opposition can see what a poisoned chalice Brexit is, so are steering the Government into doing the deed that they seem so keen on, but only on the oppositions terms. Corbyn wants Brexit, but not the responsibility of delivery.

The "promises", if such a thing exists from a proven liar, he could easily set aside (citing compliance with the law) and had his people vs Parliament election. Elect me to remove the shackles of a dead Parliament.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:30.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum