Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

He's either Santa clause or full of shyte my monies on the latter

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

She travelled 50 miles from Brighton.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

From a tier 3 lockdown area to a tier 4 lockdown area

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Link

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Perhaps she was going for an eye test?

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

I don't think the police will get involved. Even if they would bother investigating that far back - and I doubt they want to go back 5 years - the rules were you could travel for work if unable to work from home.

People will debate if a speech coach can't work from home but I doubt that's a decision the the police will want to wade into. It would then open up all the other advisors that would have been hanging around Starmer and other senior politicians at the time to possible retrospective action.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

I was responding to what Chris's post said, namely "...what he was doing, 50 miles from home..."
But that makes sense as to where the 50 miles came from.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

He was still her "employer", so had responsibility for her making the journey.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

The 24th is because that's when Starmer was giving his speech about Brexit. It was filmed at Labour HQ and she was in attendance.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Yeah, I misread some details about it earlier.

The point is, a 50-mile journey was made. That is not trivial, especially not on Christmas Eve, particularly not during a pandemic when there are legal restrictions on movement.

Starmer caused that journey to be made, apparently just so she could give him a hand.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Ah, that makes sense.

---------- Post added at 23:03 ---------- Previous post was at 23:00 ----------

I'm not condoning the 50 miles, just knew that figure made no sense as Starmer lives in London.

---------- Post added at 23:07 ---------- Previous post was at 23:03 ----------

He wouldn't employ her, just contract her services. She's doubtless got her own company and it would be her responsibility to adhere to the laws of the land. But those who contracted her services must have considered the implications of employing someone based outside London.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

I don't there are legal issues here. As I mentioned previously I think a speech coach to the Leader of the Opposition being there on the day of a speech will qualify as work. She could have done it via conference call, as it appeared she had done previously with him, but I would be surprised if the police would bother trying to decide that.

It's a political issue for him. He is morally responsible because nobody cares what a speech coach does otherwise. She is also unlikely to have been to only person in Labour HQ helping him with that speech as well so I suspect the media have more names to drop.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

People couldn't attend funerals, see their loved ones in care homes, with many other harsh restrictions due to the pandemic, but bullshiting Starmer does what ever he pleases after calling for tighter restrictions and longer lockdowns.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

Up to 30 people could attend funerals at this point in the lockdown. You could also visit relatives in care homes as long as there were COVID measures in place.

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 

The use of scare quotes in my use of "employer", means not to be taken literally. He still employed her services. She was there at his request. She didn't turn up unexpectedly.