Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Child grooming gang found guilty (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33687539)

Chris 04-06-2015 09:26

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35781301)
Ooh look.

Amother misrepresentation, no doubt.

Five charged after Oxford child sex raids
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...shire-33001256

Hussain, Hussain, Khan, Khan, Youssaf.

Surprised? I almost was.

Russ 04-06-2015 09:35

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
All a coincidence you understand. And a media conspiracy.

richard s 04-06-2015 10:37

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
White, Black, Yellow etc., Paedophiles are Paedophiles.

Back to April's article in the Daily Smell.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-Internet.html

These mothers were white!

Russ 04-06-2015 12:38

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard s (Post 35781332)
White, Black, Yellow etc., Paedophiles are Paedophiles.

Indeed but these gangs are always the same colour, the same kind of names.

nomadking 04-06-2015 12:38

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard s (Post 35781332)
White, Black, Yellow etc., Paedophiles are Paedophiles.

Back to April's article in the Daily Smell.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-Internet.html

These mothers were white!

The thread title says "Child grooming gang".

Nevertheless there are other big differences. That set of people was more a case of individuals with a shared interest than a gang They lived miles apart eg Sussex, Hampshire, Wiltshire, Humberside. They had to communicate using the "dark web". It was not an attitude that was so endemic in their culture that they could simply ask the person next to them.

Osem 04-06-2015 12:59

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35781358)
The thread title says "Child grooming gang".

Nevertheless there are other big differences. That set of people was more a case of individuals with a shared interest than a gang They lived miles apart eg Sussex, Hampshire, Wiltshire, Humberside. They had to communicate using the "dark web". It was not an attitude that was so endemic in their culture that they could simply ask the person next to them.

Yes I think someone's not paying attention to what the thread's about.

Pierre 04-06-2015 13:01

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35781358)
The thread title says "Child grooming gang".

Nevertheless there are other big differences. That set of people was more a case of individuals with a shared interest than a gang They lived miles apart eg Sussex, Hampshire, Wiltshire, Humberside. They had to communicate using the "dark web". It was not an attitude that was so endemic in their culture that they could simply ask the person next to them.

Indeed Nomad,

But it never stops the apologists.

There is no argument that there are paedo's out there, white English working in Networks.

But the rise of Asian gangs working in their local communities, preying mostly, on young ( circa 14yrs +) white vulnerable girls is beyond the scale of population average.

But try to highlight it, and all you get are apologists.

Russ 04-06-2015 13:38

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard s (Post 35781332)
White, Black, Yellow etc., Paedophiles are Paedophiles.

Back to April's article in the Daily Smell.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...-Internet.html

These mothers were white!

Take my challenge. Type 'sex gang in court' in to google and tell me how many hits come back involving white British men. Go as many pages far back as you like.

richard s 04-06-2015 14:53

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
Another interesting article:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...n-7729068.html

Russ 04-06-2015 15:08

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by richard s (Post 35781398)

Quote:

"Some of you, when arrested, said it was triggered by race," he continued.
All these men are Asian. Are you saying you believe race didn't play a major part in this?

Russ 16-06-2015 16:00

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
Didn't think I'd get a reply.

Anyway, ANOTHER coincidence....

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news...victim-5891529

Osem 24-06-2015 12:06

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
Quote:

"Hundreds" of potential offenders identified in Rotherham child abuse investigation, says National Crime Agency
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-33256405

Russ 24-06-2015 17:26

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
I wonder what the ratio of "Hussains" to "Smiths" will be out of that 300.

thenry 29-06-2015 20:11

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
Hussians to Smiths. Thats good Russ :tu:

Can this be thrown into this thread...

http://www.crawleynews.co.uk/Concern...ail/story.html

http://www.crawleynews.co.uk/Fresh-a...ail/story.html

http://www.cableforum.co.uk/board/20...l#post35780233

Nobody listens to me!

greeninferno 01-07-2015 11:53

Re: Child grooming gang found guilty
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35784866)

The scale of this story is absolutely preposterous


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:54.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum