Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Brexit (Old) (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33706539)

Hom3r 15-12-2018 21:29

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35975452)
Europe couldn't pay me £100 to go there.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975454)
In French, I translate the above paragraph into "non". :D

---------- Post added at 22:13 ---------- Previous post was at 22:09 ----------


No need to - you're currently in Europe. :D


NO, I'm in Great Britian/England/UK, I'm an English Brit.

Nowhere does that say European.

Dave42 15-12-2018 21:34

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975539)
That is manifestly absurd - MPs ran on Mandates and have these so called Manifestos that were committed to leave the EU. Go figure. :rolleyes:

all parties ignore manifesto commitments Mick not the first time not be last time

Sephiroth 15-12-2018 21:41

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35975541)
all parties ignore manifesto commitments Mick not the first time not be last time

That makes the UK politicians to be as perfidious as Varadkar! That's no reason not to honour the Referendum result.


Dave42 15-12-2018 21:45

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35975542)
That makes the UK politicians to be as perfidious as Varadkar! That's no reason not to honour the Referendum result.


never said it was

Stephen 15-12-2018 21:51

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975535)
Brexit has not flaming well happened yet, so how the hell can it be a mess? :rolleyes:
Snip..

It's a mess as it's meant to be happening in the very near future and there is still no deal in place nor does anyone actually have a clue what's happening.

The process of Brexit and the possible outcome is in a total mess.

Mick 15-12-2018 21:54

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35975541)
all parties ignore manifesto commitments Mick not the first time not be last time

Spoken like a true selfish person. So it's ok to not commit to election pledges and basically con the electorate, after MPs are elected because it suits your Anti-Brexit agenda?

Pathetic. :rolleyes:

You still have not answered that small detail on if a second referendum is called, who will pacify all the leave voters of the massive betrayal, it's pure nativity to think that us Brexiteers will just accept this level of a illegitimate 2nd referendum?

Stephen 15-12-2018 21:54

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35975526)
It is undemocratic to return to a referendum question because the losers don't like the original result. This is particularly so because the EU has engineered this outcome due to the non-existent negotiating abilities of TM.

We should now leave on a no-deal basis unless the EU changes its stand at the last hour.

You Remainers are trying to use democracy to usurp democracy. I get that.


It's nothing to do with who won or lost. It's that the parties in charge of sorting the thing out haven't got a clue.

No one is engineering anything.

Sephiroth 15-12-2018 21:55

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
That makes the UK politicians to be as perfidious as Varadkar! That's no reason not to honour the Referendum result.



Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35975544)
never said it was

So is it your position that the Referendum result should be honoured?


djfunkdup 15-12-2018 21:55

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35975545)

The process of Brexit and the possible outcome is in a total mess.


Lightly moistened toilet tissues made with Jasmine fragrance and a touch of silk.


https://www.boots.com/andrex-supreme...B&gclsrc=aw.ds :D:D

Dave42 15-12-2018 22:00

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975546)
Spoken like a true selfish person. So it's ok to not commit to election pledges and basically con the electorate, after MPs are elected because it suits your Anti-Brexit agenda?

Pathetic. :rolleyes:

You still have not answered that small detail on if a second referendum is called, who will pacify all the leave voters of the massive betrayal, it's pure nativity to think that us Brexiteers will just accept this level of a illegitimate 2nd referendum?

Mick I am just pointing out lots of commitments in manifestos aint honoured they always con people and no I have not called for a second referendum but even Nigel Farage is expecting one now

Mick 15-12-2018 22:13

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35975550)
Mick I am just pointing out lots of commitments in manifestos aint honoured they always con people and no I have not called for a second referendum

So we agree MPs can be con artists and they putting their own personal beliefs above the peoples?

---------- Post added at 22:13 ---------- Previous post was at 22:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35975550)
Mick I am just pointing out lots of commitments in manifestos aint honoured they always con people and no I have not called for a second referendum but even Nigel Farage is expecting one now

Nigel Farage has never spoke for me.

Hugh 15-12-2018 22:23

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35975529)
You still can’t back up your claim that food will be 50% more expensive in a no deal Brexit.

So until you do, or accept that what you posted was project fear bollocks, anything you post will be treated with the upmost cynicism.

---------- Post added at 20:53 ---------- Previous post was at 20:50 ----------



And just what are you doing?

The irony is simply eyewatering.

Oh no! How will I sleep at night?*



*very easily ;)

Dave42 15-12-2018 22:25

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35975548)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
That makes the UK politicians to be as perfidious as Varadkar! That's no reason not to honour the Referendum result.





[COLOR="Blue"]So is it your position that the Referendum result should be honoured?

[/COLOR]

yes never said it shouldn't be what the discussion is what kind of deal we get a no deal brexit will be worse of all worlds

ianch99 16-12-2018 00:56

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35975529)
You still can’t back up your claim that food will be 50% more expensive in a no deal Brexit.

So until you do, or accept that what you posted was project fear bollocks, anything you post will be treated with the upmost cynicism.

---------- Post added at 20:53 ---------- Previous post was at 20:50 ----------



And just what are you doing?

The irony is simply eyewatering.

I am not transposing anything. I am not trying to claim all Remain voters voted Remain for the same reasons. Some may want closer integration, some may want the current level and some may want changes to allow more autonomy with the Union.

You see (well maybe you don't) that people have different levels of tolerance for the various positions.

You (and others) have this binary interpretation of what the 17.4 million people will accept. In the real world, some Leavers would not feel they voted for a Hard brexit with all the consequences it entails especially when the Leave campaign did not discuss the negative Hard Brexit scenario. Everything they told you was positive.

---------- Post added at 00:53 ---------- Previous post was at 00:46 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35975540)
NO, I'm in Great Britian/England/UK, I'm an English Brit.

Nowhere does that say European.

Sorry, you are in Europe and so you are a European ..

---------- Post added at 00:56 ---------- Previous post was at 00:53 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975546)
Spoken like a true selfish person. So it's ok to not commit to election pledges and basically con the electorate, after MPs are elected because it suits your Anti-Brexit agenda?

Pathetic. :rolleyes:

You still have not answered that small detail on if a second referendum is called, who will pacify all the leave voters of the massive betrayal, it's pure nativity to think that us Brexiteers will just accept this level of a illegitimate 2nd referendum?

I see we're feeling the spirit of Christmas, good will to all men and all that :) I am waiting to see what a pure nativity is, maybe Santa will bring us one in the New Year?

Mick 16-12-2018 01:18

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35975560)

Sorry, you are in Europe and so you are a European ..

He can choose to revoke his European Status if he likes, just like I revoke my EU Citizenship, mainly because I don't want to be associated with a dictatorial corrupt entity AKA the EU, he is British first, everything after that is irrelevant.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99
I see we're feeling the spirit of Christmas, good will to all men and all that :) I am waiting to see what a pure nativity is, maybe Santa will bring us one in the New Year?

Oooh looks like I upset the CF Spelling Policeman, you knew which word I meant.

djfunkdup 16-12-2018 01:24

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975563)



Oooh looks like I upset the CF Spelling Policeman, you knew which word I meant.


Well as you know some on here collect spelling/grammar mistakes like woman of a certain age collect thimbles :D

1andrew1 16-12-2018 08:06

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975563)
He can choose to revoke his European Status if he likes, just like I revoke my EU Citizenship, mainly because I don't want to be associated with a dictatorial corrupt entity AKA the EU, he is British first, everything after that is irrelevant.

You will be an EU citizen until we leave the EU or you are awarded citizenship of a non-EU country. We joined the EU together, we leave it together.

---------- Post added at 07:59 ---------- Previous post was at 07:55 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35975466)
Indeed. There are those who, for their own political reasons, cynically adjust each of the input parameters to their model (BoE and treasury) to produce the worst possible outcome and then tout this as what is going to happen then the media lap it up and spit it out across their biased networks (BBC)

I wonder why we never hear what might happen when all the parameters are set for the best possible outcome?

We have heard it and it still shows us worse off than remaining. Many Brexiters acknowledge this and say it's a price worth paying.

---------- Post added at 08:06 ---------- Previous post was at 07:59 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975531)
We should have arranged a Brexit thread Christmas night out.

Lol, we'd probably need two separate venues. :D

Mick 16-12-2018 08:28

Re: Brexit
 
Nope my passport says I’m a British Citizen, no other status applies. The EU is a dictatorial, corrupted entity that I have no desire, nor want to be associated with and the UK has legitimately voted to leave this cancerous dirty empire. A 2nd losers vote for the democracy abusers will be illegitimate.

1andrew1 16-12-2018 09:39

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Theresa May condemns Tony Blair's call for second referendum - but allies are secretly preparing for fresh public vote
The prime minister hit out at predecessor Tony Blair, who on Friday told Sky News she should "switch course" and back a second referendum because of deadlock in parliament.
Yet behind the scenes, her de-facto deputy David Lidington has discussed a new poll with Labour MPs.
And her chief of staff, Gavin Barwell, was forced to deny reports on Sunday that he was planning for a second referendum.
Over the past fortnight, Mr Lidington has held a series of meetings with Labour MPs, including one on Thursday with leading campaigners for a so-called "people's vote".
https://news.sky.com/story/theresa-m...-vote-11582616

denphone 16-12-2018 09:51

Re: Brexit
 
Well she might soon not have any choice in these coming weeks whether one likes it or not Andrew.

jfman 16-12-2018 10:22

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975574)

May says one thing.
Her de-facto deputy and her chief of staff meeting Labour MPs.
Amber Rudd says there needs to be a cross party consensus.

These people aren’t the shambles they are made out to be. This is deliberate. It’s testing the water moving towards “we had no choice but to put it back to the people .

Chris 16-12-2018 11:40

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975579)
May says one thing.
Her de-facto deputy and her chief of staff meeting Labour MPs.
Amber Rudd says there needs to be a cross party consensus.

These people aren’t the shambles they are made out to be. This is deliberate. It’s testing the water moving towards “we had no choice but to put it back to the people .

That’s fanciful. Politicians equivocate, as subtly as possible, when they’re trying to say one thing while planning to do something else. They don’t launch a broadside at a former prime minister and accuse him of insulting the office he held, for suggesting the course of action she (supposedly, secretly) wants to take.

Face facts ... May knows Brexit will be her one legacy and she’s hell bent on delivering it. There won’t be a second referendum and there won’t be any significant departure from the deal on the table. She’s going to run the clock down, effectively playing chicken with the legislature, to see if there’s any way of getting the deal done when No Deal is the only real, imminent alternative.

Carth 16-12-2018 11:46

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975579)
May says one thing.
Her de-facto deputy and her chief of staff meeting Labour MPs.
Amber Rudd says there needs to be a cross party consensus.

These people aren’t the shambles they are made out to be. This is deliberate. It’s testing the water moving towards “we had no choice but to put it back to the people .

I had similar thoughts a week or so ago . .

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35974526)
Maybe it's not the shambles that we think it is.

Let's go back to the referendum result, the one where the public voted to leave the EU.

After the result was in, Government, Business and Financial sectors should have started to make preparations for leaving the EU . . including the so called 'hard brexit'.

Instead they all sat around scratching their heads, looking uncomfortable and muttering 'well that didn't go how we thought it would'.

Then some bright spark decided the best way to deal with it was to fudge, obfuscate, manipulate, and spread dissent so that it all decended into a farce that would end with no brexit at all.


Hugh 16-12-2018 11:46

Re: Brexit
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975570)
Nope my passport says I’m a British Citizen, no other status applies. The EU is a dictatorial, corrupted entity that I have, nor want to be associated with and the UK has legitimately voted to leave this cancerous dirty empire. A 2nd losers vote for the democracy abusers will be illegitimate.

It also states you are in the European Union... https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...0&d=1544960662

Mick 16-12-2018 11:49

Re: Brexit
 
Nope, wrong as usual Hugh - It says in the Nationality part: British Citizen, nothing else - I am not a EU citizen.

jfman 16-12-2018 11:59

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35975584)
That’s fanciful. Politicians equivocate, as subtly as possible, when they’re trying to say one thing while planning to do something else. They don’t launch a broadside at a former prime minister and accuse him of insulting the office he held, for suggesting the course of action she (supposedly, secretly) wants to take.

Face facts ... May knows Brexit will be her one legacy and she’s hell bent on delivering it. There won’t be a second referendum and there won’t be any significant departure from the deal on the table. She’s going to run the clock down, effectively playing chicken with the legislature, to see if there’s any way of getting the deal done when No Deal is the only real, imminent alternative.

Attacking Blair gets good headlines and makes her appear strong.

I’m not sure she does see Brexit as a legacy, delivering Remain and steering the country through the crisis would be a legacy in itself. I think she has to play chicken with Parliament to frame this as MPs meddling.

1andrew1 16-12-2018 11:59

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975588)
Nope, wrong as usual Hugh - It says in the Nationality part: British Citizen, nothing else - I am not a EU citizen.

Anyone who is a British citizen is also an EU citizen.
Quote:

Any national of an EU country is considered to be a citizen of the EU. EU citizenship does not replace national citizenship: it is an addition to it.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/summary/gl...tizenship.html

Hugh 16-12-2018 12:11

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975588)
Nope, wrong as usual Hugh - It says in the Nationality part: British Citizen, nothing else - I am not a EU citizen.

Under the Maastricht Treaty, signed in 1992 by the UK, yes, you are - under this treaty, European citizenship was created, allowing citizens to reside in and move freely between Member States.

you may not want to be a EU Citizen, but legally, you are.

Sephiroth 16-12-2018 12:15

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975592)
Anyone who is a British citizen is also an EU citizen.

https://eur-lex.europa.eu/summary/gl...tizenship.html

I've no quarrel with Andrew here. But this is a ridiculous sub-topic. When we leave the EU, all this nit-picking aspect will be put to bed particularly as Lex-Europa will no longer apply.


---------- Post added at 12:15 ---------- Previous post was at 12:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975579)
May says one thing.
Her de-facto deputy and her chief of staff meeting Labour MPs.
Amber Rudd says there needs to be a cross party consensus.

These people aren’t the shambles they are made out to be. This is deliberate. It’s testing the water moving towards “we had no choice but to put it back to the people .

May's dread would be alignment with her nemesis, Blair.

TM is determined that the UK shall leave the EU and that there is no 2nd referendum.


1andrew1 16-12-2018 12:16

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35975584)
That’s fanciful. Politicians equivocate, as subtly as possible, when they’re trying to say one thing while planning to do something else. They don’t launch a broadside at a former prime minister and accuse him of insulting the office he held, for suggesting the course of action she (supposedly, secretly) wants to take.

Face facts ... May knows Brexit will be her one legacy and she’s hell bent on delivering it. There won’t be a second referendum and there won’t be any significant departure from the deal on the table. She’s going to run the clock down, effectively playing chicken with the legislature, to see if there’s any way of getting the deal done when No Deal is the only real, imminent alternative.

Theresa May has denied many things before and then gone on to do exactly what she denied. We may not instantly recall her denying that she would not hold an election but the memory of her saying that the vote on her deal would not be postponed is still fresh.
I think Brexiters need to accept the hard facts that there is a possibility of a second referendum...and also that they may not win it. I don't want another referendum to happen but I believe the chances of it happening are steadily growing as shown by recent developments.

Mick 16-12-2018 13:04

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35975593)
Under the Maastricht Treaty, signed in 1992 by the UK, yes, you are - under this treaty, European citizenship was created, allowing citizens to reside in and move freely between Member States.

you may not want to be a EU Citizen, but legally, you are.

Screw the corrupted Maastricht treaty in which NOONE had a say on thanks to John Major!!!

So no, I will not tell you again - I am not a EU citizen and I will not accept no-one else telling me I am so cease doing so because it is bloody pointless. If I say I am not an EU citizen, I am not- I am a British and nothing else-end of discussion!

Hom3r 16-12-2018 13:05

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35975593)
Under the Maastricht Treaty, signed in 1992 by the UK, yes, you are - under this treaty, European citizenship was created, allowing citizens to reside in and move freely between Member States.

you may not want to be a EU Citizen, but legally, you are.


So when you fill a legal form out that asks nationality you put European then?

1andrew1 16-12-2018 13:16

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35975602)
So when you fill a legal form out that asks nationality you put European then?

English or British depending on the moment. ;)
When people ask you which continent you live on, which one do you tell them?

Damien 16-12-2018 13:18

Re: Brexit
 
I’m gonna put European even after we’ve left. Just to be difficult

Mick 16-12-2018 13:19

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35975602)
So when you fill a legal form out that asks nationality you put European then?

Absolutely not - you're first and *ONLY* nationality is the Country you originate from, that is Britain.

As it stands from 29th March 2019, while UK Citizens can relish and celebrate leaving a totally corrupted EU, like me, they can choose to revoke their EU Citizenship, I already have, there is not one piece of paper in my possession that says I am an EU National-this is total bliss.

jfman 16-12-2018 13:19

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975604)
English or British depending on the moment. ;)
When people ask you which continent you live on, which one do you tell them?

British Empire.

Mick 16-12-2018 13:20

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35975605)
I’m gonna put European even after we’ve left. Just to be difficult

Then you will have to refill the form again then, it's your time you're wasting, so fill your boots. :rolleyes:

Sephiroth 16-12-2018 13:39

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975596)
Theresa May has denied many things before and then gone on to do exactly what she denied. We may not instantly recall her denying that she would not hold an election but the memory of her saying that the vote on her deal would not be postponed is still fresh.
I think Brexiters need to accept the hard facts that there is a possibility of a second referendum...and also that they may not win it. I don't want another referendum to happen but I believe the chances of it happening are steadily growing as shown by recent developments.

Regarding a 2nd. Referendum:

It would only happen in limited circumstances.

1. TM goes turncoat. Unlikely as it can’t be forced by any constitutional method other than primary legislation.

2. A new government takes over and makes the necessary primary legislation.

Let’s analyse #2. It is possible that the Tories would lose a vote of confidence with TM as PM. In that case the Tories would have 21 days to find a new leader. If a Leaver, would win a vote of confidence; if a Remainer, then anything could happen at the whim of Labour, the DUP and the ERG. If a ‘leaving’ PM, then there will be no 2nd referendum. If a ‘remain’ PM then a 2nd referendum is likely because there would be time to introduce the legislation.

If there is a ‘leave’ Tory PM, there would still be parliamentary chaos if the Remain Tories stiff their party. Another confidence vote round might then ensue and so on until a coalition government emerges. By then it’ll be too late to stop Brexit via the Referendum route due to the time it takes to get it organised.

So it seems to me that we are in no deal territory save for a last minute change of attitude by the EU.

55:45 and nine of this chaos would have happened.




---------- Post added at 13:39 ---------- Previous post was at 13:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975604)
English or British depending on the moment. ;)
When people ask you which continent you live on, which one do you tell them?

What’s that got to do with anything that matters? Road to nowhere this sub-topic.


jfman 16-12-2018 14:01

Re: Brexit
 
TM doesn’t have to go turncoat. She puts her deal to the public in a referendum over no deal. Parliament amends the referendum legislation to include remain.

Hom3r 16-12-2018 14:20

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975604)
English or British depending on the moment. ;)
When people ask you which continent you live on, which one do you tell them?


So should I put Eartling on?

I will never put European on any paperwork.

Hugh 16-12-2018 14:27

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35975613)
So should I put Eartling on?

I will never put European on any paperwork.

I don't put "human" on any paperwork, but doesn't mean I'm not*.. ;)


*opinions may differ on this... :D

I am a European Citizen, under law, in addition to being a British Citizen.

djfunkdup 16-12-2018 14:30

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975612)
She puts her deal to the public in a referendum over no deal

:dunce:

jfman 16-12-2018 14:35

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by djfunkdup (Post 35975615)
:dunce:

You keep posting that offensive emoji, despite being asked not to, yet can’t explain why Theresa May wouldn’t back her deal in a referendum. She genuinely believes it’s the best deal... why not test the theory out?

400 Parliamentarians who want remain couldn’t ignore a referendum that clearly backs her deal. If she wants her deal after losing the vote it’s the only option she has left. Why wouldn’t she use it?

Mr K 16-12-2018 14:41

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975617)
You keep posting that offensive emoji, despite being asked not to, yet can’t explain why

Don't blame the guy, the emoji suits him ! :D

---------- Post added at 14:41 ---------- Previous post was at 14:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35975614)
I don't put "human" on any paperwork, but doesn't mean I'm not*.. ;)


*opinions may differ on this... :D

I am a European Citizen, under law, in addition to being a British Citizen.

Yes, European even if we leave the EU, you can't change geography as much as some would love us to join onto the United States. Now isn't that a lovely united country !

Sephiroth 16-12-2018 14:43

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975612)
TM doesn’t have to go turncoat. She puts her deal to the public in a referendum over no deal. Parliament amends the referendum legislation to include remain.

If I understand you correctly, if she allows a referendum, she has gone turncoat on her oft repeated statements that there is to be no such thing.

jfman 16-12-2018 14:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35975620)
If I understand you correctly, if she allows a referendum, she has gone turncoat on her oft repeated statements that there is to be no such thing.

But she remains committed to her deal, and gets to stiff Rees-Mogg etc because no deal will be off the ballot once Parliament has had a say.

She can hand on heart stare down a TV camera and say she believes this is best for the country, delivers on the referendum result and the only way to achieve this is due to divisions in her party and the opposition is to have public support for it.

Why do you think she has been targeting people directly, and there are Government funded ads on social media “selling” her deal?

Mr K 16-12-2018 14:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975601)
Screw the corrupted Maastricht treaty in which NOONE had a say on thanks to John Major!!!

So no, I will not tell you again - I am not a EU citizen and I will not accept no-one else telling me I am so cease doing so because it is bloody pointless. If I say I am not an EU citizen, I am not- I am a British and nothing else-end of discussion!

Never mind Mick when we import your French printed 'British' passport in 'bleu', you'll be a happy man :) (thats if it ever gets pass the queues at the ports.... )

denphone 16-12-2018 14:56

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35975620)
If I understand you correctly, if she allows a referendum, she has gone turncoat on her oft repeated statements that there is to be no such thing.

Well she has form as we all know in calling a General Election when she said countless times that there would not be one and then she stated unequivocally that there would be a vote last Tuesday which of course there was not and now she says there will be a vote before the 21st of January which of course they won't be..

Mr K 16-12-2018 15:00

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35975624)
Well she has form as we all know in calling a General Election when she said countless times that there would not be one and then she stated unequivocally that there would be a vote last Tuesday which of course there was not and now she says there will be a vote before the 21st of January which of course they won't be..

One thing is true about TM, she listens to no one, which will be her downfall. Bit like the captain of the Titanic....

1andrew1 16-12-2018 15:05

Re: Brexit
 
Liam Fox becomes the first Brexiter minister to call for free indicative vote in parliament.
Quote:

If Theresa May's Brexit deal isn't passed by MPs, then Parliament might have to decide what to do next, cabinet minister Liam Fox has said.
The senior Brexiteer said the PM's deal was unlikely to pass through Parliament unless the backstop issue was resolved.
He said one option could be a "free vote" for MPs.
One option being widely suggested is another referendum - but Mr Fox told the Andrew Marr Show this was unlikely and would not "heal division".
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-46584654

heero_yuy 16-12-2018 15:06

Re: Brexit
 
Please sign the petition: Leave the EU without a deal in March 2019. to put the pressure on.

1andrew1 16-12-2018 15:10

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35975622)
Never mind Mick when we import your French printed 'British' passport in 'bleu', you'll be a happy man :) (thats if it ever gets pass the queues at the ports.... )

If I was working for the Passport Agency, I wouldn't be instructing the printers Gemalto to remove the words "European Union" for now, given the current uncertainties. They can of course still be blue and be European Union, the current colour is recommended but not obligatory.

jfman 16-12-2018 15:20

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975631)
Liam Fox becomes the first Brexiter minister to call for free indicative vote in parliament.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-46584654

As soon as Parliament gets voting for it’s preferences that’s the the game up for Brexit.

Dave42 16-12-2018 15:59

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35975620)
If I understand you correctly, if she allows a referendum, she has gone turncoat on her oft repeated statements that there is to be no such thing.

or her cabinet want one which some are moving for one now

djfunkdup 16-12-2018 16:15

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35975632)
Please sign the petition: Leave the EU without a deal in March 2019. to put the pressure on.

Done ;)

Carth 16-12-2018 16:25

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975621)
. . . there are Government funded ads on social media “selling” her deal

Really?

My word, that's a sign of desperation if ever I saw one :shocked:

1andrew1 16-12-2018 18:47

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975591)
Attacking Blair gets good headlines and makes her appear strong.

This hasn't worked out too well for her. Not only is she being criticised for hypocrisy (she didn't criticise John Major who did the same thing as Blair) but Blair has responded in a reasoned manner.
Quote:

Responding to Mrs May's criticism, Mr Blair said: "To describe such a course as an insult is a strange description of what would be the opportunity for them to instruct Parliament as to how to proceed.
"Far from being anti-democratic, it would be the opposite - as indeed many senior figures in her party from past and present have been saying.
"What is irresponsible however is to try to steamroller MPs into accepting a deal they genuinely think is a bad one with the threat that if they do not fall into line, the government will have the country crash out without a deal."
https://news.sky.com/story/blair-and...r-mps-11582978

papa smurf 16-12-2018 18:56

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35975632)
Please sign the petition: Leave the EU without a deal in March 2019. to put the pressure on.

done

Sephiroth 16-12-2018 19:18

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975655)
This hasn't worked out too well for her. Not only is she being criticised for hypocrisy (she didn't criticise John Major who did the same thing as Blair) but Blair has responded in a reasoned manner.

https://news.sky.com/story/blair-and...r-mps-11582978


Responding to Mrs May's criticism, Mr Blair said: "To describe such a course as an insult is a strange description of what would be the opportunity for them to instruct Parliament as to how to proceed."


Pure Blair hypocrisy. The Referendum has instructed Parliament as to how to proceed. But the Parliamentarians have become anti-democratic by not fulfilling the Referendum's mandate.

That you, Andrew, consider Blair's words as "reasoned" condemns you.


jfman 16-12-2018 19:29

Re: Brexit
 
I’m inclined to think Blair is a polarising figure.

People either supported New Labour and got over the Iraq thing, or they didn’t and he was a war criminal. I think the for the audience May is appealing to the vast majority won’t side with Blair under any circumstances.

Hom3r 16-12-2018 19:33

Re: Brexit
 
I will say this again I am NOT and I will NEVER be European or a European citizen.

Yes our Continent my be in europe, that that's all.

Nowhere on any paperwork I fill our never says which Continent are you from.

1andrew1 16-12-2018 19:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35975663)
I will say this again I am NOT and I will NEVER be European or a European citizen.

Yes our Continent my be in europe, that that's all.

Nowhere on any paperwork I fill our never says which Continent are you from.

No one's asking you to put it on a form but posts 5127 and 5128 contain some clues as to whether or not you're an EU citizen which is the citizenship in question. https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...postcount=5128
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...postcount=5127

---------- Post added at 19:49 ---------- Previous post was at 19:42 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35975660)
That you, Andrew, consider Blair's words as "reasoned" condemns you.

You've misread read my post - reasoned manner is my description. Thus he's calmly defended his position with his reasons and not gone off on one. We don't have to agree with him to understand that his manner is reasoned.

Pierre 16-12-2018 20:48

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975612)
TM doesn’t have to go turncoat. She puts her deal to the public in a referendum over no deal. Parliament amends the referendum legislation to include remain.

You can’t have a 3 way question on the referendum. It would have to be Binary, because you are effectively splitting the leave vote by having two leave options.

---------- Post added at 20:48 ---------- Previous post was at 20:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975617)
You keep posting that offensive emoji,

I think it’s quite funny

Mick 16-12-2018 20:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975664)
No one's asking you to put it on a form but posts 5127 and 5128 contain some clues as to whether or not you're an EU citizen which is the citizenship in question. https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...postcount=5128
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...postcount=5127

Right move on from the discussion from the European nationality angle or EU Citizenship, if people choose not to be so that is their right and no-one should be telling them otherwise - time to move on with this discussion and I am not asking, I am telling!!!

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975617)
You keep posting that offensive emoji, despite being asked not to

CF does not have any offensive Smilies for use. People need to stop being over sensitive and reporting posts that contain the dunce smiley. It's use is permitted.

jfman 16-12-2018 21:08

Re: Brexit
 
It’s a bit of a flaw is it not?

I couldn’t repeatedly call another user an idiot, for example.

Pierre 16-12-2018 21:11

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975674)
It’s a bit of a flaw is it not?

I couldn’t repeatedly call another user an idiot, for example.

You’re an idiot, if you think that.

1andrew1 16-12-2018 21:18

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35975667)
You can’t have a 3 way question on the referendum. It would have to be Binary, because you are effectively splitting the leave vote by having two leave options.

So many permutations possible with options of transferring votes to second preferred choice, ranking choices, which options to include, etc which make a people's vote hard to agree.

jfman 16-12-2018 21:20

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975677)
So many permutations possible with options of transferring votes to second preferred choice, ranking choices, which options to include, etc which make a people's vote hard to agree.

If leave were to win (against remain) I think it’d make most sense to have a further vote a few weeks later about what type of Brexit to aim for.

1andrew1 16-12-2018 21:24

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975678)
If leave were to win (against remain) I think it’d make most sense to have a further vote a few weeks later about what type of Brexit to aim for.

I think that wouldn't work due to voter fatigue. I suspect even a people's vote in January would get a far lower turnout than in 2016.

jfman 16-12-2018 21:32

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975679)
I think that wouldn't work due to voter fatigue. I suspect even a people's vote in January would get a far lower turnout than in 2016.

It’s the only way out of having six different views of what Brexit looks like.

1andrew1 16-12-2018 21:46

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975683)
It’s the only way out of having six different views of what Brexit looks like.

I know what dead in the water looks like. :D

Mick 16-12-2018 22:22

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul M (Post 35974673)
Just a reminder :)



If you behave like children, you will be treated like them, and sent to the Naughty Step until the New Year.

As always, you have been warned.

Paul's Xmas list for Forum Holiday's is already shaping up to have some candidates names added to it.

Paul 16-12-2018 22:46

Re: Brexit
 
My finger is poised on the ban button. :)

I suggest anyone who is over sensitive should find other topics to post in, and leave this one.

Sephiroth 16-12-2018 23:42

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975677)
So many permutations possible with options of transferring votes to second preferred choice, ranking choices, which options to include, etc which make a people's vote hard to agree.

Three options with a single transferable vote would be stacked in favour of one option: TM's Deal.

As in:

REMAIN would transfer to TM's DEAL
TM's DEAL would transfer to REMAIN
NO DEAL would transfer to TM's DEAL or be a loner.

That's why there wouldn't be three options on the paper.


1andrew1 17-12-2018 00:02

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35975701)
Three options with a single transferable vote would be stacked in favour of one option: TM's Deal.

As in:

REMAIN would transfer to TM's DEAL
TM's DEAL would transfer to REMAIN
NO DEAL would transfer to TM's DEAL or be a loner.

That's why there wouldn't be three options on the paper.


The above might be a convincing argument to TM for there to be three options.

What two options would you have?
a) TM's deal and no-deal
b) TM's deal and remain
c) No deal and remain

Ultimately, this evidences that a people's vote is not a straightforward solution to the chaos in the Commons. Devising it and then gaining consensus from the Commons will prove quite difficult as different questions and voting structures will lead to different outcomes.

Sephiroth 17-12-2018 07:49

Re: Brexit
 
Good question.

I’d prefer (a) because at least we’d be out & can chuck the deal if they Macron’d the trade negotiations.


Chris 17-12-2018 08:32

Re: Brexit
 
Meanwhile, in other “I know you don’t believe me but there really isn’t going to be another referendum, please stop making yourself look silly” news:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-46586673

Quote:

Holding another referendum on the EU would "break faith with the British people", Theresa May will warn MPs.

Former PMs John Major and Tony Blair are among those urging a new referendum if MPs cannot agree on a way forward.

But the prime minister will argue that it would do "irreparable damage to the integrity of our politics" and would "likely leave us no further forward".
This is the contents of a speech to be delivered later today. Though I doubt it’ll make much difference to those who have totally bought into the idea that she’s going to call a referendum and everything that points to the contrary is just some kind of strategy.

1andrew1 17-12-2018 08:41

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35975710)
Meanwhile, in other “I know you don’t believe me but there really isn’t going to be another referendum, please stop making yourself look silly” news:

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-46586673

This is the contents of a speech to be delivered later today. Though I doubt it’ll make much difference to those who have totally bought into the idea that she’s going to call a referendum and everything that points to the contrary is just some kind of strategy.

You have to accept the woman has form on U-turns."U-turn if you want to, but Theresa May will turn first."
Personally, I don't think a referendum is desirable or practical then again, that's what I said about Brexit.;)

Chris 17-12-2018 08:44

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35975711)
You have to accept the woman has form on U-turns.
Personally, I don't think a referendum is desirable or practice then again, that's what I said about Brexit.;)

I think your evidence evaluation and weighing skills are operating at a sub-optimal level. ;)

Hugh 17-12-2018 08:59

Re: Brexit
 
So if the British people vote to overturn the previous vote of the British people, the British people are breaking the faith of the British people?

Damien 17-12-2018 08:59

Re: Brexit
 
She is going to say either way. At least until her deal is voted down.

But the suggestion is that the government is intentionally stoking up the idea of a referendum to scare the Brexit contingent into backing May's deal or losing Brexit entirely. Although it also encourages Remains to think it's within their grasp.

I don't think she has a plan B and if her deal is voted down then who knows what happened.

jfman 17-12-2018 09:19

Re: Brexit
 
I agree that it may appear like a leap of faith that May is saying one thing, but really intending to do another. That said, I don’t think her cabinet are going rogue of their own accord.

Mick 17-12-2018 09:22

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35975713)
So if the British people vote to overturn the previous vote of the British people, the British people are breaking the faith of the British people?

Er no - the obvious thing you're choosing to ignore, deliberately, I might add, is that you do not keep having the same vote over and over again because you did not like the result of the first. We had a referendum, the UK voted to leave the EU, that is exactly what should happen.

A second referendum, AKA the losers vote, would be for the democracy abusers trying to thwart the first result.

jfman 17-12-2018 09:24

Re: Brexit
 
The loser’s vote, which I will term the “well-informed vote” will be a more up to date reflection of democracy than the old one.

Mick 17-12-2018 09:27

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975717)
The loser’s vote, which I will term the “well-informed vote” will be a more up to date reflection of democracy than the old one.

We don't need an uptodate reflection. We need to get on with enacting the first result and leaving FFS! :rolleyes:

djfunkdup 17-12-2018 09:29

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35975713)
So if the British people vote to overturn the previous vote of the British people, the British people are breaking the faith of the British people?


:dunce::dunce:

[Admin Insert: :nono: Please See: https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...postcount=5191 - Thanks]

jfman 17-12-2018 09:29

Re: Brexit
 
I don’t see why we need to get on with it. In the present form it doesn’t represent what was promised before, Parliament can’t agree, and such an important decision requires taking the time and effort to ensure we make the right decision.

Rushing the A50 vote through has got us into this mess.

Mick 17-12-2018 09:34

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975720)
I don’t see why we need to get on with it. In the present form it doesn’t represent what was promised before, Parliament can’t agree, and such an important decision requires taking the time and effort to ensure we make the right decision.

I suspect millions of People did not vote to leave based on promises made, I certainly did not - I took absolutely no notice of ANY campaigns because my mind was made up for leaving years before any campaigns began.

Parliament is full of Pro EU loons who are putting their own personal beliefs before the peoples, who gave them an instruction to leave the EU and yes I say instruction because that is what they did, they passed the sovereign choice to us to decide and we decided to leave the EU, (I will not be told otherwise by anybody!!!).

Mr K 17-12-2018 09:35

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975718)
We don't need an uptodate reflection. We need to get on with enacting the first result and leaving FFS! :rolleyes:

Well suddenly every is talking about another referendum, even its opponents, which show its now very much on the agenda. TM now paranoidly bleating about it, probably means its on the cards - she also claimed there wouldn't be an election last time !

'Slowly, slowly catchy monkey'...........

jfman 17-12-2018 09:37

Re: Brexit
 
So there’s no way of quantifying how many of the 17.4 million were swayed by any of the campaigns. It’s also a betrayal of everyone in this country regardless of how they voted, or even if they voted, to crash out for ideological reasons and not leave in a controlled manner.

I’d prefer to take five years and get it right than three further months and get it massively wrong. That said, for those it was about immigration it’s only a date they see as a line in the sand.

Mick 17-12-2018 09:39

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by djfunkdup (Post 35975719)
:dunce::dunce:

Come on now DJ - while I said the use of this smiley is allowed - don't push your luck with it's use by continuously provoking members with it. Thanks.

papa smurf 17-12-2018 09:39

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35975713)
So if the British people vote to overturn the previous vote of the British people, the British people are breaking the faith of the British people?

I see what your saying
If the losers of the referendum cannot accept the result there will have to be a losers vote to give them[the losers] the opportunity to have their own way, presumably because it's unfair that they are losers because they were never told they could be losers before the referendum ,but now they are losers democracy needs a tweak to turn the losers into winners.

Mick 17-12-2018 09:41

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975723)
So there’s no way of quantifying how many of the 17.4 million were swayed by any of the campaigns. It’s also a betrayal of everyone in this country regardless of how they voted, or even if they voted, to crash out for ideological reasons and not leave in a controlled manner.

I’d prefer to take five years and get it right than three further months and get it massively wrong. That said, for those it was about immigration it’s only a date they see as a line in the sand.

Crashing out or cliff edge, is a terminology I do not accept would happen, it's Remain, fear mongering rubbish.

Mr K 17-12-2018 09:47

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975726)
Crashing out or cliff edge, is a terminology I do not accept would happen, it's Remain, fear mongering rubbish.

you might not accept it but 66 million might think otherwise. Unless you're planning a Dictatorship ;)

Mick 17-12-2018 09:53

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35975727)
you might not accept it but 66 million might think otherwise. Unless you're planning a Dictatorship ;)

A dictatorship is exactly where we are heading if we do not enact the first result - Parliament asked the people in 2016 and we told them we wanted to leave the EU and that is what a true democracy is, we do not keep asking the same question over and over because the losers of the first result did not like it.

jfman 17-12-2018 10:02

Re: Brexit
 
I think crashing is the most appropriate word. It suggests uncontrolled, which is exactly what this is.

If we triggered a50 two years ago and said “right chaps, two years to prepare for WTO terms” I’d probably not use the word crash as at least it could be deemed intentional.

Sephiroth 17-12-2018 10:13

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975733)
I think crashing is the most appropriate word. It suggests uncontrolled, which is exactly what this is.

If we triggered a50 two years ago and said “right chaps, two years to prepare for WTO terms” I’d probably not use the word crash as at least it could be deemed intentional.

A gross betrayal of trust by TM. NO DEAL should have been our starting position with planning in hand.

djfunkdup 17-12-2018 10:14

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35975724)
Come on now DJ - while I said the use of this smiley is allowed - don't push your luck with it's use by continuously provoking members with it. Thanks.

When the deluded traitors talk about having new votes to counteract the initial democratic vote then in my camp that = :dunce: There is nothing to say to them except that and only that.There is no telling them there ain't going to be another vote yet they bleat on and on and on and on.

I really am thankful that i'm chilled over this entire Brexit situation.The ramainers are tense,paranoid,deluded and almost getting to the stage they are ready to throw themselves in front of the Brexit Express to derail it,But guess what,it's got a snow plough on the front of it and its just going to plough right through them on it's way home.Not long to go now and Santa is nearly here as well :p::p::p:

Mick 17-12-2018 10:15

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975733)
I think crashing is the most appropriate word. It suggests uncontrolled, which is exactly what this is.

If we triggered a50 two years ago and said “right chaps, two years to prepare for WTO terms” I’d probably not use the word crash as at least it could be deemed intentional.

There is such a thing called controlled exit, with no deal. We save £39 Billion on day one. Like the Weatherspoons boss, Tim Martin said the other day at a Leave means Leave rally, "Whenever I wake up in the morning, and you probably think the same. Being £39 Billion better off is a great start to the day."

About 4 minutes in on his speech in this video.


Stephen 17-12-2018 10:34

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by djfunkdup (Post 35975736)
When the deluded traitors talk about having new votes to counteract the initial democratic vote then in my camp that = :dunce: There is nothing to say to them except that and only that.There is no telling them there ain't going to be another vote yet they bleat on and on and on and on.

I really am thankful that i'm chilled over this entire Brexit situation.The ramainers are tense,paranoid,deluded and almost getting to the stage they are ready to throw themselves in front of the Brexit Express to derail it,But guess what,it's got a snow plough on the front of it and its just going to plough right through them on it's way home.Not long to go now and Santa is nearly here as well :p::p::p:

No one is a traitor!

Tell that to the Scottish folk who are still demanding a new Indy Ref as they don't accept that NO won. They constantly gather and march and keep raising the issue. They are just an annoyance.

This while similar is slightly different and the leave vote won and they had 2 years to plan this out and here we are 3 months to go and there is still not a decent strategy or plan in place. Hence why so many of tyhe public and MP etv think there should be a final vote.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:43.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum