![]() |
Re: moses 'parting of the waves' a myth
Quote:
|
Re: Would you believe in God if??
Quote:
A huge booming voice, pillars of flames, dramatic scenes? Ever watched the Wizard of Oz...?! :angel: |
Re: moses 'parting of the waves' a myth
Quote:
Of course the fact that the Bible was written *after* the event and has been re-written, re-translated had sections omitted for not being "religiously correct" etc isn't relevant to the discussion... Quote:
Sending bears to tear apart children is "discipline"?? Making people burn in hell for all eternity is "discipline"??? This must be some strange usage of the word I wasn't previously aware of. |
Re: moses 'parting of the waves' a myth
Quote:
|
Re: MERGED: God (all threads)
Re: the last few posts. What people fail to realise is that trying to use science to prove/disprove something which science can never find answers for is folly.
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: MERGED: God (all threads)
Quote:
Science does not try to prove/disprove things that science cannot find answers for. Science tries to prove/disprove those things in which man is searching for answers. To assume that religions and their bibles are somehow excused from scientific examination by declaring the attempt as "folly" is rediculous and arrogant in the extreme. |
Re: MERGED: God (all threads)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: MERGED: God (all threads)
Just got into work and my you lot have been busy!
So excuse the quick recap Russ, re the red mineral in the nile, it happens to this day as well. re the Noah story, literary evidence shows when it entered hebrew culture, and that it was in messopotanian culture long before, ergo the hebrews adopted it from them (it can be pinpointed to when they were their slaves). Again, these experts who come up with the explanations of how these "miracles" happened are not saying that they weren't caused by god. Now, you said that many things in the OT are wrong or incorrect, but how can this be if the words were given to the writers from god? You could say the writers being just men could have written it down wrong, so why didn't god correct them there and then rather than letting his people wander off down the wrong path? Prepare to wince. In genisis, god says that to show you are one of his people you must be circumsised :eek: Was this decision ever revoked? If so, what are we to make of a god who can't make his mind up? If it wasn't revoked, then if you are uncircumcised, then you are not one of gods people and therefore not following his teachings, therefore failing him. Can anyone put a case forward showing that (by his own actions) god is not a genocidal tyrant? |
Re: MERGED: God (all threads)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: MERGED: God (all threads)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
So he's changed his mind. Quote:
Or are you saying god's a pervert into threesomes? (sorry, couldn't resist!) If god is responsible for giving people children, then one could extrapolate that to mean that if people are infirtile, then it is because god does not want them to have children, which kinda backs up the image of him as not a nice person at all. |
Re: MERGED: God (all threads)
Quote:
So, you have no desire for a search for the empirical truth then? That's fine. You can say it is based on faith and can I say it is based on lies and we can all argue for another few thousand years. In your terms, scientists will not find what they are looking for because their aims and your aims are apparently not the same (and in any case you believe you already have found what you are looking for so no proof is ever going to persaude you otherwise). Science does not answer to an unquestionable beliefs. If it did then it wouldn't work and we would not be having this conversation on computers over this thing we call the wibbly-wobbly-web. Science merely searches for the most reasonable explanation based on experimentation and observation. There are no tricks or lies involved. Anyway, there was a misspelling in the holy bible. It is actually "The Geek(scientist) shall inherit the earth". That was where it should have ended but they dragged it on for a few more chapters because the publishers didn't like the ending. Honest! I have the proof! Now, where did I put those papers. :D |
Re: MERGED: God (all threads)
Quote:
Quote:
You of course are welcome to believe whatever you chose :) Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: MERGED: God (all threads)
Quote:
I said empirical truth. NOT the "truth" as you see it in your singular mind. Me? I don't believe in unproven storybooks and I don't care what you believe. So, the whole argument for science not being able to prove/disprove things relies totally on whether you *think* it falls within your faith or not. It is never going to work in that case, but only because YOU won't accept it. You are not prepared to give science the slightest chance because you are afraid that your whole mental world will come tumbling down (?). |
Re: MERGED: God (all threads)
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
It's just I have made up my mind about God, I feel Him in my everyday life, I'm not harming anyone with my beliefs so I'll carry on til the end. |
Re: MERGED: God (all threads)
Can someone explain to me the whole thing about jesus being a jew, yet people believe in christianity and not judaism.
Personally, I was brought up a Catholic. I don't believe in it anymore though. I'd like to believe in God but I don't believe that the bible is the word of God. I like to think of God kinda like The Force in starwars. I just believe in living a good life, treating other people how I like to be treated myself, being kind, not causing anyone any harm. If there is a God I think thats all he'll expect of anyone, not to be living my life to the letter of the bible, castigating other peoples lifestyles, putting words before reason etc and all the rest. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 23:08. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum