Re: Traffic Shaping
 

I would imagine the only people to know are those who are implementing it. As for the rest of NTL and whom it may affect whether it be the customer or the people who have run around trying to resolve faults that where never there wouldn't know:rolleyes:

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

What did you do at ntl btw ig?

I know where some of the kit is as well, its easier to find than the flaming cf easter eggs.

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

Well, Newsgroup access here in Stoke seem to be fine, and so far tonight I haven't had to mess about changing proxies at all, so if they are slowing down BT packets and stopping dipsticks from knackering up the service because they are maxing out their upload then all the better. Besides, if you want to leech something you can still do it during the off peak hours.

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

So as far as i can see, NTL decided not to roll out 10MB to all customers with different caps. 1MB and 2MB can have "unlimited".

Well as long as it's "unlimited" at snails pace and anything but what we actually pay for.

"Look at us,We are NTL,we have the best BB in the UK" yeah right!

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

The writing on the wall was big enough for me.

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

Tea boy.

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

lol, ok TB:erm:

---------- Post added at 21:42 ---------- Previous post was at 21:39 ----------

No they are just saying let the network run fast for joe smo at tea time and on the night time your p2p app can dl at warp speed.

I'm not sure why everyone else makes such a fuss I perposfully traffic shape my own connection.

How many gamers here turn off p2p app altogether because of the negative effect it has on gaming?

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

That's a fair enough point.Why advertise a 1MB,2MB "unlimited" product in January only to do a 180 on it 8 weeks later?Their system that bad?

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

Because in the current market "unlimited" refers to download caps, and there is not one of these on the service.

Although i had reservations about the idea in the first instance, i don't see a problem with shaping between the hours stated. As internet usage patterns change it will be more important for people to get better latency (gaming, streaming, VOIP).

If people want to leech and leech that is fine, but just if they try to do it between 6pm and midnight then it will just run slower :shrug: When i used to p2p at uni then i normally left it running overnight anyway, by normal (not student) sleeping hours that will leave 8 hours of unshaped leeching time...

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

Same here however if the problems i had between 6.00pm and midnight was a test of the traffic shaping then there is no way in hell i want that. Therefor ukonline will be getting a call from me tomorrow followed by ntl disconnections on Monday. :)

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

2MB unlimited is not "unlimited" if it is shaped?

It wasn't advertised as 2MB unlimited [when we can handle it]

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

No, in ntl's case it means total traffic, a capped service is the total traffic generated by one modem both ways.

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

But it is now advertised as up to 2mb

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

Well I am unsure of what I think about this and it is yet to happen so cant pass judgement on how its implemented. But from the wording it does seem like it wont be as bad as plusnet's shaping which is a relief. My current problems are not caused by shaping as everything slows down including http so I think their is no shaping yet.

What worries me is if ntl start delaying upgrades as a result of shaping making them not needed and they then get tempted to shape that little bit more when capacity becomes tight again and the shaping eventually becomes heavy.

The p2p caches I only see as a good thing it will save upload bandwidth at the ubr and should speed things up, in fact I think ntl should stop http caching and use those servers for p2p caching like someone else suggested in the past.

Re: Traffic Shaping
 

Indeed.I'm now advertised as "looking for a new ISP";)


I wasn't in January :)