Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Starmer’s chronicles (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33712992)

Hugh 15-10-2024 10:14

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36184339)
If that was really the case, then Labour would've released the figures.
Still waiting for this to start.
A message from Prime Minister Keir Starmer to the Civil Service

Do you mean the figures that were in the in the HM Treasury report (Fixing the foundations: Public spending audit 2024-25) and then confirmed in the Office for Budget Review review letter, both dated 29th July 2024?

https://www.gov.uk/government/public...t-2024-25-html

https://obr.uk/docs/dlm_uploads/Lett...ure-limits.pdf

nomadking 15-10-2024 10:30

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36184340)
Do you mean the figures that were in the in the HM Treasury report (Fixing the foundations: Public spending audit 2024-25) and then confirmed in the Office for Budget Review review letter, both dated 29th July 2024?

https://www.gov.uk/government/public...t-2024-25-html

https://obr.uk/docs/dlm_uploads/Lett...ure-limits.pdf

Quote:

meant that public spending on pay is expected to be around £11-12 billion higher
Still not a £22bn unknown "black hole". Just an explanation of KNOWN costs plus the extra wage rises. That's before you add in the possible public sector employer NI increases.

Pierre 15-10-2024 10:50

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36184334)
So where else would you get the £22 billion from,? The NHS, increase income tax or vat, cut disability benefits? Cutting employee national insurance was a pre election desperate Tory tax bribe that we couldn't afford. Now we have to pay for their incompetence.

Get rid of all the so called "asylum seekers", that's £4-5 billion straight away.

Hugh 15-10-2024 11:39

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36184341)
Still not a £22bn unknown "black hole". Just an explanation of KNOWN costs plus the extra wage rises. That's before you add in the possible public sector employer NI increases.

The second paragraph in the first links clarifies that - the £22 billion forecast overspend was not in the March 6th Budget figures - March the departmental budgets were forecast to be £nnn billion, the Treasury audit in July showed the forecast spend was £nnn billion + £22 billion.

Quote:

The audit carried out by the Treasury shows that the forecast overspend on departmental spending is expected to be £21.9 billion above the resource departmental expenditure limit (RDEL) totals set by the Treasury at Spring Budget 2024

nomadking 15-10-2024 12:28

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36184343)
The second paragraph in the first links clarifies that - the £22 billion forecast overspend was not in the March 6th Budget figures - March the departmental budgets were forecast to be £nnn billion, the Treasury audit in July showed the forecast spend was £nnn billion + £22 billion.

Still not seeing where this £22bn of hidden spending has come from, other than the larger public sector pay increases. Everything else was known.

papa smurf 15-10-2024 13:08

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36184345)
Still not seeing where this £22bn of hidden spending has come from, other than the larger public sector pay increases. Everything else was known.

it's cleary not the money Huge is posting about as that was forcast and visible

nomadking 15-10-2024 13:22

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Whatever way you look at it, any claim of a £22bn black hole came BEFORE any(including this) report.

Hugh 15-10-2024 15:31

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
It literally came from the outcomes of the audit this document is reporting on, and it was announced to the House on the 29th July.

The Executive Summary

Quote:

On 8 July, the Chancellor of the Exchequer announced that she had instructed Treasury officials to undertake a rapid audit of public spending. This document sets out the outcome of the audit, the immediate action the government is taking in response, and the long-term measures being introduced to restore public spending control.

The audit carried out by the Treasury shows that the forecast overspend on departmental spending is expected to be £21.9 billion above the resource departmental expenditure limit (RDEL) totals set by the Treasury at Spring Budget 2024

Pierre 16-10-2024 09:53

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
this article from the IFS explains it well.

https://ifs.org.uk/articles/ps22bn-b...who-dared-look

Hugh 16-10-2024 11:56

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36184380)
this article from the IFS explains it well.

https://ifs.org.uk/articles/ps22bn-b...who-dared-look

That’s a nice earner for someone…

Quote:

nearly 50,000 are being put up in hotels at a staggering cost of £3 billion a year.
£165 per night for long-term Holiday Inn Express level hotels, which normally have a rack-rate of £60-£100 per night?

https://www.thetimes.com/article/c06...681860c2a0fa80

Quote:

The cost to the taxpayer of housing a asylum seeker is between £127 and £148 a day — a total daily bill of £8 million. The investigation found that hotel owners receive between £40 and £80, with the rest going to the middlemen companies.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1729075894

Paul 28-10-2024 01:21

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
It doesnt get any better for labour, another of their MPs in trouble.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c6244gk9d4po

Quote:

Labour suspends MP after CCTV appears to show him punching man

Damien 28-10-2024 06:55

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
He's screwed, that's a by-election.

papa smurf 28-10-2024 08:33

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36184963)
He's screwed, that's a by-election.

Another seat for reform?

Damien 28-10-2024 08:39

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
Could well be, they're in 2nd, it's a by-election so more of a protest vote....

Kursk 28-10-2024 13:05

Re: Starmer’s chronicles
 
It won’t be the last sucker punch thrown by Labour.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:29.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum