![]() |
Re: Virgin Trains loses West Coast Mainline franchise (Update)
I would say this Government has grown a pair but they have not, in the end they had no legal choice other than to agree a review.
|
Re: Virgin Trains loses West Coast Mainline franchise (Update)
LOL Nice One - Good news for a change !!!
FirstGroup's award for running the West Coast Main Line from 9th December has been Revoked. Quote:
Quote:
|
re: [Update] FirstGroup WCML franchise Award revoked
Thats excellent news.:tu:
|
re: [Update] FirstGroup WCML franchise Award revoked
well that's a positive start to the morning :)
|
re: [Update] FirstGroup WCML franchise Award revoked
Quote:
Well done Sir Richard |
Re: Virgin Trains loses West Coast Mainline franchise (Update)
Quote:
|
Re: Virgin Trains loses West Coast Mainline franchise (Update)
Quote:
First's bid was widely derided because it claimed it could massively increase passenger numbers on a route that's already close to capacity and because almost all of the additional cash over and above what Virgin was promising was back-loaded on the final couple of years of the franchise, i.e. so far in the future that if they failed and had to bail out, the taxpayer would have had no additional benefit over and above what would have resulted from the incumbent remaining in charge. ---------- Post added at 08:08 ---------- Previous post was at 08:00 ---------- I wonder what went on in the DfT over the past few weeks though. Justine Greening and then Patrick McLoughlin were both so adamant the franchise was properly assessed and awarded but then seemed in a right hurry to conclude it in the face of all the complaints. Now there are suddenly "significant technical flaws" evident in the risk assessment. I'd suggest Greening's head should be on the block were it not for the fact she's already had the chop. The question now is, having come in after the horse had bolted, how much did McLoughlin actually know about the decision-making process? Did he simply believe what Sir Humphrey told him? |
re: [Update] FirstGroup WCML franchise Award revoked
Highlights how stupid the original decision was and vindicates Virgin's claims that the process was flawed and that FirstGroup's bid was high-risk and unlikely to be delivered. Any rational person would have looked at FirstGroup's offer of more trains, with more seats, at cheaper prices with more money being delivered and asked 'How is this possible?'.
Still thankfully the Government has seen sense and revoked the bid, would rather people own up to their mistakes and fix it than blindly press ahead to avoid being found out. So what 'mistakes' did the bidding process have? Was it just that they didn't check if a bid's claims were actually achievable and simply gave it to the highest bidder? |
re: [Update] FirstGroup WCML franchise Award revoked
Seeing as they have pulled the plug on it before it got aired in court, we may never know ...
---------- Post added at 08:37 ---------- Previous post was at 08:26 ---------- I think we may actually have a debt of gratitude to First here. They submitted a bid that everyone except First seemed to believe was inachievable, yet it went through the DfT's assessment process and came out the winner. Had First's bid been only mildly crazy, rather than suicidal (as it was described by some "industry watchers" at the time), we may never have seen a proper review of what is now obviously a deeply flawed process. |
re: [Update] FirstGroup WCML franchise Award revoked
The Government has said it will be run by the state until a new process is completed but the same trains and staff will be used? How is that possible? Why not take Virgin up on the offer to run it in the interim as a non-profit (I guess that gives them a unfair advantage when it comes to bidding).
|
re: [Update] FirstGroup WCML franchise Award revoked
So who actually has the franchise in December then? Got a relative travelling down for Christmas and she uses Virgin trains, so am just wondering if there will actually be any trains running on the WCML.
|
re: [Update] FirstGroup WCML franchise Award revoked
I wonder what the true nature of the 'errors' was and whether those directly responsible will be held accountable in some meaningful way. As for resignations, well I think it's a tad harsh to seek someone's demise if they've relied, in good faith, on assessments made by supposedly reliable officials who turned out not to be. Having said that, if the mistakes made should have been quite obvious or, worse still, were known but 'overlooked' for reasons of expediency then that's a very different matter and perhaps heads ought to roll.
|
re: [Update] FirstGroup WCML franchise Award revoked
Quote:
The staff who operate the service for Virgin would have transferred to First via TUPE anyway so there is no problem with them transferring to employment by the State in the meantime. The trains are leased, not owned, and the timetable is already planned months in advance so it would actually be more difficult to try to change it than to simply carry on. Pretty much the whole of VT's staff will continue as normal while this mess is sorted out. The only visible change will be that the operation will have to be de-branded. Branson's offer to run it without profit was a canny one as he was never going to be allowed to run it for a profit under these circumstances - all he was really after was keeping the Virgin brand stuck to the outside of the trains for a bit longer. It seems he may not get that wish. ---------- Post added at 09:08 ---------- Previous post was at 08:55 ---------- I have altered the thread title as it is becoming clear that whatever happens on 9 December, Dickie B. won't be running it ... |
re: [Update] FirstGroup WCML franchise Award revoked
So if I'm reading this right the conservatives have basically (temporarily) re-nationalised a chunk of the railway system? :shocked:
|
re: [Update] FirstGroup WCML franchise Award revoked
Not yet ... Virgin has the franchise until 8 December. But yes, come 9 December they will have no choice but to take the WCML under State control, and we will have a situation where both of the most important inter-city routes are run by the State, because the ECML has been that way for 2 years now.
State-run trains zipping along State-owned tracks ... |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 20:53. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum