![]() |
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
Hmm. My stereo can reach a far higher volume than I use, which I paid for, but if I turned it a the way up to 11 for the day I would think my neighbours would have every right to ask me to pull my neck in. Isn't this the same issue? Still, a bit more capacity would be better as VM are running with the equivalent of paper thin walls.
|
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
Quote:
|
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
You can download how ever much you want without effecting anyone if you just keep it after midnight. That's such an easy solution to the issue. The issue isn't people downloading more than 1tb, it's when they do. VM need to educate customers about this. They did this to me with the letter they wrote me about the 9am-9pm restrictions.
I would imagine that I'm one of VM's best customers in terms of not effecting other people even though I use between 400-900gb a month. I barely use my connection throughout the day, I actually posted a graph of my most recent 24 hour period in the thinkbroadband results thread. But when it's after 00:00 I hammer it for at least an hour sometimes three. Someone using their internet connection 'legitimately' to stream HD youtube after work is effecting other users more than a heavy downloader who downloads over night. So my point is it's not heavy users, it's the time of usage that's critical. No question a heavy user should be penalised by shaping if they are downloading at peak times. But for me in that scenario it makes no sense to have a connection over 30mbit since I can't use it when I want. |
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
Quote:
The problem with that for VM is that if they advertised that how would they ever sell anything over 10Mbps? If somebody has to schedule their downloads then they really can't care if they take an hour at 100Mbps or 10 hours at 10Mbps. Unless of course you need more than 45GB a day... |
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
Exactly!
That's why I was initially really pleased VM removed their letter policy as I downgraded my connection from 50mbit to 30mbit due to that. So it's a bit of an issue for them as I really don't see the point having a 100mbit connection that will get shaped when I try and usenet download. So now I think the letters were a good thing. So my point is VM's strategy is all wrong, educate heavy users or do what telephone operators do and classify bandwidth as peak time and nonpeak time. So you can say off peak bandwidth is unlimited, peak is limited but to help everyone. Any of their competition who doesn't well good luck trying to deliver a service when people are downloading 1tb during peak hours a month! Oh and it is annoying if people are hogging up all your roads bandwidth but rather than being upset at those people be upset at the company supplying your service. It's up to them to manage their own resources. |
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
Quote:
If 2 100mbit users are at it during off peak then any other user on any tier will cause all 3 to be affected. |
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
I'd guess that they offered 100Mbps just to cock a snook at BT. If they get a few customers in the same area actually using it in anger at the same time then say goodbye to any semblance of reasonable performance for anybody else nearby.
---------- Post added at 15:31 ---------- Previous post was at 15:26 ---------- Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
Quote:
|
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
it wont be 200mbit to each street, much less then that. My cabinet serves multiple streets and I believe it doesnt have its own port to itself.
Kwikbreaks I am a nightowl ;) |
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
Uh, I'm a night owl, most my surfing/chatting/downloading is done between the hours of 11pm -> 5am.
VM do NOT need to move all the downloading to post-midnight. They need to fix their bandwidth issues properly, not just move the goalposts. |
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
Quote:
So if you own a car do you drive it like a loon because it\you can or do you drive in A, Accordance of the law B, With care & concideration to other road users? I would guess the latter, so why not be considerate to other users in your area? Oh & there is no need to use "CAPS" I can read & understand quite well in lower case. |
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
Quote:
|
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
Quote:
Usage patterns are about to radically change in the UK. Yes, there should be management to keep the top 5% in check. The rest of us should be able to expect ISP provision to allow us to continue with our normal usage patterns. To restrict normal usage to after midnight is madness. VM and other ISPs will have have to move with the times or fail. They have no choice. By the way folks, Tivo has noting to do with this. VM may add Youview to their Tivos, or they may not. It's their business and if they want to encourage Tivo users to pick up a Youview box from the Supermarket to go beside their cable box then fine. I suspect many may find that they don't spend enough time watching the cable box after a while to justify the cost, thus VM will be helping recession hit families save money. Very socially conscientious, I will be impressed with VM if they stick to their guns on this. Many VM users do not buy cable TV anyway though, and will be using Youview and expecting it to work well. If VM point at the Tivo and tell people to use that instead they will lose custom big time. Needless to say, they will not be doing this whatever their vision of next gen telly currently is. |
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
Quote:
There is only one solution to this: VM upgrades their network. |
Re: New Acceptable Usage Policy from VM (discussion)
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 18:01. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum