![]() |
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/06/56.png
---------- Post added at 13:45 ---------- Previous post was at 13:44 ---------- https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/06/57.png |
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
Quote:
Birmingham Server ;-P Also the Wellington Server in New Zealand would be a nice compare :) |
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
Quote:
|
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/06/53.png |
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
[QUOTE=TJS;35258748][COLOR="Silver"]
---------- Post added at 13:45 ---------- Previous post was at 13:44 ---------- I get an average of 14ms to bbc.co.uk .... ---------- Post added at 13:54 ---------- Previous post was at 13:53 ---------- Quote:
Big difference in Ping: https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/06/45.png https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/06/46.png Is it because your using the SuperHub? Guess we cant find out ;-( |
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
You appear to have all ignored my request not to post large screen shots and instead post them as attachments.
|
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
Quote:
I've not posted large screenshots? |
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
Quote:
|
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
[QUOTE=internetuser;35258756]
Quote:
https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/06/47.png ---------- Post added at 14:06 ---------- Previous post was at 14:05 ---------- https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/06/48.png ---------- Post added at 14:07 ---------- Previous post was at 14:06 ---------- https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/06/49.png ---------- Post added at 14:07 ---------- Previous post was at 14:07 ---------- https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/06/50.png ---------- Post added at 14:08 ---------- Previous post was at 14:07 ---------- https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/06/51.png ---------- Post added at 14:09 ---------- Previous post was at 14:08 ---------- https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/06/52.png ---------- Post added at 14:12 ---------- Previous post was at 14:09 ---------- Laptop hadn't been restarted since the 10.6.7 update for OS X which was near the end of march |
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
Are we trying for the longest and most pointless post in Cableforum history as that is so way of topic we may need another server.:D
|
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
That was on topic; comparing th esuperhub ot the VMNG300 :)
|
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
Pinging servers the other side of the planet is nothing at all to do with the superhub. Back on topic everyone
|
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
Quote:
Quote:
Considering a good chunk of the argument people have against the superhub is that it makes the latency poor; then yes it is. The fact that a good majority of websites you visit and game servers you use are outside of the U.K. also makes it a good test of how the isp performs. Edit: that came across ruder then intended sorry :) |
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
2 Attachment(s)
Quote:
|
Re: Can Someone Explain WHY the SuperHub is so...bad?
Anything short of a ping -t is NOT an accurate or even useful test of latancy.
Even then with VM's DPI and protocol shaping who knows what is anymore. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 10:44. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum