![]() |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
We can all agree that if Sky buy them it would be detrimental to the channels apart from the odd member, :)
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
this is the problem we have with Sky owning the content and the platform. It makes them too powerful and the only bargaining tool VM had against that they are selling off. Not sure if that really makes much sense but looks to be the way VM go.
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
I could understand if VM had a clause where they could keep them for say 20 years or maybe even 15 years because that gives them plenty of time to service their debt properly and pay a significant portion of it, plus they will have been able to establish further growth by then as the full DSO would have come and gone and they could invest in their infrastructure and platform to compete better with Sky with their customer growth and therefore revenue. Or they could have the time to build up another channel portfolio. VM might aswell get out of the channel market now anyway because it has become so heavily saturated by the sheer amount of channels now available that it's hard to establish a decent audience share now anyway and even if you can it's hard to keep it up every day and it's only going to get harder in the future.
Their TV service needs significant investment to seriously challenge Sky and this will be made even harder once BT roll out fibre and Sky can piggy back on the back of that and offer a truly great VOD service. Sky seem to be ahead of Virgin in-terms of innovation, besides vod of course, they had HD first and are now creating a 3D service all while VM are still getting their hands dirty with HD only now. I hope VM are able to use the BT infrastructure (at a cost) to infiltrate the areas where cable is currently not available. then they can truly compete with Sky. I suppose they have to sell if they want to invest but just please VM not to Sky! |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
Unfortunately Sky has always had deeper pockets than cable in the past so has been able to get to the actual content quicker. Also having a single technical platform has helped - rather than the 3 different ones Virgin have had to contend with. |
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
But that's all it was a TEST channel.
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Why did they pull it then and only come back years later on freesat? How much content are we talking about?
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Wikipedia is your friend ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ITV_HD Quote:
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
Quote:
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
It has now been announced on a certain rival site that Sky and VM have come to a deal where Living and Bravo will be available on Skyplayer! Will we be getting sky on demand i bloody doubt it!
|
Re: Sky makes £160m bid for VM channels
If you google living bravo one of the top hits takes you to the full article. Is this a sign a deal has been done? Is VM getting anthing in return?
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:33. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum