![]() |
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
An option for extra upstream for extra cash in the same manner Comhem have would rock.
|
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
yup, they can do it in bolt ons like sms for mobiles, like an extra 1mbit up for £5 or something. If i am honest i would prefer to pay £50 a month for 30/5 rather than 50/1.75.
As for what broadbandking said, i have only ever wanted more upload speed for seeding torrents because the faster we upload the quicker it gets done and then we can move onto other things. With HD encodings becoming increasingly popular the file sizes have shot up which means even more time uploading. |
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
Quote:
You seem like a very knowledgeable guy as far as cable network infrastructure goes you commented on my post on the support groups. If I understand you correctly the QPSK modulation used on my (single chanel unbonded) return path is limited to 4.4mbit/sec so if like 4 people in my street are uploading thats this thing saturated? If this is the case this sounds like mis-selling on virgins part as I get serious spikes when undertaking latency sensitive tasks (gaming+voice comms) Can you give me any more detail which I can use for going back to Virgin I don't want to be tied into a service which is worse for playing games etc. I never had a single latency issue on my 20mbit connection. Are you aware of any upstream modulation parameters from other areas in the country which have a more suitable upstream modulation for providing a solid upstream cabability? Regards, David |
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
that is the problem, it is shocking when you look at it. There is another post somewhere he has made (cant remember what about) where he worked out one line or something was 37mbit and you multiplied that by 4 and each ubr was 158mbits or something like that and you think "omg, that is only 8 people on 20mbits on an entire ubr" (I have probably got all of this wrong) but their arguement is that they can get away with it because most ubrs are only at 70% peak load which means they have got more than enough bandwidth. They would only have a problem if everyone tried to use their connect at the same time which is obviously what happens a lot of the time and you get everyone moaning they are only receiving 1mbit on their 20mbit connection.
|
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
I agree and would pay
|
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
Quote:
Simple tests to see how things are running. First try a nice traceroute or two to www.virginmedia.com Then try a ping -n 100 www.virginmedia.com and see how that goes. Also try the VM speedtest on your upstream and see how you score, go to http://www.vmpilot.net/ and use whichever one is nearest to you. Should explain if the issue is with packet loss or saturation. Other areas in the country use the 16QAM modulation upstream, which provides twice the bandwidth at 8.8Mbit. The standards go as far as a usable 27.2Mbit/s per upstream, some 6 times the performance of the upstream you appear to be connected to. ---------- Post added at 20:00 ---------- Previous post was at 19:57 ---------- Quote:
2 20Mbit customers in the same area, usually around 400 customers per 38Mbit, will saturate. It's contention, and in most cases it works ok. |
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
Quote:
Does anyone on here have connections to get this escalated up to whoever is in charge of deciding these things? Some serious money can be made here, and some serious customers as well if they become the fastest upstream provider in the UK... |
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
The thing puzzling me is upstream utilisation does not appear to be an issue so bandwidth would appear to be available - I will have a look tomorrow and report back.
|
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
Hi again,
Carried out the tests as you suggested looks ok. But to give you an example of what I'm experiencing when it happens if I'm talking on ventrillo people hear what I said to them up to 20-30 seconds after I say it then its fine for a while then does the same. Traceroutes Tracing route to www.virginmedia.net [212.250.162.12] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 4 ms 5 ms 5 ms 10.17.236.1 2 6 ms 5 ms 5 ms osr01glen-ge19.network.virginmedia.net [81.97.49.5] 3 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms osr01edin-tenge72.network.virginmedia.net [62.30.251.45] 4 12 ms 11 ms 11 ms man-bb-a-ge-400-0.network.virginmedia.net [195.182.178.90] 5 25 ms 19 ms 17 ms gfd-bb-b-so-200-0.network.virginmedia.net [62.252.192.94] 6 19 ms 17 ms 18 ms win-bb-a-so-010-0.network.virginmedia.net [213.105.172.129] 7 19 ms 17 ms 17 ms win-dc-a-v900.network.virginmedia.net [62.253.188.162] 8 18 ms 18 ms 22 ms www.virginmedia.com [212.250.162.12] Trace complete. Tracing route to www.virginmedia.net [212.250.162.12] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 5 ms 5 ms 5 ms 10.17.236.1 2 6 ms 5 ms 5 ms osr01glen-ge19.network.virginmedia.net 81.97.49.5] 3 17 ms 17 ms 17 ms osr01edin-tenge72.network.virginmedia.net [62.30.251.45] 4 12 ms 16 ms 10 ms man-bb-a-ge-400-0.network.virginmedia.net [195.182.178.90] 5 18 ms 17 ms 17 ms gfd-bb-b-so-200-0.network.virginmedia.net 62.252.192.94] 6 19 ms 17 ms 17 ms win-bb-a-so-010-0.network.virginmedia.net213.105.172.129] 7 19 ms 20 ms 19 ms win-dc-a-v900.network.virginmedia.net [62.253.188.162] 8 19 ms 19 ms 20 ms www.virginmedia.com [212.250.162.12] Trace complete. There was 1 previous trace where the ping times @ hop 2 were 150ms+ but this was likely a blip. (but blip is what my internet connection is experiencing when doing activities requiring low latency on the downstream and upstream paths. Ping Ping statistics for 212.250.162.12: Packets: Sent = 100, Received = 100, Lost = 0 (0% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 32ms, Average = 20ms Upload Tests Upload #1 ------------------------------------------------------------------ File size transferred : 10.0 MB (10485760 bytes) Total time taken : 45.56 seconds (45562 milliseconds) Throughput : 230.0 KB/sec [Kilobyte-per-second] = 0.23 MB/sec [Megabyte-per-second] = 1840.0 Kbps [Kilobit-per-second] = 1.84 Mbps [Megabit-per-second] Upload #2 ------------------------------------------------------------------ File size transferred : 10.0 MB (10485760 bytes) Total time taken : 45.42 seconds (45422 milliseconds) Throughput : 230.0 KB/sec [Kilobyte-per-second] = 0.23 MB/sec [Megabyte-per-second] = 1840.0 Kbps [Kilobit-per-second] = 1.84 Mbps [Megabit-per-second] Just for fun 1 download test: Download #1 ------------------------------------------------------------------ File size transferred : 100.0 MB (104857600 bytes) Total time taken : 18.5 seconds (18500 milliseconds) Throughput : 5667.0 KB/sec [Kilobyte-per-second] = 5.67 MB/sec [Megabyte-per-second] = 45336.0 Kbps [Kilobit-per-second] = 45.34 Mbps [Megabit-per-second] This all looks fine but your comments on the newsgroups that the QAM16 applied on my return path could be very easily saturated. My area is quite high in terms of cable usage a lot a few people on my street are already on the 50mbit serivce with a few others getting it soon. Regards, David |
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
Yer those all look absolutely fine.
It might be that very few in your street are on 50Mbit. No evidence there of saturation at all. It was just a thought, however if the upstream is so narrow your blips could be caused by a burst of load, or even a burst of loss. Those first hop pings are great. Very hard to detect unfortunately. |
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
Quote:
|
Re: 50Mbit Service Upstream Discussion
Here's a nice little quote from Barack Obama's infrastructure investment program relating to investment in broadband:
Quote:
Ouch. |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 19:11. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum