Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

1andrew1 09-02-2021 12:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36069941)
You can't ask for max price when there is no market for your fish, you need to find new markets and price accordingly.
Plus we are in lockdown so restaurants are shut.

Exactly. That's why I was keen to see and extension to the withdrawal agreement for another year so it didn't happen during the pandemic.

jonbxx 09-02-2021 12:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36069938)
They are even further up themselves than calling their foreign minister the "High Representative".

[/COLOR]

I'm reserving judgement until I hear what the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and the Lord President of the Privy Council have to say about it

Chris 09-02-2021 13:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36069945)
I'm reserving judgement until I hear what the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and the Lord President of the Privy Council have to say about it

An interesting comparison. Does the office of High Representative of the EU in London directly embody nearly a thousand years of developing political culture and accountability, in much the same way as these other offices do?

Sephiroth 09-02-2021 14:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
Just got my GHIC (which was requested before Chrimbo).

They could at least have matched the blue to the new passport!

1andrew1 09-02-2021 14:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36069938)
For those beyond the paywall: https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...aign=DM1334686

They are even further up themselves than calling their foreign minister the "High Representative".


The Government seems to be reaping what it sowed here. It had the opportunity to extend the withdrawal agreement so that we didn't end up with a last-minute deal which had to be delivered during the worst pandemic in living memory. But it decided against it.

Chris 09-02-2021 14:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
That great big Union Jack motif will drive the Guardianistas nuts. Imagine them having to produce one of these after they break their big toe while holidaying at their gite.

1andrew1 09-02-2021 14:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36069973)
Just got my GHIC (which was requested before Chrimbo).

They could at least have matched the blue to the new passport!

Unless you use a pot of ink labelled black, you can't match the new "blue" EU-manufactured passports. ;)

Sephiroth 09-02-2021 15:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36069974)
The Government seems to be reaping what it sowed here. It had the opportunity to extend the withdrawal agreement so that we didn't end up with a last-minute deal which had to be delivered during the worst pandemic in living memory. But it decided against it.

I'm almost at the point of losing my patience with you!

Extending the WA would have shovelled ££ billions to the EU, which is exactly what THEY wanted. It would only have put off the day when they'd hit us with their next bit of nastiness.

Far better to have gotten out (it honours the Referendum) and then use the options available as a last resort if we can't overcome these teething problems.

Furthermore, had we extended the WA partly because of the Pandemic, might we not have been in the situation the Brussels is now battling?



1andrew1 09-02-2021 15:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36069986)
I'm almost at the point of losing my patience with you!

Extending the WA would have shovelled ££ billions to the EU, which is exactly what THEY wanted. It would only have put off the day when they'd hit us with their next bit of nastiness.

Far better to have gotten out (it honours the Referendum) and then use the options available as a last resort if we can't overcome these teething problems.

Furthermore, had we extended the WA partly because of the Pandemic, might we not have been in the situation the Brussels is now battling?

If you're genuinely under the impression that we're no longer paying the EU handsomely each year then please look away now! We're paying them £7bn this year, last year we paid them £8bn.

If we'd have extended the withdrawal agreement until 31st December 2021 then I'd like to think the country would be far more normal when it withdrew from the EU than it is now.

That would still have honoured the Referendum result but been more beneficial for the UK's hard-working businesses struggling to cope with the double whammy of the pandemic/home-schooling and Brexit.

jonbxx 09-02-2021 15:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36069969)
An interesting comparison. Does the office of High Representative of the EU in London directly embody nearly a thousand years of developing political culture and accountability, in much the same way as these other offices do?

Nope, been around since 1999 under the Treaty of Amsterdam which we signed but hey, you've got to start at some point

Chris 09-02-2021 16:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36069995)
which we signed

One of the many benefits of leaving the EU is that we no longer have to hold our noses and go along with the stuff we disagree with, in order to enjoy the supposed benefits.

I don’t consider the UK government’s agreement to a treaty between members of a club we are no longer members of, to be binding on current policy - nor even to be relevant. My old job in corporate affairs once, briefly, compelled me to make a case for liberalisation of casino regulations, something with which I was not very comfortable and which I tolerated as only a minor aspect of my job. Thankfully I left that job long ago and I’m free to express the view that casino regulations in the UK need no liberalisation at all.

1andrew1 09-02-2021 17:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Another Brexit jobs bonus for the EU.

Quote:

The boss of JD Sports has said the impact of Brexit has been “considerably worse” than feared and that it plans to open a warehouse site in the EU amid the impact of red tape and delays.

JD Sports said that the warehouse, which will employ about 1,000 staff, could have been built in the UK but will now be within the EU in light of the UK’s exit deal.
https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/new...due-to-brexit/

Pierre 09-02-2021 17:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36070008)
Another Brexit jobs bonus for the EU.


https://www.eveningexpress.co.uk/new...due-to-brexit/

Do you just trawl the internet looking for anti-UK Brexit stories. They exist of course.

You could always balance them out a bit. I know that it would go against your narrative.

(maybe a couple of paywalls)

http://www.infrastructure-intelligen...t-construction

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...g-brexit-boost

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...e-brexit-vote/

https://www.theactuary.com/news/2020...s-after-brexit

https://eandt.theiet.org/content/art...o-brexit-deal/

---------- Post added at 16:45 ---------- Previous post was at 16:43 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36069941)
You can't ask for max price when there is no market for your fish, you need to find new markets and price accordingly.
Plus we are in lockdown so restaurants are shut.

help is on offer.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/2...cheme-now-open

1andrew1 09-02-2021 18:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36070013)
Do you just trawl the internet looking for anti-UK Brexit stories. They exist of course.

You could always balance them out a bit. I know that it would go against your narrative.

(maybe a couple of paywalls)

http://www.infrastructure-intelligen...t-construction

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...g-brexit-boost

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business...e-brexit-vote/

https://www.theactuary.com/news/2020...s-after-brexit

https://eandt.theiet.org/content/art...o-brexit-deal/

---------- Post added at 16:45 ---------- Previous post was at 16:43 ----------



help is on offer.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/2...cheme-now-open

I just post newsworthy items when they make the headlines. I don't travel back to 2020 to find Brexit stories to suit a particular narrative.

I've already posted the jobs boost for Nissan when it happened, not weeks later. Apologies if posting this good news story upset your narrative, I must try harder next time. :D

Sephiroth 10-02-2021 13:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Let us not be in doubt that the EU institutions are under orders to make it difficult for the UK. The evidence is too strong.

1/
Permanently banning our shellfish from being landed in the EU.

2/
The vaccine bru-ha-ha.

3/
The inability of musicians etc to tour the EU.

4/
The diplomatic status spat (we musty not give way - the EU is an International Organisation not a state).

Fortunately, the UK can be difficult on the issuance of fishing licences within our 6 mile limit. It is ridiculous that they can land molluscs caught in our waters but we can't.



1andrew1 10-02-2021 15:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36070091)
Let us not be in doubt that the EU institutions are under orders to make it difficult for the UK. The evidence is too strong.

1/
Permanently banning our shellfish from being landed in the EU.

2/
The vaccine bru-ha-ha.

3/
The inability of musicians etc to tour the EU.

4/
The diplomatic status spat (we musty not give way - the EU is an International Organisation not a state).

Fortunately, the UK can be difficult on the issuance of fishing licences within our 6 mile limit. It is ridiculous that they can land molluscs caught in our waters but we can't.


The British Government declined offers to allow musicians to tour as they said it went against the referendum vote by allowing freedom of movement. Hopefully, with the traditional balance of payments surplus that the UK enjoys in this area BoJo will do a U-turn on this.

The Government signed a rushed deal and our fishermen are suffering as a result. The government's solution is to throw more taxpayer's money in their direction.

pip08456 10-02-2021 16:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36070102)
The British Government declined offers to allow musicians to tour as they said it went against the referendum vote by allowing freedom of movement. Hopefully, with the traditional balance of payments surplus that the UK enjoys in this area BoJo will do a U-turn on this.

The Government signed a rushed deal and our fishermen are suffering as a result. The government's solution is to throw more taxpayer's money in their direction.

Did it?

Quote:

Now, a government spokesperson has denied the claims.

“This story is incorrect and misleading speculation from anonymous EU sources,” a spokesperson told NME. “The UK pushed for a more ambitious agreement with the EU on the temporary movement of business travellers, which would have covered musicians and others, but our proposals were rejected by the EU.”
https://www.nme.com/news/music/uk-go...ans-eu-2852655

jonbxx 10-02-2021 18:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36070091)
Let us not be in doubt that the EU institutions are under orders to make it difficult for the UK. The evidence is too strong.

1/
Permanently banning our shellfish from being landed in the EU.

2/
The vaccine bru-ha-ha.

3/
The inability of musicians etc to tour the EU.

4/
The diplomatic status spat (we musty not give way - the EU is an International Organisation not a state).

Fortunately, the UK can be difficult on the issuance of fishing licences within our 6 mile limit. It is ridiculous that they can land molluscs caught in our waters but we can't.



We should have words with our representative for fisheries when that shellfish ban was decided and brought in back in 2011. It was a Mr Nigel Farage I believe...

nomadking 10-02-2021 18:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I assume all the Eastern European shops(eg Polish) are having difficulty getting their stock into this country? Or are we too soft.

Angua 10-02-2021 18:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36070116)
I assume all the Eastern European shops(eg Polish) are having difficulty getting their stock into this country? Or are we too soft.

At the moment importing from the EU is okay. This will change in April.

papa smurf 10-02-2021 18:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36070116)
I assume all the Eastern European shops(eg Polish) are having difficulty getting their stock into this country? Or are we too soft.

They are our people now, why would we make life difficult for them / we aren't France.

1andrew1 10-02-2021 18:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36070115)
We should have words with our representative for fisheries when that shellfish ban was decided and brought in back in 2011. It was a Mr Nigel Farage I believe...

Good idea. Maybe David Frost can have a word in his shell, like? ;)

---------- Post added at 17:57 ---------- Previous post was at 17:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36070119)
They are our people now, why would we make life difficult for them / we aren't France.

It's British business that we seem to be making things incredibly difficult for. This last-minute deal is fraying at the seams :td:
Quote:

Call for UK to rethink £1bn Brexit red tape plan for chemicals

Letter from 25 industry leaders warns that new regulatory system risks driving business overseas

In a strongly worded letter, seen by the Financial Times, 25 business heads said they remained “extremely concerned” about current plans for a new system of chemicals regulation, and warned it would “hit UK industry hard across a range of manufacturing sectors”.

Boris Johnson’s government is now facing protests from various sectors as the impact of the Brexit trade deal becomes clearer, ranging from musicians to shellfish exporters and traders in Northern Ireland.

But the criticism of plans to set up a British version of “Reach” — the EU system for registering chemicals — pits ministers against a broad swath of manufacturing, from chemical companies to their customers in sectors such as cars, aerospace, food and drink, steel and perfume.

The letter, addressed to ministers including chancellor Rishi Sunak, business secretary Kwasi Kwarteng and environment secretary George Eustice, estimates the cost for complying with the new rules “at around £1bn” and calls on the government to adopt “a more proportionate, effective and efficient” UK Reach model to avoid causing serious harm.“

Perversely, this cost to industry for compliance for one jurisdiction will be double the £500m UK companies have already spent over the past decade in complying with EU Reach and its, now, 27 markets,” the letter adds.

It warns that UK Reach, as currently legislated for, could “lead to potential additional and repetitive animal testing” and that it could become uneconomic to register some lower quantity substances in the UK.
https://www.ft.com/content/b28a44fc-...9-683f174b13be

nomadking 10-02-2021 19:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36070119)
They are our people now, why would we make life difficult for them / we aren't France.

:confused: Why should that mean that Eastern European products, ie EU, can be brought into the UK any easier?

1andrew1 10-02-2021 19:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Import red tape kicks in from April and July this year.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...it-checks-loom

Sephiroth 10-02-2021 20:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I'd better stock up on my sour cucumbers and Polish mustard.


1andrew1 11-02-2021 00:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36070131)
I'd better stock up on my sour cucumbers and Polish mustard.


And your shares. Hopefully, this proves more symbolic than economic.
Quote:

Amsterdam ousts London as Europe’s top share trading hub

UK’s departure from the EU prompts shift in dealing of stocks and derivatives

Amsterdam surpassed London as Europe’s largest share trading centre last month as the Netherlands scooped up business lost by the UK since Brexit.

An average €9.2bn shares a day were traded on Euronext Amsterdam and the Dutch arms of CBOE Europe and Turquoise in January, a more than fourfold increase from December. The surge came as volumes in London fell sharply to €8.6bn, dislodging the UK from its historic position as the main hub for the European market, according to data from CBOE Europe.

The shift was prompted by a ban on EU-based financial institutions trading in London because Brussels has not recognised UK exchanges and trading venues as having the same supervisory status as its own.
https://www.ft.com/content/3dad4ef3-...3-f629a5b7d0aa

jonbxx 11-02-2021 09:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36070131)
I'd better stock up on my sour cucumbers and Polish mustard.


Mmmm, Kabanosy, kielbasa, mustard, pierogi, weird Jaffa Cakes.... I love my local Polish shop!

Sephiroth 11-02-2021 11:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36070162)
Mmmm, Kabanosy, kielbasa, mustard, pierogi, weird Jaffa Cakes.... I love my local Polish shop!

I had the privilege of living there for three years in the 1990s.
My favourite, of course, was the curry house in Warsaw run by a Singaporean with a Polish partner. I used to take coriander to them from the UK in exchange for free meals! Can't do that now.

Chris 12-02-2021 18:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Anticipating Gexit might be a little premature, however the EU’s vaccine debacle hasn’t gone down at all well in the Fatherland, where good opinion of the EU is increasingly hard to find.

Polling was conducted for Der Spiegel: https://www.spiegel.de/politik/ausla...6-3382756eb394 (in German, obvs)

Guido has a summary in English: https://order-order.com/2021/02/12/g...cine-disaster/

OLD BOY 13-02-2021 21:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36070152)
And your shares. Hopefully, this proves more symbolic than economic.

https://www.ft.com/content/3dad4ef3-...3-f629a5b7d0aa

I suspect that Amsterdam's sudden superiority will be quickly displaced. Our new trade deals will include financial services, which will be a huge advantage to us over the EU trade deals, which concentrated on goods only.

1andrew1 14-02-2021 23:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36070496)
I suspect that Amsterdam's sudden superiority will be quickly displaced. Our new trade deals will include financial services, which will be a huge advantage to us over the EU trade deals, which concentrated on goods only.

Which trade deals do you have in mind, Old Boy?

pip08456 15-02-2021 00:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36070699)
Which trade deals do you have in mind, Old Boy?

These ones perhaps?

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/uk-trade...n-eu-countries

1andrew1 15-02-2021 11:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36070704)

Thanks, but I was really looking to hear about trade deals which included financial services.

pip08456 15-02-2021 12:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36070718)
Thanks, but I was really looking to hear about trade deals which included financial services.



No problem.

Quote:

Following the EU-UK withdrawal agreement, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland needed to secure trade deals and financial agreements with other countries to secure trading partners for the future.

So far, fully ratified trade agreements of the United Kingdom have been made with the following countries and took effect from January 1st, 2021:

Costa Rica
El Salvador
Guatemala
Honduras
Nicaragua
Panama
Chile
Côte d’Ivoire
Eastern and Southern Africa trade bloc
Ecuador
Faroe Islands
Georgia
Israel
Japan
Kosovo
Liechtenstein
Moldova
Morocco
Palestinian Authority
South Korea
Southern Africa Customs Union and Mozambique trade bloc
Switzerland
Tunisia
Ukraine

Sephiroth 15-02-2021 12:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I don't see financial services in any of those agreements mentioned in the source site. Switzerland deal includes financial services. Also Brazil, not in the list but:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/u...on%20in%202020.

1andrew1 15-02-2021 19:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36070733)
I don't see financial services in any of those agreements mentioned in the source site. Switzerland deal includes financial services. Also Brazil, not in the list but:
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/u...on%20in%202020.

Agreed, thanks.
I wan't sure which trade deal's Old Boy's statement "Our new trade deals will include financial services" was referring to as these seem to elude many countries.

OLD BOY 15-02-2021 21:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36070699)
Which trade deals do you have in mind, Old Boy?

The government has indicated that they would be looking to include the services sector as part of the new trade deals they negotiate. This was not possible while we were part of the EU.

Talks to improve the agreements with Canada, Norway, Iceland, Mexico and Turkey will commence this year. In the case of Canada, both sides have committed to finalising these negotiations by the end of 2023.

This is a big programme of work which will take a good few years to complete, but clearly the government will prioritise those countries that are likely to allow us to profit the most from including the service sector, including financial services.

The deal we have with Japan includes financial services following recent negotiations, but obviously the rollover agreements do not.

Sephiroth 17-02-2021 11:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I was impressed with yesterday's BBC Newsnight wherein Mark Urban analysed the UK's relationship with the EU and vice-versa: "our friends in Europe" or a "competitor"? His conclusion was that the EU sees the UK as a competitor and if the UK diverges from their rules not to their liking, the EU can invoke penalty clauses in the treaty.

He also considered it likely that the Guvmin will indeed make us more competitive by chipping away at EU red tape and speculated how much of that the EU will "allow" before triggering treaty clauses.

My takeaway from the segment was that Brussels, backed by 27 countries, was afraid of the UK becoming too successful at the EU's expense. "Level playing field" - except with 27 countries they've got a screwed up idea of what that means.

Sod 'em. Btw, if Scotland goes its own way, we'll be even more competitive.



pip08456 17-02-2021 11:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071018)
I was impressed with yesterday's BBC Newsnight wherein Mark Urban analysed the UK's relationship with the EU and vice-versa: "our friends in Europe" or a "competitor"? His conclusion was that the EU sees the UK as a competitor and if the UK diverges from their rules not to their liking, the EU can invoke penalty clauses in the treaty.

He also considered it likely that the Guvmin will indeed make us more competitive by chipping away at EU red tape and speculated how much of that the EU will "allow" before triggering treaty clauses.

My takeaway from the segment was that Brussels, backed by 27 countries, was afraid of the UK becoming too successful at the EU's expense. "Level playing field" - except with 27 countries they've got a screwed up idea of what that means.

Sod 'em. Btw, if Scotland goes its own way, we'll be even more competitive.



We'll save more money.:D

nomadking 17-02-2021 13:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071018)
I was impressed with yesterday's BBC Newsnight wherein Mark Urban analysed the UK's relationship with the EU and vice-versa: "our friends in Europe" or a "competitor"? His conclusion was that the EU sees the UK as a competitor and if the UK diverges from their rules not to their liking, the EU can invoke penalty clauses in the treaty.

He also considered it likely that the Guvmin will indeed make us more competitive by chipping away at EU red tape and speculated how much of that the EU will "allow" before triggering treaty clauses.

My takeaway from the segment was that Brussels, backed by 27 countries, was afraid of the UK becoming too successful at the EU's expense. "Level playing field" - except with 27 countries they've got a screwed up idea of what that means.

Sod 'em. Btw, if Scotland goes its own way, we'll be even more competitive.



Only Germany is allowed to be truly successful. When Germany burdens their businesses with a new rule, eventually it becomes an EU directive and all EU countries are forced to have the same burden.

Sephiroth 17-02-2021 13:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36071030)
Only Germany is allowed to be truly successful. When Germany burdens their businesses with a new rule, eventually it becomes an EU directive and all EU countries are forced to have the same burden.

But the UK now allows itself to be successful. Just needs a government that has focus on this.

On the German point, nothing could be truer. They fiddled the Euro by bringing Greece, Portugal and Italy in, despite their deficits, thus devaluing the DM to lower their production costs without increasing the price of Bratwurst.

We need to cut seriously loose from the EU, although interim "closeness" to our enemy is necessary while we line everything up. Yes, Brussels is our enemy in the non-military sense.



1andrew1 17-02-2021 21:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I think most people have woken up to the fact of increased bureaucracy when exporting to the EU. Indeed, some have given up. But what about that bonfire of EU red tape?

Well, I think most businesses wised up to the fact that there was never such a burden unless you fell into a dark Daily Express rabbit hole and started believing everything it told you to believe. And the Government has now accepted business's viewpoint.
Quote:

Boris Johnson’s adviser on regulatory reform, Iain Duncan Smith, has said he will not lead a “slash-and-burn exercise” when it comes to changing Britain’s post-Brexit rules.

Duncan Smith’s comments chime with warnings from business leaders that they do not want the UK prime minister to oversee a “bonfire” of EU red tape and instead want to see him focus on ensuring the government becomes “nimbler” at making new rules.
https://www.ft.com/content/63d443ff-...c-8085426e7640

Sephiroth 17-02-2021 21:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36071063)
I think most people have woken up to the fact of increased bureaucracy when exporting to the EU. Indeed, some have given up. But what about that bonfire of EU red tape?

Well, I think most businesses wised up to the fact that there was never such a burden unless you fell into a dark Daily Express rabbit hole and started believing everything it told you to believe. And the Government has now accepted business's viewpoint.

https://www.ft.com/content/63d443ff-...c-8085426e7640

So what was all the level playing field stuff about? The EU wants to stop us being a successful competitor.

1andrew1 17-02-2021 21:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071064)
So what was all the level playing field stuff about? The EU wants to stop us being a successful competitor.

Boris now knows better than to pretend the UK's going to be the sweat shop of Europe and meeting that criteria should always be easy for the UK. It might be something we need to challenge the EU on if some EU countries don't follow it too.

I obviously disagree with your second sentence.

Sephiroth 17-02-2021 23:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36071067)
Boris now knows better than to pretend the UK's going to be the sweat shop of Europe and meeting that criteria should always be easy for the UK. It might be something we need to challenge the EU on if some EU countries don't follow it too.

I obviously disagree with your second sentence.

I'm shocked at your second sentence The EU wants to stop us being a successful competitor and the evidence stares you in the face.
The fish business - we can't land molluscs; they won't grant financial equivalence even though that equivalence is baked into our current legislation and regulations - to name just two. Plus the treaty terms on which they insisted regarding diversion from their rules. What evidence is there to the contrary of my assertion?

Your first paragraph is plain ridiculous (red highlight). You introduce a straw man of what Boris is not doing, and a far fetched straw man at that.

What a pity that you've got nothing better to say. Sorry.

1andrew1 18-02-2021 00:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071073)
I'm shocked at your second sentence The EU wants to stop us being a successful competitor and the evidence stares you in the face.
The fish business - we can't land molluscs; they won't grant financial equivalence even though that equivalence is baked into our current legislation and regulations - to name just two. Plus the treaty terms on which they insisted regarding diversion from their rules. What evidence is there to the contrary of my assertion?

Your first paragraph is plain ridiculous (red highlight). You introduce a straw man of what Boris is not doing, and a far fetched straw man at that.

What a pity that you've got nothing better to say. Sorry.

We need to understand and accept the new trading reality with the EU, whether it's what Raab etc promised us or not. If anyone believed that the EU would roll over and give the UK a deal that made it economically beneficial to leave then I'm sure that time has long passed.

Regarding molluscs, this comes from a phytosanitary standard for imported bi-valve shellfish that is implemented globally. The US, Japan, etc have the same rules.

Bi-valve shellfish are filter-feeders. They suck in water, extract the nutrients, expel it. As I'm sure you know, eating bad shellfish from poor waters always ends badly. This can be prevented by depuration. When the UK was a member of the EU, it was very happy for the EU to require pre-import depuration of imported shellfish from Class 2 waters. Firstly, because it was a good idea on health grounds, and secondly, it benefited UK bi-valve shellfish producers and penalised those from outside the EU.

However, we were not awake enough to grasp that once outside the EU Customs Union, UK shellfish in the EU would be imported and hence we have to perform certified depuration to enable the shellfish to be exported.

The EU is a big trading partner on our doorstep but also a competitor. Obviously, it will work in its member countries' best interests. Signing a trade deal for manufactured goods which the EU has a surplus on does not grant us equivalence in services which we have a surplus on. If the EU can nab some of that business for itself then it will.

I advise you review my sentence about Boris. No strawman there but let me expand. Boris knows that we're a high-cost, high-value country. There's no point trying to slash legislation and become a low-cost country. Hence, achieving a level-playing field is not a problem for the UK so not a tough point to yield on.

Angua 18-02-2021 09:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36071075)
We need to understand and accept the new trading reality with the EU, whether it's what Raab etc promised us or not. If anyone believed that the EU would roll over and give the UK a deal that made it economically beneficial to leave then I'm sure that time has long passed.

Regarding molluscs, this comes from a phytosanitary standard for imported bi-valve shellfish that is implemented globally. The US, Japan, etc have the same rules.

Bi-valve shellfish are filter-feeders. They suck in water, extract the nutrients, expel it. As I'm sure you know, eating bad shellfish from poor waters always ends badly. This can be prevented by depuration. When the UK was a member of the EU, it was very happy for the EU to require pre-import depuration of imported shellfish from Class 2 waters. Firstly, because it was a good idea on health grounds, and secondly, it benefited UK bi-valve shellfish producers and penalised those from outside the EU.

However, we were not awake enough to grasp that once outside the EU Customs Union, UK shellfish in the EU would be imported and hence we have to perform certified depuration to enable the shellfish to be exported.

The EU is a big trading partner on our doorstep but also a competitor. Obviously, it will work in its member countries' best interests. Signing a trade deal for manufactured goods which the EU has a surplus on does not grant us equivalence in services which we have a surplus on. If the EU can nab some of that business for itself then it will.

I advise you review my sentence about Boris. No strawman there but let me expand. Boris knows that we're a high-cost, high-value country. There's no point trying to slash legislation and become a low-cost country. Hence, achieving a level-playing field is not a problem for the UK so not a tough point to yield on.

One example of the high cost, high value is in Mobile phone waterproofing. The R&D is done here in the UK, whilst manufacture is in Wuhan. Problem is, this does not create many jobs in the UK.

jonbxx 18-02-2021 09:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071073)
I'm shocked at your second sentence The EU wants to stop us being a successful competitor and the evidence stares you in the face.
The fish business - we can't land molluscs; they won't grant financial equivalence even though that equivalence is baked into our current legislation and regulations - to name just two. Plus the treaty terms on which they insisted regarding diversion from their rules. What evidence is there to the contrary of my assertion?

Your first paragraph is plain ridiculous (red highlight). You introduce a straw man of what Boris is not doing, and a far fetched straw man at that.

What a pity that you've got nothing better to say. Sorry.

We specifically rejected equivalence with EU rules to much cheering if I remember - sovereignty and all that. That means we are a third country and are being treated as such.

The EU is by its very nature a protectionist organisation with rules which favour its' member states and businesses within. The UK electorate voted to reject the protection of the single market both at the referendum and subsequent general elections. It's what the majority of the public wanted

Sephiroth 18-02-2021 10:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36071075)
We need to understand and accept the new trading reality with the EU, whether it's what Raab etc promised us or not. If anyone believed that the EU would roll over and give the UK a deal that made it economically beneficial to leave then I'm sure that time has long passed.

Regarding molluscs, this comes from a phytosanitary standard for imported bi-valve shellfish that is implemented globally. The US, Japan, etc have the same rules.

Bi-valve shellfish are filter-feeders. They suck in water, extract the nutrients, expel it. As I'm sure you know, eating bad shellfish from poor waters always ends badly. This can be prevented by depuration. When the UK was a member of the EU, it was very happy for the EU to require pre-import depuration of imported shellfish from Class 2 waters. Firstly, because it was a good idea on health grounds, and secondly, it benefited UK bi-valve shellfish producers and penalised those from outside the EU.

However, we were not awake enough to grasp that once outside the EU Customs Union, UK shellfish in the EU would be imported and hence we have to perform certified depuration to enable the shellfish to be exported.

The EU is a big trading partner on our doorstep but also a competitor. Obviously, it will work in its member countries' best interests. Signing a trade deal for manufactured goods which the EU has a surplus on does not grant us equivalence in services which we have a surplus on. If the EU can nab some of that business for itself then it will.

I advise you review my sentence about Boris. No strawman there but let me expand. Boris knows that we're a high-cost, high-value country. There's no point trying to slash legislation and become a low-cost country. Hence, achieving a level-playing field is not a problem for the UK so not a tough point to yield on.

The EU catches molluscs in the same waters as we do and it seems illogical that they should impose rules on our catches that are not imposed on theirs.

After all, the EU has made much of the special case of the UK's proximity to the EU. Molluscs should come into that category for obvious reasons. The fact that it doesn't is evidence of the EU's intent on punishing the UK for Brexit.

They are the enemy. Simples - and your advocacy does you no favours.



Hugh 18-02-2021 10:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
And your vitriol does you none - they, like us, want the best deals; does that make us their ‘enemy", or just competitors?

We wanted to be a "third country" - we are being treated as one.

1andrew1 18-02-2021 11:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071088)
The EU catches molluscs in the same waters as we do and it seems illogical that they should impose rules on our catches that are not imposed on theirs.

After all, the EU has made much of the special case of the UK's proximity to the EU. Molluscs should come into that category for obvious reasons. The fact that it doesn't is evidence of the EU's intent on punishing the UK for Brexit.

They are the enemy. Simples - and your advocacy does you no favours.


No advocacy going on here, Seph, more of a humble messenger being shot for his efforts at providing some information.

If it wasn't in the deal, it wasn't in the deal. Simples. In practice, I'm sure George Eustice knows this and is prepared to accept a bit of small restructuring in the fishing sector. If a few people blame it on the EU, even better!

Higher-value molluscs from better quality UK waters are not impacted by the requirement that molluscs in Class 2 waters are and these account for most of our mollusc exports. But yes, we had over time to build the depuration plants before 31 December but did not.

1andrew1 18-02-2021 13:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I'm not sure that this will go down well with the newly appointed EU Minister Lord Frost despite its strong backing.
Quote:

Restart Brexit talks because UK is ‘less safe and less secure’, Tory group tells Boris Johnson

‘Every day that passes is storing up problems ... the government cannot simply cross its fingers and hope’

Talks to rebuild security cooperation with the EU must restart now after the Brexit deal left the UK “less safe and less secure”, a Conservative group says.
Boris Johnson is accused of “not being ambitious enough” after the agreement shut down access to vital criminal databases, including records of stolen identities and wanted people.

Ejection from the European Arrest Warrant system means “some criminals will not be extradited”, while leaving Europol means the UK will lose crucial influence, a report says.

Significantly, it has been carried out for the Conservative European Forum (CEF) – led by Tory heavyweights David Lidington and Dominic Grieve – and written by a former head of the Bar Council.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b1803583.html

Pierre 18-02-2021 13:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36071116)
I'm not sure that this will go down well with the newly appointed EU Minister Lord Frost despite its strong backing.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...-b1803583.html

Rabid Brexiteers Dominic Grieve and David Lidington

1andrew1 18-02-2021 13:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36071120)
Rabid Brexiteers Dominic Grieve and David Lidington

I'd never call any Brexiter rabid :angel: but I get the impression that this wing of the Conservative Party is opposite to the ERG wing. ;)

Hom3r 18-02-2021 14:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
LOL
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/13...urvey-research


I buy British were possible.

Hugh 18-02-2021 14:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36071131)

https://internetretailing.net/intern...-surveys-22692

Quote:

UK shoppers have started to avoid buying from EU retailers since the Brexit transition period ended, a new poll suggests. More than a third (34%) of UK shoppers questioned in a poll said they had had stopped buying goods and services from the EU following the end of the post-Brexit transition period.

Specialist technology PR and marketing agency Eskenzi PR & Marketing questioned 1,000 UK adults in early February 2021 via Censuswide. It found that since December 31, when the post-Brexit transition period came to an end and the UK started to trade under the new terms of new UK/EU deal, shoppers were less likely to want to buy from an EU-based retailer.

Almost a quarter (24%) of respondents aged between 16 and 24 said they were put off buying cross-border by increased costs, while 26% said their decision was as a result of increased delays.

“Following all the bad publicity around buying products from the EU post-Brexit, it is clearly having an impact on consumer buying habits”, says Yvonne Eskenzi, co-founder, and director at Eskenzi PR. “It is evident to see that UK consumers are being put off buying goods from the EU due to the various complications Brexit has created. We can only hope that this is a temporary measure. Post-Brexit Britain is still in its embryonic stage, and the true nature of our new relationship will have to be measured across the course of the following months – and indeed, years.”

Sephiroth 18-02-2021 15:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Post-Brexit Britain is still in its embryonic stage, and the true nature of our new relationship will have to be measured across the course of the following months – and indeed, years.
This will be a sign to UK entrepreneurs to seize the opportunity of plugging the goods gap. This should make the EU as third "country" as we are to the EU.

All I ask now is that they are not referred to as "our friends in Europe". It is a hollow term in the political context.

OLD BOY 18-02-2021 15:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
With friends like them, who needs enemies? I think there should be another government campaign to buy British. That will not only hurt the EU in the pocket, it would help to recoup some of our losses on this deal, before we forge new and better relationships with the rest of the world.

Hom3r 18-02-2021 15:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36071133)


I do the food shop for me and my dad, I just buy what I want, and will happily pay more for British goods, the only real time I look at cost is if there are offers etc.

1andrew1 18-02-2021 15:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36071141)
I do the food shop for me and my dad, I just buy what I want, and will happily pay more for British goods, the only real time I look at cost is if there are offers etc.

What about your car, phone, laptop, TV, wine and clothes?

Sephiroth 18-02-2021 16:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36071148)
What about your car, phone, laptop, TV, wine and clothes?


Cars: Japanese
Phones: Not made in the EU
Laptops: Not made in the EU
Clothes: Not made in the EU
Wine: No longer from the EU
TV: Japanese

Cheese: Not made in the EU
Gherkins: Polish
Mustard: Polish

Salami: Stopped eating
Fruit: Not from the EU

Daily Telegraph: A reasonable newspaper.


Hugh 18-02-2021 16:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 36071141)
I do the food shop for me and my dad, I just buy what I want, and will happily pay more for British goods, the only real time I look at cost is if there are offers etc.

The survey wasn’t about food shopping, it was about buying goods direct from the EU, not about buying EU goods already in our stores...

Re food shopping, I agree with you - I try to buy British, and even then, local foodstuffs if possible.

Haven’t found anywhere in Yorkshire growing bananas, pineapples, and citrus fruit, though... ;)

---------- Post added at 15:03 ---------- Previous post was at 15:02 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071155)

Cars: Japanese
Phones: Not made in the EU
Laptops: Not made in the EU
Clothes: Not made in the EU
Wine: No longer from the EU
TV: Japanese

Cheese: Not made in the EU
Gherkins: Polish
Mustard: Polish

Salami: Stopped eating
Fruit: Not from the EU

Daily Telegraph: A reasonable newspaper.


You were doing so well until then... :D

btw, if you’re using Google, the data centres that you use are in the EU (Ireland, Belgium, Netherlands, & Finland)....

Sephiroth 18-02-2021 17:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36071156)
<SNIP>

You were doing so well until then... :D

btw, if you’re using Google, the data centres that you use are in the EU (Ireland, Belgium, Netherlands, & Finland)....

You got me there, Squire.

Pierre 18-02-2021 17:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36071156)
btw, if you’re using Google, the data centres that you use are in the EU (Ireland, Belgium, Netherlands, & Finland)....

That's an extremely simplistic way to view things. Not wrong, just very simplistic.

Hugh 18-02-2021 18:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071155)

Cars: Japanese
Phones: Not made in the EU
Laptops: Not made in the EU
Clothes: Not made in the EU
Wine: No longer from the EU
TV: Japanese

Cheese: Not made in the EU
Gherkins: Polish
Mustard: Polish

Salami: Stopped eating
Fruit: Not from the EU

Daily Telegraph: A reasonable newspaper.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36071156)
The survey wasn’t about food shopping, it was about buying goods direct from the EU, not about buying EU goods already in our stores...

Re food shopping, I agree with you - I try to buy British, and even then, local foodstuffs if possible.

Haven’t found anywhere in Yorkshire growing bananas, pineapples, and citrus fruit, though... ;)

---------- Post added at 15:03 ---------- Previous post was at 15:02 ----------



You were doing so well until then... :D

btw, if you’re using Google, the data centres that you use are in the EU (Ireland, Belgium, Netherlands, & Finland)....

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36071171)
That's an extremely simplistic way to view things. Not wrong, just very simplistic.

You're absolutely right - I could have pointed out that 1.64 million Japanese cars were made in Europe in 2019 (as very few of the bigger-selling Japanese vehicles are built in Japan and exported to the UK), so there is a reasonable likelyhood his car was made there (and if it was made in the UK, there would have been a lot of European-manufactured parts in it).

I could have pointed out that most Japanese makes of TVs are built in Europe (Sony in Slovakia, LG in Poland, Samsung in Hungary & Slovakia, Panasonic in the Czech Republic).

If he has a Dell laptop, it will have been built in Limerick.

But I didn't, because, after all, it was just a throwaway joke line, so I thought a "not wrong, just very simplistic" answer was more appropriate... ;)

joglynne 19-02-2021 12:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Friday 19 February 2021 10:53, UK

Quote:

NatWest posts pre-tax loss of £351m and announces exit from Ireland
The bank will wind down its under-performing Irish arm Ulster Bank, after concluding it would not achieve sustainable returns.
https://news.sky.com/story/natwest-p...eland-12222377

Hom3r 19-02-2021 12:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36071148)
What about your car, phone, laptop, TV, wine and clothes?


Well my A Ford Kuga I bought from new and is 18 months old


Phone was bought at release (Note 10+ 5G)


Laptop no need to replace ATM



TV no need to replace ATM


Wine Nope, spirit drinkers here, yes I do have 22 different brands my favourite is Chase Vodka which is made from British potatoes. we do drink British beer and Cider.


Yes some items are not British but as I have said I buy British if I can.

1andrew1 21-02-2021 14:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Some good insight from fisherman Tom Haward on the shellfish situation.
Quote:

The phrase, ‘EU shellfish ban,’ keeps being used by news outlets and it’s important to understand how this language is misleading and how Government is deliberately using misinformation to hide from its own failures.

As a producer of live animals (oysters) who sells them on for human consumption, there are, quite rightly, rigorous standards we must meet to ensure what we sell is safe for people to eat. One of the most important factors in this process is the issue of water quality. If water quality is really poor (high amounts of sewage or rubbish dumped), animals like oysters will absorb the dangerous bacteria and make them unsafe to harvest.

There are 3 grades of water quality for shellfish production: Grades, A, B & C. These grades were determined through when we were part of the EU. Simply, grade A waters are excellent and you don’t have to purify shellfish from these waters (some of our waters where we grow out oysters are A). Grade B water means shellfish has to be purified before it can be sold for human consumption; most waters in the UK are B. The purpose of the grades is to ensure we use due diligence in our treatment of shellfish. It’s not a perfect system but it works.

As part of a large multi-country community we were effectively able to sell grade B shellfish unpurified to our neighbours where they would perform the process of purification before selling it on. Ideal if you harvested shellfish but didn’t have a purification centre.

At least 2 years ago I noticed (along with others in industry) that if we were no longer part of the EU then as a 3rd country our food standards would no longer align, legally, and we wouldn’t be able to export grade B, unpurified shellfish. This was raised with government figures as a major concern. It was obviously ignored. We (the UK) helped establish these EU regulations to have a consistent approach for easy, free flowing trade of shellfish. I said a no deal or equivalent would result n this catastrophe if it wasn’t looked at.

George Eustice is lying when he says it was a surprise and when it is being peddled as an ‘overnight ban’. When he was fisheries minister he was aware of these worries. If I saw this coming then Johnson, et al should have. The UK helped write the regulations government are now claiming they have been side swiped by. We are in this mess because those elected to serve us were too lazy and arrogant to read the small print because they wanted adulation without the work.
https://twitter.com/HawardTom

Even the Express is acknowledging the reality.
Quote:

BORIS JOHNSON refused to rule out a trade war with Brussels if it didn't back down on its live shellfish ban - but it appears Britain voted for the law behind these restrictions in 2008.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/13...is-johnson-spt

pip08456 21-02-2021 15:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36071500)
Some good insight from fisherman Tom Haward on the shellfish situation.

https://twitter.com/HawardTom

Even the Express is acknowledging the reality.

https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/13...is-johnson-spt

So let me get this right.

Over 2 years ago the shellfish producers knew they wouldn't be able to export to the EU without purification plants and they sat back, did nothing.

1andrew1 21-02-2021 16:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36071507)
So let me get this right.

Over 2 years ago the shellfish producers knew they wouldn't be able to export to the EU without purification plants and they sat back, did nothing.

Per Tom Haward's post - they ceryainly didn't do nothing!

Hugh 21-02-2021 16:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36071507)
So let me get this right.

Over 2 years ago the shellfish producers knew they wouldn't be able to export to the EU without purification plants and they sat back, did nothing.

No - as Tom Haward says in another tweet

https://twitter.com/HawardTom/status...783184898?s=20
Quote:

Hi James, yes that’s right. Any unpurified bivalve molluscs (oysters, mussels, clams etc) from Grade B areas have to be depurated for 42 hours before they can be sold to eat in the UK. We have tanks which can do up to 15000 oysters at a time.
However

https://twitter.com/mafevema/status/...232412673?s=20

Quote:

So, the oysters from B waters sold for consumption whether in the UK or EU are purified. Is it also true that they should be purified as close as possible to consumption because after purification they deteriorate more quickly?

Yes purified as close as possible to point of sale for that reason
His anger is at the Minister saying this is a surprise, when it was known about two years ago.

Sephiroth 21-02-2021 16:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
It's a pity that politicians (except, of course, John Redwood), are consummate liars.


1andrew1 21-02-2021 17:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071517)
It's a pity that politicians (except, of course, John Redwood), are consummate liars.


Did he really believe that his statement "the UK holds most of the cards" was true?

“Getting out of the EU can be quick and easy – the UK holds most of the cards.” John Redwood, Conservative MP, July 2016.

Hugh 21-02-2021 17:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071517)
It's a pity that politicians (except, of course, John Redwood), are consummate liars.


Yes, about that...

John Redwood from his "Diary"

Quote:

Eskenzi PR and Marketing put out a press release yesterday reporting a sampled survey of 1000 people. They said that one third of those asked had stopped buying EU goods. Reasons given included extra costs and delays in getting the goods into the UK and an unwillingness to buy EU goods given the attitude of the EU to trade with us in recent months.
The actual press release

Quote:

LONDON, UK, February 4th 2021 – Eskenzi PR & Marketing, a leading voice in the cybersecurity public relations industry has today announced the results of a survey, which found that over a third (34%) of UK consumers have stopped purchasing goods and services from the European Union since the UK officially left the world’s largest trading block at midnight on the 31st December 2020.

Since this historic change in the relationship between Europe and the UK, stories have circulated – anecdotally and in the media – about the changing relationship between EU retailers and British consumers, with Mastercard reportedly hiking fees on UK consumers purchasing goods from the EU, and the Guardian reporting in January about £100 custom bills for UK consumers. However, these survey results indicate that the mass exodus of UK consumers from Europe appears to be moving at a slower rate than many experts predicted.

“Following all the bad publicity around buying products from the EU post-Brexit, it is clearly having an impact on consumer buying habits”, said Yvonne Eskenzi, co-founder, and Director at Eskenzi PR. “It is evident to see that UK consumers are being put off buying goods from the EU due to the various complications Brexit has created. We can only hope that this is a temporary measure: Post-Brexit Britain is still in its embryonic stage, and the true nature of our new relationship will have to be measured across the course of the following months – and indeed, years.”

The survey also revealed the following trends:

Costs and delays were the biggest concern for younger consumers, with 24% of 16–24-year-olds suggesting an increase in cost had put them off, and 26% suggesting increased delays were behind the decision to stop shopping with Europe.

Men appeared to take a more ‘combative’ stance to EU relations than women, with nearly double the men indicating they would not buy EU goods for ‘ideological reasons’ as opposed to their female counterparts.
Nothing in the Press Release about "an unwillingness to buy EU goods given the attitude of the EU to trade with us in recent months".

Sounds like Redwood is not an exception... ;)

1andrew1 21-02-2021 20:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Another Brexit bonus for the EU.
Quote:

Sussex medicines firm takes production line abroad in white van to beat Brexit ban

UK assembly line at standstill as pharmaceutical company sets up in Amsterdam and plans EU expansion

A Sussex pharmaceutical company has told how it had to bundle a production line into a white van and take it to Amsterdam to beat a Brexit medicines ban.

The impromptu four-wheeled mission to the Netherlands has secured the supply of the asthma drug Ventolin for France, where the company, Mediwin, had a huge order book.

Lisa Cooke, its finance director, said the company had been preparing for Brexit since the referendum but had not counted on an overnight block on wholesale distribution from the UK into EU member states.

“It was a bit of a white-knuckle ride a couple of weeks ago. We had stockpiled supplies, particularly of Ventolin because it was being sold in huge quantities in France and we were getting anxious that we would run out,” she said. “So our production manager hired a van and took five machines – which was essentially one production line – to the Netherlands. He got the line up and running. We’ve rented an apartment and got six people working over there now. And so far we’ve hired 15 people in the Netherlands and they want another 10 or 11.”

Under the EU single market freedoms known as “parallel distribution”, Mediwin was allowed to buy drugs for a range of conditions, including type 2 diabetes, glaucoma and atrial fibrillation, from one member state and repackage them for another member state at lower prices.

In a blow to the British company, production lines in Littlehampton are now at near standstill while assembly ramps up in the Netherlands. Further expansion will take place in Spain and other EU countries.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...eat-brexit-ban

nomadking 22-02-2021 02:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
And the EU have the gall to refuse UK produced food.
Link

Quote:

Almost 400 people have fallen ill with Salmonella since the start of the year in the United Kingdom after eating frozen chicken products.
...

There have been 327 people sick in England, 32 in Scotland, 26 in Wales and five in Northern Ireland.
For cases where information is available, 36 percent needed hospital treatment and four people have died. However, it is not known whether Salmonella infection was a contributory factor in the deaths, and one fatality was attributed to COVID-19.
...
Raw material for the products came from Poland and they were distributed to Brunei, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Falkland Islands, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Guernsey, Ireland, Israel, Jersey, Malta, Norway, Saint Helena, Saudi Arabia Spain and Thailand.

And that's just in the UK.
Perhaps if the EU allowed chlorinated washing.

Sephiroth 22-02-2021 08:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Good one, Nomad. You will have sent Andrew off on a hunt for more half empty news to post here.

1andrew1 22-02-2021 10:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071567)
Good one, Nomad. You will have sent Andrew off on a hunt for more half empty news to post here.

I hope the poor guy got some sleep in the end after spending half the night searching for an irrelevant article.

---------- Post added at 09:24 ---------- Previous post was at 09:09 ----------

Fingers crossed this works out the way that Nissan did.
Quote:

Ministers enter intensive meetings in bid to save 800 jobs at Vauxhall's Ellesmere Port plant in Cheshire

Ministers have entered intensive meetings in a bid to save 800 jobs at Vauxhall's Ellesmere Port plant in Cheshire.
Senior executives at Stellantis, Vauxhall's parent company, will decide the future of the plant tomorrow, marking a critical moment for Britain's post-Brexit manufacturing.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/othe...rtan-ntp-feeds

Sephiroth 22-02-2021 10:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Might this Vauxhall problem have happened anyway, COVID and all that?

I’m assuming, rightly, of course, that Andrew is still in I told you so mode.




Chris 22-02-2021 11:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
The Ellesmere Port plant has been “at risk” every single time it’s needed re-tooled for a new Astra, going back decades. The heart of GM’s strategy in Europe was always the Opel brand, and Ellesmere Port and Luton were the symbolic last remnants of Vauxhall. Now, the new parent company has changed and Covid has slaughtered the economy. Plus, even if we were still in the EU, there are generous ‘structural funds’ (a.k.a. ‘Bribes’) available to suck these sorts of manufacturing jobs eastwards. If they do announce it’s shutting I have no doubt the usual suspects will greet the news with barely concealed glee and insist it proves them right about Brexit. The Portuguese former Renault COO who now runs Stellantis may even use it as a convenient excuse. The facts will of course speak otherwise.

nomadking 22-02-2021 11:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Sales of electric cars are included in the EU trade deal, so not affected by Brexit.
Link

Quote:

However, Ellesmere Port could still be used to build an electric or hybrid version of the new car.
Mr Tavares said he welcomed the trade agreement reached between the UK and the EU - and added that the terms of the deal meant electric cars could now be built in the UK or in continental Europe.
On paper, he said, it might make more sense to invest in Europe, because "the biggest market is on the continental Europe side".
Quote:

However, the government's decision to ban the sale of new petrol and diesel cars from 2030 - with the exception of some hybrids - has impacted that decision.
"If governments create situations that destroy the business model, we stop investing of course", said Mr Tavares.
"If we are told that in 2030 internal combustion engines cannot be sold in the UK - which we respect as a decision from the country - then are not going to invest in internal combustion engines any more. Because that makes no sense", he added.

1andrew1 22-02-2021 11:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071571)
Might this Vauxhall problem have happened anyway, COVID and all that?

I’m assuming, rightly, of course, that Andrew is still in I told you so mode.


People will condemn opinions as Captain Hindsight or told you so.

I'm optimistic on Ellesmere Port, Seph, if Nissan is anything to go by. The fact that we're in discussions is very positive. The proposed battery factory at Coventry might just tip things.

1andrew1 22-02-2021 13:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36071577)
The Ellesmere Port plant has been “at risk” every single time it’s needed re-tooled for a new Astra, going back decades. The heart of GM’s strategy in Europe was always the Opel brand, and Ellesmere Port and Luton were the symbolic last remnants of Vauxhall. Now, the new parent company has changed and Covid has slaughtered the economy. Plus, even if we were still in the EU, there are generous ‘structural funds’ (a.k.a. ‘Bribes’) available to suck these sorts of manufacturing jobs eastwards. If they do announce it’s shutting I have no doubt the usual suspects will greet the news with barely concealed glee and insist it proves them right about Brexit. The Portuguese former Renault COO who now runs Stellantis may even use it as a convenient excuse. The facts will of course speak otherwise.

Don't know who these usual suspects are - and I thought we'd all been told not to use this term?

I'm hopeful as Stellantis has previously said the merger between PSA and FCA was not about closing plants. The UK is a big market for the company. Let's see how things develop.

Sephiroth 22-02-2021 14:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36071593)
Don't know who these usual suspects are - and I thought we'd all been told not to use this term?

I'm hopeful as Stellantis has previously said the merger between PSA and FCA was not about closing plants. The UK is a big market for the company. Let's see how things develop.

"Hopeful" at this stage is as good as it gets. They will have to assess the sales volumes of product brought in from the EU vs product made here by one of he other motor manufacturers, including the Japanese plants.
Indeed we might see the Stellantis plants taken over by Nissan, for example.

TheDaddy 22-02-2021 15:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36071565)
And that's just in the UK.
Perhaps if the EU allowed chlorinated washing.

It'd be even worse, hundreds of Americans die each year because their food hygiene is so abysmal

1andrew1 22-02-2021 16:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071599)
"Hopeful" at this stage is as good as it gets. They will have to assess the sales volumes of product brought in from the EU vs product made here by one of he other motor manufacturers, including the Japanese plants.
Indeed we might see the Stellantis plants taken over by Nissan, for example.

Nissan's reducing capacity in Europe, not expanding. The Honda site in Swindon is up for grabs if anyone needs a new car manufacturing site.

spiderplant 22-02-2021 19:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36071613)
It'd be even worse, hundreds of Americans die each year because their food hygiene is so abysmal

"It is estimated that each year FBD [food-borne disease] causes approximately 5,000 deaths in the USA and 718 deaths in England and Wales" (Source: WHO)

So adjusting for population size, not much different.

Chris 22-02-2021 19:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by spiderplant (Post 36071639)
"It is estimated that each year FBD [food-borne disease] causes approximately 5,000 deaths in the USA and 718 deaths in England and Wales" (Source: WHO)

So adjusting for population size, not much different.

On the contrary, that death rate is quite significantly worse in the USA. If you scale up the England/Wales rate to the size of the USA's population it equates to a little under 4,000 deaths, which is 20% lower than the USA.

nomadking 22-02-2021 19:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36071613)
It'd be even worse, hundreds of Americans die each year because their food hygiene is so abysmal

That's from their cooking practices more than anything. IE Not washing hands properly or cooking it properly.


The Poland issue caused an increase in UK cases and also involved cases in other countries the Polish chicken was exported to.
Quote:

Raw material for the products came from Poland and they were distributed to Brunei, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Falkland Islands, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Guernsey, Ireland, Israel, Jersey, Malta, Norway, Saint Helena, Saudi Arabia Spain and Thailand.
Now include the cases from those countries.

pip08456 22-02-2021 22:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I'm (not) surprised Andrew hasn't post this yet.

Quote:

About 1,000 EU finance firms are eyeing up opening offices in the UK for the first time, according to financial consultancy Bovill.

A Freedom of Information (FOI) request by the firm found that 1,500 money managers, payment firms and insurers have applied for permission to continue operating in the UK after Brexit.

Around two-thirds had no prior physical operations in Britain, it said.

It suggests London "is set to remain a key global financial centre", it added.
https://www.bbc.com/news/business-56...medium=custom7

Sephiroth 22-02-2021 23:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Remainers tend to be half-empty as in I-told-you-so. Sometimes they put in the odd bit of non-bad news but quickly revert to type.

I'd like to know how Lord Frost is getting on with sorting out GB to NI goods traffic? To my mind this is an Article 16 matter for which there is a due process.

TheDaddy 23-02-2021 05:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36071643)
That's from their cooking practices more than anything. IE Not washing hands properly or cooking it properly.

I watched a channel 4 documentary called the truth about chlorinated chicken the other day, the thing I took from it is if we let it in there is no way we couldn't drop our standards here to compete with them, the practices from handling the meat, to conditions in the factory for cleanliness and opportunities for cross contamination are not things we should tolerate here under any circumstances and that's without even mentioning how the staff are treated

papa smurf 23-02-2021 09:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36071666)
Remainers tend to be half-empty as in I-told-you-so. Sometimes they put in the odd bit of non-bad news but quickly revert to type.

I'd like to know how Lord Frost is getting on with sorting out GB to NI goods traffic? To my mind this is an Article 16 matter for which there is a due process.

Yes he does ;)

tweetiepooh 23-02-2021 11:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Animal husbandry in the US is among the worst in the world. Why, even if safe, would we want to promote that?

Pierre 23-02-2021 12:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36071703)
Animal husbandry

Disgusting! must be a California thing, it wouldn't happen in the bible belt.........

papa smurf 23-02-2021 12:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36071707)
Disgusting! must be a California thing, it wouldn't happen in the bible belt.........

Live and let live ;)

Chris 23-02-2021 12:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36071707)
Disgusting! must be a California thing, it wouldn't happen in the bible belt.........

No, they prefer their cousins down there

Chris 24-02-2021 23:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36071593)
Don't know who these usual suspects are - and I thought we'd all been told not to use this term?

I'm hopeful as Stellantis has previously said the merger between PSA and FCA was not about closing plants. The UK is a big market for the company. Let's see how things develop.

As predicted (by me), a little more clarity on the Vauxhall Ellesmere Port situation shows it has naff-all to do with Brexit.

The issue is the UK government ban on new ICE-engine cars after 2030. This means for the factory to have a long-term future it must be re-tooled to produce entirely new electric vehicles, and the problem with electric vehicle manufacturing is the batteries. They’re big, they’re heavy and they’re difficult to transport. They’re actually covered by the Brexit trade deal for manufacture in the EU, transport to the UK for fitting in new cars and then re-export to EU markets, but the logistics make this largely moot. You can’t even put them through the channel tunnel for safety reasons.

The biggest question mark over the entire automotive industry in the UK is how quickly battery production can be scaled up, in factories within the UK, close enough to the vehicle assembly plants to mitigate the transport problems.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-56190072

1andrew1 25-02-2021 00:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36071848)
As predicted (by me), a little more clarity on the Vauxhall Ellesmere Port situation shows it has naff-all to do with Brexit.

The issue is the UK government ban on new ICE-engine cars after 2030. This means for the factory to have a long-term future it must be re-tooled to produce entirely new electric vehicles, and the problem with electric vehicle manufacturing is the batteries. They’re big, they’re heavy and they’re difficult to transport. They’re actually covered by the Brexit trade deal for manufacture in the EU, transport to the UK for fitting in new cars and then re-export to EU markets, but the logistics make this largely moot. You can’t even put them through the channel tunnel for safety reasons.

The biggest question mark over the entire automotive industry in the UK is how quickly battery production can be scaled up, in factories within the UK, close enough to the vehicle assembly plants to mitigate the transport problems.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-56190072

Yup, I said in #482, the proposed battery factory in Coventry gives me grounds for optimism.

It's wishful thinking not to see the Brexit connection - the uncertainty over a trade deal with the EU from 2016 until recently has prevented investment in UK battery manufacture.

1andrew1 25-02-2021 16:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
If anyone on the forum is between jobs, there are 700 people needed now in Cornwall. This is from the Daily Mail of all places!
Quote:

World's largest daffodil grower in Cornwall is forced to let fields of flowers ROT because there are not enough pickers available after Brexit
  • Varfell Farms in Penzance, Cornwall, is the largest daffodil grower in the world
  • They produces 500 million stems a year and need 700 workers to pick them
  • But they are heavily reliant on migrant worker and Brexit ended free movement
  • Fields of flowers are being left to rot as there are not enough pickers for harvest

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...=1490&ito=1490


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:49.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum