Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Brexit: Article 50 Has Been Triggered ! (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33704414)

pip08456 05-03-2017 19:52

Re: BREXIT
 
This straw poll isn't going well for @remain eu.

https://twitter.com/Pippincp/status/838476498017390592

Osem 05-03-2017 20:54

Re: BREXIT
 
Cab't see why anyone would not want to remain. :confused:

Staying in the EU is clearly the safest option for our long term prosperity and social wellbeing, just ask the Greeks. We clearly aren't capable of running our own affairs and there are no problems in the EU. If we leave the EU our kids will be forced to work up chimneys and our economy will be ruined. We'll be doomed... Doomed I tell you...

:D

pip08456 05-03-2017 20:57

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35888724)
Cab't see why anyone would not want to remain. :confused:

Staying in the EU is clearly the safest option for our long term prosperity and social wellbeing. We clearly aren't capable of running our own affairs and there are no problems in the EU. If we leave the EU our kids will be forced to work up chimneys and our economy will be ruined. We'll be doomed... Doomed I tell you...

:D

Damn Osem, I forgot the straw poll is bound to be screwed because only uneducated use twitter.:D

Osem 05-03-2017 21:08

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35888728)
Damn Osem, I forgot the straw poll is bound to be screwed because only uneducated use twitter.:D

No, only the uneducated vote to leave the EU. Well the uneducated and the easily led to be fair. The undeducated, the easily led and the bigoted actually. Why else would they vote to bite the hand that so lovingly feeds them? There's nothing wrong with the EU that a few more referenda won't put right. It's just a question of educating the electorate and asking the right question, more than once if the result isn't what Brussels wants to hear...

Mr K 05-03-2017 21:12

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35888728)
Damn Osem, I forgot the straw poll is bound to be screwed because only uneducated use twitter.:D

You said it Pipster , not me ! ;)

Anyway, you're wrong as the US President uses Twitter as his main method of communication, and no one can argue about his intelligence :p:

pip08456 05-03-2017 21:38

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35888733)
You said it Pipster , not me ! ;)

Anyway, you're wrong as the US President uses Twitter as his main method of communication, and no one can argue about his intelligence :p:

Just as intended you rose to the bait Mr K. I notice you wish to deflect from the straw poll by bringing Mr Trump into it.

Now let's have your honest opinion. @remain eu started a poll on twitter asking if the referendum was re-run how would you vote. So far it is overwhelmingly leave.

If you would like to debate this sensibly I don't mind as I'm sure others would also.

1andrew1 05-03-2017 22:37

Re: BREXIT
 
This poll puts leave at 51%.
https://twitter.com/remain_leave

pip08456 05-03-2017 22:41

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35888742)
This poll puts leave at 51%.
https://twitter.com/remain_leave

Different poll Andrew.

https://twitter.com/remain_eu

tweetiepooh 06-03-2017 11:56

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35888374)
I'll take the house of lords seriously when a lot of them attend for more then the required duration to get their allowance and some don't use the chamber as a snooze lounge. Norman tebbit was absolutely spot on and despite what some think he usually does speak more for citizens then many others.

My son was invited to visit the houses of parliament. While it's true many of their lordships are pretty experienced in years what often looks like a snooze may not be. Their seats are fitted with "hidden" speakers and since some are a little hard of hearing will sit in a way to get their ears closer so they can actually hear. (Of course this could also be used to excuse a little nap too!)

Osem 06-03-2017 12:16

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 35888793)
My son was invited to visit the houses of parliament. While it's true many of their lordships are pretty experienced in years what often looks like a snooze may not be. Their seats are fitted with "hidden" speakers and since some are a little hard of hearing will sit in a way to get their ears closer so they can actually hear. (Of course this could also be used to excuse a little nap too!)

I heard they're also equipped with discreet little buttons enabling them to multitask such vitally important functions as ordering their subsidised food/wine/cigars, checking their expenses and booking their taxis home...

RizzyKing 06-03-2017 15:29

Re: BREXIT
 
Since the referendum of the 12 remain voters four have said if it was rerun they would vote leave not sure whats changed their mind but none of those who voted leave have changed to remain and a few others i chat with on the net have said they have experienced the same. Obviously not conclusive or even remotely suggestive of a larger trend but I'm not so sure a rerun would end with a majority remain vote.

1andrew1 06-03-2017 19:22

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35888842)
Since the referendum of the 12 remain voters four have said if it was rerun they would vote leave not sure whats changed their mind but none of those who voted leave have changed to remain and a few others i chat with on the net have said they have experienced the same. Obviously not conclusive or even remotely suggestive of a larger trend but I'm not so sure a rerun would end with a majority remain vote.

I reckon if it were re-run now it would probably be about 55% leave. But I reckon once Article 50 has been invoked then it may revert to 45% leave.

TheDaddy 06-03-2017 19:24

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35888842)
Since the referendum of the 12 remain voters four have said if it was rerun they would vote leave not sure whats changed their mind but none of those who voted leave have changed to remain and a few others i chat with on the net have said they have experienced the same. Obviously not conclusive or even remotely suggestive of a larger trend but I'm not so sure a rerun would end with a majority remain vote.

I think the majority for leave would increase significantly, doesn't stop me suggesting it happen in other places though just to watch brextremists heads explode at the thought of it

RizzyKing 07-03-2017 00:45

Re: BREXIT
 
Andrew i know you may not believe it or understand it but most if not 99% of people that voted leave understood more about article 50 then most remainers given the amount of remain supporters calling for a soft brexit which article 50 practically makes impossible. Once article 50 is started it's a oneway street that leavers want to go down so not sure why you think a good proportion of leave voters would suddenly change to remain.

papa smurf 07-03-2017 07:24

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35888907)
Andrew i know you may not believe it or understand it but most if not 99% of people that voted leave understood more about article 50 then most remainers given the amount of remain supporters calling for a soft brexit which article 50 practically makes impossible. Once article 50 is started it's a oneway street that leavers want to go down so not sure why you think a good proportion of leave voters would suddenly change to remain.

i could never change to remain i would feel as though i had betrayed my country in favor of a foreign power .

Mr K 07-03-2017 08:00

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35888913)
i could never change to remain i would feel as though i had betrayed my country in favor of a foreign power .

No, it would mean your head had ruled your heart. Talk of 'betrayal', 'traitors', 'foreign powers' are emotive tabloid cobblers. People need to (and will when it's too late) wake up to the economic reality.
(P.s it's 'favour', we're British after all...)

Ramrod 07-03-2017 10:43

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35888915)
No, it would mean your head had ruled your heart. Talk of 'betrayal', 'traitors', 'foreign powers' are emotive tabloid cobblers. People need to (and will when it's too late) wake up to the economic reality.

If money is all you care about then that's your call :(

Mick 07-03-2017 11:06

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35888716)
This straw poll isn't going well for @remain eu.

https://twitter.com/Pippincp/status/838476498017390592

For those who don't use Twitter (Self included) managed to get the following poll results: Sample size is 56,000 votes: 69% Leave : 27% Remain : 5% Would not vote.

1andrew1 07-03-2017 11:09

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod (Post 35888934)
If money is all you care about then that's your call :(

It's not about whether you have an expensive TV or not.

It's about whether there's enough money to care for the elderly and not to ration operations. It's about whether there's enough places at schools and colleges. It's about whether public transport is available to allow people who can't drive the chance to find work further afield. It's about the chance to re-train people in new roles as mechanisation takes over in factories and in delivery and transport jobs.

If someone is well off, they can buy all those things privately, send their children to public schools, pay for their university fees, etc. So the country being poorer is less of an issue. Maybe one less ski trip a year if they really have to cut back.

Most people in the UK, however hard they work, aren't in this situation. That's why the wealth of the country is important.

Mick 07-03-2017 11:16

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35888938)
It's not about whether you have an expensive TV or not.
It's about whether there's enough money to care for the elderly and not to ration operations. It's about whether there's enough places at schools and colleges. It's about whether public transport is available to allow people who can't drive the chance to find work further afield. It's about the chance to re-train people in new roles as mechanisation takes over in factories and in delivery and transport jobs.
If you're well off you can buy all those things privately, send your children to public schools, pay for their university fees, etc. Most people in the UK, however hard they work, aren't in this situation.

Load of crap : My parents were born in the 50's and they said they managed fine. They said country was brought to it's knees in 1972 (When we came to be on the EU bloc) and they said it was downhill from then on in.

1andrew1 07-03-2017 11:38

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35888939)
Load of crap : My parents were born in the 50's and they said they managed fine. They said country was brought to it's knees in 1972 (When we came to be on the EU bloc) and they said it was downhill from then on in.

Two peoples' worthy experience does not represent a country of 64m people.

Kursk 07-03-2017 11:41

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35888915)
No, it would mean your head had ruled your heart. Talk of 'betrayal', 'traitors', 'foreign powers' are emotive tabloid cobblers. People need to (and will when it's too late) wake up to the economic reality.
(P.s it's 'favour', we're British after all...)

Good Morning all decent, hardworking, patriotic, British, EU Leavers.
Good Moaning traitorous Remoaners :D

Ramrod 07-03-2017 12:02

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35888938)
It's not about whether you have an expensive TV or not.

It's about whether there's enough money to care for the elderly and not to ration operations. It's about whether there's enough places at schools and colleges. It's about whether public transport is available to allow people who can't drive the chance to find work further afield. It's about the chance to re-train people in new roles as mechanisation takes over in factories and in delivery and transport jobs.

If someone is well off, they can buy all those things privately, send their children to public schools, pay for their university fees, etc. So the country being poorer is less of an issue. Maybe one less ski trip a year if they really have to cut back.

Most people in the UK, however hard they work, aren't in this situation. That's why the wealth of the country is important.

One wonders how we got by before the EU......and the rest of the world gets by. :D

Mick 07-03-2017 12:08

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35888942)
Two peoples' worthy experience does not represent a country of 64m people.

Bollocks. We managed before 1972, we will again you need to let that sink in instead of wanting to remain in a corrupted pile of garbage.

gba93 07-03-2017 12:27

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35888942)
Two peoples' worthy experience does not represent a country of 64m people.

Just worth a mention that majority that voted to leave were in the older age group who had had experience of life outside the EU (and inside) ~ maybe not just the two peoples experience.

papa smurf 07-03-2017 16:48

Re: Brexit
 
REMOANERS DEFEATED: Government BEATS pro-Remain peers' demand for SECOND Brexit referendum

http://www.express.co.uk/news/politi...ed-Brexit-vote

---------- Post added at 16:48 ---------- Previous post was at 16:40 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35888915)
No, it would mean your head had ruled your heart. Talk of 'betrayal', 'traitors', 'foreign powers' are emotive tabloid cobblers. People need to (and will when it's too late) wake up to the economic reality.
(P.s it's 'favour', we're British after all...)

sorry i meant Zugunsten einer fremden Macht ;)

Kursk 07-03-2017 16:58

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35889015)
REMOANERS DEFEATED: Government BEATS pro-Remain peers' demand for SECOND Brexit referendum

Good. I suggest their Lordships continue to observe the will of the people or the people will observe their expenses more closely ;).

ianch99 07-03-2017 18:20

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35888944)
Good Morning all decent, hardworking, patriotic, British, EU Leavers.
Good Moaning traitorous Remoaners :D

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2017/03/13.jpg

:)

Kursk 07-03-2017 18:26

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35889039)

Stop being a traitorous remoaning minnie then ner ner ;)

papa smurf 07-03-2017 18:45

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35889022)
Good. I suggest their Lordships continue to observe the will of the people or the people will observe their expenses more closely ;).

and derail the gravy train:)

pip08456 07-03-2017 18:46

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35888942)
Two peoples' worthy experience does not represent a country of 64m people.

I agree with Mick's parents. I was born in the 50's so know exactly what it was like.

Two referendums (referenda for the educated) and I voted leave each time!

denphone 07-03-2017 18:55

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35889039)

Sadly some still continue to use insults and make themselves look even more stupid it seems...:rolleyes:

papa smurf 07-03-2017 19:10

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35889047)
Sadly some still continue to use insults and make themselves look even more stupid it seems...:rolleyes:

hows the sense of humor bypass going? sadly it seems to have saddened you to the point of starting every sentence with "sadly" and that's just plain sad :) its just banter lighten up :)

denphone 07-03-2017 19:20

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35889050)
hows the sense of humor bypass going? sadly it seems to have saddened you to the point of starting every sentence with "sadly" and that's just plain sad :) its just banter lighten up :)

In case you have forgotten Brexit is a very serious process as its probably the biggest event to happen to this country for nearly 50 years so one has to not take it lightly and make sure we get it right because if we don't generations to come will be picking up the debris for many many years long after we have exited the EU papa.

And no l am not using sadly or indeed in this post as you have to remember that my vocabulary is pretty limited.;)

Mr K 07-03-2017 19:49

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35889050)
hows the sense of humor bypass going? sadly it seems to have saddened you to the point of starting every sentence with "sadly" and that's just plain sad :) its just banter lighten up :)

tbf Papa have to agree with you there, humour is often sadly lacking on these forums, and often misinterpreted.

Anyway Brexiters now defeated :)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39200658

Quote:

The government has suffered a second Brexit defeat in the House of Lords as peers backed, by 366 votes to 268, calls for a "meaningful" parliamentary vote on the final terms of withdrawal.
Bit of a strange vote anyway. Surely all parliamentary votes should be meaningful , otherwise they are wasting tax payers money. How can the govt. oppose a vote being meaningful?

passingbat 07-03-2017 20:22

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35889055)

Bit of a strange vote anyway. Surely all parliamentary votes should be meaningful , otherwise they are wasting tax payers money. How can the govt. oppose a vote being meaningful?


Because of negotiating training 101; The other side needs to know that you are prepared to walk away from the deal. Your barging power is severely weakened without that option. Remainers know that but they see an option to force a soft (almost melted) Brexit.


Didn't one of your best mates write a book on deal making... Donald... something or other? Might be worth you getting a copy... they're probably going pretty cheap in the UK ;)

papa smurf 07-03-2017 20:22

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35889055)
tbf Papa have to agree with you there, humour is often sadly lacking on these forums, and often misinterpreted.

Anyway Brexiters now defeated :)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39200658



Bit of a strange vote anyway. Surely all parliamentary votes should be meaningful , otherwise they are wasting tax payers money. How can the govt. oppose a vote being meaningful?



it just goes back to the commons to be overturned

techguyone 07-03-2017 20:25

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35889063)
it just goes back to the commons to be overturned

Yup no need to worry.

1andrew1 07-03-2017 20:38

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35889055)
tbf Papa have to agree with you there, humour is often sadly lacking on these forums, and often misinterpreted.

Anyway Brexiters now defeated :)

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39200658

Bit of a strange vote anyway. Surely all parliamentary votes should be meaningful , otherwise they are wasting tax payers money. How can the govt. oppose a vote being meaningful?

Agree with all your comments. The Lords are proving their worth as a robust check and balance to a Ukip-emulating Parliament.

Mr K 07-03-2017 20:45

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35889063)
it just goes back to the commons to be overturned

And then it goes back to the Lords ;)

1andrew1 07-03-2017 20:54

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35888955)
Bollocks. We managed before 1972, we will again you need to let that sink in instead of wanting to remain in a corrupted pile of garbage.

You're missing the point.

---------- Post added at 20:54 ---------- Previous post was at 20:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35889067)
And then it goes back to the Lords ;)

How long can they keep batting it back to one another? Forever? :)

Hom3r 07-03-2017 21:08

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35888451)
Legally maybe, the reality might be different if we want to do any trade with the EU in future.
So the Lord's are worthwhile after all ;)

They need to sell there stuff here as well.

Can you honestly see Germany not selling any cars here.

techguyone 07-03-2017 21:31

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35889067)
And then it goes back to the Lords ;)

Ultimately the Parliament act gets used and that's that.

TheDaddy 07-03-2017 23:08

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35889055)
humour is often sadly lacking on these forums, and often misinterpreted.

Wonder how long it'll be before some shining wit comes along and says it's due to education standards... :angel:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35889072)
They need to sell there stuff here as well.

Can you honestly see Germany not selling any cars here.

It's not as simple as that, certainly not for us anyway, tariffs are easy to negotiate or absorb, services much harder to include in trade deals

1andrew1 07-03-2017 23:51

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35889055)
Anyway Brexiters now defeated :)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39200658

Looks like Theresa May doesn't like alternative views too much. She's sacked Hezza as an adviser following today's defeat in the Lords.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7617191.html

Kursk 08-03-2017 00:46

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35889052)
In case you have forgotten Brexit is a very serious process as its probably the biggest event to happen to this country for nearly 50 years so one has to not take it lightly and make sure we get it right because if we don't generations to come will be picking up the debris for many many years long after we have exited the EU papa.

And no l am not using sadly or indeed in this post as you have to remember that my vocabulary is pretty limited.;)

Don't worry Den, nothing we discuss on this forum will have the slightest impact on the outcome of Brexit. Besides, we have discussed everything at length, more than once, so a bit of humour now and then isn't a bad thing is it?

Some might say that humour is used to build bridges and I know the rift between Leave and Remain is something that concerns you so a laff might be just what the Doctor ordered eh? As others have said a laff is all that it is :)

papa smurf 08-03-2017 07:16

Re: Brexit
 
SACKED from Government adviser role

"I have just been told by the Chief Whip in the Lords that No 10 is to sack me from the five jobs ....

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/776...european-union

1andrew1 08-03-2017 10:22

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 3588909)
SACKED from Government adviser role

"I have just been told by the Chief Whip in the Lords that No 10 is to sack me from the five jobs ....

http://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/776...european-union

Yes, posted that last night. Interestingly, the two have never met so don't know how much she will miss him!
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017...elling-brexit/

ianch99 08-03-2017 10:26

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 35889091)
Don't worry Den, nothing we discuss on this forum will have the slightest impact on the outcome of Brexit. Besides, we have discussed everything at length, more than once, so a bit of humour now and then isn't a bad thing is it?

Some might say that humour is used to build bridges and I know the rift between Leave and Remain is something that concerns you so a laff might be just what the Doctor ordered eh? As others have said a laff is all that it is :)

Off topic slighty but is your Avatar picture an accurate likeness? :) Mine is ... :)

Kursk 08-03-2017 12:28

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 35889119)
Off topic slighty but is your Avatar picture an accurate likeness? :) Mine is ... :)

Mine is the personification of a withered and forgotten spirit trapped inside cable forum and who is desperate to escape. Yours looks pretty much the same to me ;).
I'll change it soon though; change is good :).

RizzyKing 08-03-2017 23:04

Re: Brexit
 
Heseltine is a self serving dinosaur that only sees thing's oneway and i doubt he'll be missed by number 10 anymore then we have missed him as an mp. We need to get on with getting out and be done with it.

Mr K 08-03-2017 23:14

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35889212)
Heseltine is a self serving dinosaur that only sees thing's oneway and i doubt he'll be missed by number 10 anymore then we have missed him as an mp. We need to get on with getting out and be done with it.

Oh I don't know, quite like him. Best political moment in the 1980s was when he stormed out of Thatchers cabinet through the No10 front door, and resigned live in front of the TV cameras. Tarzan is a top bloke and history will prove him right.

RizzyKing 09-03-2017 02:04

Re: Brexit
 
I very much doubt history will bother much with him just another self serving backstabber not exactly a rarity in politics. Your in for a few good years MrK as there will be an economic cost to brexit in the short to midterm but after that the UK will prosper as we again become a global trader and we will watch as the EU struggles from one mess to the next. That's the harsh reality for the EU growing financial issues that are not being properly or decisively handled and as time goes on more member states fail the EU's requirements. Not even touching on the ever greater integration or the creation of federal european entities such as a singular police force and military because expanding EU borders ever closer to russia isn't enough we have to then threaten them with a european military.

Your very good at slating brexit every chance you get but perhaps you should open your eyes to the problems the EU faces in the coming years because out of the two brexit will be significantly less costly.

Mr K 09-03-2017 08:02

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35889228)
.

Your very good at slating brexit every chance you get but perhaps you should open your eyes to the problems the EU faces in the coming years because out of the two brexit will be significantly less costly.

Never pretended the EU is perfect, nothing ever is. We aren't the only country that wanted reform, that would have been the much more sensible route. That's why all main political parties campaigned for Remain ( including the current and former PMs and Chancellors), the alternative wasn't credible. We just hear negative news about EU from the press and the benefits will only be truly realised when we've left. Leaving the largest trading block in the World is madness. However accept that what people have voted for, but they can't blame anyone except themselves when they are significantly less well off as a result. Not just for a few years, but generations. There's the £50bn bill for just leaving to begin with (the exact figure to be negotiated, but it's going to be big). Yesterday's Budget tax rise was just the start.

passingbat 09-03-2017 09:10

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35889238)
Never pretended the EU is perfect, nothing ever is. We aren't the only country that wanted reform, that would have been the much more sensible route. .


And Cameron proved that the Federal states of Europe were having none of that. Glad he did; now we get to leave.

Osem 09-03-2017 09:17

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35889228)
I very much doubt history will bother much with him just another self serving backstabber not exactly a rarity in politics. Your in for a few good years MrK as there will be an economic cost to brexit in the short to midterm but after that the UK will prosper as we again become a global trader and we will watch as the EU struggles from one mess to the next. That's the harsh reality for the EU growing financial issues that are not being properly or decisively handled and as time goes on more member states fail the EU's requirements. Not even touching on the ever greater integration or the creation of federal european entities such as a singular police force and military because expanding EU borders ever closer to russia isn't enough we have to then threaten them with a european military.

Your very good at slating brexit every chance you get but perhaps you should open your eyes to the problems the EU faces in the coming years because out of the two brexit will be significantly less costly.

It's called being in denial. Some folks are experts at it.

---------- Post added at 09:17 ---------- Previous post was at 09:12 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35889244)
And Cameron proved that the Federal states of Europe were having none of that. Glad he did; now we get to leave.

Funny how some people are still peddling the old 'reform the EU from the inside' guff. Went well for DC didn't it when he tried to get some iota of movement on the verge of the EU's second largest contributor having a vote on leaving... :rolleyes:

1andrew1 09-03-2017 10:32

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35889238)
Never pretended the EU is perfect, nothing ever is. We aren't the only country that wanted reform, that would have been the much more sensible route. That's why all main political parties campaigned for Remain ( including the current and former PMs and Chancellors), the alternative wasn't credible. We just hear negative news about EU from the press and the benefits will only be truly realised when we've left. Leaving the largest trading block in the World is madness. However accept that what people have voted for, but they can't blame anyone except themselves when they are significantly less well off as a result. Not just for a few years, but generations. There's the £50bn bill for just leaving to begin with (the exact figure to be negotiated, but it's going to be big). Yesterday's Budget tax rise was just the start.

I agree. By leaving the EU, we're throwing out the baby with the bath water. It's not just a simple loss of prosperity for five years, it's a long-term reduction in global influence and prosperity due to a smaller number of markets to sell our services in. The EU has been the most successful trading bloc for making trading deals with other countries; overall it's not held us back in making deals. Yes, the UK will survive but we won't be such an important player or as prosperous as if we had remained in the EU.

techguyone 09-03-2017 11:00

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35889238)
Never pretended the EU is perfect, nothing ever is. We aren't the only country that wanted reform, that would have been the much more sensible route. That's why all main political parties campaigned for Remain ( including the current and former PMs and Chancellors), the alternative wasn't credible. We just hear negative news about EU from the press and the benefits will only be truly realised when we've left. Leaving the largest trading block in the World is madness. However accept that what people have voted for, but they can't blame anyone except themselves when they are significantly less well off as a result. Not just for a few years, but generations. There's the £50bn bill for just leaving to begin with (the exact figure to be negotiated, but it's going to be big). Yesterday's Budget tax rise was just the start.

Thing is, it was far from just being 'the biggest trading bloc in the World' wasn't it. It started off as that, hence the old name 'Common Market' but it mutated into much much more, with the trading only ending up as one facet.

It's the other facets that we are (or will be) well rid off.

I don't think we will be alone either.

1andrew1 09-03-2017 11:11

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35889215)
Oh I don't know, quite like him. Best political moment in the 1980s was when he stormed out of Thatchers cabinet through the No10 front door, and resigned live in front of the TV cameras. Tarzan is a top bloke and history will prove him right.

Didn't he threaten a bunch of Labour MPs with the ceremonial mace when they celebrated after voting to nationalise the defence industry? ;) That was one of his most famous moments, albeit it one not recorded by TV cameras as the time.

passingbat 09-03-2017 11:44

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889260)
It's not just a simple loss of prosperity for five years, it's a long-term reduction in global influence .


You can not prove that. I can not prove the opposite. But you can prove that leaving the Federal States of Europe gives Britain control of Laws, Taxes and Immigration; i.e. Sovereignty.

---------- Post added at 11:44 ---------- Previous post was at 11:38 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35889245)
Funny how some people are still peddling the old 'reform the EU from the inside' guff. Went well for DC didn't it when he tried to get some iota of movement on the verge of the EU's second largest contributor having a vote on leaving... :rolleyes:


The EU have an agenda; The Federal States of Europe. Nothing will sway them away from that agenda. Failing to understand that, is a mistake in my view.

Mick 09-03-2017 11:54

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889260)
I agree. By leaving the EU, we're throwing out the baby with the bath water. It's not just a simple loss of prosperity for five years, it's a long-term reduction in global influence and prosperity due to a smaller number of markets to sell our services in. The EU has been the most successful trading bloc for making trading deals with other countries; overall it's not held us back in making deals. Yes, the UK will survive but we won't be such an important player or as prosperous as if we had remained in the EU.

That's a blinkered way of putting it. The EU is failing Andrew, it consists of countries that are not paying their fair share, some of them have required bail out after bail out and it was being said Greece is looking like it will require yet another.

It is not sustainable and the trading block is not worth being part of when it cripples those countries who should be able to trade with who they like, when they like, sorry but I don't want to be part of a corrupted system that dictates like that so I'm glad we leaving that nonsense and we can do what the hell we like, instead of being told what to do by unelected set of pricks.

RizzyKing 09-03-2017 11:55

Re: Brexit
 
Brexit has caused quite a few other member states of the EU to consider the degree to which their citizens are supporting the EU or being dragged along by politicians looking out for themselves. We were the first but we will not be the last and it will be interesting to see how france and germany will fare once they have to make up the shortfall. It is simply stupid to suggest it's all downhill from here for the UK and the worlds largest trading bloc was giving us less and less as time went on so stepping out is not necessarily a bad thing. I personally have more faith in the UK and it's people then some clearly have and believe we will make a success out of getting out of the EU.

It's funny in a way that the doom and gloom approach of the remain campaign backfired so badly and yet the supposedly more educated people continue to use a failed tactic rather then come up with something better.

Osem 09-03-2017 12:48

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35889277)
You can not prove that. I can not prove the opposite. But you can prove that leaving the Federal States of Europe gives Britain control of Laws, Taxes and Immigration; i.e. Sovereignty.

---------- Post added at 11:44 ---------- Previous post was at 11:38 ----------




The EU have an agenda; The Federal States of Europe. Nothing will sway them away from that agenda. Failing to understand that, is a mistake in my view.

The usual suspects here know that full well, they just don't like admitting it because doing so destroys their argument that the UK can reform the EU from the inside*. There is no negotiation possible on the EU's raison d'etre and they've confirmed it categorically many times.


* Just look how far we've managed to reform it in the decades we've been members lol.

---------- Post added at 12:48 ---------- Previous post was at 12:45 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35889285)
Brexit has caused quite a few other member states of the EU to consider the degree to which their citizens are supporting the EU or being dragged along by politicians looking out for themselves. We were the first but we will not be the last and it will be interesting to see how france and germany will fare once they have to make up the shortfall. It is simply stupid to suggest it's all downhill from here for the UK and the worlds largest trading bloc was giving us less and less as time went on so stepping out is not necessarily a bad thing. I personally have more faith in the UK and it's people then some clearly have and believe we will make a success out of getting out of the EU.

It's funny in a way that the doom and gloom approach of the remain campaign backfired so badly and yet the supposedly more educated people continue to use a failed tactic rather then come up with something better.

Maybe they're not as clever as they think eh? :D

They're all too ready to predict nothing but gloom and doom ahead for the UK outside of the EU but have nothing to say about all the huge known risks and problems evident within the EU. I can't think why... :shrug:

:rolleyes:

Mr K 09-03-2017 16:33

Re: Brexit
 
See the 'usual suspect' is still labelling those that don't agree with his narrow view of the world as 'the usual suspects' :D.
Nearly as childish as seeing what you want to see and ignoring what you don't, nothing is ever all good or all bad.

1andrew1 09-03-2017 16:51

Re: Brexit
 
Interesting article in the FT about what kind of trade the country wants after we leave the UK.

Economists for Brexit has been renamed Economists for Free Trade which reflects its beliefs of no barriers to trade in the UK. The organisation's Patrick Minford wrote last year “Over time . . . it seems likely that we would mostly eliminate manufacturing, but this shouldn’t scare us.”

Quote:

Voters are deeply divided about which of these objectives should be prioritised. Polling by Ipsos Mori found that 45 per cent of Britons thought single market access should be prioritised, while 39 per cent opted for control of immigration.

An important test of the British government’s commitment to free trade will be its willingness to make concessions to strike the deals it wants — including on work visas. India has already made clear it would like more immigration into the UK as part of any new deal.

Other countries are likely to make similar demands, but for an electorate with concerns about immigration, admitting more migrants is hardly a foregone conclusion.
To read the article, google Brexit campaigners shift focus to global free trade or subscribers can visit https://www.ft.com/content/f2a07810-...8-3700c5664d30

---------- Post added at 16:51 ---------- Previous post was at 16:36 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35889284)
That's a blinkered way of putting it. The EU is failing Andrew, it consists of countries that are not paying their fair share, some of them have required bail out after bail out and it was being said Greece is looking like it will require yet another.

It is not sustainable and the trading block is not worth being part of when it cripples those countries who should be able to trade with who they like, when they like, sorry but I don't want to be part of a corrupted system that dictates like that so I'm glad we leaving that nonsense and we can do what the hell we like, instead of being told what to do by unelected set of pricks.

The EU's imperfect, I'll be the first to admit that. Greece is Greece and it should never have been allowed to join the Eurozone, but that's another matter. But compared to countries like the US which employs the President's son-in-law the EU is a shining beacon of democracy. And I lose track of people who say that the EU can't get anything down as countries need to vote on things, and the next minute complain it's undemocratic and run by bureaucrats whilst forgetting there is a Parliament!
In economic terms, we pay about 0.6% of our GDP and we get back a 10% larger GDP. I'd say that's a good return on investment.

papa smurf 09-03-2017 17:22

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889326)
Interesting article in the FT about what kind of trade the country wants after we leave the UK.

Economists for Brexit has been renamed Economists for Free Trade which reflects its beliefs of no barriers to trade in the UK. The organisation's Patrick Minford wrote last year “Over time . . . it seems likely that we would mostly eliminate manufacturing, but this shouldn’t scare us.”


To read the article, google Brexit campaigners shift focus to global free trade or subscribers can visit https://www.ft.com/content/f2a07810-...8-3700c5664d30

---------- Post added at 16:51 ---------- Previous post was at 16:36 ----------


The EU's imperfect, I'll be the first to admit that. Greece is Greece and it should never have been allowed to join the Eurozone, but that's another matter. But compared to countries like the US which employs the President's son-in-law the EU is a shining beacon of democracy. And I lose track of people who say that the EU can't get anything down as countries need to vote on things, and the next minute complain it's undemocratic and run by bureaucrats whilst forgetting there is a Parliament!
In economic terms, we pay about 0.6% of our GDP and we get back a 10% larger GDP. I'd say that's a good return on investment.

thats not how you spell bureaucracy

passingbat 09-03-2017 18:03

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889326)


But compared to countries like the US which employs the President's son-in-law the EU is a shining beacon of democracy.


If you want to willingly surrender your National Sovereignty to a Federal States of Europe, which means progressively surrendering Laws, Taxes and Borders to people who are not directly elected, then you could be correct, although wasn't there some issue with getting the books signed off?


But I don't want to be ruled by unelected people and lose British control of Laws, Taxes and Borders. I don't think you will find many UK citizens that do.


It seems to me that you're happy to trade our Sovereignty. I'm not.


And What has Trump got to do with it? He was democratically elected, more than can be said for the EU leaders. Here's an anti Trump news outlet saying that it is legal to appoint his son in law.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/21/u...ment.html?_r=0

Osem 09-03-2017 18:21

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35889349)
If you want to willingly surrender your National Sovereignty to a Federal States of Europe, which means progressively surrendering Laws, Taxes and Borders to people who are not directly elected, then you could be correct, although wasn't there some issue with getting the books signed off?


But I don't want to be ruled by unelected people and lose British control of Laws, Taxes and Borders. I don't think you will find many UK citizens that do.


It seems to me that you're happy to trade our Sovereignty. I'm not.


And What has Trump got to do with it? He was democratically elected, more than can be said for the EU leaders. Here's an anti Trump news outlet saying that it is legal to appoint his son in law.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/21/u...ment.html?_r=0

:tu:

Clearly some people only respect democracy when it yields what they want.

Hom3r 09-03-2017 18:37

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35888742)
This poll puts leave at 51%.
https://twitter.com/remain_leave

My poll at work is 98% leave.

The sooner we leave and the sooner Jimmy Krankie resigns the happier I'll be.

We must do a hard Brexit so the EU can't force us into things we don't want.

Can you really see Audi, BMW, Mercedes, Seat, Fiat etc pulling out of the UK and not selling any cars.

We survived before, we'll survive after.

TheDaddy 09-03-2017 18:42

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35889349)


And What has Trump got to do with it? He was democratically elected, more than can be said for the EU leaders. Here's an anti Trump news outlet saying that it is legal to appoint his son in law.


https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/21/u...ment.html?_r=0

Not entirely true about being unelected, same as the accounts not being signed of since 1926 or whenever isn't really true, still explaining it properly doesn't make for those short, snappy headlines we so enjoy that don't stretch our attention spans for to long so we can get back to important stuff like Facebook or cats on slides.

passingbat 09-03-2017 19:44

Re: BREXIT
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hom3r (Post 35889355)
We must do a hard Brexit so the EU can't force us into things we don't want.

.



Imperative in my view.

1andrew1 09-03-2017 20:08

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35889349)
If you want to willingly surrender your National Sovereignty to a Federal States of Europe, which means progressively surrendering Laws, Taxes and Borders to people who are not directly elected, then you could be correct, although wasn't there some issue with getting the books signed off?

But I don't want to be ruled by unelected people and lose British control of Laws, Taxes and Borders. I don't think you will find many UK citizens that do.

It seems to me that you're happy to trade our Sovereignty. I'm not.

And What has Trump got to do with it? He was democratically elected, more than can be said for the EU leaders. Here's an anti Trump news outlet saying that it is legal to appoint his son in law.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/21/u...ment.html?_r=0

The debate has moved on. Others are trying to drag us back to mid-June 2016's debate which is unproductive.
The debate now is for free trade or not free trade.

---------- Post added at 20:06 ---------- Previous post was at 20:04 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35889370)
Imperative in my view.

Imperative if we want a break-up of the UK. I don't, but I accept some see it as an acceptable price to pay.

---------- Post added at 20:08 ---------- Previous post was at 20:06 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35889359)
Not entirely true about being unelected, same as the accounts not being signed of since 1926 or whenever isn't really true, still explaining it properly doesn't make for those short, snappy headlines we so enjoy that don't stretch our attention spans for to long so we can get back to important stuff like Facebook or cats on slides.

lol, nailed it perfectly!

papa smurf 09-03-2017 21:09

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889372)
The debate has moved on. Others are trying to drag us back to mid-June 2016's debate which is unproductive.
The debate now is for free trade or not free trade.[COLOR="Silver"]

we'll let you know when it's moved on, and what it's moved on to, if in fact it moves at all ;)

1andrew1 09-03-2017 22:08

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35889391)
we'll let you know when it's moved on, and what it's moved on to, if in fact it moves at all ;)

like Brexit itself. :)

papa smurf 09-03-2017 22:17

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889398)
like Brexit itself. :)

i think we are somewhere between stale and mate with a smattering of dog chasing its own tail .:)

passingbat 09-03-2017 23:03

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889372)
The debate has moved on. Others are trying to drag us back to mid-June 2016's debate which is unproductive.
The debate now is for free trade or not free trade.


And that is directly related to sovereignty. That is what you don't seem to understand. To stay in the single market would mean surrendering some of our control over Laws, immigration and tax policies. As I've said several times, Sovereignty is eroded via the back door of trade deals. By advocating the single market, you are advocating erosion of British Sovereignty.


We need to be out of the single market and negotiating the best trade deal we can. And when you are negotiating, the other side needs to know, in no uncertain terms, that you will walk away if you don't like the deal they offer.

RizzyKing 09-03-2017 23:08

Re: Brexit
 
I have no problem with the scots having another independence vote as long as the rest of the UK gets a vote on if they want scotland in the union anymore. It was meant to be a once in a generation vote according to everyone up north now clearly it will be something the snp kick off at the slightest excuse and that is a disruption we do not need. I'm also betting if the rest got a vote the snp would go very quiet and a lot less enthusiastic it's easy to keep having disruptive referenda when there is no consequence.

1andrew1 10-03-2017 00:44

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35889405)
And that is directly related to sovereignty. That is what you don't seem to understand. To stay in the single market would mean surrendering some of our control over Laws, immigration and tax policies. As I've said several times, Sovereignty is eroded via the back door of trade deals. By advocating the single market, you are advocating erosion of British Sovereignty.

We need to be out of the single market and negotiating the best trade deal we can. And when you are negotiating, the other side needs to know, in uncertain terms, that you will walk away if you don't like the deal they offer.

Sorry, in connection with the article I posted I meant there's now a debate in the Brexit camp about trade deals full stop, not just with the EU.
Do we:
- Go for Economists for Free Trade's approach. They want no tariffs. But their Patrick Minford has said this will cause the end of UK manufacturing.
- Go for a more interventionist, protectionist economy with tariffs which is likely to leave the country a lot poorer.

In context, polling by Ipsos Mori found that 45% of Britons thought single market access should be prioritised, while 39% prioritised control of immigration. Free trade is linked to granting work visas to trading partners. India has already made clear it would like more immigration into the UK as part of any new deal and other countries are likely to want this too. How will this go down with the electorate?

---------- Post added 10-03-2017 at 00:44 ---------- Previous post was 09-03-2017 at 23:30 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35889406)
I have no problem with the scots having another independence vote as long as the rest of the UK gets a vote on if they want scotland in the union anymore. It was meant to be a once in a generation vote according to everyone up north now clearly it will be something the snp kick off at the slightest excuse and that is a disruption we do not need. I'm also betting if the rest got a vote the snp would go very quiet and a lot less enthusiastic it's easy to keep having disruptive referenda when there is no consequence.

A Scottish refrendum is now on the cards, though whether the SNP will win it is unknown. Latest polls are 50% remain, 50% leave the UK. As Brexit and Trump have shown, we shouldn't rule out another poll upset.
Nicola Sturgeon is aiming for late 2018 but Downing Street is hoping to delay a referendum until after Brexit. Having it half-way through the Brexit negotiations sounds a bit disruptive but maybe that's the plan.

pip08456 10-03-2017 01:39

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889407)
A Scottish refrendum is now on the cards, though whether the SNP will win it is unknown. Latest polls are 50% remain, 50% leave the UK. As Brexit and Trump have shown, we shouldn't rule out another poll upset.
Nicola Sturgeon is aiming for late 2018 but Downing Street is hoping to delay a referendum until after Brexit. Having it half-way through the Brexit negotiations sounds a bit disruptive but maybe that's the plan.

Nicola the fish can aim for anything, it doesn't mean she'll get it so no cards are on the table.

Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35889359)
Not entirely true about being unelected, same as the accounts not being signed of since 1926 or whenever isn't really true, still explaining it properly doesn't make for those short, snappy headlines we so enjoy that don't stretch our attention spans for to long so we can get back to important stuff like Facebook or cats on slides.

Your usual bs. The EU’s Court of Auditors didn't produce (public) REPORTS until 1995.

Since then not one report has stated that the accounts are free from "material error".

Link

Link

Link


Quote:

Conclusion

Auditors say the accounts are accurate and have been since 2007. But they record significant errors in how money is paid, and this has been the case since 1995.

TheDaddy 10-03-2017 02:18

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35889412)

Your usual bs. The EU’s Court of Auditors didn't produce (public) REPORTS until 1995.

Since then not one report has stated that the accounts are free from "material error".

Link

Link

Link

As usual humour is something that happens to other people isn't it pip, like that time you went to the effort of proving to us articles 1-49 didn't need to be triggered one after the other and in order before we could trigger article 50, still thanks for providing links for anyone who can tear themselves away from cats on slides for a moment that didn't know the accounts have in fact been signed of, lots.

passingbat 10-03-2017 05:39

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889407)
Sorry, in connection with the article I posted I meant there's now a debate in the Brexit camp about trade deals full stop, not just with the EU.
Do we:
- Go for Economists for Free Trade's approach. They want no tariffs. But their Patrick Minford has said this will cause the end of UK manufacturing.
- Go for a more interventionist, protectionist economy with tariffs which is likely to leave the country a lot poorer.

In context, polling by Ipsos Mori found that 45% of Britons thought single market access should be prioritised, while 39% prioritised control of immigration. Free trade is linked to granting work visas to trading partners. India has already made clear it would like more immigration into the UK as part of any new deal and other countries are likely to want this too. How will this go down with the electorate?
.


I heard Patrick Minford some time ago on the Daily Politics putting forwaed his analysis. As far as I'm concerned, he's just another economist with another view. Brexit showed us how much we should trust Economists.

Quote:

Free trade is linked to granting work visas to trading partners. India has already made clear it would like more immigration into the UK as part of any new deal and other countries are likely to want this too..
So you're now trying a new scare tactic; if you have free trade you have to accept more immigration. Do you remainers ever stop? You seem to think Britain will be so weak after we finally leave the EU that we will be over a barrel as far as trade deals go and agree to anything. I completely disagree.

Britain's immigration policy should be controlled immigration; i.e. people coming to our country to fulfil a specific job or skill need. Not an immigration quota tied to a trade deal. The latter would defeat one of the main tenants of Brexit.

1andrew1 10-03-2017 10:02

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35889419)
I heard Patrick Minford some time ago on the Daily Politics putting forwaed his analysis. As far as I'm concerned, he's just another economist with another view. Brexit showed us how much we should trust Economists.

So you're now trying a new scare tactic; if you have free trade you have to accept more immigration. Do you remainers ever stop? You seem to think Britain will be so weak after we finally leave the EU that we will be over a barrel as far as trade deals go and agree to anything. I completely disagree.

Britain's immigration policy should be controlled immigration; i.e. people coming to our country to fulfil a specific job or skill need. Not an immigration quota tied to a trade deal. The latter would defeat one of the main tenants of Brexit.

No one's scaring anyone unless people are easily scared. Read the article - there's a debate going on in the Brexit camp on free trade v protectionism. It's an important debate to have. To read the article, google Brexit campaigners shift focus to global free trade

passingbat 10-03-2017 12:24

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889445)
No one's scaring anyone unless people are easily scared. Read the article - there's a debate going on in the Brexit camp on free trade v protectionism. It's an important debate to have. To read the article, google Brexit campaigners shift focus to global free trade


Let's look at the source; a pro-remain newspaper, who have links to the Bilderberg Group. Wow! Such a surprise that they are trying to sow seeds of disharmony amongst leave supporters.

I'll put that article on my completely ignore list.

1andrew1 10-03-2017 13:07

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35889468)
Let's look at the source; a pro-remain newspaper, who have links to the Bilderberg Group. Wow! Such a surprise that they are trying to sow seeds of disharmony amongst leave supporters.

I'll put that article on my completely ignore list.

Always worth reading sources outside your comfort zone. Keep it quiet, but I've been known to read the Ukipgraph and Mail. ;)

passingbat 10-03-2017 13:34

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889471)
Always worth reading sources outside your comfort zone. Keep it quiet, but I've been known to read the Ukipgraph and Mail. ;)

I did actually read the article, not just ignore it. When you know where a publication is coming from, discernment of what is really going with an article is much easier.

Quote:

Keep it quiet, but I've been known to read the Ukipgraph and Mail. ;)
And for your next 'Walk on the wild side'...... US Fox News via Youtube... just try not to throw things at your computer, they're not cheap to replace!:D

papa smurf 10-03-2017 16:30

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by passingbat (Post 35889468)
Let's look at the source; a pro-remain newspaper, who have links to the Bilderberg Group. Wow! Such a surprise that they are trying to sow seeds of disharmony amongst leave supporters.

I'll put that article on my completely ignore list.



i'll put on the nail on the back of the outside lavy door :)

TheDaddy 10-03-2017 17:39

Re: Brexit
 
I don't think this is a good idea at all

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...xit-negotiator

1andrew1 10-03-2017 17:44

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35889492)
I don't think this is a good idea at all

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...xit-negotiator

Plenty of Brits with homes in France and Spain would be happy.

passingbat 10-03-2017 18:14

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35889492)
I don't think this is a good idea at all

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...xit-negotiator

They just can't bear to let us go. Doesn't it just bring a tear to your eye....

And Juncker wants us back.

Quote:

Mr Juncker, the most senior official in Brussels, said he did not like Brexit because he wanted "to be in the same boat as the British".
"The day will come when the British will re-enter the boat, I hope," he said following an EU summit
Quote:

Former UKIP leader Nigel Farage said: "The ship will have sunk by then"
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-39230044

Ramrod 10-03-2017 18:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35889492)
I don't think this is a good idea at all

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...xit-negotiator

On the face of it, it's a nice idea.

1andrew1 10-03-2017 19:32

Re: Brexit
 
Lovers of a hard Brexit and good value chocolate be warned - you can't have your chocolate and eat it! ;)
"A top Mars executive says that if the UK leaves the EU without a trade deal it will result in higher prices and threaten jobs."
"In simple terms, if the UK and the EU fail to agree on a new preferential deal, it will be to the detriment of all. Yet that realisation may not be sufficient to produce an agreement."
http://news.sky.com/story/why-mars-b...-deal-10796207
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...rd-Brexit.html

papa smurf 10-03-2017 20:12

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889514)
Lovers of a hard Brexit and good value chocolate be warned - you can't have your chocolate and eat it! ;)
"A top Mars executive says that if the UK leaves the EU without a trade deal it will result in higher prices and threaten jobs."
"In simple terms, if the UK and the EU fail to agree on a new preferential deal, it will be to the detriment of all. Yet that realisation may not be sufficient to produce an agreement."
http://news.sky.com/story/why-mars-b...-deal-10796207
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...rd-Brexit.html

a remoan a day helps you work rest and play .

1andrew1 10-03-2017 22:31

Re: Brexit
 
More bad news I'm afraid peeps.

Quote:

EU leaders prepare for Theresa May to trigger Article 50 within days
Brexiteers' hopes are raised as the Prime Minister schedules a major Commons statement on Tuesday.
http://news.sky.com/story/eu-leaders...-days-10797397

Mick 11-03-2017 01:12

Re: Brexit
 
That's not bad news....



Oh this is a more fitting tune, more fitting words to that sorry arse mess EU.

;)

Pierre 11-03-2017 07:53

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889514)
Lovers of a hard Brexit and good value chocolate be warned - you can't have your chocolate and eat it! ;)
"A top Mars executive says that if the UK leaves the EU without a trade deal it will result in higher prices and threaten jobs."
"In simple terms, if the UK and the EU fail to agree on a new preferential deal, it will be to the detriment of all. Yet that realisation may not be sufficient to produce an agreement."
http://news.sky.com/story/why-mars-b...-deal-10796207
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...rd-Brexit.html

A bonus for the health of the country.

TheDaddy 11-03-2017 07:56

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Ramrod (Post 35889503)
On the face of it, it's a nice idea.

Yes on the face of it, as ever the devils in the detail and 50p says there will be some caveat most of us won't like though

papa smurf 11-03-2017 08:07

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889546)

whats bad :shrug: its what the democratic process demands .

1andrew1 11-03-2017 10:53

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35889578)
whats bad :shrug: its what the democratic process demands .

Hook line and sinker! I normally get accused by Brexiters of posting negative news whatever I post so I'd thought I'd label this one negative news. :)

papa smurf 11-03-2017 11:18

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 35889592)
Hook line and sinker! I normally get accused by Brexiters of posting negative news whatever I post so I'd thought I'd label this one negative news. :)

aha game set and match got ya .

Osem 11-03-2017 11:35

Re: Brexit
 
Well according to some, the Dutch are 'fascists and Nazis remnants' so all the more reason for the UK to get out I'd have thought. :D

Quote:

Turkish president brands the Dutch "Nazi remnants and fascists" as row over cancelled Rotterdam rally escalates
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39241417
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-39242707

Seriously, there seems to be a massive problem in the offing for the EU if this thing escalates and Turkey decides to renege on the migration deal and forge closer links with Putin.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:11.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum