Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Corbyn's kerfuffle (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33702119)

martyh 19-08-2016 16:04

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35854771)
Well Comrade, you do seem a bit obsessed about Jeremy. If he's in no danger of ever being elected why bother ? I like him, he offers an definite alternative, which people may or may not want. Cameron/Clegg/Blair/May - virtually no difference between them once PM.

He did a very good sit down protest on the train the other day with other passengers in economy that didn't have seats. Compare that to sweet George Osborne who insisted on being in First Class without paying.....

only as obsessed as you are with Cameron and Osborne .

As someone who's always banging on about democracy or lack thereof i'm surprised that you approve of the lack of opposition to the Conservatives

---------- Post added at 16:04 ---------- Previous post was at 16:00 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35854778)
If anyone wants an effective opposition, they're not going to get it with a clown like Corbyn running the Labour show. He's a relic of the past and a very poor leader who'd bring this country to its knees. What's required is for Labour to split, leave Corbyn and his loony left cronies to count their votes from the rose tinted brigade and those who're serious about creating a new, more representative, party to get off their bums and do it. If Smith is the best Labour can do to challenge Corbyn the Tories are going to be well and truly delighted.

Like or loathe them, when you compare the heavyweights Labour used to have within their ranks to today's bunch the extent to which the party has deteriorated is quite obvious.

couldn't agree more

RizzyKing 19-08-2016 21:09

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
There does seem to be growing support for Russia and Putin and when our political representatives start saying it we have a major problem as Putin is very good at playing to the crowd. Corbyn saying we might not aid a NATO ally is another nail in the coffin and i do believe there is a concerted effort from Russia to undermine and eventually collapse NATO.

martyh 19-08-2016 22:30

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I've been watching a documentary on BBC2 about the '80's and one thing that stands out is that Labour where in exactly the same position '80 to around '83 as they are now ,a good point made was that Maggie did not win her second term (even with the Falklands war)Labour lost it because of the split in the party .Never has the phrase 'history repeats itself 'been more applicable .

Osem 19-08-2016 22:54

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Corbyn's always been an apologist for communism.

---------- Post added at 22:54 ---------- Previous post was at 22:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35854848)
I've been watching a documentary on BBC2 about the '80's and one thing that stands out is that Labour where in exactly the same position '80 to around '83 as they are now ,a good point made was that Maggie did not win her second term (even with the Falklands war)Labour lost it because of the split in the party .Never has the phrase 'history repeats itself 'been more applicable .

Despite being a trusim in Labour's case, never has the phrase 'They never learn' been more applicable. :D

Mr K 20-08-2016 12:43

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35854833)
There does seem to be growing support for Russia and Putin and when our political representatives start saying it we have a major problem as Putin is very good at playing to the crowd. Corbyn saying we might not aid a NATO ally is another nail in the coffin and i do believe there is a concerted effort from Russia to undermine and eventually collapse NATO.

If it came down to siding with Trump or Putin it wouldn't be straightforward choice... :( Suspect Trump wouldn't be interested in Nato/protecting other countries. The world's gone mad which is worrying.

RizzyKing 20-08-2016 21:40

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
It's very straightforward actually never ever side or support in anyway vladimir putin he hankers for the bad old days of the soviet union and is trying to turn desire into reality and the west taking their eye off the russia ball has allowed him to be far more successful then he should have been. No matter how bad trump may personally be he will be operating within a system with multiple levels of checks and balances which will keep any real looniness under control till they can get him out of office.

That's another big difference a bad US president can be removed no one is able to remove putin despite growing concern amongst both the political and military establishment in Russia he is going nowhere. Russia is very good at playing the friend till they get what they want and then you get cut loose but they are currently making friends in asia. If NATO does collapse war will not be far behind thats why all member states and their politicians need to start getting behind it and stop the rubbish some are engaging in right now.

We have to take some blame and responsibility for the current situation we made agreements and have broken them handing putin the opportunity to appear more justifiable then he otherwise would.

Damien 20-08-2016 21:59

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35854911)
If it came down to siding with Trump or Putin it wouldn't be straightforward choice... :( Suspect Trump wouldn't be interested in Nato/protecting other countries. The world's gone mad which is worrying.

You wouldn't need to choose a side. Trump is clearly far more positive about Putin than any standard Presidential candidate.

Arthurgray50@blu 20-08-2016 23:51

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I suppose the good point out of all this. I heard that IF Corbyn loses the GE, he will then quit.
Well height as well quit now.

I would bet that when they all come back from there extra long Holiday - My, will call an election, she has a great chance of another five years.

The Labour Party, is in total disarray, and they are fighting each other. May will wipe all the Labour sides totally.

It will be a landslide for the Tories.

And tonight we have the London Mayor, saying that Corbyn MUST step down, and Mr Khan had a landslide against the Tories in the Mayor Elections.

rhyds 21-08-2016 07:35

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I doubt the Tories will call an election.

1: The fixed term parliaments act would need to be modified or repealed. That will take time

2: Why bother? With Labour in such a mess their slender majority of seats becomes much more secure.

Osem 21-08-2016 09:52

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Having decided to nominate Corbyn for the leadership in the first place, Sadiq Khan has decided he's not quite up to the job. It's all very well changing his mind but is he really expecting anyone to believe he didn't know what Corbyn was about when he put his name forward? It's not as though Corbyn hasn't been playing the same tune for about 40 years is it...

Quote:

London mayor Sadiq Khan has urged Labour voters to ditch Jeremy Corbyn as leader and vote for Owen Smith in the party's leadership contest.
Writing in the Observer, Mr Khan said Mr Corbyn had "totally failed" to get his messages across in the UK's EU referendum in June.
"Why would things be different in a general election?," Mr Khan said.
Explaining his support for Mr Smith, he said the pair had agreed on the "big issues", such as opposing the Iraq War.
Labour 'suffering badly'
Mr Khan said: "Jeremy has already proved that he is unable to organise an effective team and has failed to win the trust and respect of the British people.
"Jeremy's personal ratings are the worst of any opposition leader on record and the Labour party is suffering badly as a result.
"He has lost the confidence of more than 80% of Labour's MPs in Parliament - and I am afraid we simply cannot afford to go on like this."
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37146729

heero_yuy 21-08-2016 11:15

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

The Sunday Times reports the “party within a party” framework will be based on the Socialist Campaign Group of MPs, which counts Mr Corbyn as a member.

According to the paper, the rebels will look to sign up more than 100 MPs to join the Co-operative party, Labour’s sister party, and sit on the green benches as “double hatted” MPs.

The group will appoint their own whips in parliament to co-ordinate rebellions where they disagree with Mr Corbyn’s policy and look to change the rules to appoint an elected Shadow Cabinet, as previously called for by the party’s deputy leader Tom Watson.

It will draw up policies on areas including Brexit and national security, the Sunday Times reports.

The rebels apparently prefer the creation of a new group on Labour benches to forming a breakaway party
Linky

Looks like dissent is rife in the ranks. :D

Damien 21-08-2016 18:33

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35855020)
Having decided to nominate Corbyn for the leadership in the first place, Sadiq Khan has decided he's not quite up to the job. It's all very well changing his mind but is he really expecting anyone to believe he didn't know what Corbyn was about when he put his name forward? It's not as though Corbyn hasn't been playing the same tune for about 40 years is it...


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37146729

They put his name forward to appease the hard-core leftists. A naive move but not a endorsement of Corbyn for leader.

rhyds 21-08-2016 18:51

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Labour like to stick a token hard leftist on their leadership elections to "broaden the debate". Unfortunately nobody realised that Ed Milliband's changes to the leadership election rules meant said token lefty could actually win.

Osem 21-08-2016 18:58

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rhyds (Post 35855102)
Labour like to stick a token hard leftist on their leadership elections to "broaden the debate". Unfortunately nobody realised that Ed Milliband's changes to the leadership election rules meant said token lefty could actually win.

Just goes to show how utterly inept they are. Thank the Lords they're no longer running the country. Time for a new party methinks, one which is at least a credible opposition.

---------- Post added at 18:58 ---------- Previous post was at 18:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35855097)
They put his name forward to appease the hard-core leftists. A naive move but not a endorsement of Corbyn for leader.

That's what I was alluding to. Khan knew full well what Corbyn's always been about. It was a typically cynical stunt which misfired badly and as such doesn't reflect well on Khan.

RizzyKing 21-08-2016 22:45

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
The more i see of khan the less i like and thankfully i think he will be a one term mayor.

Osem 21-08-2016 22:57

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RizzyKing (Post 35855162)
The more i see of khan the less i like and thankfully i think he will be a one term mayor.

Me too. He has all the likeability and sincerity of Keith Vaz.

Arthurgray50@blu 21-08-2016 23:16

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I totally disagree. Sadiq Khan will serve a second term. I voted for him. I voted as he hs stated that he will put more Police Officers and PCSO's on the street. And l work for them.

We need that extra coverage. But the major problem is that this Country, will NEVER have a Labour Party in Government, while Corbyn is in charge.

He is the only Leader, that has had a Leadship challenge, and No Confidence vote in such a short time when in office.

He does NOT have the bottle to take on the Tories. I hate to say this, but we will have a Tory Government for many years to come

Damien 22-08-2016 09:23

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Khan might well serve a 2nd term but we'll see, 4 years is a long time, he has decent approval ratings though and won by a large margin and being Labour is an advantage in the Mayoral race. We'll see who the Tories put up though, they really had a poor candidate last time and his campaign repulsed people.

Osem 22-08-2016 11:00

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Khan beat an opponent with zero charisma whose campaign couldn't have been managed any worse*. His pledges are already unravelling and if anyone seriously believes his housing target was ever sincere and a realistic goal, I suggest they seek medical help. ;)


* some say Cameron didn't help much...

Osem 22-08-2016 14:22

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
They're sending the ballot papers out now - wonder if they'll be able to get that right... :D

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37150553

Hugh 22-08-2016 14:59

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Jeremy Corbyn refuses to take part in Labour leadership debates if C4, Guardian, or the Mirror are involved.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7198171.html
Quote:

Jeremy Corbyn is refusing to take part in Labour leadership hustings organised by the New Statesman, The Guardian, the Mirror or Channel Four on account of them having previously shown bias against him.

Jon Lansman, the director of Momentum, the group running Mr Corbyn’s leadership campaign, wrote in an email that all four had “taken partisan positions against Jeremy’s leadership or campaign... therefore can’t be regarded as impartial hosts or moderators.”

martyh 22-08-2016 15:05

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35855258)
Jeremy Corbyn refuses to take part in Labour leadership debates if C4, Guardian, or the Mirror are involved.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7198171.html

somebody give him a dummy so he spit it out :rolleyes:

Osem 22-08-2016 15:16

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
How's a guy like this going to behave if ever there were enough idiots out there to vote him in? He's like a spoilt little brat who likes to dish it out but can't take it. Given his history lurking on the back benches and voting against his party, I think his recent fame has gone right to his head and addled what little brain he had left. If a scriptwriter had come up with a concept similar to Labour's recent past it would have been rejected as too ridiculous.

I'd love it if the media, from now on, refused to cover Corbyn at all. He's full of hot air anyway so it's not as if we'd be missing much...

martyh 22-08-2016 15:28

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35855265)
How's a guy like this going to behave if ever there were enough idiots out there to vote him in? He's like a spoilt little brat who likes to dish it out but can't take it. Given his history lurking on the back benches and voting against his party, I think his recent fame has gone right to his head and addled what little brain he had left. If a scriptwriter had come up with an concept similar to Labour's recent past it would have been rejected as too ridiculous.

I'd love it if the media, from now on, refused to cover Corbyn at all. He's full of hot air anyway so it's not as if we'd be missing much...

Spitting Image couldn't make it up :D

rhyds 22-08-2016 19:57

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
The New Statesman, Channel 4, the Mirror and the Guardian are probably the the four most blatantly pro left/pro Labour outlets in the UK. If he think they're all against him then he's totally lost it.

Osem 22-08-2016 21:13

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Corbyn's bunker mentality... :D

nidave 23-08-2016 15:28

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Virgin Trains disputes Jeremy Corbyn claim over lack of seats
Labour leader, who released film of him sitting on floor of ‘ram-packed’ train, seen walking past empty seats on CCTV footage
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...-lack-of-seats

Arthurgray50@blu 23-08-2016 16:46

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Why is everyone having s dig at Sadiq Khan. Under Buffoon Boris. He wasted thousands of pounds on water cannons
That wont be used
He wasted loads on super highways for cyclist. And that buffoon is now running the country. God help us

Ramrod 23-08-2016 17:07

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nidave (Post 35855474)
Virgin Trains disputes Jeremy Corbyn claim over lack of seats
Labour leader, who released film of him sitting on floor of ‘ram-packed’ train, seen walking past empty seats on CCTV footage
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...-lack-of-seats

another link
Quote:

Quote:

Jeremy Corbyn had a seat on a train journey he suggested was so “ram-packed” he had to sit on floor, according to CCTV footage seen by The Telegraph.

The Labour leader walked past rows of empty seats before sitting on the ground between carriages for a video in which he attacked the state of Britain’
s railways, footage shows.

Minutes after filming the video, during when he called for renationalisation of the railways, he took up a seat for the remaining journey of his London to Newcastle trip.

On August 11, Corbyn and his team boarded a Virgin Trains East Coast (VTEC) train at London King’s Cross to get to Newcastle. According to Virgin, CCTV footage shows them walking through Coach H – where there were plenty of unreserved seats – and walking to the far end of the train where Corbyn sat on the floor and was duly filmed by his staff.

In this video, Corbyn, more in sorrow than in anger, regrets the lack of seating and uses it as part of his campaigning initiative, launched that very day, for the renationalisation of the railways. It was subsequently posted on a newspaper website.

It now transpires that after he had finished filming – just 45 minutes into a journey set to last two and three quarter hours – he ambled back to Coach H and spent the rest of the journey sitting in comfort.
:erm::dozey::td:

heero_yuy 23-08-2016 17:38

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
A silly leftie publicity stunt that's fallen foul of modern CCTV technology. It's so crass it would be funny if it wasn't so serious. This is HMG's "opposition":dozey:

rhyds 23-08-2016 17:42

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
The thing is its so easy to organise a genuine case of it happening , so why make it up?

Its like people who bodge telephone wiring. It takes longer to do it wrong than it does to do it right!

Osem 23-08-2016 17:44

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I wonder how many episodes of this wonderful comedy Corbyn and his chum are going to come up with. It's all rather reminiscent of the Keystone Cops... :D

To think there are folks who're actually voting for this clown... :nutter:

rhyds 23-08-2016 17:54

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35855525)
I wonder how many episodes of this wonderful comedy Corbyn and his chum are going to come up with. It's all rather reminiscent of the Keystone Cops... :D

To think there are folks who're actually voting for this clown... :nutter:

Some people are so desperate for "the revolution" they think an old white bloke with all the charisma of a dishcloth and all the political skill of a dead badger is the answer...

martyh 23-08-2016 18:06

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rhyds (Post 35855524)
The thing is its so easy to organise a genuine case of it happening , so why make it up?

Its like people who bodge telephone wiring. It takes longer to do it wrong than it does to do it right!

I think any train leaving London at 5:20pm would have sufficed :)

heero_yuy 23-08-2016 18:08

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35855539)
I think any train leaving London at 5:20pm would have sufficed :)

It is the supreme irony and symptomatic of the disorganisation of the Labour party machine that the one he chose had empty seats. :erm:

rhyds 23-08-2016 18:14

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by heero_yuy (Post 35855542)
It is the supreme irony and symptomatic of the disorganisation of the Labour party machine that the one he chose had empty seats. :erm:

Exactly! Its not difficult to find an overcrowded train as martyh points out.

And to think a majority of Labour members think this man is capable of running the country...

Chris 23-08-2016 19:03

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Cynical, hypocritical, nasty piece of work.

That man o'the people mask is slipping.

Julian 23-08-2016 19:16

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
The scariest thing is that he and his cronies are that thick they didn't know the train had cctv.....

martyh 23-08-2016 19:22

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 35855565)
The scariest thing is that he and his cronies are that thick they didn't know the train had cctv.....

Given that Labour policy is responsible for the uptake of much of the cctv in use today it's very scary

rhyds 23-08-2016 19:30

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 35855565)
The scariest thing is that he and his cronies are that thick they didn't know the train had cctv.....

I think his crew thought that Virgin Trains wouldn't bother defending themselves.

Julian 23-08-2016 19:56

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Does THIS mean we can expect a strike soon over the use of the cctv footage.......

rhyds 23-08-2016 20:01

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 35855572)
Does THIS mean we can expect a strike soon over the use of the cctv footage.......

I wouldn't put it past the RMT. Of course they'll call it "work/life balance" or "for matters of safety" so its not obviously political...

RizzyKing 23-08-2016 21:20

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Generally you like your leader to have the appearence of good judgement and rational behaviour so jow can any labour party member with a straight face endorse corbyn a man so stupid he picks sitting on the floor to demonstrate a crowded train. That's not even touching the fact neither he or any of his team noticed the cctv camera or the signs that there was cctv that typically fixed to the wall the guy is an utter joke. Got to be honest though if theresa may actually backs her words with action she'll be more labour then most of the parliamentary labour party of the last two decades and with corbyn leading labour she's gauranteed another term in office at the next election.

Thinking about it all of us with a brain have a good reason to want corbyn for leader so march forward brother's and sister's and lets get jeremy re-elected.

Osem 23-08-2016 21:43

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35855562)
Cynical, hypocritical, nasty piece of work.

That man o'the people mask is slipping.

He's of the same ilk as Red Ken and various others who, most of the time, manage to hide the nastiness within but every so often...

I hear so many people saying they've voted for him because he's different but most of them seem never to have heard of him until the last year or so. Ironically, they think he's a breath of fresh air but all he has to offer is stale, out of date political dogma. He's no different now to what he was way back when and he's just proved he's certainly not above the sort of self serving stunt he's been highly critical of in the past. He really is yet another supreme hypocrite.

rhyds 23-08-2016 21:56

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
The thing is, if the left really do want to get in to power then they need a dynamic, charismatic leader who can sell the idea of socialism not to the scruffy SWP/Momentum "true believers" in notting hill, but to Mr and Mrs swing voter in Nuneaton or Northampton.

Corbyn simply doesn't have the ability to do that.

Arthurgray50@blu 23-08-2016 22:06

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Yes, but CCTV also have a clock on them. An idiot for the Corbyn camp stated that that the CCTV is from another Train, on a separate Journey.

But, the slip up is that he is shown on the Tape, going to sit down in anear empty carriage,

Good old Virgin Trains. Proving that Corbyn is a prat

TheDaddy 24-08-2016 07:40

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Does it matter that the train was full in the end, what's the most important point of this story, commuters having to sit on the floor after paying a fortune for a season ticket or having a pop at corbyn, since when has a politician playing fast and loose with the truth made the news, it's not like we've just made the most important decision of a generation based on nothing but lies

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...-lack-of-seats

---------- Post added at 07:40 ---------- Previous post was at 07:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arthurgray50@blu (Post 35855612)
Good old Virgin Trains. Proving that Corbyn is a prat

If I was feeling uncharitable I'd say it takes one to know one but seeing as I'm am feeling charitable I won't say that.

rhyds 24-08-2016 08:00

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35855635)
Does it matter that the train was full in the end, what's the most important point of this story, commuters having to sit on the floor after paying a fortune for a season ticket or having a pop at corbyn, since when has a politician playing fast and loose with the truth made the news, it's not like we've just made the most important decision of a generation based on nothing but lies

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/...-lack-of-seats[COLOR="Silver"]

The problem is Corbyn (and his supporters) have painted the man as a scrupulously honest, principled man, who's above the petty double-dealing of your average politician.

It basically boils down to the following options:

1: Jeremy Corbyn's team is so incompetent it couldn't even book its leader a train ticket with a seat reservation, and even so, he managed to get a seat in the end. They then film this to make out the train was full up.

2: Jeremy Corbyn's team purposefully booked a ticket without a seat reservation, meaning it was all a set up to start with.

Chris 24-08-2016 09:28

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Politicians are frequently misleading, however even in their game telling deliberate, outright lies to the public is frowned upon.

Walking past empty seats, sitting on the floor and then telling YouTube that there are no empty seats isn't misleading - it is a bare-faced lie, apparently because the facts were getting in the way of the story they wanted to tell.

In another age - not so far in the past - this would have been a resigning issue. Unfortunately, what passes for the Labour leadership is now operating according to some bizarre pseudo-revolutionary principle where just about anything is permissible as long as it furthers The Cause.

heero_yuy 24-08-2016 09:34

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

LABOUR Leadership challenger Owen Smith has been forced to apologise after seeming to call his rival Jeremy Corbyn a “lunatic”.

The former Shadow cabinet member is accused of “degrading” the contest and “injects an ugly tone” into it with the remarks at a rally in London last night.

Mr Smith has apologised for his comments after being accused of “degrading” the contest

Mr Smith has since denied he was referring to the veteran leftie with his comment, and said he is sorry “if anybody was offended”.

The ex-Shadow Work and Pensions Secretary said at the event in Hammersmith: “What you won’t get from me, is some, you know, lunatic at the top of the Labour Party.”

His outburst was caught on camera by reporter Tom Peck, who posted a recording on social media.”
Linky

Those pesky cameras and microphones get everywhere. :D

The real nasty party at work.

Osem 24-08-2016 11:07

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Yes just like Corbyn's mask of respectability which slipped when he cynically decided to mislead the public and got caught out, Labour's cloak of decency has well and truly slipped over the past year or so. Of course those of us who've seen it all before knew full well it was always an act, occasionally betrayed by one or other of them like Brown when he called an old lady a bigot or Livingstone when he likened a Jewish journalist to a Nazi prison camp guard. Some folks are of course just too young to remember the nastiness of the past, others just have a selective memory when it suits but the reality is that nastiness, hypocrisy and deceit runs through Labour's core just like 'Blackpool' in a Fylde Coast stick of rock.

I see Corbyn's typically now claiming that he's been the victim of a politically inspired attack, this time by Richard Branson. In typical lefty style, he hasn't got the decency to admit he's been caught out and gets all nasty about it, trying to shift the spotlight from his deceit. I dare say he'll be hoping for 'a good day to bury bad news' to rescue him...

Damien 24-08-2016 11:56

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35855635)
Does it matter that the train was full in the end, what's the most important point of this story, commuters having to sit on the floor after paying a fortune for a season ticket or having a pop at corbyn, since when has a politician playing fast and loose with the truth made the news, it's not like we've just made the most important decision of a generation based on nothing but lies

[url]http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/23/jeremy-corbyn-virgin-trains-disputes-claim-over-lack-of-seats

He lied. His supporters defend his political incompetence in part because he is a honest politician who doesn't do PR or spin. Here though he lied, he does do these things, so all we're left with is an incompetent politician.

It cuts to the heart of his biggest strength. That's why its news.

Also I hate this idea politicians should travel 2nd class or as have scummy a trip as possible. I hope next time May is on a train she takes 1st class and when asked why he says it's because she is the PM and needs to travel for work. It's not unreasonable for the Prime Minister to travel first class given the work they have to do and the hours they do.

heero_yuy 24-08-2016 12:05

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35855674)
He lied. His supporters defend his political incompetence in part because he is a honest politician who doesn't do PR or spin. Here though he lied, he does do these things, so all we're left with is an incompetent politician.

It cuts to the heart of his biggest strength. That's why its news.

Also I hate this idea politicians should travel 2nd class or as have scummy a trip as possible. I hope next time May is on a train she takes 1st class and when asked why he says it's because she is the PM and needs to travel for work. It's not unreasonable for the Prime Minister to travel first class given the work they have to do and the hours they do.

It's called "Standard Class" these days. ;)

Julian 24-08-2016 13:22

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Jeremy is angry

And at the foot of the article is the report that the release of the cctv footage is being investigated, what a shock :rolleyes:

rhyds 24-08-2016 13:35

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
As Al Murray said on twitter

"Branson won't have run this past his legal team. No chance at all..."

heero_yuy 24-08-2016 14:08

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rhyds (Post 35855689)
As Al Murray said on twitter

"Branson won't have run this past his legal team. No chance at all..."

I'd be surprised at that. It wouldn't have been Branson who did the actual publishing of the CCTV footage and I would have thought that a Virgin employee with access to such footage would be in knowledge of the DPA and how it applies to their company.

TheDaddy 24-08-2016 15:13

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35855649)
Politicians are frequently misleading, however even in their game telling deliberate, outright lies to the public is frowned upon.

Walking past empty seats, sitting on the floor and then telling YouTube that there are no empty seats isn't misleading - it is a bare-faced lie, apparently because the facts were getting in the way of the story they wanted to tell.

In another age - not so far in the past - this would have been a resigning issue. Unfortunately, what passes for the Labour leadership is now operating according to some bizarre pseudo-revolutionary principle where just about anything is permissible as long as it furthers The Cause.

Yes the story he wanted to tell that was true a couple of stops later, that seems to have been lost in the ensuing excrement storm. I like politicians to be above reproach but the days of doing the honourable thing are long gone

Hugh 24-08-2016 15:25

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
But some people may have left the train at York, so it may not necessarily have been true a couple of stops later...

Damien 24-08-2016 15:30

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35855711)
Yes the story he wanted to tell that was true a couple of stops later, that seems to have been lost in the ensuing excrement storm. I like politicians to be above reproach but the days of doing the honourable thing are long gone

Then he should have recorded it then.

There is plenty of overcrowding on trains so Corbyn has managed to lie in telling a story that is often true. That is a special kind of incompetence.

techguyone 24-08-2016 15:40

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35855714)
Then he should have recorded it then.

There is plenty of overcrowding on trains so Corbyn has managed to lie in telling a story that is often true. That is a special kind of incompetence.

so true.

Chris 24-08-2016 15:57

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35855711)
Yes the story he wanted to tell that was true a couple of stops later, that seems to have been lost in the ensuing excrement storm. I like politicians to be above reproach but the days of doing the honourable thing are long gone

Sorry but that sounds like Piers Morgan weakly insisting that his front page splash of British soldiers peeing all over Iraqi detainees was "representative of the sort of thing that's going on", right before being forced to admit the photos were staged. And then resigning.

As Damian said, if what he wanted to say was essentially true, all he had to to was bide his time and shoot his footage at a point when it was actually true. This was a very special form of incompetence.

TheDaddy 24-08-2016 17:39

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35855721)
Sorry but that sounds like Piers Morgan weakly insisting that his front page splash of British soldiers peeing all over Iraqi detainees was "representative of the sort of thing that's going on", right before being forced to admit the photos were staged. And then resigning.

As Damian said, if what he wanted to say was essentially true, all he had to to was bide his time and shoot his footage at a point when it was actually true. This was a very special form of incompetence.

Apparently Corbyn's account was true according to the other passengers, you know the people that were actually there.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.ind...android-h3g-gb

Pierre 24-08-2016 18:10

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I travel the East Coast line on a weekly basis at all different times and I chan tell you at 11:00 there is no issue in finding any seat you want.

Now if he'd jumped on at Kings X at 17:15, he could probably be stood up until Stevenage or even Peterborough. But even at those times you can still find a seat if really want one, depends who you're willing to sit next to!

Also, like most of us he'd probably be travelling on an off-peak advance were reserving your seat is mandatory!!!

Hugh 24-08-2016 18:12

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35855740)
Apparently Corbyn's account was true according to the other passengers, you know the people that were actually there.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.ind...android-h3g-gb

Those CCTV pictures showing the empty seats must have been faked, then... ;)

heero_yuy 24-08-2016 18:14

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
He was insisting on finding a pair of seats so he could sit next to his wife. A rather difficult requirement on a crowded train. IMHO a self manufactured problem.

If he wanted that he should have booked seats. It ain't rocket science.

Damien 24-08-2016 18:17

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35855740)
Apparently Corbyn's account was true according to the other passengers, you know the people that were actually there.

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.ind...android-h3g-gb

Or fans of his making excuses. I would take CCTV evidence over testimony from others. You can see it yourself. He walks past empty seats, shoots the video, goes back to the seats. All before the train reached it's first stop.

Osem 24-08-2016 18:19

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Some folks really are desperate to support Corbyn the clown aren't they... :rofl:

TheDaddy 24-08-2016 18:46

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35855743)
Those CCTV pictures showing the empty seats must have been faked, then... ;)

What you mean those pictures that could well have been illegally released

http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/uk_57...b042aee74dca3e

---------- Post added at 18:46 ---------- Previous post was at 18:44 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35855747)
Or fans of his making excuses. I would take CCTV evidence over testimony from others. You can see it yourself. He walks past empty seats, shoots the video, goes back to the seats. All before the train reached it's first stop.

I'm really not that interested, I'm more interested in a labour leaders lies getting people killed than this bs, politician doesn't quite tell truth shocker

martyh 24-08-2016 18:52

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35855750)
What you mean those pictures that could well have been illegally released

http://m.huffpost.com/uk/entry/uk_57...b042aee74dca3e

---------- Post added at 18:46 ---------- Previous post was at 18:44 ----------



I'm really not that interested, I'm more interested in a labour leaders lies getting people killed than this bs, politician doesn't quite tell truth shocker

illegal or not doesn't matter ,they still show what really happened

it may well be bs but put it all together with everything else the bloke has fubard it is not a good place for the leader of HMG opposition to be in

Damien 24-08-2016 19:29

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35855750)
I'm really not that interested, I'm more interested in a labour leaders lies getting people killed than this bs, politician doesn't quite tell truth shocker

But Corbyn not being a politician is his biggest selling point. His slogan was 'straight talking, honest politics'. Every time he makes one of his tone-deaf gaffs, poor PMQs performances or misses open goals against the government his fans will tell us that this is because he isn't a politician who spins.

If Corbyn has spent the last year taking the moral high ground it's going to news when he falls from it.

Osem 24-08-2016 19:41

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35855754)
illegal or not doesn't matter ,they still show what really happened

it may well be bs but put it all together with everything else the bloke has fubard it is not a good place for the leader of HMG opposition to be in

To give him credit where it's due, at least he's made Miliband look a bit better... :D

TheDaddy 24-08-2016 19:42

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35855754)
illegal or not doesn't matter ,they still show what really happened

it may well be bs but put it all together with everything else the bloke has fubard it is not a good place for the leader of HMG opposition to be in

So law breaking doesn't matter but telling a fib does, interesting perspective on rule breaking you have.

---------- Post added at 19:42 ---------- Previous post was at 19:41 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35855770)
But Corbyn not being a politician is his biggest selling point. His slogan was 'straight talking, honest politics'. Every time he makes one of his tone-deaf gaffs, poor PMQs performances or misses open goals against the government his fans will tell us that this is because he isn't a politician who spins.

If Corbyn has spent the last year taking the moral high ground it's going to news when he falls from it.

You think that's why it's caused a kerfuffle then, because people fell for his act and got their pants pulled down, more fool them for trusting him

martyh 24-08-2016 19:46

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35855776)
So law breaking doesn't matter but telling a fib does, interesting perspective on rule breaking you have.


How about you run along and try and twist my words a bit more :rolleyes:

You suggested(in reply to Hugh) that the fact the cctv may have been obtained or released illegally somehow changes the facts ,it doesn't, there where still empty seats and Corbyn is still a lying SOB .

TheDaddy 24-08-2016 19:56

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35855778)
How about you run along and try and twist my words a bit more :rolleyes:

You suggested(in reply to Hugh) that the fact the cctv may have been obtained or released illegally somehow changes the facts ,it doesn't, there where still empty seats and Corbyn is still a lying SOB .

And now those facts are bring questioned to by people that were there, on top of the video quite possibly not being legal so I'd say it changes things. Why you so angry marty, you weren't one of the people taken in by him were you? There's no shame in it if you were, I had high hopes for him to at one point.

Mr K 24-08-2016 20:02

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
The 'story' is a pathetic irrelevance. There is an agenda to get Corbyn, from all quarters, from both inside & outside politics. The timing of all this, as voting papers go out, is interesting. It won't make a difference, quite the opposite. People are fed up of the Tory and Blairite Westminster clique, only interested in their own careers/power at whatever cost. If there was a genuinely good alternative then go for it. Owen Smith isn't it.

martyh 24-08-2016 20:12

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35855782)
And now those facts are bring questioned to by people that were there, on top of the video quite possibly not being legal so I'd say it changes things. Why you so angry marty, you weren't one of the people taken in by him were you? There's no shame in it if you were, I had high hopes for him to at one point.

Doesn't change a thing ,how could it ? a fact is a fact regardless of the dubious illegality of the releasing of the CCTV .That is a very weak argument .There where 100 different ways to get the point across RE overcrowded trains and every single one of them would do it better and more honestly than the way Corbyn did it .Next time he has a point to make how do we know he hasn't fabricated facts to support his point

I haven't been a labour supporter since never

TheDaddy 24-08-2016 20:48

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by martyh (Post 35855791)
Doesn't change a thing ,how could it ? a fact is a fact regardless of the dubious illegality of the releasing of the CCTV .That is a very weak argument .There where 100 different ways to get the point across RE overcrowded trains and every single one of them would do it better and more honestly than the way Corbyn did it .Next time he has a point to make how do we know he hasn't fabricated facts to support his point

I haven't been a labour supporter since never

Why you so angry then, shouting and cursing. People actually being there on the train corroborating his story calls the facts into question imo and questioning the cctv legality isn't weak, if they've broken the law releasing it who is to say they haven't doctored it as Hugh jokingly suggested, their integrity is in question every bit as much as Corbyn's imo

Chris 24-08-2016 23:12

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 35855776)
So law breaking doesn't matter but telling a fib does, interesting perspective on rule breaking you have.

As an attempt at deflection this is mildly amusing. The legality of the release is a separate issue, worthy of its own discussion. It does not, however, alter any of the facts of last week's incident.

Corbyn lied. His team lied. They have spent the last 48 hours frantically trying to cover their asses and now they are hilariously all offering slightly different versions of the tale, thereby breaking all four rules of spin in record time.

Arthurgray50@blu 24-08-2016 23:32

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Corbyn is a **** full stop. I just hope that Miss May goes to the country, and then he will quit.

He reminds me of an old Black and White film where a Militant worker gets hired for a company in Brighton and goes there to wreck the company who starts a strike.

An when he succeeds, he leaves and gets paid and that's it.

Cobyns reminds me of him

TheDaddy 25-08-2016 02:39

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35855822)
As an attempt at deflection this is mildly amusing. The legality of the release is a separate issue, worthy of its own discussion. It does not, however, alter any of the facts of last week's incident.

Corbyn lied. His team lied. They have spent the last 48 hours frantically trying to cover their asses and now they are hilariously all offering slightly different versions of the tale, thereby breaking all four rules of spin in record time.

What I find amusing is that people are getting their knickers in a twist over a politician lying, perhaps it's the straw that broke the camels back after all those whoppers we swallowed during the referendum campaign. I thought we liked being lied to anyway, I mean there's a guy sleeping on a giant pile of cash and was complicit in the on going deaths of about a million people based solely on lies and we've done nothing about him and no I'm not trying to deflect anything of anyone just stating facts that we're all so fond of.

Chris 25-08-2016 08:04

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Corbyn has turned Arthur into a Tory. That's how bad he is.

The article I linked to about spin is a useful read. There is a difference between spin, which is a presentational trick, and outright lies (such as, for example, "there are no seats" when in fact there are).

Corbyn is guilty of telling an outright lie, in a way almost guaranteed to get himself caught, and then spectacularly mismanaging the fallout. He isn't fit to lead any political party, never mind the country.

Damien 25-08-2016 08:40

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35855851)
Corbyn has turned Arthur into a Tory. That's how bad he is.

The article I linked to about spin is a useful read. There is a difference between spin, which is a presentational trick, and outright lies (such as, for example, "there are no seats" when in fact there are).

Corbyn is guilty of telling an outright lie, in a way almost guaranteed to get himself caught, and then spectacularly mismanaging the fallout. He isn't fit to lead any political party, never mind the country.

At least if you're going to lie then do it well.

Tony Blair and Alistair Campbell wouldn't get caught out by so simple an error. They would have intentionally sought out a crowded train. Cynics would say they set themselves up for a photo-op but crucially they wouldn't be able to definitively prove it nor would it really matter.

Talented politicians rarely outright lie. They spin, obfuscate, carefully word statements or deal in hypothetical scenarios but they would rarely put themselves in a situation where something can be completely shown to be false.

The incompetence of it all should alarm people more than the lie.

heero_yuy 25-08-2016 08:44

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35855858)
At least if you're going to lie then do it well.

Tony Blair and Alistair Campbell wouldn't get caught out by so simple an error. They would have intentionally sought out a crowded train. Cynics would say they set themselves up for a photo-op but crucially they wouldn't be able to definitively prove it nor would it really matter.

Talented politicians rarely outright lie. They spin, obfuscate, carefully word statements or deal in hypothetical scenarios but they would rarely put themselves in a situation where something can be completely shown to be false.

That is the test of a true politician.

Quote:

The incompetence of it all should alarm people more than the lie.
:tu:

rhyds 25-08-2016 09:46

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35855858)
At least if you're going to lie then do it well.

Tony Blair and Alistair Campbell wouldn't get caught out by so simple an error. They would have intentionally sought out a crowded train. Cynics would say they set themselves up for a photo-op but crucially they wouldn't be able to definitively prove it nor would it really matter.

Talented politicians rarely outright lie. They spin, obfuscate, carefully word statements or deal in hypothetical scenarios but they would rarely put themselves in a situation where something can be completely shown to be false.

The incompetence of it all should alarm people more than the lie.

As a chap on another forum pointed out, if Corbyn had both brain cells firing he'd have done the stunt on a Southern train at rush hour. That would be pretty much irrefutable, keep the southern rail strikes (which are damaging the government) in the news and really help his cause.

Instead his crew decide to do it on an 11am train to Newcastle with spare seats. Again, if he'd gone for "people have to do this every day, I decided to try it for an hour to highlight the issues" he might have got away with it.

But no, his crew decided to go for the full whopper and make it all up. It reminds me of that woman who claimed she'd been assaulted in Primark while breastfeeding, only for it to be proven she'd made it all up and she was given a suspended prison sentence.

And as for those laying in to Branson for releasing the CCTV footage, all companies are well within their rights to defend their reputation against what could be argued to be defamation/libel or similar. I think Corbyn's team thought that Virgin Trains and Branson simply wouldn't bother defending themselves, only for them to get a very nasty shock.

Osem 25-08-2016 09:49

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35855851)
Corbyn has turned Arthur into a Tory. That's how bad he is.

The article I linked to about spin is a useful read. There is a difference between spin, which is a presentational trick, and outright lies (such as, for example, "there are no seats" when in fact there are).

Corbyn is guilty of telling an outright lie, in a way almost guaranteed to get himself caught, and then spectacularly mismanaging the fallout. He isn't fit to lead any political party, never mind the country.

With all due respect, Corbyn couldn't run a children's party. ;)

Aside from UK PLC not so slowly grinding to a halt, can you imagine the sort of international incidents Corbyn would get us into if he were leading the country? In political terms he's like a sad old man who's become a bit of a hermit with some odd and not very nice habits which he hitherto got away with because nobody noticed. Can anyone seriously imagine him representing and negotiating anything of any worth for the UK? Right now he's only the leader of a party in what I hope is terminal decline yet he's managed to show himself as a ditherer or fantasist on virtually all the important issues he's faced.

rhyds 25-08-2016 09:52

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 35855868)
With all due respect, Corbyn couldn't run a children's party. ;)

On facebook, someone who's the son of a serving Labour MP and a true believer of Corbyn said "Corbyn can take May"

The reply?

"Corbyn would struggle to take a bath..."

Osem 25-08-2016 10:08

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
:rofl:

It's quite noticeable how there's a vociferous minority of people who appear out of the woodwork whenever Corbyn puts his foot in it and argue he's done nothing wrong. Similar tactics are used when there's a tube strike and all of a sudden seemingly random people appear on the airwaves, all saying remarkably similar things in defence of the union line. Far too similar...

It's a well known tactic of course based on the he who shouts loudest school of thought. The difference with Corbyn is that I don't think most of these people respect him half as much as they claim. What the extremist element see in him is, I believe, an opportunity to exploit his weakness in order to further their destructive objectives. To that extent Corbyn is a tool in more ways than one...

rhyds 25-08-2016 10:34

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Yep, Corbyn's just an Useful Idiot to the hard left.

RizzyKing 25-08-2016 12:36

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Corbyn is not useful for anything or anyone the man is a walking calamity and how he's managed to get the fanatical followers i have no idea but i suspect they are fanatical about what he claims to be rather then what he actually is. This entire train stunt was just plain lazy and badly implemented and if the man can't bring the issue of overcrowded trains which do exist fairly often to light in an honest and semi intelligent way then that's a massive warning as to how incapable he'd be with anything remotely hard much less the day to day running of a government.

It's been funny but this is a joke that's long since run it's course labour party members need to come back to planet earth and elect someone serious and who may be able to run things. Corbyn is not a leader he's barely a politician and has no right being in the forefront old story of a very limited individual elevated far beyond his ability and the other lesson for labour is not to put up joke candidates because as Corbyn has proved they sometimes win.

heero_yuy 25-08-2016 13:30

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
The joke may have run its course but the gift just keeps on giving. :)

Damien 25-08-2016 13:39

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
In case you're wondering what excuses are being made for Corbyn so that he didn't lie they are:
  1. CCTV was fake
  2. He walked down to find seats together, when he went back they were all taken. Then Virgin moved people around and he got one
  3. There are bags and coats on the seats but Corbyn couldn't talk to the passangers in case they were not converts of St Jeremy the Honest
  4. The passengers were neoliberal shills and as such Corbyn stood (or sat) well clear
  5. The seats were taken by a band of travelling midgets

rhyds 25-08-2016 13:48

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
6. Richard Branson once had a photo taken with Tony Blair. Ergo he's Blairite

7. There were spare seats, but Jeremy wanted two together so he could sit by his wife

8. The tories have done the same

Osem 25-08-2016 13:52

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
9. It's all Thatcher's fault.

10. It's all Bliar's fault.

:D

Hugh 25-08-2016 20:12

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
On a related note...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-37190437
Quote:

G4S 'rejects Labour conference security offer'

Security giant G4S says it has rejected a last-minute approach by Labour to cover its annual conference.

G4S - which Labour previously voted to boycott - said it was contacted this week but could not take on the "large, complex" job at short notice.

It comes amid a standoff between the GMB and another security firm, Showsec, over union recognition.

Labour refused to comment on commercial arrangements but sources said the conference would go ahead as planned.

The GMB has claimed the conference could be "scuppered" by its row with Showsec, which centres on the company's refusal to sign a union recognition agreement before the conference, which begins in Liverpool on 25 September.

'Successful relationship'
Security at recent conferences has been provided by G4S, which Labour's executive committee voted to boycott, over claims the company has links to Israeli prisons.

The company said it had been approached earlier this week by Labour for this year's event.
G4S managing director Eric Alexander said his company had been disappointed not to continue its "successful working relationship" with Labour.

Planning for such an event would normally take up to a year, involving clearance for security officers, detailed risk assessments and planning with local police forces, he said.

"Safety for delegates and our staff is our priority and at this late stage and with our teams committed elsewhere, we are not in a position to step in and provide security for the conference."
Brings to mind the old phrase about the inability to organise a heavy drinking session at a place where beer is made.... :D

Osem 25-08-2016 21:38

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Right now a whelk stall is looking like it'd overstretch Labour's organisational capabilities.

TheDaddy 26-08-2016 01:57

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 35855851)
Corbyn has turned Arthur into a Tory. That's how bad he is.

The article I linked to about spin is a useful read. There is a difference between spin, which is a presentational trick, and outright lies (such as, for example, "there are no seats" when in fact there are).

Corbyn is guilty of telling an outright lie, in a way almost guaranteed to get himself caught, and then spectacularly mismanaging the fallout. He isn't fit to lead any political party, never mind the country.

A lie is a lie in my book. It's no wonder people trust politicians less than bankers or estate agents, if they really want people to start engaging with politics they could start by simply telling the truth more.

https://www.ipsos-mori.com/researchp...d-bankers.aspx

I do agree with you about corbyn though, I had high hopes for him when he got the job and really hoped he could change the face of politics as we now know it but he wasn't up to it. I don't think he is a very honourable man either, if I was damaging something I claimed to love to such an extent it might be destroyed surely the decent thing to do is step aside.

rhyds 26-08-2016 08:00

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
I'm actually beginning to doubt how "pleasant" Corbyn really is. His tetchy, combative responses to difficult questions are a bit of an eye opener.

TheDaddy 26-08-2016 08:20

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Sigh he's at it again

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/www.ind...android-h3g-gb

Hugh 26-08-2016 09:30

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
It would help if he and his aides could agree on a consistent story...

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entr...b0f78b2b4c727a
Quote:

23 August, 17:51

Unreserved seats free but blocked by bags

Corbyn’s team revised that claim less than 50 minutes later. It told the BBC that some of those seats shown unoccupied in the picture had bags on them - “which appeared to belong to people who had gone to the toilet”.

23 August, 21:00

‘Wanted to sit with wife’

That account was changed again a few hours after, when a source in the Corbyn camp revealed the Labour leader had walked past empty unreserved seats without bags on.

They told the Guardian he had shunned them in favour of the floor as there were no two seats together and he wanted to sit with his wife, Laura Alvarez.

23 August, later that evening

‘That’s nonsense’

That allegation was flatly denied by other sources in Jeremy for Leader. One told the Mirror’s Jack Blanchard that the claim was “nonsense”, while the Sun’s Harry Cole was told: “That line about only wanting to sit with his wife is nonsense and not from us.”

24 August, 10:40

‘Wanted to sit with wife’

Corbyn held a press conference the following day when he was asked about the rubbished claims concerning his wife.

He revealed first that he turned down seats as there were no two together for him and his wife: “I looked for two empty seats together so I could sit down with my wife to talk to her - that was impossible.”

Then he upped the minimum number of seats he had been looking for, saying of the team that joined him on his journey: “There wasn’t a place for us all to sit down.”

At time of writing, this was the most recent explanation given.

Osem 26-08-2016 09:56

Re: Corbyn's kerfuffle
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rhyds (Post 35856028)
I'm actually beginning to doubt how "pleasant" Corbyn really is. His tetchy, combative responses to difficult questions are a bit of an eye opener.

Not for me, I recall him and his unpleasantness from years back.

As for the supposed message of support from Bernie Sanders:

Quote:

Jeremy Corbyn was left red-faced after his claim that he'd received a supportive message from Bernie Sanders was denied by the US senator.

It comes after the Labour leader told supporters at a phone bank on Monday evening in Walthamstow that the former Democratic hopeful for President had been in touch with his aides to draw parallels between their left-wing campaigns.

But a spokesman for Mr Sanders, who was beaten by Hillary Clinton to the Democratic nomination, told the Huffington Post: “The senator didn't send a message and doesn't intend to get involved in British politics but he admires Mr Corbyn and wishes him well.”

Of Mr Sanders supposed message, according to the Press Association, Mr Corbyn had said: “We had a message yesterday from Bernie Sanders saying that they condemned him because he wasn’t electable.

“And he said the reason they condemned him was because he was electable. And he represented a threat to the establishment within the USA.”

“So I think you can see the parallels that are going on there,” he added.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7208631.html

Yet another red face for Corbyn, well I suppose that's to be expected from someone so rooted in the leftist politics of the past.

I think what's going on here is that Corbyn and his cronies are making it up as they go along. He seems to have his very own version of the Midas touch which sadly for him, results in everything he touches going wrong...


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:47.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum