![]() |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
I thought most people regarded Amazon Prime prices as being rather lower than elsewhere. I've heard it all now! ---------- Post added at 10:04 ---------- Previous post was at 09:55 ---------- Quote:
If it is not understood that competition leads to lower prices, maybe some tuition on economics is required. There have not been enough players for the Premiership Football rights to demonstrate this to date, but as more competition comes in, things can start to change. I've already outlined how Amazon (as an example) could bid more yet lower prices, and to say that higher prices will follow 'end of' does rather indicate that you have a closed mind on this subject, Den. Profit is certainly the prime motivator for all companies, but lower pricing gets you a better share of the market. Sometimes, it's the only way to get into that market. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
why keep on about this myth please tell us what happened to price with competition between sky vm and bt OB when did they ever become lower |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
---------- Post added at 11:40 ---------- Previous post was at 11:38 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Perhaps going for a full house, he's been a pundit for BBC, ITV, Ch4 and BT already this year. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
KCOM fined £900,000 for failing to ensure people could make 999 calls after flooding in York from Storm Eva hit the telephone exchange
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Sky/BT/VM prices will become more reasonable as such competition increases, because otherwise, cord cutting will put them in an unsustainable position. I think the loss of Premiership football to Amazon, Google, Twitter or Netflix will hasten the process of price reductions for cable and satellite services. OTT services are a real threat to the existing order, I'm surprised you can't see that. ---------- Post added at 15:33 ---------- Previous post was at 15:27 ---------- Quote:
I guess you must be satisfied with the status quo, Den, or you wouldn't be so against these ideas, which makes me wonder why you keep complaining about these constant price increases. Nothing lasts forever, and the existing order of things will soon change. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Sky sports now £22 a month for 1 year with VM
Offer not open to existing Sky sports or movies customers |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
So after all the excitement at the end of last week Sky set to retain EFL rights with highlights moving to ITV (not confirmed but if they are reporting it so it's probably true)
https://www.theguardian.com/football...0m-a-year-deal |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
All the reports of SKY's dominance being in decline appear to be nothing more than speculation and wishful thinking. Does anyone realistically think they will lose their grip over Premiership rights? They appear to have reserves of money available that BT don't. There has to be a point when inflated sports costs plateau. Analysts have been saying this for nearly 5 years now but we're still not seeing it happening. Something has got to give somewhere surely? |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
---------- Post added at 06:02 ---------- Previous post was at 06:00 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
The problem for Sky is that there are other challengers waiting in the wings. They have even bigger pockets than Sky and could outbid them if they wanted to. The big question is, will they do so, and will this translate into even higher prices, which is clearly what you believe, or will the new players have different models that see lower prices to bring in a bigger audience and help to combat piracy, and will they sell on their rights to enhance the income to pay for this so that at least some matches can be shown on more platforms? For these answers, we will have to wait and see. However, simply to respond doggedly that it will never happen without giving an explanation does not really contribute to this debate convincingly, although that view may be your genuinely held opinion. |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Alan Brazil facing the axe from talkSPORT breakfast with Jeff Stelling lined up
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/foo...ings-fall.html |
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
|
Re: ESPN, BT, Euro, Premier and Sky Sports news
Quote:
Your view that Sky would pay anything to retain these rights does not make business sense, has been contradicted by Sky itself and is clearly nonsense. Sky know perfectly well that the more they put up prices now, the more subscribers they will lose and piracy will start to go through the roof. If customer resistence results in subscribers leaving in droves, where's the profit coming from? You yourself remind us constantly that these companies are purely motivated by profit and you come out with this! You are clearly not listening to the reasoned arguments being made here. An Amazon type global player will come in with a different model if they wish to break into this market as I firmly believe at least one of them will - if not this time, then next. This will enable them to bid high but then recoup their money by reducing the price of subscriptions. That will attract more customers and will help in the fight againsy piracy. Instead of hogging matches to itself as Sky does, it would bring in other platforms, for which they would be charged. The terrestrials would be able to buy selected matches as well. Basically, a range of new ways would be introduced to make money from these rights. They would not tie one hand behind their backs as Sky does as a result of its overwhelming desire to force as many people as possible to use its own platform to receive content. Whether people subscribe via their own website, through Sky, VM, BT, Talk Talk or wherever would not matter because they would still get their share of the revenue. It's time to take off those blinkers, Den, before the reality hits you between the eyes! ;) |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:49. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum