Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Brexit (Old) (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33706539)

Hugh 11-12-2018 20:33

Re: Brexit
 
Repeated warning- Let's leave the British Empire to another time or thread.

---------- Post added at 19:33 ---------- Previous post was at 19:26 ----------

Further off-topic post deleted- any more, infractions will be issued, as will those who use personal insults.

jfman 11-12-2018 20:33

Re: Brexit
 
I suspect the leave voters are trying to sabotage this thread so they can deny the present too.

The dream is crumbling along with this Government.

Pierre 11-12-2018 20:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35974849)
I suspect the leave voters are trying to sabotage this thread so they can deny the present too.

The dream is crumbling along with this Government.

If you have nothing to say, why post? Are you that bored?

jfman 11-12-2018 20:53

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35974831)
I did spot that, the problem being a second referendum doesn’t need a majority of the public to want one, only Parliament to legislate for it.

What’d be curious, and I accept highly unlikely, is if leave voters boycotted the referendum. It’d be a legally enacted referendum with no real legitimacy. To lose 52-48 would demonstrably be a shift in public opinion, but what if you couldn’t measure a shift at all?

I refer to my last post, the most recent post that didn’t contradict moderator instructions. I welcome any input that isn’t a personal insult.

Pierre 11-12-2018 21:07

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35974831)
I did spot that, the problem being a second referendum doesn’t need a majority of the public to want one, only Parliament to legislate for it.

As I have maintained a second referendum is not an issue for me, but what it asks is.


Quote:

What’d be curious, and I accept highly unlikely, is if leave voters boycotted the referendum. It’d be a legally enacted referendum with no real legitimacy. To lose 52-48 would demonstrably be a shift in public opinion, but what if you couldn’t measure a shift at all?
I think the result would be too close to call, a second referendum is a massive gamble for Parliament. Because, regardless of opinion polls, it is one they could very well lose. Then what??? For them?

A second referendum is a possibility, but I think they will try some other avenue to revoke A50 “temporarily” for an indeterminate amount of time until they are convinced they would win (by they I mean parliament) a referendum.

Can I personally insult you later?

ianch99 11-12-2018 21:27

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35974855)
Can I personally insult you later?

The strangest remark so far on this thread ... and there have been many :)

denphone 11-12-2018 21:47

Re: Brexit
 
Haulage bosses say plans for customs ‘dire’ and government in denial over scale of issue.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...no-deal-brexit

Quote:

Government plans for customs checks at Dover in a no-deal scenario are so impractical it would take eight hours to clear an average lorry carrying food and goods from Calais, the Road Haulage Association has warned.
Quote:

It said plans for no-deal Brexit were “dire” and the sector faced a catastrophe on 30 March.
Quote:

“The government is in denial about the scale of this,” said Rod McKenzie, director of policy at the RHA, which represents major hauliers including Eddie Stobart and DHL.

Sephiroth 11-12-2018 21:53

Re: Brexit
 
A second referendum would have to be advisory only (the first was declared by the then PM to be binding). That is because exit is enshrined in law unless/until new primary legislation repeals the 2018 ACT.

pip08456 11-12-2018 21:55

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35974852)
I refer to my last post, the most recent post that didn’t contradict moderator instructions. I welcome any input that isn’t a personal insult.

Sorry you considered it as personal but I would consider it applied to anyone of you POV (not you personally). Can we leave it there?

2nd referendum. not a hope in hell!

Remain or leave has already been decided and no deal with any Country or Bloc has ever been decided by the electorate.

jfman 11-12-2018 22:04

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35974862)
Sorry you considered it as personal but I would consider it applied to anyone of you POV (not you personally). Can we leave it there?

2nd referendum. not a hope in hell!

Remain or leave has already been decided and no deal with any Country or Bloc has ever been decided by the electorate.

You are inviting reopening a discussion you been told to leave. Whether you’d use the insult in a blanket fashion is irrelevant.

---------- Post added at 21:04 ---------- Previous post was at 21:02 ----------

If the 48 letters are in can Corbyn get there first or does he wait and see who wins the Tory leadership? Does May actually win it?

RichardCoulter 11-12-2018 22:22

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35974861)
A second referendum would have to be advisory only (the first was declared by the then PM to be binding). That is because exit is enshrined in law unless/until new primary legislation repeals the 2018 ACT.

There was nothing in the 2015 EU Referendum Act that made the outcome of the referendum legally binding.

In 2010 the House Of Lords Constitution Committee explained that referendums in this country can only ever be advisory because of the sovereignty of Parliament. The only way that they could become legally binding would be if Parliament actively agreed to bind itself to the result of a future referendum.

Confusion has been caused by people e.g. the former Culture Secretary Karen Bradley erroneously saying that the result was actually binding.

pip08456 11-12-2018 22:37

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 35974869)
There was nothing in the 2015 EU Referendum Act that made the outcome of the referendum legally binding.

In 2010 the House Of Lords Constitution Committee explained that referendums in this country can only ever be advisory because of the sovereignty of Parliament. The only way that they could become legally binding would be if Parliament actively agreed to bind itself to the result of a future referendum.

Confusion has been caused by people e.g. the former Culture Secretary Karen Bradley erroneously saying that the result was actually binding

.


European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018

jfman 11-12-2018 23:16

Re: Brexit
 
It’ll sound pedantic, but the fact Parliament chose to introduce legislation on the back of the result doesn’t prove the result in and of itself was legally binding upon Parliament.

The legal status of the referendum is that Parliament chose to follow the advice. No statement by any Minister or any document produced by the Government and posted into every home in the country can change that. If a Government policy was to follow the result again that’s a manifesto commitment with no legal status.

The European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 is legally binding until such times as Parliament withdraws or amends it.

I know, it’s pedantic, and of no real consequence to what may/may not happen in future anyway. All the options are on the table. Deal, no deal, extension, remain (2nd referendum optional but politically very likely required before remain).

Alternatively a party could win a general election with a commitment to remain and unilaterally withdraw A50 but I’m sure despite much disagreement on this thread we would all agree that’s unlikely! Politically and legally, it’d be legit tho.

RichardCoulter 11-12-2018 23:40

Re: Brexit
 
EU Parliament on lock down following a shooting incident in Strasbourg Centre Christmas market. EU staff said to be safe in their building.

It'll be interesting to find out if this has got anything to do with Brexit.

1andrew1 12-12-2018 00:32

Re: Brexit
 
May's strategy:
  • * Frame the choice in January as being her deal or a chaotic no-deal Brexit.
    * To ensure this, meaningful no-deal planning has been put on hold with no solution existing for the crucial Dover-Calais route.
    * Will tell her cabinet on Wednesday to ramp up no-deal planning, but as this is too late in the day its true purpose will be to emphasise the oncoming chaos if there is no deal.
    * Concessions squeezed out of Europe will be used to win over some of the Eurosceptics.
https://www.ft.com/content/c14c8f1c-...0-57a2a826423e

Gavin78 12-12-2018 00:32

Re: Brexit
 
So if Corbyn talks about a 2nd referendum can he actually do this if the original is binding or doesn't this apply to a new Government?

Dave42 12-12-2018 00:42

Re: Brexit
 
Tim Shipman@ShippersUnbound
28 minutes ago

I know I’m hours after the fray. But source in No10 says 48 letters are in and second source says conversations have taken place between Cabinet Office and Palace

Hugh 12-12-2018 00:54

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Gavin78 (Post 35974889)
So if Corbyn talks about a 2nd referendum can he actually do this if the original is binding or doesn't this apply to a new Government?

A previous Government cannot bind a future government’s legislation.

pip08456 12-12-2018 00:57

Re: Brexit
 
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga...ntents/enacted

Sephiroth 12-12-2018 07:52

Re: Brexit
 
Whilst I want to leave the EU, a 2nd referendum would be very exciting, bearing in mind that there won't be a Corbyn government in the near future.

Incidentally, there was an excellent article in yesterday's Torygraph that pitched the crassness of TM on the basis that she was doing the rounds to obtain "clarifications" on her "best deal" that was starkly clear on its terms! The article also noted that she had stiffed her cabinet colleagues on Monday morning by telling them to say that the vote was on for yesterday. What kind of person is that to lead the country?

No wonder OB has scarpered off the thread!

Hugh 12-12-2018 08:42

Re: Brexit
 
Just breaking on BBC News - vote of confidence on Theresa May taking place this evening, as 48 (or more) letters received by the 1922 Committee.

Simple majority of Tory MPs required.

jfman 12-12-2018 08:46

Re: Brexit
 
It’d be funny if she held on.

Chris 12-12-2018 08:54

Re: Brexit
 
I’m slightly surprised it’s taken this long.

Damien 12-12-2018 09:01

Re: Brexit
 
At the moment you assume she’ll survive but the DUP might theaten to bring down the government...

denphone 12-12-2018 09:22

Re: Brexit
 
Did not the DUP say that they would support the government in a vote of confidence in parliament?.

jfman 12-12-2018 09:38

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35974913)
Did not the DUP say that they would support the government in a vote of confidence in parliament?.

DUP have said as long her her deal doesn’t pass they will back the Government in a no confidence vote. That’s not to say they can’t change their mind depending on who (and what) proposals step forward. It’s not legally binding. ;)

denphone 12-12-2018 09:40

Re: Brexit
 
Timetable for the day.

Quote:

12pm: Theresa May faces Jeremy Corbyn at PMQs.
2pm: May chairs cabinet
5pm: May addresses the 1922 Committee.
6pm: The no confidence ballot opens,
8pm: The ballot closes. The result is announced soon afterwards.

jfman 12-12-2018 09:43

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35974916)
Timetable for the day.

She’s about to speak imminently... your timetable could be in the bin if she chucks it. :D

denphone 12-12-2018 09:45

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35974917)
She’s about to speak imminently... your timetable could be in the bin if she chucks it. :D

l doubt it unless you have some inside knowledge.;)

jfman 12-12-2018 09:53

Re: Brexit
 
Powerful words. Back me or it’s no deal vs no Brexit.

denphone 12-12-2018 09:58

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35974921)
Powerful words. Back me or it’s no deal vs no Brexit.

A governing party tearing itself apart..

Mr K 12-12-2018 10:06

Re: Brexit
 
What a shambles this country is. Betting she'll comfortably survive, seeing as they struggled for so long just to get 48 letters. . Turkeys don't vote for Xmas, especially at this time of the year !

denphone 12-12-2018 10:11

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35974925)
What a shambles this country is. Betting she'll comfortably survive, seeing as they struggled for so long just to get 48 letters. . Turkeys don't vote for Xmas, especially at this time of the year !

And the civil war which is engulfing the Conservative party is highly likely to get even worse Mr K.

Mr K 12-12-2018 10:15

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35974926)
And the civil war which is engulfing the Conservative party is highly likely to get even worse Mr K.

Oh good, I'll get some popcorn in ;).

Seriously what a selfish load of muppets, jostling for power whilst the country goes down the pan. This has all Brexit has-been about, individuals, ambition and power.

tweetiepooh 12-12-2018 10:21

Re: Brexit
 
The whole lot of them are a right pain at the moment. The public may have no love for policies but they really don't like back stabbing and behaviour like that.

Labour must be rejoicing that they don't have to take the risk.

djfunkdup 12-12-2018 10:26

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35974926)
And the civil war which is engulfing the Conservative party is highly likely to get even worse Mr K.

You really are turning into the Joan Collins of CF :D:D .

---------- Post added at 09:26 ---------- Previous post was at 09:24 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 35974930)
The public may have no love for policies but they really don't like back stabbing and behaviour like that.

I love it. Democracy at it's best :):):)

We will get through all this don't worry . It's actually part of the cycle of change ;)

denphone 12-12-2018 10:27

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by djfunkdup (Post 35974931)
You really are turning into the Joan Collins of CF :D:D .

Thank you dear as l will introduce her great nemesis soon.;):D

Stuart 12-12-2018 10:37

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35974873)

Nope, the fact that the government decided to initiate the act of leaving after the referendum does not mean it was legally bound to implement the result of the referendum.

Previously, government has only cared about the will of the people during election campaigns. There's a reason they seem to care about it all the time now. Personally, I think it's so they can blame the people for the mess they are making.

Dave42 12-12-2018 10:42

Re: Brexit
 
May to fight confidence vote - and says: 'I'm ready to finish the job'

https://news.sky.com/story/live-may-...lenge-11578479

djfunkdup 12-12-2018 10:45

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35974938)
Nope, the fact that the government decided to initiate the act of leaving after the referendum does not mean it was legally bound to implement the result of the referendum.

Previously, government has only cared about the will of the people during election campaigns. There's a reason they seem to care about it all the time now. Personally, I think it's so they can blame the people for the mess they are making.

Andrex Classic White Toilet Rolls should help ;);)


https://www.waitrose.com/ecom/produc...B&gclsrc=aw.ds

:D:D:D

Mr K 12-12-2018 10:48

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart (Post 35974938)
Nope, the fact that the government decided to initiate the act of leaving after the referendum does not mean it was legally bound to implement the result of the referendum.

Previously, government has only cared about the will of the people during election campaigns. There's a reason they seem to care about it all the time now. Personally, I think it's so they can blame the people for the mess they are making.

Personally I think it'd be right to let the public take some of the blame. 'Project Fear' warned of chaos, it is, and Brexit hasn't happened yet.

papa smurf 12-12-2018 11:08

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35974916)
Timetable for the day.

Cabinet meeting is binned .

Stuart 12-12-2018 11:09

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35974945)
Personally I think it'd be right to let the public take some of the blame. 'Project Fear' warned of chaos, it is, and Brexit hadn't happened yet.

Not denying that.. When the referendum happened, Private Eye had an article about Brexiters crowing about how the predicted economic apocalypse hadn't happened, and the article pointed out that the reason the **** hadn't hit the fan is the fan had not started spinning yet.

Actually, that should have been an indicator of the level of detail the leave campaign worked at. They were crowing because mere days after the vote, the economy hadn't collapsed. As far as I remember, no one said any of the predicted disasters would happen before we left the EU. Based on their public statements, I've seen nothing that indicates that the current Brexiters (Johnson, Davis, Gove, Rees-Mogg, Rahb etc) go any deeper. Not a good thing in a government minister.

denphone 12-12-2018 11:11

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35974948)
Cabinet meeting is binned .

Just like the parliament vote yesterday..

nomadking 12-12-2018 11:27

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35974945)
Personally I think it'd be right to let the public take some of the blame. 'Project Fear' warned of chaos, it is, and Brexit hasn't happened yet.

Any chaos is down to the remain side promoting fear and uncertainty, and continually insisting on blocking the result of a democratic vote. Just look at the time and effort put into trying to overturn the vote, rather than making Brexit a success.

Mick 12-12-2018 12:02

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35974952)
Any chaos is down to the remain side promoting fear and uncertainty, and continually insisting on blocking the result of a democratic vote. Just look at the time and effort put into trying to overturn the vote, rather than making Brexit a success.

Precisely - a lot of the Fake News Remainers in Government and civil service have caused this delay shambles - how can Brexiteers be responsible, when ALL we have wanted is to immediately leave the EU in it's entirety?

Had a true Brexiteer being steering the ship - they would have got on with leaving the corrupted, cancerous EU.

The Naivety now being shown by many of the Remainers, with calls for a second referendum AKA a "Losers vote", which it is exactly that, that they hope to win and us Brexiteers will just ride along with this bullshit should there be some chance they win, why should their win be implemented when ours was not - it will not fly and this country will be more divided than ever.

Dave42 12-12-2018 12:11

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35974957)
Precisely - a lot of the Fake News Remainers in Government and civil service have caused this delay shambles - how can Brexiteers be responsible, when ALL we have wanted is to immediately leave the EU in it's entirety?

Had a true Brexiteer being steering the ship - they would have got on with leaving the corrupted, cancerous EU.

The Naivety now being shown by many of the Remainers, with calls for a second referendum AKA a "Losers vote", which it is exactly that, that they hope to win and us Brexiteers will just ride along with this bullshit should there be some chance they win, why should their win be implemented when ours was not - it will not fly and this country will be more divided than ever.

of course no brexiteer ever told lies right the hard brexiteers gonna look stupid later when May wins

denphone 12-12-2018 12:26

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35974959)
of course no brexiteer ever told lies right the hard brexiteers gonna look stupid later when May wins

Well she has certainly looked clueless if her previous episodes are anything to go by as she stated there would be no general election countless times which of course there was then a election which mortally wounded her premiership so much so we have a minority government now.

She stated there would be a vote on Tuesday evening so she sent out her cabinet ministers on Tuesday morning and then two hours later called of the vote.

She said no deal is better then a bad deal and then stated her deal is the only deal on the table.

She then said this is the only deal on the table and then changes her mind and goes back to the EU to try to get concessions from them which to put it bluntly she has no chance of getting.

Mick 12-12-2018 12:27

Re: Brexit
 
I don’t know what a hard Brexiteer is. I know what a Brexiteer is. Someone who voted to leave the EU. There is no other distinction.

nomadking 12-12-2018 12:30

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35974959)
of course no brexiteer ever told lies right the hard brexiteers gonna look stupid later when May wins

Whatever way you look at it, the remain side are speculating about problems or are actually creating them in the first place, eg delaying tactics and promoting weakness in negotiating position.

Mr K 12-12-2018 12:41

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35974964)
Whatever way you look at it, the remain side are speculating about problems or are actually creating them in the first place, eg delaying tactics and promoting weakness in negotiating position.

Maybe it just is a weak negotiating position and Brexit is madness. It's supporters had no plan and have left Remainers to pick up the pieces. They've been rumbled. Blame anyone and everyone except themselves seems to be their only response.

Pierre 12-12-2018 12:47

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35974921)
Powerful words. Back me or it’s no deal vs no Brexit.

I'm all for that. That's the referendum I want to see.

jonbxx 12-12-2018 12:51

Re: Brexit
 
Twitter has been great fun this morning. Michael Deacon of The Telegraph and Marina Hyde of The Guardian have been especially good value!

A tweet from The Secret Barrister made me laugh;

Quote:

28 months ago, the Conservative Party elected Theresa May leader with 60% of the vote.

29 months ago, 51.9% of voters supported leaving the EU.

On one of these, it’s fine to ask if people have changed their minds. To do so on the other is apparently an affront to democracy.
The arguments in response to this tweet are amazing, some greats ones from all sides and some cracking fruitloopery - https://twitter.com/BarristerSecret/...72452923686912

Mr K 12-12-2018 12:53

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35974967)
I'm all for that. That's the referendum I want to see.

Suits me aswell, if people genuinely want to be poorer and the country in general chaos, then fair enough.

denphone 12-12-2018 12:57

Re: Brexit
 
l thought this was a great tweet yesterday.

Quote:

Most depressing aspect of Brexit is the confirmation that absolutely everyone suffers from the overconfidence bias of believing that they're right & clever about stuff and those who don't agree with you are wrong & stupid. It's intellectual and moral otherization and it's obscene

nomadking 12-12-2018 12:57

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35974966)
Maybe it just is a weak negotiating position and Brexit is madness. It's supporters had no plan and have left Remainers to pick up the pieces. They've been rumbled. Blame anyone and everyone except themselves seems to be their only response.

How can you have a fully detailed plan when you supposedly can't predict how the EU would respond? Especially when those in charge of creating and implementing any plan seem to be firmly in the remain camp. Trade agreements are not meant to be about strength and weakness and imposing your will. The Eu seems to forget that and are just being vindictive. What is wrong with agreements that are to a mutual benefit.

jfman 12-12-2018 13:26

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 35974972)
How can you have a fully detailed plan when you supposedly can't predict how the EU would respond? Especially when those in charge of creating and implementing any plan seem to be firmly in the remain camp. Trade agreements are not meant to be about strength and weakness and imposing your will. The Eu seems to forget that and are just being vindictive. What is wrong with agreements that are to a mutual benefit.

Like membership of the EU? Plenty of mutual benefit there.

What we can’t actualll quantify is what we have to offer the EU at all? Our finance and service sectors are more likely to give themselves a European presence (because of the size of the market) than export their services into the EU.

Hugh 12-12-2018 13:33

Re: Brexit
 
1 Attachment(s)
<snigger>

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...9&d=1544617967

nomadking 12-12-2018 13:55

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35974974)
Like membership of the EU? Plenty of mutual benefit there.

What we can’t actualll quantify is what we have to offer the EU at all? Our finance and service sectors are more likely to give themselves a European presence (because of the size of the market) than export their services into the EU.

The EEC might have been a mutual benefit, but the EU along with the expansion to the East isn't.

jfman 12-12-2018 13:56

Re: Brexit
 
Stability on our eastern frontier as Russia tries to extend its sphere of influence?

Mick 12-12-2018 14:03

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35974966)
Maybe it just is a weak negotiating position and Brexit is madness. It's supporters had no plan and have left Remainers to pick up the pieces. They've been rumbled. Blame anyone and everyone except themselves seems to be their only response.

More bollocks. Brexiteers cannot be blamed when they have not been steering the ship. :rolleyes:

denphone 12-12-2018 14:07

Re: Brexit
 
May signals to Tories that she will stand aside before general election if she wins vote.

Quote:

Heavy hint from Downing St source on how May will play today: “She does not believe that this vote, today is about who leads the Conservative party into the next election - it is about whether it is sensible to change the leader at this point in the Brexit process”.

jfman 12-12-2018 14:19

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35974982)
More bollocks. Brexiteers cannot be blamed when they have not been steering the ship. :rolleyes:

They’ve all held key offices, with true exception of Mogg.

Carth 12-12-2018 14:24

Re: Brexit
 
Lots of people can steer a ship, but usually only in the direction the Captain orders ;)

Gavin78 12-12-2018 14:34

Re: Brexit
 
It's just a shame she didn't do what we asked and that was to leave the EU then do talks.

She has tried to carry out a deal for all and it hasn't worked it should have stayed with leave or remain not this crap inbetween

---------- Post added at 13:34 ---------- Previous post was at 13:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35974982)
More bollocks. Brexiteers cannot be blamed when they have not been steering the ship. :rolleyes:


Totally agree,

We voted out, remain got to decide how and now look at the state of it.

Mick 12-12-2018 14:38

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35974985)
They’ve all held key offices, with true exception of Mogg.

And as previously said, those brexiteers in cabinet positions have been overruled. Brexiteers cannot be blamed-end of discussion.

jfman 12-12-2018 14:45

Re: Brexit
 
I don’t agree with that interpretation of events. As I’ve stated before the adults have had to step in because of the incoherent stance of leave campaigners.

Liam Fox and Michael Gove have seen the light. I’m not sure why the rest haven’t, but then we all accept leaving is economically irrational.

Mr K 12-12-2018 14:45

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 35974990)
And as previously said, those brexiteers in cabinet positions have been overruled. Brexiteers cannot be blamed-end of discussion.

End of discussion - again? Thread closed then ?

denphone 12-12-2018 14:56

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35974993)
End of discussion - again? Thread closed then ?

Don't be daft Mr K as we do live in a democracy where one can discuss , debate and agree and disagree.

Gavin78 12-12-2018 14:56

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 35974993)
End of discussion - again? Thread closed then ?

By all means discuss but we have a remain PM by which remain argue she stepped upto the plate.

She's made a mess of it so how has she done any better than someone who is pro brexit?


By staying in the EU then I can only assume those that want to remain are happy with becoming a federal state?

Carth 12-12-2018 14:59

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35974992)
. . . . we all accept leaving is economically irrational.

you could also say that a great many believe staying is economically irrational, especially those who have seen jobs lost or wages reduced.

When you talk of the economy, it's sometimes hard to envisage it in terms of the people at the bottom, those to whom £30 a week less is a lot of money.

denphone 12-12-2018 15:00

Re: Brexit
 
Philip Hammond on Sky News.

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-politics-live

Quote:

I’m very clear that the prime minister will have the support of the great majority of parliamentary colleagues. And I think what this vote today will do is flush out the extremists who are trying to advance a particular agenda which would really not be in the interests of the British people or the British economy. Leaving the European Union without a deal would be bad for Britain.

1andrew1 12-12-2018 15:06

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35974996)
When you talk of the economy, it's sometimes hard to envisage it in terms of the people at the bottom, those to whom £30 a week less is a lot of money.

For the Brexit elite like Rees-Mogg, BoJo, Farage and co it is. For the rest of us it's easier.

jfman 12-12-2018 15:06

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Carth (Post 35974996)
you could also say that a great many believe staying is economically irrational, especially those who have seen jobs lost or wages reduced.

When you talk of the economy, it's sometimes hard to envisage it in terms of the people at the bottom, those to whom £30 a week less is a lot of money.

I don’t see how people at the bottom benefit from Brexit. It’s not like the money will be used to take people out of poverty, reform Universal Credit, solve the housing crisis, increase the minimum wage, or any meaningful steps to benefit people in poverty in this country.

Lower economic growth, lower tax revenues and lower investment aren’t going to help our poorest.

Mr K 12-12-2018 15:10

Re: Brexit
 
They do seem to have miscalculated (again) with this. The vote against her might be embarrassingly small and she'll end up stronger. Might even convert a few to backing the crappy deal now the ERG are sidelined as an irrelevance.

jfman 12-12-2018 15:10

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35974997)

Hard Brexit dies today. With one year to implement her vision Mrs May has the freedom to extend A50 if required, and use the spectre of no Brexit to marshal her party into line. It’ll be a fantastic watch.

denphone 12-12-2018 15:17

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975002)
Hard Brexit dies today. With one year to implement her vision Mrs May has the freedom to extend A50 if required, and use the spectre of no Brexit to marshal her party into line. It’ll be a fantastic watch.



Do get me front row tickets.:)

Carth 12-12-2018 15:22

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35975004)

Do get me front row tickets.:)

You'd be better off up on the balcony, well away from the burning torches and pitchforks :D

heero_yuy 12-12-2018 15:48

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Quote from Carth:


You'd be better off up on the balcony, well away from the burning torches and pitchforks :D
If it's NI that the issue, tar and feathers used to be the way. :D

Sephiroth 12-12-2018 16:50

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35974999)
I don’t see how people at the bottom benefit from Brexit. It’s not like the money will be used to take people out of poverty, reform Universal Credit, solve the housing crisis, increase the minimum wage, or any meaningful steps to benefit people in poverty in this country.

Lower economic growth, lower tax revenues and lower investment aren’t going to help our poorest.

You’ve hit on the conundrum here. Higher minimum wage feeds through to higher prices. The other items listed are, as you imply, matters for government to fix (fat chance.)

Dave42 12-12-2018 17:00

Re: Brexit
 
sky news saying 168 have said publicly they voting for her

denphone 12-12-2018 17:08

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35975019)
sky news saying 168 have said publicly they voting for her

She will win comfortably Dave but the civil war over Europe will continue unabated..

Dave42 12-12-2018 17:10

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35975020)
She will win comfortably Dave but the civil war over Europe will continue unabated..

very true Den and we still be in this chaos for long time

Damien 12-12-2018 17:13

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35975019)
sky news saying 168 have said publicly they voting for her

Secret ballot tho

denphone 12-12-2018 17:19

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35975022)
Secret ballot tho

Do you think there could be a few white lies being told then?.

papa smurf 12-12-2018 17:29

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35975023)
Do you think there could be a few white lies being told then?.

Has any politician ever told the truth?

Damien 12-12-2018 17:31

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35975023)
Do you think there could be a few white lies being told then?.

May is saying she won't take this as a mandate to stay on for years, which is a odd concession to make if the whips were confident of a win.

Although I have also heard Tory MPs saying their constituency associations aren't pleased with the timing of this

denphone 12-12-2018 17:38

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35975025)
May is saying she won't take this as a mandate to stay on for years, which is a odd concession to make if the whips were confident of a win.

Although I have also heard Tory MPs saying their constituency associations aren't pleased with the timing of this

The whips have allowed 2 suspended Tory MPs get the whip back for tonight's big vote but according to several sources they say would they be doing this if the private numbers were anything like the public ones.

---------- Post added at 16:38 ---------- Previous post was at 16:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 35975024)
Has any politician ever told the truth?

Certainly not papa but its certainly got worse IMO.

Damien 12-12-2018 18:25

Re: Brexit
 
May has told the 22 committee she'll not fight the next election...but what if the next election is next month?

pip08456 12-12-2018 18:31

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975002)
Hard Brexit dies today. With one year to implement her vision Mrs May has the freedom to extend A50 if required, and use the spectre of no Brexit to marshal her party into line. It’ll be a fantastic watch.

I applaud your optimism not matter how misguided.:D

Dave42 12-12-2018 18:41

Re: Brexit
 
Theo Usherwood LBC political editor just said on LBC May not ruled out a snap general election

denphone 12-12-2018 18:47

Re: Brexit
 
l thought this tweet was funny.

Quote:

Ken Clarke in fine form on @BBCPM rubbishing the claims of the four main Brexiteers as candidates to be prime minister.

“Boris is great company but he couldn’t run a whelk stall.”

Dave42 12-12-2018 18:49

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by denphone (Post 35975036)
l thought this tweet was funny.

and what he said about Boris is very true :D:D:D

denphone 12-12-2018 18:59

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35975037)
and what he said about Boris is very true :D:D:D

Not a great fan of Theresa May but if it came down to who one would support there simply would be no contest as Boris Johnson has never had the calibre or trustworthiness to be the leader of the Conservative party let alone be prime minister of the country.

jfman 12-12-2018 19:06

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35975033)
I applaud your optimism not matter how misguided.:D

Back at 9pm.

pip08456 12-12-2018 19:14

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35975043)
Back at 9pm.

Sounds reasonable.

RichardCoulter 12-12-2018 19:17

Re: Brexit
 
Tonight's One Show will end early and the Chris Bavin show at 8pm will be rescheduled as BBC1 will be showing a special programme about today's events.

Pierre 12-12-2018 19:23

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 35974992)
but then we all accept leaving is economically irrational.

For many that voted the economy was not the overriding issue.

---------- Post added at 18:21 ---------- Previous post was at 18:18 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35975032)
May has told the 22 committee she'll not fight the next election...but what if the next election is next month?

It won’t be, it’ll be in 2022. She’ll step down either in October 2019 or 2020.

---------- Post added at 18:23 ---------- Previous post was at 18:21 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 35975035)
Theo Usherwood LBC political editor just said on LBC May not ruled out a snap general election

Pointless statement.

She hasn’t ruled out a career as a pole dancer after being PM either.

Damien 12-12-2018 19:25

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 35975047)
It won’t be, it’ll be in 2022. She’ll step down either in October 2019 or 2020.

It might have to be. I don’t see how this government lasts that long when they can’t do anything.

pip08456 12-12-2018 19:54

Re: Brexit
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 35975051)
It might have to be. I don’t see how this government lasts that long when they can’t do anything.

I suppose that is reliant on if May gets replaced or not and if the DUP are happy with any replacement.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:09.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum