Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

Damien 21-12-2022 12:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36142346)
... shouldn't be as we have free trade with EU, albeit with some non-tariff downsides.

https://ukandeu.ac.uk/the-brexit-dea...uk-automotive/




Trade isn't just about tariffs though it's about regulatory alignment, customs checks and, in the specific case of the EU, workers' ability to move back and forth. We know the problems in Dover for example. The amount of red tape and paperwork added to trade increases time and cost.

As an example remember the arguments we had on here about Just in Time manufacturing. That doesn't hold if there are delays moving parts in/out of Britain.

I just don't think it's arguable that Brexit hit our economic performance. I think it's a bit mad that should be seen as controversial. That you could leave a massive economic block like the EU, don't really replace it with anything (which was initially the argument from the Brexit camp), and pretended it didn't have an impact. It's also true that COVID played a massive part as well coupled with general economic incompetence from the government and topped off with generally low productivity that we also seem to have had a problem with.

1andrew1 21-12-2022 13:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36142349)
Trade isn't just about tariffs though it's about regulatory alignment, customs checks and, in the specific case of the EU, workers' ability to move back and forth. We know the problems in Dover for example. The amount of red tape and paperwork added to trade increases time and cost.

As an example remember the arguments we had on here about Just in Time manufacturing. That doesn't hold if there are delays moving parts in/out of Britain.

Some of the hard Brexit approaches have added considerable costs to manufacturing with no benefits. In the short term, companies may absorb them but longer term, as we have seen, investment has fallen significantly which does not bode well.

Quote:

UK chemicals sector hit by £2bn Brexit red tape bill

New ‘UK Reach’ regime has pitted ministers against a broad swath of manufacturing

A government impact assessment, seen by the Financial Times, has put the central estimate for the costs of registering chemicals on a new UK database — often duplicating existing registrations with the EU — at £2bn.

The chemicals industry warned last year that the new regime — known as UK Reach — would cost about £1bn — but the government now accepts that many more substances will have to be registered than previously thought.

The British regime would be far more costly than the EU Reach system; UK companies spent £500mn complying with the Brussels regime over the previous decade, winning access to 27 markets.
https://www.ft.com/content/f41e3350-...0-80d3a483ef8d

1andrew1 22-12-2022 12:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36142349)
Trade isn't just about tariffs though it's about regulatory alignment, customs checks and, in the specific case of the EU, workers' ability to move back and forth. We know the problems in Dover for example. The amount of red tape and paperwork added to trade increases time and cost.

As an example remember the arguments we had on here about Just in Time manufacturing. That doesn't hold if there are delays moving parts in/out of Britain.

A look at some of the headlines I'm reading today supports the points you're making:

Quote:

Businesses 'banging their heads against a brick wall' over improving trade with EU, BCC warns

The BCC wants additional deals to made food exports easier more than two years after the Trade and Co-operation Agreement was signed.

Shevaun Haviland, director general of the BCC, said: "Businesses feel they are banging their heads against a brick wall as nothing has been done to help them, almost two years after the TCA was first agreed.

"The longer the current problems go unchecked, the more EU traders go elsewhere, and the more damage is done."

The BCC is calling for an additional deal with the EU to eliminate or reduce the complexity of food exports for small and medium-sized businesses, along with a Norway-style deal that would exempt small firms from needing a fiscal representative for VAT in the EU.

It is also calling for deals with the EU and member states that would allow UK firms to travel for longer and work in Europe.
https://news.sky.com/story/businesse...0is%20done.%22

Quote:

Minister admits more needed to ease trade after damning Brexit business survey

There has not been much response from the government, but Mark Spencer, the farming minister, has been giving interviews and he told Times Radio this morning he claimed the government did want to reduce “red tape” for exporters to the EU. He said:

There’s always more that we can do to try and ease the way and the passage of trade. We’re very keen to do that. We’re a free and open trading nation, we want to work closely with our EU colleagues, and we want to try and reduce that red tape, if there is any red tape, on their side of the Channel. So, of course, we want to keep those channels of trade open in both directions.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...085ce9739c3875

These non-tariff barriers are likely to contribute heavily to this:
Quote:

UK only G7 member with economic output still lower than pre-pandemic level

ONS says UK economy contracted by 0.3% in three months to September leading to weaker recovery than expected
https://www.theguardian.com/business...pandemic-level

1andrew1 22-12-2022 18:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Under pressure!
Quote:

Joe Biden’s visit to the UK in doubt over slow progress on Northern Ireland Brexit talks

The US is ready to scrap mooted plans for Joe Biden to visit the UK for the 25th anniversary of the Good Friday Agreement if Rishi Sunak fails to strike a deal with the EU on post-Brexit trade arrangements with Northern Ireland in time.

Diplomatic sources told i that US Secretary of State, Antony Blinken, is being lined up as an alternative to visit on behalf of the US, which is a guarantor to the peace agreement, if the President does not attend.

News that Mr Biden is considering cancelling his first bilateral trip to the UK puts increased pressure on the Prime Minister and the EU to reach an agreement.
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/us...elated_stories

Chris 22-12-2022 21:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I know we just love to see everything through the Brexit lens here but the fact is domestic American politics are also at play. Biden identifies as Irish-American, and regardless of how daft and arbitrary Americans’ preoccupation with their European ancestry can be, the Irish-American vote matters to Democrats. He has to stand by his previous comments on this issue regardless of how badly he may personally want to attend. It is obviously untenable for there not to be senior US government representation, hence Blinken’s name is being floated. However I suspect when it comes to it, Biden will come. The GFA isn’t just about the UK, it’s about Ireland, and Biden thinks he’s Irish.

Dave42 08-01-2023 20:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
https://twitter.com/DominicPenna/sta...87099519389698

Quote:

EXCLUSIVE: Tory voters now believe the costs of Brexit outweigh its benefits, polling shows for the first time

One-third (33%) think it has caused more problems, while 22% believe it has solved more
from the torygraph

Damien 10-01-2023 09:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
A closer relationship with the EU, i.e customs union or similar arrangement, will be on the cards if this pattern continues.

Hugh 10-01-2023 10:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36143437)
A closer relationship with the EU, i.e customs union or similar arrangement, will be on the cards if this pattern continues.

https://news.sky.com/story/ni-protoc...-deal-12783377

Quote:

The EU and UK say there is a "new basis" for resolving the Northern Ireland Protocol row after an agreement was reached on sharing trade data.

Foreign Secretary James Cleverly and Northern Ireland Secretary Chris Heaton-Harris met EU chief negotiator Maros Sefcovic in London on Monday, as efforts to find a way forward over post-Brexit arrangements in the region continue.

The agreement will allow the EU to access UK IT systems which will provide detailed information about goods flowing from Great Britain to Northern Ireland.

1andrew1 10-01-2023 10:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36143441)

The NI development is really good news and I hope it removes the reason for Stormont not sitting. My only concern is if the ERG ultras don't like it.

From what I read in the FT, the Ukraine war has brought Europe together more so these are now far less tense negotiations. And having a more pragmatic PM is helpful too.

---------- Post added at 09:53 ---------- Previous post was at 09:49 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36143437)
A closer relationship with the EU, i.e customs union or similar arrangement, will be on the cards if this pattern continues.

I think a far closer relationship will occur over time - gravity of trade drives this. I believe Labour has plans to align veterinary standards to try and improve food exports to the EU.

tweetiepooh 10-01-2023 11:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36143437)
A closer relationship with the EU, i.e customs union or similar arrangement, will be on the cards if this pattern continues.

A bit like the EEC or similar then.

ianch99 10-01-2023 12:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36143442)
The NI development is really good news and I hope it removes the reason for Stormont not sitting. My only concern is if the ERG ultras don't like it.

From what I read in the FT, the Ukraine war has brought Europe together more so these are now far less tense negotiations. And having a more pragmatic PM is helpful too.

---------- Post added at 09:53 ---------- Previous post was at 09:49 ----------


I think a far closer relationship will occur over time - gravity of trade drives this. I believe Labour has plans to align veterinary standards to try and improve food exports to the EU.

I agree. Given the economic disaster that Brexit is, I can see EFTA alignment and then entry sooner rather than later. With the percentage of voters thinking it was wrong to Leave approaching 60%, EU alignment in some form is inevitable.

It is sort of ironic that the handling of Leave by the Party that spawned it, will accelerate its demise.

Damien 10-01-2023 12:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36143454)
A bit like the EEC or similar then.

Probably a modified version of something like that.

Sephiroth 10-01-2023 20:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36143461)
Probably a modified version of something like that [EEC].

The EEC was good news.

pip08456 10-01-2023 21:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:



London and Brussels have secured a breakthrough in the corrosive dispute over Northern Ireland’s post-Brexit trading relations, clearing the way for a new push to resolve the longstanding issue.

After months of deadlock and acrimony, the UK and EU issued a joint statement proclaiming a tentative deal that would give Brussels access to the UK’s IT systems for trade across the Irish Sea.

The statement described the talks between James Cleverly, UK foreign secretary, and Maroš Šefčovič, European Commission vice-president, as “cordial and constructive”. An EU official said: “It’s looking good.”

Cleverly and Šefčovič will meet again on January 16, with EU and UK officials hoping the two sides could agree shortly afterwards to enter a final negotiating “tunnel” to resolve significant outstanding issues.
https://www.ft.com/content/e8244ef7-...e-2910e70294ca

1andrew1 16-01-2023 23:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

UK tax billions go uncollected as staff tackle Covid fraud and Brexit

Stretched HMRC resources transferred to other work instead of enforcing compliance

Billions of pounds of tax are being left uncollected in the UK because almost 2,300 HM Revenue & Customs tax compliance staff have been transferred to work on Brexit and Covid-19 schemes.

Victoria Atkins, the Treasury minister, acknowledged in response to ministerial questions that 1,043 HMRC tax compliance staff had been assigned to work on Brexit cases in the 2021-22 tax year. She added that a further 1,250 staff, who would normally be working on recovering unpaid taxes, have been moved to working on Covid-19 loan schemes — which have been subject to fraud.

“Civil servants are being moved from one crisis to another in a constant game of whack-a-mole, leaving taxes uncollected and public services deprived of cash,” said the Liberal Democrat party, which put the questions to Atkins.

Atkins revealed that £30.7bn had been recovered through compliance efforts in 2021-22 compared with £36.9bn in 2019-20, the year before the pandemic fully hit, a fall of more than £6bn.
https://www.ft.com/content/63ce3722-...d-0ae666e69b3c

tweetiepooh 17-01-2023 12:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Is the problem with the HMRC or the criminals stealing from the public purse?


And are lower recovering figure due to less staff or people earning less due to the pandemic so less being needed to be recovered?Stats can be made to say anything.

Chris 17-01-2023 12:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Yeah, there’s a whiff of victim-blaming about this. It’s actually the pursuit of tax avoidance that’s at issue, and ultimately the blame for tax avoidance lies with the tax avoider.

You wouldn’t know that from the FT though, which has chosen to regurgitate a Lib Dem press release instead of doing any actual journalism here. The way they talk about tax going uncollected you would think there was a fundamental problem with the way they issue tax demands or maintain self assessment systems.

Hugh 17-01-2023 12:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36143793)
Is the problem with the HMRC or the criminals stealing from the public purse?


And are lower recovering figure due to less staff or people earning less due to the pandemic so less being needed to be recovered? Stats can be made to say anything.



https://www.gov.uk/government/statis...nnual-bulletin

Quote:

Total annual receipts in the tax year 2021 to 2022

HMRC collected £714.8 billion in taxes in 2021 to 2022, an increase of 22.4% from the year before.

ianch99 17-01-2023 14:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Just to confirm:

Quote:

Treasury minister Victoria Atkins said nearly 1,250 tax compliance officers, who would usually investigate tax dodging and non-compliance, were redeployed to work on Covid-19 pandemic schemes in 2021-22.

Another 1,040 were shifted to handle matters relating to the UK’s departure from the EU, she said in response to ministerial questions.

Tax revenue recovered through compliance work was £30.8 billion in 2021-22, down £6 billion from 2019-20, Ms Atkins said.
Clear redirection of HMRC resources away from tax compliance. Another Brexit benefit ..

Paul 17-01-2023 15:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36143802)
Clear redirection of HMRC resources away from tax compliance. Another Brexit benefit ..

:zzz:

Sephiroth 17-01-2023 15:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36143802)
Just to confirm:



Clear redirection of HMRC resources away from tax compliance. Another Brexit benefit ..

Of course HMRC staff have to be deployed on handling Brexit - a democratically determined event.


ianch99 17-01-2023 19:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36143817)
Of course HMRC staff have to be deployed on handling Brexit - a democratically determined event.

Your point? You are welcoming the additional loss of tax revenues in addition to the losses already in place due to the Hard Brexit.

Given the state of the country, I am surprised people celebrate the loss of monies that are so desperately needed.

Sephiroth 17-01-2023 20:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36143831)
Your point? You are welcoming the additional loss of tax revenues in addition to the losses already in place due to the Hard Brexit.

Given the state of the country, I am surprised people celebrate the loss of monies that are so desperately needed.

My point is simple. You're a sour Remainer. Leaving the EU, which we decided to do, requires adjustments to taxation at various levels.

And, where have I "welcomed" anything? You really are sour.

Hugh 17-01-2023 20:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36143817)
Of course HMRC staff have to be deployed on handling Brexit - a democratically determined event.


So was tackling tax evasion and reducing opportunities for aggressive tax avoidance…

https://www.conservatives.com/our-pl...manifesto-2019

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1673985173

GrimUpNorth 17-01-2023 21:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36143836)
So was tackling tax evasion and reducing opportunities for aggressive tax avoidance…

https://www.conservatives.com/our-pl...manifesto-2019

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...5&d=1673985173

But they got Brexit done!

Paul 17-01-2023 22:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36143837)
But they got Brexit done!

That would be the whole point of this topic, but well spotted anyway. ;)

1andrew1 17-01-2023 22:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Daily Telegraph joins the Bregreters!
Quote:

An editorial column in The Telegraph – where Mr Johnson formerly worked and known to be his favoured newspaper – suggested that Brexit was now doomed to failure.

Admitting “almost nothing has been achieved”, the Brexit-backing newspaper added: “With no plan to unleash its potential, it can only fester, stoking tensions in Northern Ireland and strangling small firms with red tape.”

“It is time for the Leave camp to start saying the unsayable: the Tories have made such a hash of Brexit that the project is probably now unsalvageable,” it added.

The column marks the rise of so-called “Bregret” or “Regrexit”, with polls indicating that many Leave voters believe Brexit is going badly and a growing number are in favour of rejoining the EU.

One in three Tory voters (33 per cent) believe Brexit has created more problems than it has solved, an Opinium survey in early January. A separate YouGov poll found 30 per cent of Leave voters said the UK should now forge closer ties with Brussels....

Meanwhile, Asda chair Stuart Rose said on Tuesday the UK was suffering from the “catastrophic” impact of Brexit and should consider a closer trading relationship with Brussels.

“I can smell it – we have suffered. We are the only economy I think in the G7, possibly in the G20, who has actually not yet recovered to pre-Covid levels. That tells you something,” Lord Rose told LBC.

The Tory peer said trade between the UK and the EU was “not flowing smoothly”, adding: “We can call it the Mickey Mouse agreement as far as I’m concerned. What we need to do is we need to have a stronger trading relationship.”
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...4d991475fb1e23

ianch99 17-01-2023 23:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36143834)
My point is simple. You're a sour Remainer. Leaving the EU, which we decided to do, requires adjustments to taxation at various levels.

And, where have I "welcomed" anything? You really are sour.

I am sensing, and it is a common theme now the reality, forecast in advance, has come to pass and that is one of anger & denial. Anger in being proved wrong and denial where that is literally all that remains of the project.

BTW, "we" did not decide to leave the EU. The tragic irony is that the Tories demand, in the name of "democracy", that the Unions achieve a minimum percentage in ballots for strike action. If the Tories applied their own rules for Brexit, it would never have happened.

Polls all over the EU and now far more in favour of staying in the EU than they were. All because of the self inflicted disaster that the UK played out on the world stage.

Some glory and rejoice in our national humiliation, I'd rather, like the Telegraph, us get back on the road to prosperity and align ourselves again with the EU.

Sephiroth 17-01-2023 23:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36143844)
I am sensing, and it is a common theme now the reality, forecast in advance, has come to pass and that is one of anger & denial. Anger in being proved wrong and denial where that is literally all that remains of the project.

BTW, "we" did not decide to leave the EU. The tragic irony is that the Tories demand, in the name of "democracy", that the Unions achieve a minimum percentage in ballots for strike action. If the Tories applied their own rules for Brexit, it would never have happened.

Polls all over the EU and now far more in favour of staying in the EU than they were. All because of the self inflicted disaster that the UK played out on the world stage.

Some glory and rejoice in our national humiliation, I'd rather, like the Telegraph, us get back on the road to prosperity and align ourselves again with the EU.

Surely not! Btw, there was a UK wide referendum; Leave won; we left the EU. That's obviously democratic.

ianch99 17-01-2023 23:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36143846)
Surely not! Btw, there was a UK wide referendum; Leave won; we left the EU. That's obviously democratic.

Yes but the definition of insanity is ".. doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results”. The con trick failed as it always was going to. Economic gravity demanded it.

Yes, we can continue getting poorer while the economy is remodelled for benefits of the ultra wealthy but that was not what was sold to those who put their faith in Leave. The con has been revealed and the snake oil salesmen are still selling their product.

Sephiroth 17-01-2023 23:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36143847)
Yes but the definition of insanity is ".. doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results”. The con trick failed as it always was going to. Economic gravity demanded it.

Yes, we can continue getting poorer while the economy is remodelled for benefits of the ultra wealthy but that was not what was sold to those who put their faith in Leave. The con has been revealed and the snake oil salesmen are still selling their product.

There was no con. Just an unbelievably incompetent government.

1andrew1 18-01-2023 00:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36143849)
There was no con. Just an unbelievably incompetent government.

How many more Prime Ministers do you need to prove that you can't put lipstick on a pig. You've had four of them!

tweetiepooh 18-01-2023 11:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
So are we saying that we vote to leave but the job of implementing the result is being performed by those who want to remain (and maybe be part of a federal Europe) so have deliberately fouled up the process?


That's not to excuse bad policies though.


We do have to remember that we have had COVID, Ukraine and other happenings that were not in the road map and required some redirection. Brexit would have been hard enough without all of that happening too.

Hugh 18-01-2023 11:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
No, we aren’t saying that…

(Well, some people are, but that’s more about the "well, we can’t deliver what we promised, so we need to hold some else responsible" approach rather than being evidence-based…).

Remember all the benefits listed by Jacob Rees-Mogg when he was given the job of Brexit Opportunities Minister?

No, me neither…

Sephiroth 18-01-2023 11:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 

The Guvmin has gone mad. For example, introducing the UK equivalent of CE marking without formal equivalence agreement with the EU. Adds burden to UK companies and affects exports to the EU. We are failing to adequately plow a furrow forward - for example allowing British battery production to fail. We are taxed to buggery because Truss screwed up in spades. Equivalence does not destroy our sovereignty; it is pragmatic and supports business.

I am still in favour of being outside the EU but I want it done properly. Btw, a serious fight of the NI Protocol seems to be looming unless the Guvmin bends over. The ECJ is the issue and I’m sure there’s a middle way if entrenched groups can grasp the need for compromise. The important thing to achieve is that for all practical purposes, NI is part of the UK and we can send stuff over there without customs documentation, other than perhaps 1 page.


mrmistoffelees 18-01-2023 13:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36143866)
No, we aren’t saying that…

(Well, some people are, but that’s more about the "well, we can’t deliver what we promised, so we need to hold some else responsible" approach rather than being evidence-based…).

Remember all the benefits listed by Jacob Rees-Mogg when he was given the job of Brexit Opportunities Minister?

No, me neither…

TBF He did mention that we would be able to have more powerful vacuum cleaners

---------- Post added at 12:49 ---------- Previous post was at 12:37 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36143849)
There was no con. Just an unbelievably incompetent government.

Just IMHO The problem is now that Brexit is done (or is still in the process of being done depending on your view) there hasn't been anything of observable value to the average person in the street. People may say that we're free of X and Y but if that new found freedom isn't put to use in a way that the country can benefit from, then simply what is the point ?

Is it a case of an incompetent government? or, are there no actual benefits for the average joe/josephine. apart from vacuum cleaners?

ianch99 18-01-2023 14:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36143877)
TBF He did mention that we would be able to have more powerful vacuum cleaners

---------- Post added at 12:49 ---------- Previous post was at 12:37 ----------



Just IMHO The problem is now that Brexit is done (or is still in the process of being done depending on your view) there hasn't been anything of observable value to the average person in the street. People may say that we're free of X and Y but if that new found freedom isn't put to use in a way that the country can benefit from, then simply what is the point ?

Is it a case of an incompetent government? or, are there no actual benefits for the average joe/josephine. apart from vacuum cleaners?

You point out that there have been no tangible benefits and you are correct. You forgot the immense cost in loss of tax revenues, loss of skilled EU workers, red tape hitting Just In Time systems, the list literally goes on and on and on. People are starting to see the real costs in their pocket and they are rightly wanting to know why. The con men are taking people for suckers (pun intended).

It is a case of utmost delusion that the promised Vote Leave paradise would have been had "if it wasn't for those pesky kids"*

*paraphrase as my homage to my childhood TV watching Scooby Doo

1andrew1 18-01-2023 14:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36143867)

The Guvmin has gone mad. For example, introducing the UK equivalent of CE marking without formal equivalence agreement with the EU. Adds burden to UK companies and affects exports to the EU. We are failing to adequately plow a furrow forward - for example allowing British battery production to fail. We are taxed to buggery because Truss screwed up in spades. Equivalence does not destroy our sovereignty; it is pragmatic and supports business.

I fear the government is too worried about keeping the ERG on board to adopt such policies as equivalence. If they did, there would be even more whingeing from that camp about a betrayal and Remainers sabotaging Brexit.

Sephiroth 18-01-2023 14:29

Re: Britain outside the EU
 

Leaving the EU means we don’t have to do what Brussels demands. Simples.

That the Guvmin can screw everything up is lamentable. All they had to do was provide a business friendly growth environment and instead Truss trashed what was already fragile economy.

But we must not rejoin the EU. Obviously.

mrmistoffelees 18-01-2023 14:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36143879)
You point out that there have been no tangible benefits and you are correct. You forgot the immense cost in loss of tax revenues, loss of skilled EU workers, red tape hitting Just In Time systems, the list literally goes on and on and on. People are starting to see the real costs in their pocket and they are rightly wanting to know why. The con men are taking people for suckers (pun intended).

It is a case of utmost delusion that the promised Vote Leave paradise would have been had "if it wasn't for those pesky kids"*

*paraphrase as my homage to my childhood TV watching Scooby Doo

I dont need to point the costs out, they're being repeatedly being pointed out by various media outlets

---------- Post added at 13:59 ---------- Previous post was at 13:57 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36143885)

Leaving the EU means we don’t have to do what Brussels demands. Simples.

That the Guvmin can screw everything up is lamentable. All they had to do was provide a business friendly growth environment and instead Truss trashed what was already fragile economy.

But we must not rejoin the EU. Obviously.

I think you've just made my point, rhetorical statement delivered but with zero benefit to the average member of the public.

The issues for business with regards to Brexit have long proceeded Truss and her shambolic tenure. Don't try and scapegoat her, you're better than that.

I'd bet that ultimately we will rejoin the EU, it may take twenty years possibly even longer but I'll wager that what happens.

Sephiroth 18-01-2023 15:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 

I can’t rule out that the UK will rejoin the EU in twenty years. They won’t have us because of all the funds they’ll need to send us!

All we need is a competent government that is investment led on new technologies etc. Sunak needs to solve the crisis caused by Truss and then whatever government needs to have an economic strategy. A tall order.


Paul 18-01-2023 15:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Who knows what anyone will be doing in 20 years, the EU may not even exist.

ianch99 18-01-2023 15:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36143888)
I dont need to point the costs out, they're being repeatedly being pointed out by various media outlets

---------- Post added at 13:59 ---------- Previous post was at 13:57 ----------



I think you've just made my point, rhetorical statement delivered but with zero benefit to the average member of the public.

The issues for business with regards to Brexit have long proceeded Truss and her shambolic tenure. Don't try and scapegoat her, you're better than that.

I'd bet that ultimately we will rejoin the EU, it may take twenty years possibly even longer but I'll wager that what happens.

We will not join the EU first, we'll start with EFTA I am guessing and much sooner than in 20 yrs. Within 5 to 10 years I am thinking ..

mrmistoffelees 18-01-2023 15:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36143897)
Who knows what anyone will be doing in 20 years, the EU may not even exist.

Quite, but I would of thought it was fairly obvious that the point was made with the assumption that the EU would still be in existence.....

---------- Post added at 14:48 ---------- Previous post was at 14:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36143896)

I can’t rule out that the UK will rejoin the EU in twenty years. They won’t have us because of all the funds they’ll need to send us!

All we need is a competent government that is investment led on new technologies etc. Sunak needs to solve the crisis caused by Truss and then whatever government needs to have an economic strategy. A tall order.


Ah like BritishVolt? The company that went into administration yesterday?

The current lot aren't interested in investment led on new technologies, they're preparing for a probable spell in the wilderness. I don't hold out much hope for the alternatives.

The implementation of Brexit can probably be best described as King Arthur vs The Black Knight

ianch99 18-01-2023 17:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I came across this analysis on Reddit and thought it does a really good job of capturing the reality of our recent experience:

Quote:

I think it's more complex than that.

Bear with me as this might get in the weeds a bit but there's a coherent point to this.

So immigration is good for the economy, most people understand that, but does that economic boost translate into improvements for normal people?

There was a significant increase in economic migration from eastern europe after the mid 2000's when Poland, Bulgaria and Romania joined the EU.

UK population Growth
You can see on that graph the effect of Poland joining the UK in 2003.

This was good for UK business, it was good for the exchequer too as it meant more tax was being collected. However we can't shy away from the fact that more people in a community means more competition for resources. It means more people needing housing, more people using public transport, more people looking for jobs and more kids in schools. Central government did nothing to invest in infrastructure to accommodate a sharply rising population, in fact they did the exact opposite.

What happened in 2008/9? A financial crisis that led to a Tory government and never ending austerity budgets.

So for local people across the country they experienced 2 distinct changes happening in their communities, they saw a rise in immigration with the accompanying demographic shift. And they saw the slow degradation of their public services. Housing costs kept going up, wages stagnated, schools hospitals and public transport deteriorated. So suddenly there is less to go around and more people to share it with.

What is really going on is that the economic benefits of migration aren't translating into better schools and hospitals or new infrastructure or an increase in affordable housing or any of the things that ordinary people need.

Instead the economic benefits of migration are being used to boost profit margins and to offset the tax burden on corporations and the wealthy. Because when the Tories designed a plan to address the economic impact of the 2008 financial crisis they wanted to shield business and the asset rich, at the expense of the general public.

When people in deprived parts of the country voted for Brexit, it was because they weren't seeing the tangible benefits of the EU, instead they were seeing their lives becoming measurably worse year on year due to austerity and instead of placing the blame on government policy, they were told that it was because that foreigner over there is taking something that belongs to you.

It isn't so simple as saying "people wanted the dossers and scroungers out", instead it's people not being able to square the circle of "migration is good for the economy" with "my living standards are dropping".

The underlying cause of Brexit was that ever since 2008 we've just been papering over the cracks of a broken economic model that has utterly failed a massive portion of the country, and unscrupulous politicians and media have been able to deflect the blame onto the EU.

Chris 18-01-2023 18:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
A good analysis, up to a point. Sadly however the author clearly comes from the left-leaning school that thinks chanting Tory! Tory! Tory! is a handy way of summoning a bogeyman, a suitably ill-defined thing that is generally agreed to be not very nice and therefore a suitable target to blame for whatever.

However, there are two obvious weaknesses, the first being that the infrastructure required to deliver state services has long lead-times and really ought to have been in the planning years before it was needed, or at the very least right from when the need became apparent. And that wasn’t at the point of the financial crash, it was when free movement was first extended to Eastern Europe and the *Labour* government then in charge took an active decision not to invoke any of the temporary limitations allowable under EU law.

The second obvious weakness is to blame failure in domestic government policy while taking it as given that uncontrolled migration across a bloc with wildly different living standards is itself an unimpeachably good thing. The author hasn’t made that case and shouldn’t assume it to be so.

Damien 19-01-2023 08:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36143896)
[COLOR="black"][COLOR="Blue"]
I can’t rule out that the UK will rejoin the EU in twenty years. They won’t have us because of all the funds they’ll need to send us!

I think the more immediate risk if you're a Brexiter is the prospect of a customs union. I don't think we're long from a Government working out that solves far more issues right now in terms of NI, Calais and imports than it will cause them trouble with voters.

1andrew1 19-01-2023 10:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36143935)
I think the more immediate risk if you're a Brexiter is the prospect of a customs union. I don't think we're long from a Government working out that solves far more issues right now in terms of NI, Calais and imports than it will cause them trouble with voters.

I think all but the most zealous of Brexiters acknowledge that Johnson's deal was not an oven-ready one but a half-baked one, and and a closer relationship with our main trading partner to reduce trade friction and raise GDP and tax revenues is needed.

The trade-offs are becoming clearer now the fog of Covid has lifted but this issue is one for the next government and not the embers of the current one given the divisive influence of the ERG on the current government.

Quote:

In a joint interview with the FT in the Labour leader’s Westminster office, Starmer and Reeves berated Rishi Sunak, prime minister, for not going to Davos this year and said they would be touting for investment.

Key for Starmer is revamping Britain’s post-Brexit EU relationship. The government’s own forecasters say that Johnson’s “bare bones” trade deal with the EU would cost the UK 4 per cent of gross domestic product in the medium term.

“The damage to our economy is obvious as every day passes,” he said. “We have to be clear that we want a closer trading relationship with the EU.”

Labour has already said it wants a veterinary deal with the EU to ease the most strenuous border checks on food.

The Labour leader said he would not take Britain back into the EU or the single market; he fears alienating the 30 per cent of his party’s supporters who backed Leave in 2016 and reopening old arguments.
https://www.ft.com/content/a13f684f-...e-55bb3ce55712

1andrew1 31-01-2023 13:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
I think the economic realities of a UK outside the EU are starting to bite.
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...6&d=1675167569

1andrew1 31-01-2023 13:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
Not just trade, also growth
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...8&d=1675167734

See full story at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-64450882

TheDaddy 31-01-2023 20:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Was listening to Barnier on the Andrew Marr show earlier and he said Guy Verhofstadt said without Brexit he didn't think Russia would have invaded Ukraine last year, interesting that everything we were warned about is coming true and none of the things we were promised are coming to fruition and no one is being held accountable for their promises

Paul 31-01-2023 21:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36144850)
Was listening to Barnier on the Andrew Marr show earlier and he said Guy Verhofstadt said without Brexit he didn't think Russia would have invaded Ukraine last year

Yeah right, I'm sure that was top of Putins reasons. :rolleyes:

Pierre 31-01-2023 23:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36144850)
Was listening to Barnier on the Andrew Marr show earlier and he said Guy Verhofstadt said without Brexit he didn't think Russia would have invaded Ukraine last year

I also heard that without Brexit China wouldn’t have released COVID from a lab in Wuhan.

Chris 31-01-2023 23:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36144850)
Was listening to Barnier on the Andrew Marr show earlier and he said Guy Verhofstadt said without Brexit he didn't think Russia would have invaded Ukraine last year, interesting that everything we were warned about is coming true and none of the things we were promised are coming to fruition and no one is being held accountable for their promises

Guy Verhostadt holds a special loathing for all things British, and has done for a great many years. He was infamous in his speeches in the European Parliament long before Brexit was a thing. I wouldn’t raise anything he says in support of any argument you might want to make. It doesn’t strengthen your position.

With particular regard to Ukraine, it takes a special sort of strategic idiocy (which to be fair Verhostadt appears to have in spades) to still be obsessed with the idea that 2022 was the inflection point in this crisis. Putin invaded Crimea and the Donbas in 2014. That in turn was preceded by similar adventurism in Georgia, with similar justifications, in 2008. Meanwhile the West gave every indication that it no longer had any interest in intervention in other people’s wars by refusing to back rebels against the Assad regime in Syria in 2011. The Western response has been tardy in the extreme but for Putin this is a continuity of planning that has been ongoing for a long time.

Yes, Russia’s geopolitical strategy is to divide western democracies because it calculated it was stronger, in its will to succeed and in its military ability to do so, than any of them acting alone. But Putin is informed by a vision of a renewed imperial Russia and has been playing an exceedingly long game. Ukraine is the jewel in the crown because many of Russia’s cultural and religious origins are actually in Kyiv, not St Petersburg and certainly not Moscow. It was always going to end here (and in fact, if Russia is not resoundingly beaten in Ukraine and kept under sanction for a very long time, it *will* flare up again).

In the 18th century, Russia invaded Crimea repeatedly and took 80 years to finally secure it and forcibly incorporate it into its empire. That’s the portion of Russian history that informs Putin’s motives and his timescales. The invasion of *more of* Ukraine in 2022 has absolutely, literally feck-all to do with Brexit and you oughtn’t to make yourself sound as much a chump as Verhostadt does on a daily basis by claiming otherwise.

TheDaddy 01-02-2023 01:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36144851)
Yeah right, I'm sure that was top of Putins reasons. :rolleyes:

You don't think a weakened EU played into puti's hands, interesting

Quote:

Yes, Russia’s geopolitical strategy is to divide western democracies because it calculated it was stronger, in its will to succeed and in its military ability to do so, than any of them acting alone
You might find that helpful

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36144862)
Guy Verhostadt holds a special loathing for all things British, and has done for a great many years. He was infamous in his speeches in the European Parliament long before Brexit was a thing.

I'd have thought if he loathed us that much he'd have kept his mouth shut, don't you think it's complimentary to say we were stronger with you than without


Quote:

With particular regard to Ukraine, it takes a special sort of strategic idiocy (which to be fair Verhostadt appears to have in spades) to still be obsessed with the idea that 2022 was the inflection point in this crisis.
Barny was quite clear that he said the full invasion last year wouldn't have happened

Chris 01-02-2023 11:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36144870)
Barny was quite clear that he said the full invasion last year wouldn't have happened

None of the war studies academics I’m following have made such a claim, and one of them will be a Lib Dem candidate at the next election (Mike Martin, @ThreshedThought on the Twitters).

Forgive me for dismissing the views of career Europhiles trying to big up their part.

Damien 01-02-2023 11:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Brexit obviously didn't pay much, if any, part in Putin's decision. If so then why invade in 2014? Why wait so long after Brexit to do it? Why make the EU the deciding factor rather than NATO?

Putin banked on a divided West I think but that could more likely have been a misreading that Biden's exit from Afghanistan showed he was continuing Trump's isolationist skew in American foreign policy and therefore they wouldn't have the will to back Ukraine. Maybe he interpreted Brexit as evidence of Britain disengaging from the world but that would have been an idiotic view that any half-competent analyst would have warmed him against.

He clearly wasn't expecting this unity from the West nor the resistance from the Ukrainian people but it's hard to draw the line from Brexit to that other than Brexit is just one of several things you could point to show a general picture of a divided West.

TheDaddy 01-02-2023 14:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36144915)
Maybe he interpreted Brexit as evidence of Britain disengaging from the world but that would have been an idiotic view that any half-competent analyst would have warmed him against.

Would you have warned him, people who don't tell him what he wants to hear or displease him seem to end up falling out of windows

Quote:

He clearly wasn't expecting this unity from the West nor the resistance from the Ukrainian people but it's hard to draw the line from Brexit to that other than Brexit is just one of several things you could point to show a general picture of a divided West.
Which is exactly the point Barney was making, interestingly he also pointed out there were plenty of people in America who were delighted we'd made ourselves and the EU weaker too

1andrew1 01-02-2023 14:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Rishi Sunak faces crunch decision on post-Brexit Northern Ireland

Deal takes shape on trading arrangements but unionists and Eurosceptics still need to be brought on board

Rishi Sunak is facing a big test of his authority as he agonises over whether he can sell an outline deal on the Northern Ireland protocol to pro-UK unionist politicians in the region and Eurosceptic Tory MPs.

After months of talks, negotiators have briefed the UK prime minister that a deal is taking shape to resolve the dispute over post-Brexit trading arrangements in Northern Ireland. “It’s getting close,” said one person briefed on the talks.

Downing Street has insisted that no deal has been reached, adding that “intensive scoping discussions” were still taking place.

Tory Eurosceptics warned they would not accept any deal that left the European Court of Justice with any role in UK territory: under the protocol Northern Ireland remains part of the EU single market for goods.

One Conservative MP said Boris Johnson would be at the forefront of a rebellion if Sunak gave too much ground. Johnson’s spokesperson insisted the former premier was “fully supporting the government”...

The prime minister wants to end the corrosive dispute with the EU, which has damaged relations between the two sides, including blocking British scientists participating in the €95bn Horizon Europe research project.
https://www.ft.com/content/fc7c076e-...b-bc9213926814

ianch99 05-02-2023 16:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Very disturbing finding, albeit not unexpected:

Brexit causes collapse in European research funding for Oxbridge

Quote:

Oxford and Cambridge universities, once given more than £130m a year in total by European research programmes, are now getting £1m annually between them
Without investment in research funding, all that flows from this is in peril.

TheDaddy 05-02-2023 16:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36145239)
Very disturbing finding, albeit not unexpected:

Brexit causes collapse in European research funding for Oxbridge



Without investment in research funding, all that flows from this is in peril.

Don'tcha know we don't like experts anymore, besides which where even is Oxbridge :erm:

Plus for every remoaner scare story there's a brexit dividend that's completely ignored, thanks to our South Korean trade deal pork sales could be worth as much as £200k per year

1andrew1 05-02-2023 18:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36145239)
Very disturbing finding, albeit not unexpected:

Brexit causes collapse in European research funding for Oxbridge

Without investment in research funding, all that flows from this is in peril.

We can rejoin the Horizon science programme and get some of this money back *if* we and the EU can come to a deal on Northern Ireland. This may necessitate Sunak squaring up to the ERG.

Let's hope he steps up.

Sephiroth 05-02-2023 19:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
A deal on NI is challenging. A way has to be found to narrow the ECJ's writ on UK soil. That they should rule on interpretation of EU law is reasonable on the face of it; but who calls in the ECJ is the problem.

EU law applies to the single market aspects of goods arriving into NI. The solution may be as simple as a Union Flag flying over the green lane and the EU flag flying over the red lane!

RichardCoulter 06-02-2023 00:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
It was reported on the BBC earlier that Boris Johnson was in favour of Ukraine joining the EU.

If he is so against the EU, why would he be in favour of Ukraine joining it?

1andrew1 06-02-2023 00:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36145264)
It was reported on the BBC earlier that Boris Johnson was in favour of Ukrania joining the EU.

If he is so against the EU, why would he be in favour of Ukrania joining it?

It is a little bizarre. At this rate, he'll be advocating for the UK to rejoin and adopt the Euro before we can say Partygate!

BTW I think your spell checker has mangled the spelling of Ukraine.

RichardCoulter 06-02-2023 01:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36145266)
It is a little bizarre. At this rate, he'll be advocating for the UK to rejoin and adopt the Euro before we can say Partygate!

BTW I think your spell checker has mangled the spelling of Ukraine.

Thanks, it's now been corrected :)

1andrew1 06-02-2023 21:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Interesting that politicians are lagging voters. I don't blame them for being cautious though!
Quote:

Brexit could be reversed — here’s how

Opinion is shifting but the public are running ahead of the politicians

Seven years after the 2016 referendum, and three years after Brexit actually happened, opinion has shifted markedly. As the academic Matthew Goodwin wrote recently, some 60 per cent of Britons now think Brexit was the wrong decision and would vote to rejoin the EU at a second referendum. An average of recent polls shows 58 per cent of voters not only regretting Brexit, but actively favouring Rejoin.

It is easy to understand why. Brexit was sold as a way of controlling immigration and improving the NHS. But the NHS is now in far worse shape than it was in 2016. Immigration into the UK remains very high, with EU immigrants largely replaced by people from outside the bloc. And the IMF predicts that Britain will have the worst performing economy in the developed world this year.

Demographics and economics suggest that the Rejoin sentiment will strengthen over time. Young voters are the most pro-EU of the lot, with 79 per cent of 18- to 24-year-olds wanting to rejoin. And, sadly, the damage done to the UK economy by Brexit is likely to become increasingly evident.
https://www.ft.com/content/0d195d46-...f-c33889bb2cc0

Sephiroth 11-02-2023 10:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I completely understand what the FT is saying, particularly that EU immigrants are being replaced by immigrants from elsewhere.

This is a very difficult matter. The Guvmin, being incompetent, let this happen by not lining up the legal ducks in primary legislation. The worst of it is that our British culture is being frayed at the edges and the Police are gearing up for London being a majority non-white city in the near future - with all the cultural clashes that could bring.

Rejoining the EU might have to be on their terms, perhaps even so in their march to federalism. We could prolly get away with keeping the pound and the laughing stock element would dissipate quickly, imo.

But the central reason for leaving, namely to get away from Brussels diktat, would have been squashed. This is the UK, and a more competent government could incentivise the economy to be successful and that is what we need - not to rejoin the EU.



Hugh 11-02-2023 10:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145683)
I completely understand what the FT is saying, particularly that EU immigrants are being replaced by immigrants from elsewhere.

This is a very difficult matter. The Guvmin, being incompetent, let this happen by not lining up the legal ducks in primary legislation. The worst of it is that our British culture is being frayed at the edges and the Police are gearing up for London being a majority non-white city in the near future - with all the cultural clashes that could bring.

Rejoining the EU might have to be on their terms, perhaps even so in their march to federalism. We could prolly get away with keeping the pound and the laughing stock element would dissipate quickly, imo.

But the central reason for leaving, namely to get away from Brussels diktat, would have been squashed. This is the UK, and a more competent government could incentivise the economy to be successful and that is what we need - not to rejoin the EU.



https://y.yarn.co/b48730f6-c696-47bb...eb513_text.gif

Sephiroth 11-02-2023 13:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
If Hugh disagrees with me, he's fooling himself.

Hugh 11-02-2023 16:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145694)
If Hugh disagrees with me, he's fooling himself.

Hugh agrees with reality, but disagrees with Sephiroth - "And why beholdest thou the mote that is in thy brother's eye, but considerest not the beam that is in thine own eye?"

Unless, of course, Sephiroth can provide evidence* to back up his assertion that

Quote:

the Police are gearing up for London being a majority non-white city in the near future
such as statistics showing that London will be "majority non-white in the near future" and policy papers/plans that state the Met are "gearing up" for this…

nb - non-evidence based opinion pieces from the Telegraph/Spectator/Farage don’t count…

Sephiroth 11-02-2023 17:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36145708)
Hugh agrees with reality, but disagrees with Sephiroth…

Unless, of course, Sephiroth can provide evidence* to back up his assertion that



such as statistics showing that London will be "majority non-white in the near future" and policy papers/plans that state the Met are "gearing up" for this…

nb - non-evidence based opinion pieces from the Telegraph/Spectator/Farage don’t count…


If you put these two links together, you have the proof.

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/white-bri...on-birmingham/

Quote:

White British people are the minority in London and Birmingham, the UK's two largest cities, for the first time since records began, according to new census figures.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...epted-met-bid/

Quote:

..... Mr Parr said setting ambitious targets both around the number of police recruits and diversity was understandable, but that it increased the risk of lowering standards and recruiting people who were not suited to the job.

He said there was even anecdotal evidence that some applicants were being accepted even though they were “functionally illiterate in English” and had difficulty writing up crime reports.

Mr Parr told The Telegraph: “We completely support the idea that London - which will likely be a minority white city in the next decade or so - should not be policed by an overwhelmingly white police force.

“That is clearly wrong. It is not just wrong from a legitimacy point of view, and from an appearances point of view, it is also operationally wrong because it means that the Met does not get insight into some of the communities it polices and that has caused problems in the past.

“So we completely support the drive to make the Met much more representative of the community it serves than it is at the moment.”
The Telegraph is reputable.

:PP::PP:


Hugh 11-02-2023 17:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
I see the goalposts have moved from London being "majority non-white" to "minority White British"… ;)

There is nothing in the Telegraph article to support your assertion

Quote:

the Police are gearing up for London being a majority non-white city in the near future - with all the cultural clashes that could bring.
Meanwhile, back in reality…

https://data.london.gov.uk/dataset/e...on-projections

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...0&d=1676132061

"Other White" is European/Australian/NZ/American/Canadian/etc…

Sephiroth 11-02-2023 17:29

Re: Britain outside the EU
 

Like it or not, it's coming.

https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures....c%20minorities

Quote:

2021 Census data for England and Wales shows that:

the most ethnically diverse region was London – 46.2% of residents identified with Asian, black, mixed or ‘other’ ethnic groups, and a further 17.0% with white ethnic minorities




ianch99 11-02-2023 18:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
The only "cultural clashes" happening are those from the fascist right, terrorising asylum seekers and burning police vehicles:

Far-right protesters clash with police at Merseyside hotel housing asylum seekers

A direct result of the toxic Tory policy towards asylum seekers.

"as you sow, so shall you reap"

---------- Post added at 17:28 ---------- Previous post was at 17:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145711)

If you put these two links together, you have the proof.

https://www.lbc.co.uk/news/white-bri...on-birmingham/



https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...epted-met-bid/



The Telegraph is reputable.

:PP::PP:


Why do you have a problem with a multi-cultural London?

Hugh 11-02-2023 18:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145713)

https://i.pinimg.com/originals/94/34...25c79e2c96.gif

Sephiroth 11-02-2023 18:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36145716)
SNIP>

Why do you have a problem with a multi-cultural London?

Not all cultures mix well. Some cultures are utterly alien to ours, bringing their crime and attitudes with them.

But what matters to me is that we see what's going on, smell the coffee and understand that you can expect no-go areas in London as certain cultures dominate. That's already been seen in East London.

Then, if you have a considerably higher ethnic balance in the police force, and if those ethnic officers retain their culture, justice and good order is likely to suffer.

My fears are echoed in Sweden.

https://www.euractiv.com/section/pol...ers-in-sweden/

Quote:

Social Democrat Swedish Prime Minister Magdalena Andersson declared on Tuesday that she stands against ‘ethnic clusters’ in the country in a bid to defend the earlier controversial declarations of her Integration Minister on “non-Nordic” residents.

In the run-up to the September elections, the ruling Social Democrats are toughening their stance on integration issues in the face of the breakthrough of the far right in the polls. According to the latest opinion poll from SVT/Novus published on Monday, the Social Democrats stood at 27.8%, followed by the eurosceptic Sweden Democrat party at 21.5%.
You'll note that this is in response to "far-right" voting sentiments (by ordinary, very nice Swedes).. Some cultures don't mix here, nor in Sweden, nor in Germany etc. Your hysteric term "fascist" is misplaced. Cultures clash and that brings out extremes that would otherwise stay quiet.



Paul 11-02-2023 19:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36145716)
A direct result of the toxic Tory policy towards asylum seekers.

:rolleyes: You do realise that not everything in the country is the result of a "Tory" policy.

Hugh 11-02-2023 21:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145724)
Not all cultures mix well. Some cultures are utterly alien to ours, bringing their crime and attitudes with them.

But what matters to me is that we see what's going on, smell the coffee and understand that you can expect no-go areas in London as certain cultures dominate. That's already been seen in East London.

Then, if you have a considerably higher ethnic balance in the police force, and if those ethnic officers retain their culture, justice and good order is likely to suffer.

My fears are echoed in Sweden.

https://www.euractiv.com/section/pol...ers-in-sweden/


You'll note that this is in response to "far-right" voting sentiments (by ordinary, very nice Swedes).. Some cultures don't mix here, nor in Sweden, nor in Germany etc. Your hysteric term "fascist" is misplaced. Cultures clash and that brings out extremes that would otherwise stay quiet.



Evidence of "no go areas" in East London, please?

Mad Max 11-02-2023 21:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36145732)
:rolleyes: You do realise that not everything in the country is the result of a "Tory" policy.

Correct, but you'll get the usual " but I no better" from him.

Ms NTL 11-02-2023 21:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36145716)
The only "cultural clashes" happening are those from the fascist right, terrorising asylum seekers and burning police vehicles:

Leicester: Hindus v Muslims

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36145716)

Why do you have a problem with a multi-cultural London?

Good question/point.


@Seph I partially lived in the Mile End (East London) for 5-6 years. The cockneys are integrated with the muslims that you could not tell them apart (except clothes/beard shape -if different) -they are all cockneys. I could not see any conflict. I was living near the station, was I in the wrong neighbourhood?

I am not Dulux brilliant white, but European white (lol)

South Africa has the full range of white colours: British white, French white Dutch white ...., and yes, they still have coloured (not black) people .... A friend of mine had no colour, he was mixed race Canadian-Malay, transparent colour?

What's the skin colour has to do with anything?

Sephiroth 11-02-2023 21:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36145735)
Evidence of "no go areas" in East London, please?

Don't you remember the Sharia Law no-go areas a few years ago? That thinking hasn't gone away.

---------- Post added at 20:33 ---------- Previous post was at 20:28 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36145738)
Leicester: Hindus v Muslims



Good question/point.


@Seph I partially lived in the Mile End (East London) for 5-6 years. The cockneys are integrated with the muslims that you could not tell them apart (except clothes/beard shape -if different) -they are all cockneys. I could not see any conflict. I was living near the station, was I in the wrong neighbourhood?

I am not Dulux brilliant white, but European white (lol)

South Africa has the full range of white colours: British white, French white Dutch white ...., and yes, they still have coloured (not black) people .... A friend of mine had no colour, he was mixed race Canadian-Malay, transparent colour?

What's the skin colour has to do with anything?

Nothing per se beyond the word "White" that the official statistics use.

Hugh 11-02-2023 22:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36145735)
Evidence of "no go areas" in East London, please?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145739)
Don't you remember the Sharia Law no-go areas a few years ago? That thinking hasn't gone away.

---------- Post added at 20:33 ---------- Previous post was at 20:28 ----------



Nothing per se beyond the word "White" that the official statistics use.

That’s a "none", then…

Unless you mean the half a dozen assholes in 2013-14 who were arrested and jailed…

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Musl...ents_in_London

mrmistoffelees 11-02-2023 22:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145739)
Don't you remember the Sharia Law no-go areas a few years ago? That thinking hasn't gone away.[COLOR="Silver"]

I think you’re confusing that with the M&M store

https://youtu.be/9GrH_PRKsf4

Hugh 11-02-2023 22:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Very apposite..

Quote:

Simply saying it’s a thing, doesn’t make it a thing…

Sephiroth 11-02-2023 23:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Oh well, your heads in the sand vs my forebodings.

ianch99 12-02-2023 00:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36145732)
:rolleyes: You do realise that not everything in the country is the result of a "Tory" policy.

No, but this is

---------- Post added at 23:51 ---------- Previous post was at 23:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36145737)
Correct, but you'll get the usual " but I no better" from him.

But I am no better :D Don't agree with gambling ;)

---------- Post added at 23:54 ---------- Previous post was at 23:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ms NTL (Post 36145738)
Leicester: Hindus v Muslims

Seph was alluding to those between "Whites" and "Non-whites" i.e. a "Rivers of Blood" analog

TheDaddy 12-02-2023 01:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145739)
Don't you remember the Sharia Law no-go areas a few years ago? That thinking hasn't gone away.[COLOR="Silver"]

No because it was a steaming pile of bs, a few ********s with stickers, no more than that

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36145748)

Seph was alluding to those between "Whites" and "Non-whites" i.e. a "Rivers of Blood" analog

Interestingly the woman with the "dog poo through the door" did exist, I wrongly assumed he'd made her up

Pierre 12-02-2023 09:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36145735)
Evidence of "no go areas" in East London, please?

Plenty of “no go” areas in London, most major cities and towns. Not all down to immigration though.

TheDaddy 12-02-2023 09:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36145755)
Plenty of “no go” areas in London.

Name one

Sephiroth 12-02-2023 10:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quite a few people on the old "name one" trick. Their heads must be truly in the sand if they don't recall the Sharia no-go areas of a few years ago. What went on above ground then is stil doing nothing to integrate with British culture.

What do you people see when you briefly pop your heads out of the sand? Muslims integrating with Judeo-Christian Brits? The other way round? Hindus embracing Muslims as cultural equals? Somalians adopting British culture?

Or are you just being argumentatively woke?


ianch99 12-02-2023 11:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145757)
Quite a few people on the old "name one" trick. Their heads must be truly in the sand if they don't recall the Sharia no-go areas of a few years ago. What went on above ground then is stil doing nothing to integrate with British culture.

What do you people see when you briefly pop your heads out of the sand? Muslims integrating with Judeo-Christian Brits? The other way round? Hindus embracing Muslims as cultural equals? Somalians adopting British culture?

Or are you just being argumentatively woke?


What does "adopting British culture" mean, exactly?

Hugh 12-02-2023 11:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I agree with Sephiroth - there will never be integration with other cultures whilst there is a vociferous minority running about screaming about being oppressed and disadvantaged, putting forward flaky culture-war arguments about how badly they are treated and always being picked upon, and that everyone in the country should conform to their religious views - but that's enough about Farage and Seph... :)

"Judeo-Christian Brits"?

There goes that "dog whistle’ again…

https://theconversation.com/why-jude...ar-right-85922

Quote:

A right wing slogan

“Judeo-Christian” is now most often used to draw a line between imagined Christian values and a perceived (but false) threat of Muslim immigration. It’s in this context, that right wing figures such as Nigel Farage use the phrase. Talking about radical Muslim clerics such as Anjem Choudary, he said for example:

"My country is a Judeo-Christian country. So we’ve got to actually start standing up for our values."

But in this statement, Farage connects his fears of radical Islam with the idea of “Judeo-Christian values”. It appears that it isn’t so much about including Jews as it is about excluding Muslims. And since Farage has also come under attack for anti-Semitic comments, including being called on to apologise after recent comments about the threat of “the Jewish lobby” to American politics, it seems hard to view the “Judeo-” in his “Judeo-Christian” as actually valuing Jewish people or Judaism as a religion.
Quote:

Invoked in anti-immigration rhetoric with the goal of excluding Muslims, this phrase is actually used to scaffold a false narrative about Christians being persecuted, threatened or besieged, which gives motivation for the protection of “Judeo-Christian values”. In fact, Christians are not persecuted in the countries where Farage and Trump make their homes.

A quick search on Twitter for the phrase “Judeo-Christian” illustrates that white supremacists have embraced the term – and that Jews reject it.

It’s not surprising that many Jews are not falling for this dog-whistle phrase, especially since the myth of a Judeo-Christian society rests on the false – and dangerous – idea that Judaism and Christianity hold the same ideas and values.
https://newhumanist.org.uk/articles/...-actually-mean

Quote:

Several prominent Jewish commentators have pointed out that the term elides the fact that Jews have often experienced persecution in Christian-majority European countries. After Donald Trump used the term in 2017, Rabbi Jill Jacobs wrote on Twitter that “much of ‘Judeo-Christian’ tradition involves centuries of Christians trying to kill us,” adding, “if you mean ‘not Muslim’ say it.”

ianch99 12-02-2023 11:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
The 2023 Tories have finally, just about, got there:

Attachment 30371

Final task, change the name to complete the job.

Sephiroth 12-02-2023 12:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36145762)
I agree with Sephiroth - there will never be integration with other cultures whilst there is a vociferous minority running about screaming about being oppressed and disadvantaged, putting forward flaky culture-war arguments about how badly they are treated and always being picked upon, and that everyone in the country should conform to their religious views - but that's enough about Farage and Seph... :)

"Judeo-Christian Brits"?

There goes that "dog whistle’ again…

https://theconversation.com/why-jude...ar-right-85922


https://newhumanist.org.uk/articles/...-actually-mean

Farage is spot on. He smells the coffee; he understands 9/11 and who did that; he understands how cultures without similarity don’t mix and when numbers reach a critical mass, problems arise.

---------- Post added at 11:03 ---------- Previous post was at 10:56 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36145761)
What does "adopting British culture" mean, exactly?

Sorry to put it this way, but, are you thick? Or just trying to trap me (again).

On the naive assumption that you are thick, and pardon the aggression to counter your passive aggression, British culture is all about the society (and its span) that has been built up over the centuries. It includes the effects of literature, democracy, sense of humour, sense of history and tolerance (up to a tipping point that we’re now passing).

I wonder what you’d say, assuming now that you’re not thick if the question was posed to you?

Smell the coffee.

ianch99 12-02-2023 12:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145766)
Sorry to put it this way, but, are you thick? Or just trying to trap me (again).

On the naive assumption that you are thick, and pardon the aggression to counter your passive aggression, British culture is all about the society (and its span) that has been built up over the centuries. It includes the effects of literature, democracy, sense of humour, sense of history and tolerance (up to a tipping point that we’re now passing).

I wonder what you’d say, assuming now that you’re not thick if the question was posed to you?

Smell the coffee.

I don't think I'm "thick" as you put it. The question I ask is the essential one here as it sets the context from which the complainant (you) is defining their world view.

You are equating "not adopting British culture" as just doing anything you object to. These people, from a myriad of countries, have their own cultural identities, literature, democracy, sense of humour, sense of history and tolerance, all of which are perfectly possible to be melded into ours. I think what you mean by "British culture" is some artificial Anglo-Saxon construct where "whiteness", being Christian, etc. is the (false) measure of conformity.

Remember that we invaded the lands where the majority of the people you object to come from, we subjugated them, stole their wealth and imposed our "British culture" on them. It is poetic karma that the position is now reversed.

Another thing to remember is the "British culture ... that has been built up over the centuries" is a direct result of waves of immigration, each, in turn, imposing its own cultural identity on the resident population.

GrimUpNorth 12-02-2023 12:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145766)
Farage is spot on. He smells the coffee; he understands 9/11 and who did that; he understands how cultures without similarity don’t mix and when numbers reach a critical mass, problems arise.

---------- Post added at 11:03 ---------- Previous post was at 10:56 ----------



Sorry to put it this way, but, are you thick? Or just trying to trap me (again).

On the naive assumption that you are thick, and pardon the aggression to counter your passive aggression, British culture is all about the society (and its span) that has been built up over the centuries. It includes the effects of literature, democracy, sense of humour, sense of history and tolerance (up to a tipping point that we’re now passing).

I wonder what you’d say, assuming now that you’re not thick if the question was posed to you?

Smell the coffee.

Did you conveniently forget to include religion, migration, foreign cultural influences etc in your list?

TheDaddy 12-02-2023 13:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145757)
Quite a few people on the old "name one" trick. Their heads must be truly in the sand if they don't recall the Sharia no-go areas of a few years ago. What went on above ground then is stil doing nothing to integrate with British culture.

What do you people see when you briefly pop your heads out of the sand? Muslims integrating with Judeo-Christian Brits? The other way round? Hindus embracing Muslims as cultural equals? Somalians adopting British culture?

Or are you just being argumentatively woke?


I'm just concerned that working all over London from evening till morning I might get a callout in a no go area and then what, I mean I've only been doing it 15 years without any issue but I need to know where these no go areas are so I can demand danger money for going in them

Head in the sand :rofl: that's a good one coming from someone terrified the muslims are coming to get him based on a sticker on a lamp post because make no mistake that's what the sharia no go zones were, I saw them, they like farage are full of shit

mrmistoffelees 12-02-2023 16:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36145757)
Quite a few people on the old "name one" trick. Their heads must be truly in the sand if they don't recall the Sharia no-go areas of a few years ago. What went on above ground then is stil doing nothing to integrate with British culture.

What do you people see when you briefly pop your heads out of the sand? Muslims integrating with Judeo-Christian Brits? The other way round? Hindus embracing Muslims as cultural equals? Somalians adopting British culture?

Or are you just being argumentatively woke?


I’d much rather be woke than jingoistic. You seem to be OD’ing on rivers of boood

Presumably you have the same concerns regarding catholics & protestants ? Or is that OK somehow ?

Hugh 12-02-2023 16:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36145790)
I’d much rather be woke than jingoistic. You seem to be OD’ing on rivers of boood

Presumably you have the same concerns regarding catholics & protestants ? Or is that OK somehow ?

I remember exactly the same kind of language/rhetoric/fearmongering against the Irish Catholics in Glasgow in the 60s - coming over here, getting council houses, taking our jobs/never working and just claiming benefits, with their funny religion and all living in the same areas, etc., etc...


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:13.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum