Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

so if say Corbyn called for riots it be ok or any remain supporter you stay quiet yeah right we would never ever here end of it as you well know OB

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

Labour is conniving with the EU to prevent Boris from getting a deal, and of course we are surrendering if they get their way. The electorate understand this truth. And the opposition is betraying the electorate, who voted to leave.

Labour is facing in two directions at the same time on Brexit, and everyone knows it.

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

No one is saying that language should not be moderated on all sides.

If I try and explain to you that calling someone a name is worse than calling a tax or charge a name, I don't have to add a disclaimer condemning everything bad that everyone has said. That would probably confuse people even more.

---------- Post added at 15:25 ---------- Previous post was at 15:21 ----------

Can you clarify - are you now quoting what Boris has pledged or are you saying it will happen yourself?

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

We aren’t surrendering anything. This wartime rhetoric, laughable, is dangerous because of the morons out there’s who will buy into it and do something stupid. The world won’t end if we extend 3 months - if we have a GE in the meantime and 2nd referendum or remain parties win then that’s the will of the people.

Boris doesn’t want a deal, as his donors are in for shorting the pound to the tune of £8bn on the basis of no deal. You are kidding yourself if you think Boris is genuinely interested in a deal.

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

I said no-one in their right mind would want riots on the streets. What are you actually arguing about, Dave?

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

Indeed

Police investigate 'utterly vile' banner calling for Tory deaths condemned by Labour mayor

On sky news, can’t link on my phone for some reason.

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

Brendan O.Neill said they should be OB I be mad and very disgusted if a remain supporter said that are you not with him OB

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

l have the link here.

https://news.sky.com/story/utterly-v...mayor-11822793

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

Do come off it, who are you kidding? We are surrendering because we are being forced into a close relationship with the EU and on their terms.

If you don't like wartime rhetoric, and it's arguable as to whether the word 'surrender' is, then maybe you should be equally critical of Labour members who call Conservative members 'Nazis'.

Brexit will not be extended further as Boris has pledged not to do so. You would soon be cackling away if he failed to honour that pledge, which is exactly what you and the opposition want him to do.

Boris may not want a deal, but the reason for that is that not being tied closely to the EU will give us the maximum freedom in trading with the rest of the world.

Substitute your own reasons if you want to, but they are not true although they may give you some comfort in thinking that.

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

I didn’t say I didn’t like the wartime rhetoric - I said it was a matter of time before it had a dangerous effect on a moron. The death of Jo Cox for one being an event someone has clearly bought too much into propaganda. There’s idiots out there, and you know it.

Nobody is “forcing” us into a close relationship with the EU. If we accept a deal it’s because we do so on our own terms. Be that a Johnson, Corbyn or other Government.

If Boris extended for the purposes of a General Election he’d pull the rug from under his opponents, have the possibility of delivering Brexit and a majority Government for five years. If that’s what the public wants. Any cackling would be short lived on that basis, and I think acting in the best interests of the country is worth more than delivering Brexit on an absolutely arbitrary date.

Then again as I said his donors stand to make hundreds of millions of pounds all over again - so why take the risk when you could just crash out.

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

Why on earth would I want to side with a man like that? I may want Brexit, but that doesn’t mean I agree with everything any Brexiteer may say or do!

In case you were unaware, that man is described in Wikipedia in the following terms:

‘Once a Trotskyist Marxist, O'Neill was formerly a member of Revolutionary Communist Party and wrote for the party's journal, Living Marxism. O'Neill self identifies as a Marxist libertarian and writes for a range of publications.’

I am most truly offended that you could ever think of me as a Marxist and atheist, Dave!

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

Brendan O’Neill is what l would call a contemptible human being as his divisive and incendiary rhetoric should not be tolerated by anyone.

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

So you are ok with the opposition calling Boris a liar?

All I am saying is that the opposition cannot take the moral high ground here. They are just as guilty of name-calling and to suggest otherwise is ludicrous. If they want any legitimacy at all when they claim to be oh so offended, then they can stop the name-calling themselves and set a good example.

As for Boris, I actually believe that he means it when he says we will leave on 31 October. You underestimate him if you don't believe he will stick to that.

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

Boris lies. It’s an observable fact to anyone who is unbiased. That’s straightforward denial of the truth.

We will not leave on October 31, the sooner that is accepted and working to a solution after that date the better.

Re: Brexit Development(s) Discussion
 

Absolutely. I can't understand why Dave thought I would support him in any way!

---------- Post added at 16:01 ---------- Previous post was at 15:59 ----------

Oh, so you are ok with the opposition calling Boris a liar (which is unparliamentary language) but not ok for the PM to describe Hilary Benn's man trap as the surrender bill? Interesting.

As for the 31 October statement, can we quote you on that?