Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

I just get a blank page?

Lots of router activity, progress bar moves - then - Nothing!

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

And I'm now on 10mb, but even before the upgrade I found the 3mb was doing less than 2mb at peak times, but after 12am and before 3PM my best speed has been 7mb, could this be down to the 120 modem? also has "ntlhm120_ntl0002.cpr"

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

Right Noob At Work Here So Bare With Me !

I have a pc and a laptop pc doesnt have an ethernet card laptop does.
Im currently on ntl home 100 ambit modem not getting full 10 meg speeds when config file has been upgraded etc.

If i buy a router is it possible i can have it usb in the pc and ethernet in the laptop or usb as both connections and if that works should i see a better connection speed as i wouldnt be using the modem anymore.

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

sunday evening contention kicking in :)

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 18:23:58 UTC

1st 512K took 766 ms = 684449 KB/sec, approx 5640 Kbps, 5.51 Mbps
2nd 512K took 968 ms = 541620 KB/sec, approx 4463 Kbps, 4.36 Mbps
3rd 512K took 750 ms = 699051 KB/sec, approx 5760 Kbps, 5.63 Mbps
4th 512K took 719 ms = 729191 KB/sec, approx 5834 Kbps, 5.7 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 5424 Kbps, 5.3 Mbps

things will be interesting when the lower 2 tiers get upgraded along with the rest of 3meg tier.

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

you could use usb to ehternet adaptors altough its not recomended

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

Congestion free for me still, but i do live in a village.

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:27:43 GMT

1st 512K took 296 ms = 1771243 KB/sec, approx 14595 Kbps, 14.25 Mbps
2nd 512K took 375 ms = 1398101 KB/sec, approx 11520 Kbps, 11.25 Mbps
3rd 512K took 375 ms = 1398101 KB/sec, approx 11520 Kbps, 11.25 Mbps
4th 512K took 1016 ms = 516031 KB/sec, approx 4128 Kbps, 4.03 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 10441 Kbps, 10.2 Mbps

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:45:46 UTC

1st 512K took 578 ms = 907073 KB/sec, approx 7474 Kbps, 7.3 Mbps
2nd 512K took 610 ms = 859489 KB/sec, approx 7082 Kbps, 6.92 Mbps
3rd 512K took 593 ms = 884128 KB/sec, approx 7285 Kbps, 7.11 Mbps
4th 512K took 641 ms = 817922 KB/sec, approx 6543 Kbps, 6.39 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 7096 Kbps, 6.93 Mbps


NTL 120 home - new config file, never seen it much higher than 7.00MBps so will be downgrading asap when the new unlimited tiers start as i'm not paying for a upto service because that just passes the buck, why should i pay the same as someone on 10meg if i'm on 6meg, not on really

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

No contention here in Herts:

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 19:47:14 UTC

1st 512K took 437 ms = 1199744 KB/sec, approx 9886 Kbps, 9.65 Mbps
2nd 512K took 422 ms = 1242389 KB/sec, approx 10237 Kbps, 10 Mbps
3rd 512K took 438 ms = 1197005 KB/sec, approx 9863 Kbps, 9.63 Mbps
4th 512K took 453 ms = 1157369 KB/sec, approx 9259 Kbps, 9.04 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 9811 Kbps, 9.58 Mbps

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

Is all good here in Stoke at the moment:

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 20:22:06 GMT

1st 512K took 438 ms = 1197005 KB/sec, approx 9863 Kbps, 9.63 Mbps
2nd 512K took 437 ms = 1199744 KB/sec, approx 9886 Kbps, 9.65 Mbps
3rd 512K took 454 ms = 1154819 KB/sec, approx 9516 Kbps, 9.29 Mbps
4th 512K took 421 ms = 1245340 KB/sec, approx 9963 Kbps, 9.73 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 9807 Kbps, 9.58 Mbps

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

Even better than before here in Rushden...

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:11:14 UTC

1st 512K took 406 ms = 1291350 KB/sec, approx 10641 Kbps, 10.39 Mbps
2nd 512K took 421 ms = 1245340 KB/sec, approx 10262 Kbps, 10.02 Mbps
3rd 512K took 422 ms = 1242389 KB/sec, approx 10237 Kbps, 10 Mbps
4th 512K took 405 ms = 1294538 KB/sec, approx 10356 Kbps, 10.11 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 10374 Kbps, 10.13 Mbps

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

No contention all day in chilly langford....

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 21:16:22 GMT

1st 512K took 453 ms = 1157369 KB/sec, approx 9537 Kbps, 9.31 Mbps
2nd 512K took 437 ms = 1199744 KB/sec, approx 9886 Kbps, 9.65 Mbps
3rd 512K took 422 ms = 1242389 KB/sec, approx 10237 Kbps, 10 Mbps
4th 512K took 438 ms = 1197005 KB/sec, approx 9576 Kbps, 9.35 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 9809 Kbps, 9.58 Mbps

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

since firmware update NTL120..
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 22:08:50 UTC

1st 512K took 546 ms = 960234 KB/sec, approx 7912 Kbps, 7.73 Mbps
2nd 512K took 563 ms = 931240 KB/sec, approx 7673 Kbps, 7.49 Mbps
3rd 512K took 562 ms = 932897 KB/sec, approx 7687 Kbps, 7.51 Mbps
4th 512K took 563 ms = 931240 KB/sec, approx 7450 Kbps, 7.28 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 7681 Kbps, 7.5 Mbps

But the modem resets on average once every 20mins or when upstream goes over 40k:erm:
phoning cs tomorrow. speed increase is pointless if ya cant stay connected long enough to do anything with it:sleep:

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

PCI ethernet card cost around £10

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

Would be helpfull to know modem model on speeds being shown. Anyone for top speed from a surfboard 3100 yet?

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 

had already said which modem in earlier posts around the 8th, only posted again because of firmware update, so didnt think i needed to say it again, but just for you ive added it :p: