![]() |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Quote:
Literally straight out the playbook. In either case, there is no excuse. |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Oh right.
Guess you missed the part where I said I don’t condone attacks on anyone? Congratulations on the effort at drama but at no time have I justified, or tried to justify, an attack. In the words of Joey Swole, you need to do better. |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
“I don’t condone”……god forbid. But I fully understand…………I mean who wouldn’t under the circumstances? Just rhymes with, I’m not racist but………….just a little bit. So no, I didn’t miss it, I ignored it because it’s not what you really think. I’d have respected you more if you said you did condone it, as that’s what you really think, you know for members of the tory party. ---------- Post added at 22:14 ---------- Previous post was at 22:05 ---------- Quote:
If you are not trying to justify or explain away an attack Then what is the point of this statement? Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
In the past 21 years you’ve come out with some absolute weapons-grade dogshit on here but you’ve truly peaked now.
Adding words I did not say to twist my post to suit your own agenda? Truly nothing is beyond you. And you’d have respected me more? To be honest I’m more offended that you assume I care whether you respect me or not. Take your word twisting agenda elsewhere and stop pretending to know someone you genuinely know nothing about. ---------- Post added at 22:22 ---------- Previous post was at 22:16 ---------- Quote:
Let me use smaller and simpler words for you. I don’t agree with, advise or condone (apologies if that’s bit too big for you) physical attacks on any person or country. If I knew it was going to happen and I had a way of stopping it from occurring then I absolutely would. However I understand the anger. Before you quote-edit this post too, let me qualify that but. Understanding anger, and condoning attacks are a world apart (perhaps not in yours but definitely in the minds of rational people). I make no attempt to hide my disgust of the Tory Party. Doesn’t mean I want to see any of them harmed. That clear enough for you? |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
I think I’ve called it right. You can protest all you want, that’s how I see it. You’ve said your bit and I’ve said my bit. |
Re: Online Safety Bill
That enough of this utter nonsense, back to the topic.
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
St Albans is the latest place to want to ban smartphones for children (under 14 in this case):
. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...s%20for%20them. |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
It’s. Not. Going. To. Happen. Thanks for your time. |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n%20the%20idea.
Schools seem to be on a roll with wanting to ban things. A primary school wants to ban it's 7-11 year old girls from wearing skirts as they are wearing them too short: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...n%20the%20idea. Is this innapropriately sexualising children or a good idea to deter paedophiles from taking an interest in them? |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 22:32. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum