Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

1andrew1 02-09-2022 20:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133102)
Well, that’s twisting it even further than you normally twist things, Andrew. I’ve been consistent in saying all along that we are in a transitional stage and that the adjustments we need to make Brexit a success have hardly even begun.

I was saying to Ian that he was labelling it a failure, as indeed are you and far too many others on here. The bureaucracy businesses are co mplaining of are those the EU is insisting on. The benefits of Brexit will not be discovered in practice until we do something about that

Ian did not say Brexit was a failure. The only person who used that word was you. Perhaps you invoked the term subconsciously?

The import bureaucracy in question concerns that applied by most countries to imports outside their own trading bloc. Since the UK has left the EU, the UK falls into this category. So the way round this, or to use your phrase "to do something about this" is for the UK and EU to get closer eg mutual recognition of veterinary standards for the UK to join the Single Market. Are you on board with this?

OLD BOY 02-09-2022 20:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36133098)
With the best will in the world to ianch99, Mr K, 1andrew1 and myself we’re not the experts in this. We’ve no buy in.

OB on the other hand wants to move the conversation on to discuss what now needs to be done to make it work and, since he referenced it, I’ve invited him to name specific laws and bureaucracy that have to change to make it a success.

If he’s stumped you’ve no chance of us having the answer.

Already given you some clues.

I have reminded Ian of the General Data Protection Regulation, the Working Time Directive and Acquired Rights Directive, but there are tons more. Examples include:

The Health and Safety at Work Framework Directive (requires all businesses to keep written records of all risk assessments, regardless of risk)
The Tobacco Products Directive (which restricts e-cigarettes even though there are health benefits to smokers).
The Chemicals Directive (which requires companies to carry out a huge and unnecessary amount of animal testing costing millions of pounds to the chemicals industry)
The European Food Information for Consumers Regulation (which for example requires shops to attach warnings to their fish products that the product contains fish)
The Clinical Trials Directive (which hampers clinical research and makes more difficult the access patients have to innovative new treatments).
The Genetically Modified Organisms Directive (which prevents genome editing, which is preventing the discovery of effective treatments, for example for malaria).

This gives you just an essence of a flavour of how the EU is frustrating businesses of all types. There are hundreds of these regulations that need to be overhauled or repealed altogether.

Some of these were put in place with good intentions, but they have overegged it all to a ridiculous degree which just makes more work for everyone, often for little benefit.

---------- Post added at 19:36 ---------- Previous post was at 19:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36133109)
Ian did not say Brexit was a failure. The only person who used that word was you. Perhaps you invoked the term subconsciously?

The import bureaucracy in question concerns that applied by most countries to imports outside their own trading bloc. Since the UK has left the EU, the UK falls into this category. So the way round this, or to use your phrase "to do something about this" is for the UK and EU to get closer eg mutual recognition of veterinary standards for the UK to join the Single Market. Are you on board with this?

No, failure is clearly what is in the minds of people who with glee post negative stories about Brexit with no attempt whatsoever of how to put these things right.

I most certainly do not think it has failed. What I am saying is we have not yet even begun to start flexing our muscles to make it work, and that’s why I think the coming years will be exciting.

---------- Post added at 19:37 ---------- Previous post was at 19:36 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36133107)
The floor if yours, OB. Tell us how the erosion of workers rights will raise living standards? :rofl:

See above :p:

jfman 02-09-2022 20:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133110)
Already given you some clues.

I have reminded Ian of the General Data Protection Regulation, the Working Time Directive and Acquired Rights Directive, but there is tons more. Examples include:

The Health and Safety at Work Framework Directive (requires all businesses to keep written records of all risk assessments, regardless of risk)
The Tobacco Products Directive (which restricts e-cigarettes even though there are health benefits to smokers).
The Chemicals Directive (which requires companies to carry out a huge and unnecessary amount of animal testing costing millions of pounds to the chemicals industry)
The European Food Information for Consumers Regulation (which for example requires shops to attach warnings to their fish products that the product contains fish)
The Clinical Trials Directive (which hampers clinical research and makes more difficult the access patients have to innovative new treatments).
The Genetically Modified Organisms Directive (which prevents genome editing, which is preventing the discovery of effective treatments, for example for malaria).

This gives you just an essence of a flavour of how the EU is frustrating businesses of all types. There are hundreds of these regulations that need to be overhauled or repealed altogether.

Some of these were put in place with good intentions, but they have overegged it all to a ridiculous degree which just makes more work for everyone, often for little benefit.

You’ve just given a list.

It doesn’t give me a flavour for anything. You’ve not meaningfully quantified the impact they have on businesses or how they are preventing “success”. What would you replace them with? You claim good intentions - so what do you replace them with to keep the benefits without the costs?

Quote:

See above :p:
Nope. Your hyperbole fails the sniff test.

OLD BOY 02-09-2022 20:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36133113)
You’ve just given a list.

It doesn’t give me a flavour for anything. You’ve not meaningfully quantified the impact they have on businesses or how they are preventing “success”. What would you replace them with? You claim good intentions - so what do you replace them with to keep the benefits without the costs?



Nope. Your hyperbole fails the sniff test.

I think you need to do the detailed research yourself. I am not the one doubting me, you are, so if you want to verify my post one way or the other, that’s down to you.

I am supremely confident that removal of the unnecessary bureaucracy imposed by a myriad of EU laws will free up all kinds of businesses.

If you want to question that, it’s you who must provide the evidence. I am not your researcher, jfman, and in any case, you wouldn’t accept the obvious if it was about to eat you alive.

jfman 02-09-2022 20:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133115)
I think you need to do the detailed research yourself. I am not the one doubting me, you are, so if you want to verify my post one way or the other, that’s down to you.

I am supremely confident that removal of the unnecessary bureaucracy imposed by a myriad of EU laws will free up all kinds of businesses.

If you want to question that, it’s you who must provide the evidence. I am not your researcher, jfman, and in any case, you wouldn’t accept the obvious if it was about to eat you alive.

You claim the discussion isn’t moving on, yet when given the opportunity are unable to do so of your own accord. :rofl:

So extensive is the myriad of rules you cannot quantify the impact of a single one on the economy - to explain how the benefits could be retained through a UK law without the costs imposed by the EU.

The absence of any insight into the subject at hand renders your supreme confidence irrelevant. If proven to correct it will be through chance, much like a toss of a coin but with a lower level of probability.

You’re the expert here, OB. Enlighten us naysayers.

OLD BOY 02-09-2022 21:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36133117)
You claim the discussion isn’t moving on, yet when given the opportunity are unable to do so of your own accord. :rofl:

So extensive is the myriad of rules you cannot quantify the impact of a single one on the economy - to explain how the benefits could be retained through a UK law without the costs imposed by the EU.

The absence of any insight into the subject at hand renders your supreme confidence irrelevant. If proven to correct it will be through chance, much like a toss of a coin but with a lower level of probability.

You’re the expert here, OB. Enlighten us naysayers.

Don’t be silly, jfman. I have given you examples of a small number of EU Directives that are restricting us, and I have also given you a clue against each one by way of a single example of how those Directives are impacting on us.

That, by itself, makes the point. I am not rising to the bait you so carefully set to derail that point. You can search the internet as well as I can, and as I have a life, I do not have the time nor the inclination to dot every i and cross every t just to satisfy you.

There are hundreds of such Directives and you want me to list them all, with a critique! You really are a case. :p:

The actual argument, which is that the abolition or amendment of hundreds of Directives will free up industry from a considerable amount of bureaucracy was my point. If you want to challenge that with a considered argument to the contrary, be my guest. Otherwise, you are simply trying to disrupt the debate and I am not going to assist you with that.

This is not Monty Python’s Department for Arguments. It is a debating forum. So debate.

jfman 02-09-2022 21:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133122)
Don’t be silly, jfman. I have given you examples of a small number of EU Directives that are restricting us, and I have also given you a clue against each one by way of a single example of how those Directives are impacting on us.

In the same sense you could tell me what a 70 mph speed limit is on the motorway is. What’s the alternative? Where’s the benefit? How many jobs?

Quote:

That, by itself, makes the point. I am not rising to the bait you so carefully set to derail that point. You can search the internet as well as I can, and as I have a life, I do not have the time nor the inclination to dot every i and cross every t just to satisfy you.
Bait carefully set? That’s an interesting way to say you have no answer to the questions as posed.

Quote:

There are hundreds of such Directives and you want me to list them all, with a critique! You really are a case. :p:

The actual argument, which is that the abolition or amendment of hundreds of Directives will free up industry from a considerable amount of bureaucracy was my point. If you want to challenge that with a considered argument to the contrary, be my guest. Otherwise, you are simply trying to disrupt the debate and I am not going to assist you with that.

This is not Monty Python’s Department for Arguments. It is a debating forum. So debate.
“Considered argument”

:rofl:

Your argument is so hollow you cannot quantify a single one, make an alternative proposal and tell us how businesses would benefit? Wider impact on jobs? The economy?

GrimUpNorth 02-09-2022 21:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133110)
Already given you some clues.

I have reminded Ian of the General Data Protection Regulation, the Working Time Directive and Acquired Rights Directive, but there are tons more. Examples include:

OK, to try and move the conversation along and so we can all try and get an understanding of how you feel things should change, let's just look at the first paragraph. It would help me understand you if you could answer me three questions:
  1. Would you be happy with companies using your personal data for anything they wanted, including selling it to the highest bidder anywhere in the world?
  2. How many hours a week would you happily work?
  3. If your company got taken over, would you like your terms and conditions preserved or be happy for the new owners to be allowed to change them as they saw fit?

And for info, my answers are:
  1. I do 37 hours at the moment and that's enough.
  2. No I don't want companies holding my data longer than they need and I don't want them to be able to do whatever they want with it.
  3. I would like my conditions preserved.

jfman 02-09-2022 21:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36133126)
OK, to try and move the conversation along and so we can all try and get an understanding of how you feel things should change, let's just look at the first paragraph. It would help me understand you if you could answer me three questions:
  1. Would you be happy with companies using your personal data for anything they wanted, including selling it to the highest bidder anywhere in the world?
  2. How many hours a week would you happily work?
  3. If your company got taken over, would you like your terms and conditions preserved or be happy for the new owners to be allowed to change them as they saw fit?

And for info, my answers are:
  1. I do 37 hours at the moment and that's enough.
  2. No I don't want companies holding my data longer than they need and I don't want them to be able to do whatever they want with it.
  3. I would like my conditions preserved.

Maybe not personally but OB has already admitted making a career out of steamrollering workers rights advising unscrupulous employers in driving down working conditions to squeeze further profits at their expense. Like parasites.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...9&postcount=19

Whether he’d want those things for himself who knows.

ianch99 02-09-2022 23:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133105)
The electorate voted for Brexit. Get over it.

Not quite, they voted to leave the EU. Keep up dear ..

You really do have just a single answer when confronted with the damage this decision has done and that is to gaslight. Decisions need to be owned, if you promise the earth and do not deliver then you will be held to account. Moreover, when the aim is to continue the fantasy when the evidence is all around demonstrating that it is folly, you end up with:

Quote:

Insanity Is Doing the Same Thing Over and Over Again and Expecting Different Results

OLD BOY 03-09-2022 19:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36133126)
OK, to try and move the conversation along and so we can all try and get an understanding of how you feel things should change, let's just look at the first paragraph. It would help me understand you if you could answer me three questions:
  1. Would you be happy with companies using your personal data for anything they wanted, including selling it to the highest bidder anywhere in the world?
  2. How many hours a week would you happily work?
  3. If your company got taken over, would you like your terms and conditions preserved or be happy for the new owners to be allowed to change them as they saw fit?

And for info, my answers are:
  1. I do 37 hours at the moment and that's enough.
  2. No I don't want companies holding my data longer than they need and I don't want them to be able to do whatever they want with it.
  3. I would like my conditions preserved.

You see, this is the common response. But we are not talking about throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Yes, 37 hours a week may suit you, but others may want to work longer hours. The legislation does not allow the choice that a lot of people want to achieve the standard of living they want. For some low paid workers, working longer hours could prove the difference between eating or not eating. You also ignore the fact that the Working Time Regulations is rather more extensive in scope than the 48 hour week.

We are all concerned about data protection, but the GDPR is extremely bureaucratic in its application. Are you really happy to have that ridiculous screen come up each time that you have to accept to proceed? It's simply unnecessary.

All the EU laws require review to establish which provisions are necessary, and is the legislation addressing the problem at hand without unnecessary bureaucracy?

---------- Post added at 18:28 ---------- Previous post was at 18:25 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36133113)
Your hyperbole fails the sniff test.

You need to get a Covid test.

---------- Post added at 18:34 ---------- Previous post was at 18:28 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36133134)
Not quite, they voted to leave the EU. Keep up dear ..

You really do have just a single answer when confronted with the damage this decision has done and that is to gaslight. Decisions need to be owned, if you promise the earth and do not deliver then you will be held to account. Moreover, when the aim is to continue the fantasy when the evidence is all around demonstrating that it is folly, you end up with:

Nonsense, Ian. The benefits of Brexit have yet to be felt, given that Covid has effectively stalled the process.

Brexit - leaving the EU....what do you see as being the difference?

---------- Post added at 18:35 ---------- Previous post was at 18:34 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36133127)
Maybe not personally but OB has already admitted making a career out of steamrollering workers rights advising unscrupulous employers in driving down working conditions to squeeze further profits at their expense. Like parasites.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/show...9&postcount=19

Whether he’d want those things for himself who knows.

God, more conflation from this man. He's just interested in trading insults instead of debating.

GrimUpNorth 03-09-2022 20:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133157)
You see, this is the common response. But we are not talking about throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Yes, 37 hours a week may suit you, but others may want to work longer hours. The legislation does not allow the choice that a lot of people want to achieve the standard of living they want. For some low paid workers, working longer hours could prove the difference between eating or not eating. You also ignore the fact that the Working Time Regulations is rather more extensive in scope than the 48 hour week.

We are all concerned about data protection, but the GDPR is extremely bureaucratic in its application. Are you really happy to have that ridiculous screen come up each time that you have to accept to proceed? It's simply unnecessary.

All the EU laws require review to establish which provisions are necessary, and is the legislation addressing the problem at hand without unnecessary bureaucracy?

---------- Post added at 18:28 ---------- Previous post was at 18:25 ----------



You need to get a Covid test.

---------- Post added at 18:34 ---------- Previous post was at 18:28 ----------



Nonsense, Ian. The benefits of Brexit have yet to be felt, given that Covid has effectively stalled the process.

Brexit - leaving the EU....what do you see as being the difference?

---------- Post added at 18:35 ---------- Previous post was at 18:34 ----------



God, more conflation from this man. He's just interested in trading insults instead of debating.

All very nice, but do you want to have a go at answering the questions? They weren't the most complicated questions ever asked.

jonbxx 03-09-2022 20:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133157)
You see, this is the common response. But we are not talking about throwing the baby out with the bathwater.

Yes, 37 hours a week may suit you, but others may want to work longer hours. The legislation does not allow the choice that a lot of people want to achieve the standard of living they want. For some low paid workers, working longer hours could prove the difference between eating or not eating. You also ignore the fact that the Working Time Regulations is rather more extensive in scope than the 48 hour week.

You can work more than 48 hours except for some limited jobs. The employee need to waive those rights and they can’t be forced to do it - https://www.gov.uk/maximum-weekly-wo...and-opting-out . I am starting a new job next week and due to the nature of the job working with people in different time zones, I have signed off those rights

OLD BOY 03-09-2022 20:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36133165)
All very nice, but do you want to have a go at answering the questions? They weren't the most complicated questions ever asked.

I have answered them, Grim. My point is simply that there is a lot of scope to change the EU laws that are currently in force in Britain, for the benefit of business.

There’s nothing controversial about this, and I am not the only one making this point.

Hugh 03-09-2022 21:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133167)
I have answered them, Grim. My point is simply that there is a lot of scope to change the EU laws that are currently in force in Britain, for the benefit of business.

There’s nothing controversial about this, and I am not the only one making this point.

Hopefully not to the detriment of the employees, customers, and the environment?

Like…

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/1...f729e09f78fc79

Quote:

Truss eyes bonfire of workers’ rights to boost economy

Among reforms due to be examined are changes to the 48-hour working week, part of the EU working time directive implemented in the UK in 1998. It prevents workers from being discriminated against or sacked if they refuse to work over 48 hours a week.

The new government is also understood to want to look at rules on taking breaks and calculating holiday pay that guarantees most people four weeks’ holiday a year plus bank holidays…

… One Conservative source said that Boris Johnson vetoed the plans because they would have gone against his pledge in the Brexit referendum not to strip workers of rights, but that Truss was not bound by such pledges.

GrimUpNorth 03-09-2022 21:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133167)
I have answered them, Grim. My point is simply that there is a lot of scope to change the EU laws that are currently in force in Britain, for the benefit of business.

There’s nothing controversial about this, and I am not the only one making this point.

Oh my mistake, I must have blinked and missed them. I've gone back and checked and still can't see them. Did anyone else notice his answers?

papa smurf 03-09-2022 21:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36133173)
Oh my mistake, I must have blinked and missed them. I've gone back and checked and still can't see them. Did anyone else notice his answers?

I did

jfman 03-09-2022 22:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133157)
God, more conflation from this man. He's just interested in trading insults instead of debating.

Yet OB it is you, far more than anyone else in this thread, who harps back to the referendum more than anyone else.

We’ve invited you to name a single regulation that could be changed and to quantify what that means for the economy, living standards, jobs and you have not.

Indeed, it’s quite a paradox that these open goals exist yet our Conservative government with a commanding majority haven’t simply tapped the ball into the net. Despite this, your enemy is the lay voter who disagrees with you and is inconsequential to whether change occurs.

We have at least uncovered some background to your hatred for the British worker.

Julian 03-09-2022 23:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36133173)
Oh my mistake, I must have blinked and missed them. I've gone back and checked and still can't see them. Did anyone else notice his answers?

I know what I noticed and that's the fact that this thread is going nowhere with constant digs and sniping. :td:

Paul 03-09-2022 23:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36133187)
I know what I noticed and that's the fact that this thread is going nowhere with constant digs and sniping. :td:

It is becoming a little tiresome. :sleep:

The sniping can stop now, or a few people are going to take a rest from this topic.

tweetiepooh 05-09-2022 10:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I think that one issue with EU rules is how countries interpret and implement them. Our system tends to take the rules as "law" and forces obedience. Other countries take them as guidelines to be generally followed with a good pinch of common sense unless it applies to "foreigners" when for some reason whole layers of bureaucracy is involved.


I also think that it's the same here with our own laws. If the civil servants who get to implement things don't like it they can make it very hard to work.


Finally lots of rules are here because of people that break the rules. It should be easy to, for example, say that if you are unemployed after 2 weeks you can claim benefit that would include fuel bills being covered, food etc. But you have to then prevent people just claiming because they don't want to work, ensure that payments go to the right person and lots of other rules and regulations with exceptions and exceptions to the exceptions and so on. GDPR shouldn't really be needed, good companies should be doing that sort of thing anyway. You need a framework to tell them that maybe so they can ensure they design systems well and maybe outline punishments for abuse but not all the weight and work GDPR requires from everyone collecting data.

Chris 05-09-2022 12:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36133221)
I think that one issue with EU rules is how countries interpret and implement them. Our system tends to take the rules as "law" and forces obedience. Other countries take them as guidelines to be generally followed with a good pinch of common sense unless it applies to "foreigners" when for some reason whole layers of bureaucracy is involved.

It’s called “gold plating” and our civil service is exceptionally good at it. Those of them who rue the day we voted to leave the EU might find it useful to ponder the extent to which the culture they work in, and perpetuate, helped bring it about.

1andrew1 08-09-2022 00:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Not surprised to see the Minister for Brexit Opportunities position abolished. You can only keep an oxymoron of a job going for so long. ;)

mrmistoffelees 08-09-2022 09:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36133653)
Not surprised to see the Minister for Brexit Opportunities position abolished. You can only keep an oxymoron of a job going for so long. ;)

Indeed, I can’t think of a single thing he delivered whilst in post that warrants such a significant promotion

Cronyism over competence who would have thought it ?

Oh wait, he put some bits of paper on some desks

Hugh 08-09-2022 10:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36133655)
Indeed, I can’t think of a single thing he delivered whilst in post that warrants such a significant promotion

Cronyism over competence who would have thought it ?

Oh wait, he put some bits of paper on some desks

The funniest part of the article he wrote in the Sun about this was a picture that was supposed to show an empty Serious Fraud Squad office was in fact a picture of the Cabinet Office (where he worked…).

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1662625324

1andrew1 08-09-2022 10:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36133659)
The funniest part of the article he wrote in the Sun about this was a picture that was supposed to show an empty Serious Fraud Squad office was in fact a picture of the Cabinet Office (where he worked…).

That was my major gripe with the Johnson regime - just blatantly not worrying about the truth.

Hugh 13-09-2022 19:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https://www....reType=nongift

Quote:

Britain and the EU are preparing to avoid a diplomatic confrontation this week over post-Brexit trading arrangements on Northern Ireland, according to officials on both sides.

The sides are expected to agree a diplomatic finesse to avoid a September 15 legal deadline on grace periods becoming a flashpoint in the relationship, which has soured over the implementation of the Northern Ireland protocol on trade.

There were fears last month that Liz Truss, UK prime minister, might immediately trigger the Article 16 safeguards clause in the protocol to maintain the grace periods, which allow for temporary lighter-touch implementation of the deal, but insiders in London and Brussels said these have now have been allayed.

Instead, the UK is expected to make a written request to the European Commission to extend the light-touch implementation, and Brussels is expected to give informal consent by not lodging any objection.

A similar diplomatic fudge was agreed in July 2021. London says the continuation of the grace periods is the bare minimum for businesses pending a fundamental renegotiation of the protocol.

1andrew1 20-09-2022 16:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Trade deal with US won't happen in 2022 as promised.
Quote:

Ahead of the meeting Ms Truss admitted a new trade deal with the United States is unlikely in the "short to medium term" and that no discussions were currently underway.

The UK government had previously promised a post-Brexit trade deal with the US by 2022.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-62968072 (see end of article)

Sephiroth 20-09-2022 17:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 

US trade deal not in our hands. Remember, Biden is Irish.


Julian 20-09-2022 17:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36134539)
Trade deal with US won't happen in 2022 as promised.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-62968072 (see end of article)

So what happens then?

Do we trade as per WTO rules like:-

Quote:

Despite the US being the EU’s largest trading partner, there is no dedicated free trade agreement between the EU and the US. The Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations were launched in 2013, but ended without conclusion at the end of 2016. They were formally closed in 2019 after being considered obsolete. Nevertheless, transatlantic trade continues to enjoy one of the lowest average tariffs (under 3%) in the world, governed by World Trade Organization (WTO) rules.

LINKAGE

papa smurf 20-09-2022 17:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36134542)

US trade deal not in our hands. Remember, Biden is Irish.


Throughout the Troubles, Biden voiced support for the Irish cause and sometimes took action in the Senate. In 1985, he opposed an extradition treaty with Britain that would have affected members of the Irish Republican Army who had fled to the United States. Taking issue with the British administration of justice in Northern Ireland, he helped force the GOP to water down the agreement.

1andrew1 20-09-2022 17:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36134542)

US trade deal not in our hands. Remember, Biden is Irish.


Just saw the news hidden in Damien's link about banker bonuses so posted the snippet.

Despite the promises of 2017, I don't think it was really ever on the cards whoever the President was. The US is focused on its treaty with Mexico and Canada and doesn't see the need to go beyond this given its large market size.

---------- Post added at 16:37 ---------- Previous post was at 16:36 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36134544)
Throughout the Troubles, Biden voiced support for the Irish cause and sometimes took action in the Senate. In 1985, he opposed an extradition treaty with Britain that would have affected members of the Irish Republican Army who had fled to the United States. Taking issue with the British administration of justice in Northern Ireland, he helped force the GOP to water down the agreement.

People's views change - Truss was more recently a Leaver, before that a Liberal Democrat and before that an anti-monarchist.

papa smurf 20-09-2022 17:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36134547)
Just saw the news hidden in Damien's link about banker bonuses so posted the snippet.

Despite the promises of 2017, I don't think it was really ever on the cards whoever the President was. The US is focused on its treaty with Mexico and Canada and doesn't see the need to go beyond this given its large market size.

---------- Post added at 16:37 ---------- Previous post was at 16:36 ----------


People's views change - Truss was more recently a Leaver, before that a Liberal Democrat and before that an anti-monarchist.

She never supported a bunch of murdering terrorists and as far as i know the things she did support were all legal

ianch99 20-09-2022 17:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36134542)

US trade deal not in our hands. Remember, Biden is Irish.


In 2016, Barack Obama warned it could take the United Kingdom up to 10 years to negotiate trade deals with the US. This was dismissed as Project Fear.

1andrew1 20-09-2022 17:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36134552)
She never supported a bunch of murdering terrorists and as far as i know the things she did support were all legal

Agreed, my point was about a politician's views being able to shift over time.

papa smurf 20-09-2022 19:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36134562)
In 2016, Barack Obama warned it could take the United Kingdom up to 10 years to negotiate trade deals with the US. This was dismissed as Project Fear.

He's a racist pig who hates the British who gives a toss about his opinion

Dave42 20-09-2022 19:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36134577)
He's a racist pig who hates the British who gives a toss about his opinion

why because he told the truth and leavers don't like it

Sephiroth 20-09-2022 20:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36134580)
why because he told the truth and leavers don't like it

Doesn't alter the fact that Biden doesn't like the UK and prefers Ireland - and behaves accordingly.


Dave42 20-09-2022 20:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36134582)
Doesn't alter the fact that Biden doesn't like the UK and prefers Ireland - and behaves accordingly.


even if Trump was still in they be no trade deal congress would not allow it because of uk going to break NI protocol and threating the GFA people from both parties in America have said that

Sephiroth 20-09-2022 21:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36134583)
even if Trump was still in they be no trade deal congress would not allow it because of uk going to break NI protocol and threating the GFA people from both parties in America have said that

... and, of course, they'd be wrong.

Pierre 20-09-2022 22:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36134539)
Trade deal with US won't happen in 2022 as promised.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-62968072 (see end of article)

Didn’t think you wanted one anyway? You know all that chlorinated chicken et Al. You should be happy.

1andrew1 20-09-2022 22:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36134592)
Didn’t think you wanted one anyway? You know all that chlorinated chicken et Al. You should be happy.

If you can get a deal on the right terms, it would obviously be good for the country so I'd be up for it. But as I said before, the US is not particularly interested in going much beyond its current free trade area with Mexico and Canada, whoever is in power.

1andrew1 22-09-2022 20:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I think the Telegraph is trolling Johnson here over getting Brexit done! But I predict now Truss is PM we'll get this resolved and hopefully this will pave the way for us to participate in Horizon Europe.

Quote:

Brexit deal looks closer than ever under Liz Truss

A Brexit deal looks more likely than not after Britain set a six-month deadline for negotiations over the Northern Ireland Protocol.

The one thing Brexit deadlines have in common is that they are almost all missed. A deal to cut Irish Sea border checks, however, can be struck by the 25th anniversary of the Good Friday Agreement in April.

By setting the deadline, Liz Truss has taken the threat of the Northern Ireland Protocol Bill off the table for now. The prospect of tearing up the treaty with the legislation enraged the EU, which said the move would break international law.

The rhetoric from both sides has softened. London and Dublin have talked of a “landing zone” for the agreement.

That lies somewhere between reducing checks enough to satisfy Britain while keeping enough safeguards to reassure Brussels that nothing not meeting EU standards crosses from Northern Ireland into Ireland.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...3994b5987e14b1

1andrew1 01-10-2022 11:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I wonder what we've done differently to the rest of the G7?
Quote:

UK remains only G7 economy to languish below pre-pandemic levels

GDP stuck 0.2% below final quarter of 2019, but latest growth data now positive

Significant revisions to UK data indicate that Britain is the only G7 economy that remains smaller than it was before the pandemic, despite an improved performance in the second quarter that diminished fears of recession.

Office for National Statistics figures released on Friday showed that UK gross domestic product for the three months to June this year remained 0.2 per cent below the level it reached in the final quarter of 2019.

Previously, official data had indicated that GDP had risen 0.6 per cent above pre-pandemic levels by June.

By contrast with the UK’s failure to return to pre-pandemic levels, the eurozone economy reached 1.8 per cent above 2019 levels in the second quarter. The US had recovered to pre-pandemic levels by the start of last year.

Friday’s UK growth downgrade was largely due to a lower ONS estimate of 2020 output. However, growth for 2021 and this year was revised higher.

Samuel Tombs, chief UK economist at Pantheon Macroeconomics, said the figures will compel the Office for Budget Responsibility, the UK fiscal watchdog, to revise down further its estimates for future potential GDP. They would also mean that the tax-to-GDP ratio will be slightly higher than previously estimated.

“The damage inflicted to the economy’s supply side by Covid and Brexit is even larger than previously thought,” Tombs said.
https://www.ft.com/content/4edae69b-...a-03d14ca8caa6

Dave42 02-10-2022 21:29

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Tory MP Steve Baker apologies to Ireland and EU for behaviour during Brexit
Northern Ireland secretary says he and colleagues had not always respected others’ ‘legitimate interests’

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-during-brexit

1andrew1 02-10-2022 21:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36135738)
Tory MP Steve Baker apologies to Ireland and EU for behaviour during Brexit
Northern Ireland secretary says he and colleagues had not always respected others’ ‘legitimate interests’

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-during-brexit

Good to hear.

Hugh 04-10-2022 10:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36135738)
Tory MP Steve Baker apologies to Ireland and EU for behaviour during Brexit
Northern Ireland secretary says he and colleagues had not always respected others’ ‘legitimate interests’

https://www.theguardian.com/politics...-during-brexit

Here he is again at Conference, saying footballers ‘taking the knee" is not Neo-Marxist ideology, it’s about showing solidarity…

https://twitter.com/nadinebh_/status...y-MB-Oi_O2hnhw

Sephiroth 04-10-2022 10:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36135943)
Here he is again at Conference, saying footballers ‘taking the knee" is not Neo-Marxist ideology, it’s about showing solidarity…

https://twitter.com/nadinebh_/status...y-MB-Oi_O2hnhw

Taking the knee is woke nonsense.


Hugh 04-10-2022 12:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36135945)
Taking the knee is woke nonsense.


So Steve Baker, one of the driving forces behind Brexit and the ERG, is "woke"?

Sephiroth 04-10-2022 12:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36135950)
So Steve Baker, one of the driving forces behind Brexit and the ERG, is "woke"?

Not necessarily, but taking the knee is woke nonsense. Btw, the rest of Europe are in no way united about taking the knee.

On topic, however, I can't see a problem with Sefcovic's offer to keep lorry inspections at NI down to "1 or 2 per week". Unless the headline masks some awkward small print.

Dave42 04-10-2022 13:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36135951)
Not necessarily, but taking the knee is woke nonsense. Btw, the rest of Europe are in no way united about taking the knee.

On topic, however, I can't see a problem with Sefcovic's offer to keep lorry inspections at NI down to "1 or 2 per week". Unless the headline masks some awkward small print.

taking the knee it about showing there no room for racism in the world after the racist murder of George Floyd by a cop

1andrew1 04-10-2022 20:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
OK, they may have messed up the economy but credit where it's due, prospects in Northern Ireland are looking up.

Quote:

Exclusive Post-Brexit deal in sight for Northern Ireland Protocol after major shift in ‘mood music’

Ministers believe that a “landing zone” for a deal on the Northern Ireland protocol is in sight with a potential agreement being struck within weeks, i understands.

The Government has been working furiously behind the scenes on finding a solution on post-Brexit trading arrangements in Northern Ireland with optimism increasing that a deal is close to being signed.

i has been told that US investors are poised to start making major investments in the province as soon as the issues with the Protocol are ironed out and political stability returns.

According to senior government sources, the “mood music” between the UK, European Union and the Republic of Ireland shifted significantly at a British Irish Alliance meeting in Oxford last month.

Officials are now drawing up solutions to the protocol with the hope that they will be signed off at a political level.

Downing Street is eager to secure a deal before the 28 October deadline for when the UK Government must call another Stormont election.
https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/po...rotoco-1893869

Dave42 05-10-2022 03:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36136012)
OK, they may have messed up the economy but credit where it's due, prospects in Northern Ireland are looking up.


https://inews.co.uk/news/politics/po...rotoco-1893869

hopefully a deal gets done

1andrew1 12-10-2022 10:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Indian trade deal in peril after Suella Braverman migrant comments

Liz Truss’s flagship trade deal with India is on the “verge of collapse” after Indian ministers reacted furiously to comments by Suella Braverman criticising migrants from their country.

Last week the home secretary said she had “concerns” about the trade deal because it would increase migration to the UK and Indians represented the largest group of visa overstayers.

She told The Spectator magazine: “I do have some reservations. Look at migration in this country — the largest group of people who overstay are Indian migrants.”

The comments sparked a furious reaction from Indian government ministers and officials, sources from both governments have told The Times.

A source in Delhi said they were “shocked and disappointed” by the “disrespectful” remarks.

Delhi is demanding more work and study visas for its citizens, including a new visa that would emulate agreements struck with Australia and New Zealand that allow under-35s to live in the UK for up to three years. The enhanced terms for Indian migrants are referred to as “mobility” in talks.

A senior UK government source said: “Mobility has been the key Indian ask and everything else — financial services, banking, education, rules of origin on whisky, etc, hinges on the mobility ask. And Suella has gone and pulled the rug from under that mobility ask.”

A UK government source who has spoken to Indian officials involved in the trade negotiations said: “They were apoplectic. Mad doesn’t even come close to describing how angry they are.”
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/i...ents-bpgkw6prr

Pierre 12-10-2022 10:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

A UK government source who has spoken to Indian officials involved in the trade negotiations said: “They were apoplectic. Mad doesn’t even come close to describing how angry they are.”
I'd wager that is totally made up.

Maggy 12-10-2022 10:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36136558)
I'd wager that is totally made up.

How much do you wager?

1andrew1 12-10-2022 12:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36136558)
I'd wager that is totally made up.

I doubt The Times will share its sources with us so your money's safe.

At the heart of the matter, there does seem to be a tension between Truss's desire for supply-side reforms ie to increase immigration and Braverman's desire to reduce it.

Braverman's inexperience is likely coming through in her undiplomatic comments in naming a specific country.

papa smurf 12-10-2022 12:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36136558)
I'd wager that is totally made up.

They aint mad until they start throwing sandals at you;)

1andrew1 12-10-2022 13:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Wonder what they're doing differently?
Quote:

Eurozone industrial output jumps in contrast to UK

Industrial output in the eurozone rose sharply in August as manufacturers boosted investment despite fears of a recession, official figures have shown.

Industrial production in the 19 countries sharing the euro rose 1.5% in August from July, according to Eurostat, and was much better than the 0.6% gain forecast by economists.

This is in sharp contrast with UK manufacturing, which fell 1.6% in August, contributing to an overall economic decline of 0.3%
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/othe...b4946e3467ab2f

Chris 12-10-2022 15:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Following an entirely different investment model than the UK is what they’re doing. Sadly for years the UK has been saddled with long hours, low productivity and an excessively cautious attitude to investment.

Bear in mind however that there are differing industrial policies within EU-27 countries and industrial policy isn’t an area of EU competence so these statistics really only serve to obfuscate rather than illuminate. Within the Eurozone you will find some countries doing wildly better than others (I’ll take a stab in the dark and say Germany is probably doing very well here).

papa smurf 12-10-2022 15:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36136581)
Wonder what they're doing differently?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/othe...b4946e3467ab2f

It'll go down the pan when the gas runs out;)

Taf 12-10-2022 17:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
The missus' order of French food and drinks arrived this morning. Still no shortages across the entire shop, with many new lines arriving daily. They are even selling fresh peaches and nectarines after a few hiccoughs with transport within the UK (London and beyond).

The only thing missing was mustard. "Severe drought in Canada, poor harvests in France and the war in Ukraine have combined to reduce the supplies of mustard seeds available to producers."

1andrew1 12-10-2022 18:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 36136603)
The missus' order of French food and drinks arrived this morning. Still no shortages across the entire shop, with many new lines arriving daily. They are even selling fresh peaches and nectarines after a few hiccoughs with transport within the UK (London and beyond).

The only thing missing was mustard. "Severe drought in Canada, poor harvests in France and the war in Ukraine have combined to reduce the supplies of mustard seeds available to producers."

Yup, French food should be delivered as pre Brexit because we're postponing checking EU imports.

1andrew1 14-10-2022 00:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Meanwhile, this Tweet looks like something Mr K would say! ;)

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...1&d=1665698569

TheDaddy 19-10-2022 15:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Remember when Rees Smug told the people that border checks at Dover were unnecessary and would cause us harm, well 21 out of 22 lorries inspected were carrying meat unfit for human consumption, some were riddled with maggots, might not be so bad but when people told the victorian pipe cleaner that it was a smugglers charter he called their warnings project fear :( :dozey:

GrimUpNorth 19-10-2022 15:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36137561)
Remember when Rees Smug told the people that border checks at Dover were unnecessary and would cause us harm, well 21 out of 22 lorries inspected were carrying meat unfit for human consumption, some were riddled with maggots, might not be so bad but when people told the victorian pipe cleaner that it was a smugglers charter he called their warnings project fear :( :dozey:

Maybe he thinks that's the type of food your typical hard working family normally eats, because after all he would know hard work if it punched him in the face.

TheDaddy 19-10-2022 15:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36137567)
Maybe he thinks that's the type of food your typical hard working family normally eats, because after all he would know hard work if it punched him in the face.

Indeed, it's the brexit dividend of cheap food he promised the plebs :doh:

GrimUpNorth 19-10-2022 20:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36137570)
Indeed, it's the brexit dividend of cheap food he promised the plebs :doh:

Maybe he's been watching I'm a Celebrity. The swear filter just won't give me the words to describe him.

1andrew1 24-10-2022 14:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Tory backer says UK economy is ‘frankly doomed’ without Brexit renegotiation

Guy Hands says Conservatives are putting country ‘on a path to be sick man of Europe’

The billionaire businessman Guy Hands has accused the Conservatives of putting the UK “on a path to be the sick man of Europe”, as he issued a series of stark predictions about what could lie ahead for the post-Brexit economy, including higher taxes and interest rates and fewer social services.

The founder and chair of the private equity firm Terra Firma, a longtime Tory supporter, called for the government to “renegotiate Brexit”, stating that otherwise the British economy was “frankly doomed”.

The Conservative party needed to “move on from fighting its own internal wars and actually focus on what needs to be done in the economy”, Hands told Radio 4’s Today programme on Monday.

On the day that Rishi Sunak is expected to become Britain’s next prime minister, the third in less than two months, Hands called for a Tory leader with “the intellectual capability and the authority to renegotiate Brexit” and turn around the economy. “Without that the economy is frankly doomed,” Hands said.

Asked what this would mean for the country, Hands said without a renegotiation of Brexit, Britain would face “steadily increasing taxes, steadily reducing benefits and social services, higher interest rates and eventually the need for a bailout from the IMF [International Monetary Fund] like we were in the 70s”.

Hands, who estimated that 70% of his firm’s investments were in the UK, said he was worried about increasing poverty, including among “middle-class people” who would struggle to meet their mortgage payments amid rising interest rates.
https://www.theguardian.com/business...-renegotiation

1andrew1 30-10-2022 13:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Useful update on the impact of Brexit on the UK economy in the context of the new PM.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-63426412

TheDaddy 30-10-2022 15:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36138857)
Useful update on the impact of Brexit on the UK economy in the context of the new PM.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-63426412

Any update on what the opportunities of brexit are, smugg's been looking for them for years without luck and even resorted to asking The Sun readers for theirs in desperation

1andrew1 30-10-2022 22:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36138864)
Any update on what the opportunities of brexit are, smugg's been looking for them for years without luck and even resorted to asking The Sun readers for theirs in desperation

Here's what were promised: Weekly food shop will become cheaper, shorter NHS waiting times, potentially more money for schools, higher wages, a resurgent economy, easier for young people to get on the housing ladder, more accountable politicians, a more prosperous and safer future.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1555249564663398401

The move to Imperial measure will doubtless be canned as will the idea to repeal EU legislation we incorporated into UK law. That probably leaves refinement of the Solvency II laws as doable, but the EU is also looking at those itself

Sephiroth 30-10-2022 22:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
We are free from the EU shackles and we will build on that - eventually.

Hugh 30-10-2022 23:47

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Is that JRM’s 50 years eventually?

1andrew1 31-10-2022 13:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36138885)
We are free from the EU shackles and we will build on that - eventually.

I think Truss showed that the loss-tax, low-regulation Brexiters' fantasy is an economist's nightmare and unachievable.

You can't argue with the gravity of trade and if you want lower taxes or more money to spend on the NHS, we will require smoother trading terms with our main trading bloc, the EU. The UK is the only G7 country whose GDP is not back to pre-Covid levels.

Voters may have been happy to accept the economy taking a 4% hit for more sovereignty and other reasons. But when that 4% hit translates into higher taxes, poorer services or no triple pensions lock, it's no surprise the polls suggest they're now thinking differently.

TheDaddy 31-10-2022 13:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36138919)
Voters may have been happy to accept the economy taking a 4% hit for more sovereignty and other reasons. But when that 4% hit translates into higher taxes, poorer services or no triple pensions lock, it's no surprise the polls suggest they're now thinking differently.

Well they knew what they were voting for, if pensioners are struggling without the triple lock perhaps they should get a job, there's plenty out there

Sephiroth 31-10-2022 14:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Truss showed that she didn't know how to do it. John Redwood knows, of course.

The higher taxes etc are down to Covid and Ukraine, in the main.


daveeb 31-10-2022 16:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36138927)
Truss showed that she didn't know how to do it. John Redwood knows, of course.

The higher taxes etc are down to Covid and Ukraine, in the main.


But a bit confused about good British, out of the EU, reservoirs apparently.



https://twitter.com/johnredwood/stat...56919838887937

Hugh 31-10-2022 16:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36138927)
Truss showed that she didn't know how to do it. John Redwood knows, of course.

The higher taxes etc are down to Covid and Ukraine, in the main.


Do you mean the man who posted this a couple of days ago?

Quote:

The government wants tax rises and spending cuts to reduce borrowing because the OBR says there will be a big deficit in 2025. No-one knows what the deficit will be then so being slave to a made up figure is wrong.
https://twitter.com/johnredwood/stat...vN6UbcwZvHCuVQ

If only there had been a recent event which had shown the folly of marginalising the role of OBR when setting fiscal policy...

ianch99 31-10-2022 18:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36138932)
Do you mean the man who posted this a couple of days ago?



https://twitter.com/johnredwood/stat...vN6UbcwZvHCuVQ

If only there had been a recent event which had shown the folly of marginalising the role of OBR when setting fiscal policy...

You are being too polite Hugh, the guy is a fool.

Pierre 31-10-2022 19:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36138932)
Do you mean the man who posted this a couple of days ago?



https://twitter.com/johnredwood/stat...vN6UbcwZvHCuVQ

If only there had been a recent event which had shown the folly of marginalising the role of OBR when setting fiscal policy...

A big deficit in 2025? I’m pretty sure the deficit is big enough already.

1andrew1 31-10-2022 22:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36138955)
A big deficit in 2025? I’m pretty sure the deficit is big enough already.

Not big enough for Redwood, apparently!

tweetiepooh 01-11-2022 12:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I know it's crude and doesn't work but £50 billion deficit divided over 70 million population is around £720 each. Now all 70 million can't pay as we have children and others in that number. But that really is only the deficit and doesn't do much for the huge debt. We do need to pay that off..

Sephiroth 01-11-2022 12:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Whilst I remain a convinced Brexiteer (as in shedding the EU shackles), shouldn't there be a hefty proportion of the £39bn somewhere in the mix? The cheating Guvmin never mentions this.

jfman 01-11-2022 12:39

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36138998)
I know it's crude and doesn't work but £50 billion deficit divided over 70 million population is around £720 each. Now all 70 million can't pay as we have children and others in that number. But that really is only the deficit and doesn't do much for the huge debt. We do need to pay that off..

You think that’s bad mate wait til you see the national debt.

Sephiroth 01-11-2022 12:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36138998)
I know it's crude and doesn't work but £50 billion deficit divided over 70 million population is around £720 each. Now all 70 million can't pay as we have children and others in that number. But that really is only the deficit and doesn't do much for the huge debt. We do need to pay that off..


Actually, that's very insightful. If you take the working population, you're looking at £1,500 per person. That's per year of deficit. If the Guvmin splits that 50/50, as mooted, with departmental savings, we're back to tweetiepooh's £720 each (per year). Of course that'll be higher because the tax take will be weighted according to affordability sort of thing and thus higher earners will see a higher burden (never mind their mortgages).

All because that fool Truss spooked the markets. Jeez.

Hugh 01-11-2022 12:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36139000)
Whilst I remain a convinced Brexiteer (as in shedding the EU shackles), shouldn't there be a hefty proportion of the £39bn somewhere in the mix? The cheating Guvmin never mentions this.

It’s around £5.5 billion this year, £3 billion next year, £1 billion 2024…

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/51110096

1andrew1 01-11-2022 13:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36138998)
I know it's crude and doesn't work but £50 billion deficit divided over 70 million population is around £720 each. Now all 70 million can't pay as we have children and others in that number. But that really is only the deficit and doesn't do much for the huge debt. We do need to pay that off..

Is it about £30k per person to pay off the UK's national debt?

tweetiepooh 04-11-2022 10:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36139017)
Is it about £30k per person to pay off the UK's national debt?

Yes but getting the budget right means we start to pay off that debt and people who pay off debt get that debt at better rates than those who don't.

Hugh 04-11-2022 11:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36139280)
Yes but getting the budget right means we start to pay off that debt and people who pay off debt get that debt at better rates than those who don't.

And people who add additional debt without explaining how they’re going to pay for it have to pay more for that debt - pretty basic process you would have thought most people would know…

1andrew1 15-11-2022 00:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Another Brexit benefit for our competitors found. ;)

London has lost its rank as Europe’s biggest stock market to Paris. The gap between the two markets has been narrowing since the Brexit vote in 2016.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ges-ahead.html

Paul 15-11-2022 00:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
:zzz:

jonbxx 15-11-2022 09:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
There was good news for manufacturers published by the government yesterday. It has been decided to extend recognition of CE marking for another two years. Goods were due to need UKCA approval by the end of this year but this has now been extended to the end of 2024.

Linky- https://www.gov.uk/government/news/b...ng-flexibility

1andrew1 15-11-2022 09:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36139980)
There was good news for manufacturers published by the government yesterday. It has been decided to extend recognition of CE marking for another two years. Goods were due to need UKCA approval by the end of this year but this has now been extended to the end of 2024. UKCA may tick the box for sovereignty purists but the reality is it makes British business less competitive.

Linky- https://www.gov.uk/government/news/b...ng-flexibility

I suspect this will continue to be kicked down he road by future governments.

Sephiroth 15-11-2022 13:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36139982)
I suspect this will continue to be kicked down he road by future governments.

… and so it should be. To export goods to the EU we need CE compluance. I can’t think of any derogation we would need. Pig-headed sovereignty is pointless.

TheDaddy 15-11-2022 19:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36139971)
Another Brexit benefit for our competitors found. ;)

London has lost its rank as Europe’s biggest stock market to Paris. The gap between the two markets has been narrowing since the Brexit vote in 2016.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ges-ahead.html

On top of George Useless sorry Eustice saying our trade deal with Australia is a complete disaster, nothing says sovereignty more than having to rely on other countries for your food

---------- Post added at 18:37 ---------- Previous post was at 18:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36140002)
… and so it should be. To export goods to the EU we need CE compluance. I can’t think of any derogation we would need. Pig-headed sovereignty is pointless.

Indeed our everyday sovereignty is causing more than enough problems

ianch99 16-11-2022 17:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36140002)
Pig-headed sovereignty is pointless.

Finally ...

Sephiroth 16-11-2022 19:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36140146)
Finally ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth
Pig-headed sovereignty is pointless.
.... as, of course, is the EU.

1andrew1 17-11-2022 14:29

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
We're feeling the pinch now.
Quote:

Brexit and drop in workforce harming economic recovery, says Bank governor

Britain is suffering worse economic performance than its rivals because of Brexit and a stark drop in the size of the workforce since the Covid pandemic, the governor of the Bank of England has said.

Bailey said UK GDP remained about 0.7% below its pre-Covid level, compared with much stronger recoveries in the eurozone and in the US, where he said the levels of GDP had recovered to about 2.1% and 4.2% above pre-pandemic levels.

“It’s a dramatic difference,” he said. Asked whether Brexit was contributing to the country’s underperformance, he said that “there is an effect” from leaving the EU, including a “long-run downshift” in the level of productivity.

“It’s not [an impact] we’ve been surprised by. As a public official I’m neutral on Brexit per se, but I’m not neutral in saying these are what we think are the most likely economic effects of it,” he said.
https://www.theguardian.com/business...-bank-governor

TheDaddy 17-11-2022 16:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36140217)
We're feeling the pinch now.

Meh, we wanted this and voted for it :shrug:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:12.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum