Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

The second video showed two things, firstly that he is a bloody idiot willing to put himself in harms way deliberately to make a 'good film' and secondly the Israeli troops are bloody accurate when firing tear gas.

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

Bloody polis, standing there acting as targets for snooker balls, petrol bombs, paint and bottles of urine before reacting. What do they expect? :rolleyes:

I've tried reading the protestors blog, I can only get so far in before a mixture of anger and laughter stops me.

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

he was lucky it was tear gas out there.
is he brave or is he just $@%$£%$ stupid

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

The latter imo :nutter:

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

Does it? Well coming from you it doesn't surprise me one jot frankly - you have 'previous' when it comes to a rather jaundiced view of the Police after all. Just just to clarify it for you, however, I'm well aware that certain elements of the police can and do act very badly at times. Unlike some people, however, I am not prepared to tar them all with that particular brush from the outset, before the facts are known and don't see cover-ups, conspiracies and falsifications from within their ranks everywhere I look. Given the considerable provocation they face and the constraints they work under I think the Police have a very difficult job to do, by and large do it very well and deserve our thanks for having the guts to put themselves in the firing line.

---------- Post added at 20:31 ---------- Previous post was at 20:26 ----------

You do like to keep reminding people of the facts don't you!! :D

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

yep, it is a bad habit i picked up from you :D

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

Nah - I learned everything I know from Hugh... ;)

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

lesson 2 ...passing the buck ....it's all Hughs fault :D

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

It usually is......;)

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

You're confusing Hugh with Thatcher now matey... :D

---------- Post added at 21:32 ---------- Previous post was at 21:28 ----------

Well if you want any tips on grovelling, I'm your man.... :D

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

Just watched that ... he didn't acquit himself very well at all. Just hid behind a lot of bluster, and, TBH, tried on several occasions to use his disability as justification for going wherever he wanted, whenever he wanted, and expecting not to be challenged in any way.

Oh, and then he blamed his brother, because he was the one pushing the chair. Just slightly pathetic from one who styles himself as a cyber-revolutionary.

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

it's the silver hair and the handbag :Sprint:

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

Oh come now, that excuse is wearing a bit thin. What is the point of them being in government at all, if they can't influence policy?



No they weren't. I asked if there was anymore footage of him on that day and the answer was "yes" and then the links to the videos. If the poster meant that it was about metaphors, he really should have said. I can't be blamed for someone not being clear.

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

I believe the "metaphor" comment was in reply to your earlier post, about Jody standing up in front of the police horses....

Re: Students Rioting in London.
 

Well they've clearly influenced policy - on personal allowances, for example, so what's your point again? :confused::rolleyes: Influencing policy isn't quite the same as being able to dictate policy after all and they at least being in coalition affords them an excuse which Blair and Brown can't rely on when it comes to delivering on pre-election promises..