Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

ianch99 25-07-2022 16:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Irony off the chart! :)

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FYfqcNvX...jpg&name=small

Mick 25-07-2022 16:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36129447)
Irony off the chart! :)

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

That isn’t GB News official account. ;)

Hugh 25-07-2022 16:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...0&d=1658759649

ianch99 25-07-2022 16:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36129448)
That isn’t GB News official account. ;)

Don't mind :) It's the idea I found funny

Mad Max 25-07-2022 17:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I'm sure he could have saved himself the hassle and got his seafood from Scotland, and champagne from his local booze shop, the sausage/salami could also have been bought in the UK, but tough luck, eh. lol

Sephiroth 25-07-2022 17:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36129455)
I'm sure he could have saved himself the hassle and got his seafood from Scotland, and champagne from his local booze shop, the sausage/salami could also have been bought in the UK, but tough luck, eh. lol

Except it was fake news.

https://www.reuters.com/article/fact...-idUSL1N2Z619Z

Mad Max 25-07-2022 17:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36129458)

Aww, that's just not fair...:p:

Dave42 25-07-2022 17:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Simon Calder laying out the facts on GB news of all places

https://twitter.com/jonlis1/status/1551525150566359040

was UK choice to become a third country and add all the rules of being a third country

Mick 25-07-2022 18:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36129460)
Simon Calder laying out the facts on GB news of all places

https://twitter.com/jonlis1/status/1551525150566359040

was UK choice to become a third country and add all the rules of being a third country

And it is a choice I’m totally okay with. Pretty standard having to have passport checked and stamped. It does not remove France obligations to adequately staff their border checks. After all, these could be French nationals re-entering their country, and as already mentioned, tourists paying in to French coffers, they need to step up their game, regardless of Brexit.

Sephiroth 25-07-2022 18:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36129460)
Simon Calder laying out the facts on GB news of all places

https://twitter.com/jonlis1/status/1551525150566359040

was UK choice to become a third country and add all the rules of being a third country

Remain campaign: Remember, if you vote Leave, you'll have to show your passport if you want to travel to France - with possible long queues on the M20.

The 52%: Sod that - it's freedom from Brussels' control that I'm after.
If I want to go to France, I'll find a suitable way.


The Guvmin's Remain campaign made no mention of the travel rules that would be consequential on leaving the EU. The 52% would have known that anyway - why do we have passports? We needed them to travel to the EU anyway.

So Calder is right - I just hope he isn't a whingeing Remainer.


ianch99 25-07-2022 18:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mad Max (Post 36129459)
Aww, that's just not fair...:p:

Exactly!

---------- Post added at 17:56 ---------- Previous post was at 17:51 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36129462)
And it is a choice I’m totally okay with. Pretty standard having to have passport checked and stamped. It does not remove France obligations to adequately staff their border checks. After all, these could be French nationals re-entering their country, and as already mentioned, tourists paying in to French coffers, they need to step up their game, regardless of Brexit.

Finally some sanity around here. Brexit means 3rd country checks which means delays in peak periods. End of.

The delays could be mitigated to an extent if additional resources were added (booths, etc.) with the ability to convince the French to staff them.

Pierre 25-07-2022 19:51

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36129441)
By my definition, the last sentence makes you a Brexiter. Mick may choose to disagree of course. And it's not a term of criticism, it's a term of classification.

Why the need to neatly label someone and put them in a box?

I am not a “Brexiter” (which is a term I despise) and on the only chance we had to vote on it, I voted Remain….( I’m also not a Remainer, I voted Remain that’s all)

As a Democrat, I believe we should all move forward and not whinge about getting your own way like a child.

Quote:

Unfortunately for you Pierre, the gravity of trade will always tie us into the EU. Leaving the EU won't stop the debate on our optimum relationship with the bloc. As we've seen this weekend, few would agree we have the optimum relationship right now.
It depends on what you consider “optimum”. Anyone with half a brain would know the journey from leaving the EU to establishing a new equilibrium with the globe would be difficult, painful and lengthy. The very reasons I voted Remain, but the decision went against me, and I can live with that.

What I can’t live with is people throwing unnecessary obstacles in our way, and others taking pleasure as we find our way through these very early stages of the journey.

Again, only an idiot (and there seems to be millions) would have thought that Brexit Day+1 would instantly see us reap any benefits and sunny uplands free of the EU. To complain and constantly moan that it hasn’t happened just cements the stupidity.

Brexit is a generational journey, and once the bitterness and aftershocks have subsided, we may begin to forge a new relationship with the EU, but there’s too much hate on both sides at the moment to do anything meaningful.

For real Brexiters, the fact we are no longer in the EU is reward enough.

The rest of us need to look reality in the face and do what’s best for the country.

Julian 25-07-2022 20:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36129419)
Like the next PM Liz Truss, I believe he's changed his mind since the Referendum.

---------- Post added at 10:23 ---------- Previous post was at 10:20 ----------


Not a good look for these countries. Something we need to tidy up now through negotiation.

And yet French disabled badges can be used here. :rolleyes:

They should just reciprocate.

Hugh 25-07-2022 20:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
tbf, the online articles state "may not" or "might not" be valid/accepted in some countries…

20 Countries/Territories accept them, 10 are "Undecided".

It’s wrong that the Blue Badge holders don’t know what’s happening, but the individual countries are making, or are in the process of making, Sovereign decisions…

https://www.gov.uk/government/public...european-union

Sephiroth 25-07-2022 20:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36129475)
And yet French disabled badges can be used here. :rolleyes:

They should just reciprocate.

.... and so it must remain. We're not them.

1andrew1 26-07-2022 00:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Julian (Post 36129475)
And yet French disabled badges can be used here. :rolleyes:

They should just reciprocate.

Agreed.

---------- Post added at 23:13 ---------- Previous post was at 23:09 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36129477)
.... and so it must remain. We're not them.

Agreed.

Hugh 26-07-2022 20:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
From today’s FT

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1658858906

So glad we are cutting unnecessary red tape…

spiderplant 26-07-2022 21:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36129567)
So glad we are cutting unnecessary red tape…

I wonder how much they spent thinking up the new name

1andrew1 27-07-2022 00:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36129567)
From today’s FT

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1658858906

So glad we are cutting unnecessary red tape…

Sad to read that.

jonbxx 27-07-2022 10:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36129567)
From today’s FT

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1658858906

So glad we are cutting unnecessary red tape…

This was always going to happen with highly regulated industries and highlights the issue with re-regulation vs. deregulation. If the UK diverges from EU regulations, then the regulatory burden for a company can effectively double. For the chemical industry, REACH is a massive pain until you get in to the rhythm of applications but it' s hurdle that needs to be got over if you want to sell to the EU. The smart move would be to allow the UK regulators to accept EU REACH applications for UK REACH but I suspect the political position of 'EU bad, UK good' wouldn't allow this.

In the absence of local regulations, companies will lean towards the most stringent regulations in any of their markets which is why you see cookie acceptance buttons on websites based anywhere

1andrew1 10-08-2022 00:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
For some reason, this article has escaped our usual Daily Express re-posters.
Quote:

Brexit farce as empty security post to taxpayers a 'ludicrous' £2million a year

TAXPAYERS are facing a bill of almost £2million a year to cover the costs of a mothballed border crossing building - with one elected official branding it a "useless white elephant".

The security checkpoint - built at Portsmouth International Port following Brexit - was supposed to open last month, with a workforce of 67 employees, and built at an estimated cost of £30million. However, the Government put the plans on ice, opting to delay the introduction of physical checks on animal, plant and forest imports until the end of next year.

Port director Mike Sellers has written to Stephen Webb, Britain’s director of border readiness Stephen Webb, warning him the cost to the city would be £1,845,108 - including £500,000 between now and October.

A Border Trade and Brexit Opportunities Team delegation visited the port last month but have yet to offer any "support", Mr Sellers explained in his letter.

With Portsmouth City Council now threatening legal action in an attempt to force the Government to offer compensation, Mr Sellers added: “You kindly offered to help the port mitigate the significant costs to the border control post (BCP) due to the government’s decision to stop the import controls on EU freight and move towards a new target operating model from the end of 2023, but there has been no support nor clarity.

Portsmouth South MP Stephen Morgan said: “This Conservative government’s incompetence has left our city facing an eye-watering bill for post-Brexit infrastructure that now won't be needed.

“At a time when families in Portsmouth and across the country are struggling with the cost-of-living crisis, this government wasting almost £30m of taxpayers’ money is unforgivable.”

The facility is just one of several throughout the UK which cost a combined £500 million-plus in public and private sector cash, but which are now standing empty after the Government opted to delay the planned checks.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...ny-mordaunt-eu

OLD BOY 10-08-2022 15:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
It’s a delay, not a cancellation.

1andrew1 10-08-2022 17:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36130817)
It’s a delay, not a cancellation.

I doubt it will ever get implemented as it just adds cost to imports and who's going to want to do that in the middle of Truss's recession? There are even rumours that she will bring back some freedom of movement from the EU for to try and tackle wage inflation.

It's a £2m pa bill that the council is being saddled with for following government instructions. The least they can do is to cover it.

Sephiroth 10-08-2022 18:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36130831)
I doubt it will ever get implemented as it just adds cost to imports and who's going to want to do that in the middle of Truss's recession? There are even rumours that she will bring back some freedom of movement from the EU for to try and tackle wage inflation.

It's a £2m pa bill that the council is being saddled with for following government instructions. The least they can do is to cover it.

I've said a few times on this forum, I never had anything against freedom of movement - just the poor way it was implemented allowing beggars to remain. So, some sort of free movement wouldn't hurt on the right terms. I'd want it to address skills shortage, though. Wages will need to be attractive and that means taxes should not be prohibitively high.

Btw, I'm firmly in the "none of the above" camp.

TheDaddy 10-08-2022 19:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36130835)
I've said a few times on this forum, I never had anything against freedom of movement - just the poor way it was implemented allowing beggars to remain. So, some sort of free movement wouldn't hurt on the right terms. I'd want it to address skills shortage, though. Wages will need to be attractive and that means taxes should not be prohibitively high.

Btw, I'm firmly in the "none of the above" camp.

You're joking, we haven't gone through all this to just simply reintroduce stuff we voted to leave behind

1andrew1 10-08-2022 20:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36130858)
You're joking, we haven't gone through all this to just simply reintroduce stuff we voted to leave behind

We went through this to give BoJo a spin nehind tbe wheel!

Sephiroth 10-08-2022 20:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
We went through Brexit to regain our sovereignty.

TheDaddy 10-08-2022 20:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36130863)
We went through Brexit to regain our sovereignty.

No we never, there was a myriad of reasons people voted to leave and you only speak for yourself, fact is we left and in doing so left the single market that maggie dreamt up including it's free movement of services, goods, capital and people, we haven't gone through all this crap to glibly say oh we'll reintroduce one of them, there would be uproar and rightly so imo

1andrew1 10-08-2022 21:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36130867)
No we never, there was a myriad of reasons people voted to leave and you only speak for yourself, fact is we left and in doing so left the single market that maggie dreamt up including it's free movement of services, goods, capital and people, we haven't gone through all this crap to glibly say oh we'll reintroduce one of them, there would be uproar and rightly so imo

I rhink Truss may introduce one way FOM for farm and hospitality work.

pip08456 11-08-2022 00:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36130867)
No we never, there was a myriad of reasons people voted to leave and you only speak for yourself, fact is we left and in doing so left the single market that maggie dreamt up including it's free movement of services, goods, capital and people, we haven't gone through all this crap to glibly say oh we'll reintroduce one of them, there would be uproar and rightly so imo

Maggie didn't "dream up" the single market at all, that was the EEC at the time and it certainly didn't include free movement of people. It was merely a trading block.

1andrew1 11-08-2022 02:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36130889)
Maggie didn't "dream up" the single market at all, that was the EEC at the time and it certainly didn't include free movement of people. It was merely a trading block.

Hmm. She had a lot to do with making it happen and freedom of movement was always intended to be one of its four pillars.
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/o...ld-432900.html

TheDaddy 11-08-2022 02:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36130889)
Maggie didn't "dream up" the single market at all, that was the EEC at the time and it certainly didn't include free movement of people. It was merely a trading block.

Who said this then

and to move towards free enterprise in a single market. She stated that "of course, we want to make it easier for goods to pass through frontiers. Of course, we must make it easier for people to travel throughout the Community

pip08456 11-08-2022 02:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Though her government backed the creation of the single European market, which removed all barriers to trade, in the mid-1980s, Thatcher became increasingly hostile to further integration between the European countries.

The appointment of French socialist Jacques Delors to head the executive European Commission in 1985 arguably provided the euroskeptics their first real European bogeyman. Thatcher was aghast at Delors’ ambition for the creation of a single currency and a European central bank. The EEC, to her, was venturing into areas that would significantly dilute the sovereignty of individual nation states to set economic policy.
https://apnews.com/article/brexit-bu...b5132bdfb22ea6

Easier for people to travel does not automatically mean free movement.

TheDaddy 11-08-2022 04:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36130894)
https://apnews.com/article/brexit-bu...b5132bdfb22ea6

Easier for people to travel does not automatically mean free movement.

Great, a quote that bares no relevance to the point you're trying to prove, like it or not she was the political driving force behind the unified single market for goods, services, labour and capital, the fact she didn't like the euro or Central Bank doesn't change that

Chris 11-08-2022 15:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Got my new driving license photo card in the post today after changing address. No more euro-flag in my wallet. A small thing, I know, but it made me smile. I can’t wait for those disingenuous “structural fund” signs to start vanishing from our regional infrastructure projects as well, all decorated with the EU flag as if it wasn’t our own money they were sending back to us (after necessary deductions for their commissioners’ private jets, naturally).

1andrew1 11-08-2022 16:02

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36130964)
I can’t wait for those disingenuous “structural fund” signs to start vanishing from our regional infrastructure projects as well, all decorated with the EU flag as if it wasn’t our own money they were sending back to us (after necessary deductions for their commissioners’ private jets, naturally).

I doubt you'll be seeing any replacement Union Flag signs unless your MP is Conservative. ;)

TheDaddy 11-08-2022 16:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36130964)
Got my new driving license photo card in the post today after changing address. No more euro-flag in my wallet. A small thing, I know, but it made me smile. I can’t wait for those disingenuous “structural fund” signs to start vanishing from our regional infrastructure projects as well, all decorated with the EU flag as if it wasn’t our own money they were sending back to us (after necessary deductions for their commissioners’ private jets, naturally).

Wonder if any of the regional infrastructure projects will vanish as well, after rishi's boasting about taking money of poor regions it wouldn't surprise me

Chris 11-08-2022 19:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
If they do, then political accountability for it will rest at Westminster and nowhere else, and it can become a directly relevant issue at the next election - which is part of the point of Brexit.

nomadking 11-08-2022 20:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36130967)
Wonder if any of the regional infrastructure projects will vanish as well, after rishi's boasting about taking money of poor regions it wouldn't surprise me

It was returning money to the regions Labour had stolen it from. There are a set of formulae that are used to allocate money to regions. Labour altered them to take money away from non-Labour areas.

Chris 11-08-2022 20:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36130966)
I doubt you'll be seeing any replacement Union Flag signs unless your MP is Conservative. ;)

Not really bothered about that to be honest - we’re not really a big flag-waving nation. It’s more the symbolism of the disengagement from EU institutions and structures I was pointing out. The main advantage is that signage no longer implies we should be grateful for largesse paid for with our own money.

ianch99 11-08-2022 20:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36131005)
Not really bothered about that to be honest - we’re not really a big flag-waving nation. It’s more the symbolism of the disengagement from EU institutions and structures I was pointing out. The main advantage is that signage no longer implies we should be grateful for largesse paid for with our own money.

It is quite depressing that people are content in celebrating the removal of insignia with the price paid for the removal of such trivia being the structural impoverishment of the nation and the visceral division of our society.

Mick 12-08-2022 01:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99
It is quite depressing that people are content in celebrating the removal of insignia


That is what Democracy does and those who voted to leave chose. That little detail you conveniently Keep ignoring Ianch.

ianch99 12-08-2022 09:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36131032)
That is what Democracy does and those who voted to leave chose. That little detail you conveniently Keep ignoring Ianch.

No, this is not to do with the vote anymore. It is the honesty of those who voted to Leave, knowing that this would have severe economic & societal consequences and to then ignore, and worse, misrepresent the reality that was foretold.

There are those, like you and Seph, who will stand up and say: "Yes, I was prepared for the downsides and was happy with these consequences". I fundamentally disagree with you but I respect the honesty. There are others, however, who will not be this honest and will, and this is the unsavoury part, will go out of their way to pretend that there is no downside and try and gaslight the situation.

Sephiroth 12-08-2022 09:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36131006)
It is quite depressing that people are content in celebrating the removal of insignia with the price paid for the removal of such trivia being the structural impoverishment of the nation and the visceral division of our society.

"Such trivia" refers to the small proportion of what we paid into the EU that we got back at their discretion.

It is, of course, a great shame that the stupid Guvmin doesn't seem to be improving on that.

GrimUpNorth 12-08-2022 10:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36131038)
"Such trivia" refers to the small proportion of what we paid into the EU that we got back at their discretion.

It is, of course, a great shame that the stupid Guvmin doesn't seem to be improving on that.

I think the problem is they didn't have a plan B (some might say they didn't even have a plan A, but that's another discussion). We left with our Government expecting the world to be tripping over itself to get us to sign a trade deal and we'd all be living on milk and honey. Meanwhile in the real world, that hasn't happened and most of the rest of the world has watched us threaten to renegade on the biggest deal we signed and then acting like a child crying because we've not got our own way. The next PM and their team need to take a long hard look in the mirror and ask themselves how they're going to repair out reputation which is becoming evermore tarnished. Let's have at least the bones of a plan - the meat can come later, but give us some idea what direction they plan to follow otherwise HMS UK will end up going in circles getting nowhere. One thing we must not do is sign deals at any price, and a good start would be employing people who can read to at least have a quick glance through any deal before we sign. That would be an improvement on what appears to have happened with the deal we signed with the EU.

Oh and I got my new photocard the other day and didn't notice any flag, but then I can't say I ever noticed any flag on my old one either. Trust me when I say there're many many more important things to worry about in life.

ianch99 12-08-2022 13:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36131038)
"Such trivia" refers to the small proportion of what we paid into the EU that we got back at their discretion.

It is, of course, a great shame that the stupid Guvmin doesn't seem to be improving on that.

Your hindsight is flawed. We were part of the EU and any monies sent and/or received were sanctioned by us as a member state.

Of course, the whole point is moot since the financial cost of Brexit has now exceeded the total of the monies we paid into the EU as a member state. Sort of sums up the whole debacle.

Qtx 12-08-2022 14:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36131037)
No, this is not to do with the vote anymore. It is the honesty of those who voted to Leave, knowing that this would have severe economic & societal consequences

I think many blame leaving the EU for everything, ignoring the timing of covid/other external factors and the fact many EU countries are having some similar financial difficulties at the moment. We outperformed many main EU countries some quarters too.

ianch99 12-08-2022 16:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Qtx (Post 36131063)
I think many blame leaving the EU for everything, ignoring the timing of covid/other external factors and the fact many EU countries are having some similar financial difficulties at the moment. We outperformed many main EU countries some quarters too.

Not sure who the "many" are here? The "blame leaving the EU for everything" trope is not worth the debate. No one in the right mind would do this - the issue is that all the troubled sectors e.g. farming, fisheries, trade imports/exports, R&D, Finance, etc. will have a Brexit contribution. Some small and some considerable.

It is wishful thinking that we are just like the other EU countries in our economic performance post-Covid, we're not.

Chris 12-08-2022 16:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36131006)
It is quite depressing that people are content in celebrating the removal of insignia with the price paid for the removal of such trivia being the structural impoverishment of the nation and the visceral division of our society.

How?

Insignia symbolise things. Removing them symbolises the deeper change permitting their removal. The removal of the EU name and/or flag from our driving licences, our infrastructure projects and whatever else, is a visible reminder of where the buck now always stops. Harmonised EU rules now need no longer be an excuse for government inaction. And that’s good for our democracy because we can debate these things and hold our representatives to account in elections that can actually result in an entire change of government rather than the massive deckchair shuffling process that occurs in Strasbourg.

jfman 12-08-2022 18:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36131084)
Harmonised EU rules now need no longer be an excuse for government inaction.

:rofl:

Now we just have that they’re crap.

Chris 12-08-2022 19:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36131095)
:rofl:

Now we just have that they’re crap.

Quite possibly. And while it’s all but impossible to effect co-ordinated, meaningful change in the EU legislature across the entire bloc, it is most definitely possible to do it within the UK. Accountability now rests where it ought to.

jfman 12-08-2022 19:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36131096)
Quite possibly. And while it’s all but impossible to effect co-ordinated, meaningful change in the EU legislature across the entire bloc, it is most definitely possible to do it within the UK. Accountability now rests where it ought to.

Given their impotence in applying the powers they do have I look forward to the exhaustive list of planned improvements that couldn’t happen in the EU.

Hugh 18-08-2022 11:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
You have to admire (not really) Rees-Mogg’s brass neck in claiming £1 billion in savings/avoided costs by suspending something we only introduced because we left the EU…

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/politics...-saved-almost/

Quote:

The trade border is one example of how government efficiency eases inflation. In the spring, thanks to the support of the Prime Minister and Liz Truss, the government suspended the expensive physical checks on incoming goods from the European Union to address the rising cost of food. As well as saving officials at the border time and resources, this measure has also saved businesses in the wider economy at least £1 billion in avoided costs, preventing shortages of goods and delays in already strained supply chains.

1andrew1 24-08-2022 22:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Johnson's terrible Brexit deal that penalised UK manufacturing continues to unravel. As a trade expert reveals, if Johnson had wanted to, he could have sorted this issue out over a couple of beers in Brussels.
Quote:

British steelmakers forced to pay 25% tariff on N Ireland sales

EU quotas for global imports have been exhausted earlier than expected

British steel producers will have to pay a 25 per cent tariff to sell certain construction products into Northern Ireland after EU quotas for global imports were exhausted earlier than expected.

Steel producers and stockholders were informed of the new tariff on Wednesday in a notice from HM Revenue & Customs, prompting a fierce backlash from industry.

“It is beyond farcical that UK producers are now prevented by these tariffs from selling goods to customers in their own country,” said Gareth Stace, director-general of UK Steel, the industry trade association.

“To add insult to injury EU steel producers can continue to export these goods tariff free throughout the UK, but we can no longer do so in the opposite direction,” he added.

“Countries like Turkey are using up big chunks of the quota and there is none left for anyone else,” said Richard Warren, UK Steel head of policy.

Sam Lowe, a trade expert at consultancy Flint Global, wrote that the soured political relationship between London and Brussels over the Northern Ireland protocol had exacerbated the commission’s refusal to make exceptions for the UK.

“This is something that could be resolved fairly easily if the EU-UK relationship was in a better place. But it’s not,” he wrote in his Most Favoured Nation blog on trade affairs earlier this month.
https://www.ft.com/content/fcddb854-...5-4dc905abc64e

TheDaddy 24-08-2022 23:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36132276)
Johnson's terrible Brexit deal that penalised UK manufacturing continues to unravel. As a trade expert reveals, if Johnson had wanted to, he could have sorted this issue out over a couple of beers in Brussels.

It's not unravelling, we were told manufacturing and farming would be sacrificed, that they are is hardly a shock to anyone paying attention

Mick 25-08-2022 23:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
BREAKING: Liz Truss is considering plans to trigger Article 16 within days of becoming PM, according to govt insiders.

UK facing critical Sep 15 deadline with EU. Truss campaign insists she still wants negotiated solution to NI protocol - Financial Times.

Taf 30-08-2022 18:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

New rules for visitors to the EU are due to come into force by the end of May next year.
The system will mean travellers from outside the bloc must have their fingerprints scanned and photograph taken, instead of having their passport manually stamped.

Hugh 30-08-2022 19:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Link to above story.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-62728618

OLD BOY 30-08-2022 20:29

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36132434)
BREAKING: Liz Truss is considering plans to trigger Article 16 within days of becoming PM, according to govt insiders.

UK facing critical Sep 15 deadline with EU. Truss campaign insists she still wants negotiated solution to NI protocol - Financial Times.

Good for her!

1andrew1 30-08-2022 20:34

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36132819)
Good for her!

Better to use the agreed course of action like Article 16 than tear up the agreement unilaterally. But do we really want to fall out with our largest trading partners the EU at a time of rampant inflation and a common aggressive enemy? Thatcher used tact and diplomacy as well as threats; Truss needs to acquire the former skills sharpish!

Sephiroth 30-08-2022 20:46

Re: Britain outside the EU
 

https://www.schengenvisainfo.com/new...border-checks/

Quote:

“EES will replace the current system of manual stamping of passports, which is time-consuming, does not provide reliable data on border crossings and does not allow a systematic detection of over-stayers (travellers who have exceeded the maximum duration of their authorised stay),” the European Commission’s Migration and Home Affairs notes.


Taf 30-08-2022 21:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36132821)

Large numbers of Albanians have been entering the EU illegally, and many are trying to cross the English Channel. They have been a thorn in the backside for the French police.

Dave42 30-08-2022 22:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36132819)
Good for her!

so would you want a trade war OB it wont be us that wins if there is one

OLD BOY 31-08-2022 08:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36132820)
Better to use the agreed course of action like Article 16 than tear up the agreement unilaterally. But do we really want to fall out with our largest trading partners the EU at a time of rampant inflation and a common aggressive enemy? Thatcher used tact and diplomacy as well as threats; Truss needs to acquire the former skills sharpish!

I'd rather not fall out with the EU, but we can't put up with being pushed around either. We've been trying for some time to get an agreement to get the protocol working as it should and we've had nothing but obstruction. It is hurting the Northern Ireland economy, its businesses and even preventing Stormont from sitting.

We cannot go on like this, and in the absence of co-operation we have to do what is best for us. Our proposals do not affect the EU's ability to prevent the wrong goods getting in. They are simply being obstinate.

---------- Post added at 07:42 ---------- Previous post was at 07:39 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36132831)
so would you want a trade war OB it wont be us that wins if there is one

I didn't say that.

Hugh 31-08-2022 10:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36132846)
I'd rather not fall out with the EU, but we can't put up with being pushed around either. We've been trying for some time to get an agreement to get the protocol working as it should and we've had nothing but obstruction. It is hurting the Northern Ireland economy, its businesses and even preventing Stormont from sitting.

We cannot go on like this, and in the absence of co-operation we have to do what is best for us. Our proposals do not affect the EU's ability to prevent the wrong goods getting in. They are simply being obstinate.

---------- Post added at 07:42 ---------- Previous post was at 07:39 ----------



I didn't say that.

Your assertion is counter-factual…

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-62398680

Quote:

Brexit: Northern Ireland Protocol gives temporary economic boost

By John Campbell

BBC News NI Economics & Business Editor

Published 3 August

The Northern Ireland Protocol has given the region's economy a temporary boost, a think tank has said.

The National Institute for Economic and Social Research (NIESR) said the boost was unlikely to be sustained without more investment in the region.

It said Northern Ireland's economic output had slightly outperformed the UK average since the end of 2019.
The reason Stormont isn’t sitting is because the DUP have taken the hump with a legal agreement (NI Protocol) signed by the U.K. Government - as the article states
Quote:

it would "set a dangerous precedent to respond to the refusal of one side to participate in the institutions by providing a concession in their favour, especially one which would run contrary to the views and interests of the majority".
Sounds as if you are supporting the anti-democratic DUP…

1andrew1 31-08-2022 10:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36132846)
I'd rather not fall out with the EU, but we can't put up with being pushed around either. We've been trying for some time to get an agreement to get the protocol working as it should and we've had nothing but obstruction. It is hurting the Northern Ireland economy, its businesses and even preventing Stormont from sitting.

We cannot go on like this, and in the absence of co-operation we have to do what is best for us. Our proposals do not affect the EU's ability to prevent the wrong goods getting in. They are simply being obstinate.

The Northern Ireland Assembly is not running because the DUP are boycotting it, ostensibly because they don't like Johnson's Northern Ireland Protocol. The EU is not preventing Stormont from working.

If we fall out with the EU then we fall out with the US and we don't want to do either. Especially with rampant inflation.

The Protocol is actually helping the Northern Ireland economy - it's the only part of the UK apart from London to have shown growth. Perhaps the rest of the UK would have done the same if we'd stayed in the Single Market as Daniel Hanan said we would?

Dave42 31-08-2022 11:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36132846)
I'd rather not fall out with the EU, but we can't put up with being pushed around either. We've been trying for some time to get an agreement to get the protocol working as it should and we've had nothing but obstruction. It is hurting the Northern Ireland economy, its businesses and even preventing Stormont from sitting.

We cannot go on like this, and in the absence of co-operation we have to do what is best for us. Our proposals do not affect the EU's ability to prevent the wrong goods getting in. They are simply being obstinate.

---------- Post added at 07:42 ---------- Previous post was at 07:39 ----------



I didn't say that.

i know you didn't OB was asking the question that's all surely be better to talk to EU and try sort it instead of trying to stir up the tension which it looks like Truss is trying to to does not do either side any good

1andrew1 31-08-2022 13:40

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36132850)
Sounds as if you are supporting the anti-democratic DUP…

The same DUP that spent £435k on newspaper adverts in another country's newspaper (Metro, not available in NI) to encourage people to vote for Brexit that many believe was not its own money.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/irel...aign-1.4320055

Chris 31-08-2022 16:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36132869)
The same DUP that spent £435k on newspaper adverts in another country's newspaper (Metro, not available in NI) to encourage people to vote for Brexit that many believe was not its own money.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/irel...aign-1.4320055

I didn’t take you for an Irish nationalist Andrew.

Mainland GB may be beyond the usual election territory of the DUP but as I’m sure you’re very well aware, a referendum is not an election and the DUP does not consider Great Britain to be another country.

OLD BOY 31-08-2022 19:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36132850)
Your assertion is counter-factual…

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-62398680



The reason Stormont isn’t sitting is because the DUP have taken the hump with a legal agreement (NI Protocol) signed by the U.K. Government - as the article states

Sounds as if you are supporting the anti-democratic DUP…

What I am saying is that we should do what is best for Britain.

And while the NI economy may have improved, that is despite the EU intransigence and the unnecessary bureaucracy they have imposed. Without that, they would do even better.

---------- Post added at 18:34 ---------- Previous post was at 18:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36132861)
i know you didn't OB was asking the question that's all surely be better to talk to EU and try sort it instead of trying to stir up the tension which it looks like Truss is trying to to does not do either side any good

Yes, but what do you think we have been doing all this time? The EU just put up barriers and stick their fingers in their ears.

---------- Post added at 18:37 ---------- Previous post was at 18:34 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36132869)
The same DUP that spent £435k on newspaper adverts in another country's newspaper (Metro, not available in NI) to encourage people to vote for Brexit that many believe was not its own money.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/irel...aign-1.4320055

Some people didn't realise how childish and awkward the EU would be because they were classed as our 'friends'.

Had both sides co-operated with each other, the DUP would not have got the hump, would they?

Hugh 31-08-2022 20:15

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36132846)
I'd rather not fall out with the EU, but we can't put up with being pushed around either. We've been trying for some time to get an agreement to get the protocol working as it should and we've had nothing but obstruction. It is hurting the Northern Ireland economy, its businesses and even preventing Stormont from sitting.

We cannot go on like this, and in the absence of co-operation we have to do what is best for us. Our proposals do not affect the EU's ability to prevent the wrong goods getting in. They are simply being obstinate.

---------- Post added at 07:42 ---------- Previous post was at 07:39 ----------



I didn't say that.

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36132888)
What I am saying is that we should do what is best for Britain.

And while the NI economy may have improved, that is despite the EU intransigence and the unnecessary bureaucracy they have imposed. Without that, they would do even better.

---------- Post added at 18:34 ---------- Previous post was at 18:33 ----------



Yes, but what do you think we have been doing all this time? The EU just put up barriers and stick their fingers in their ears.

---------- Post added at 18:37 ---------- Previous post was at 18:34 ----------



Some people didn't realise how childish and awkward the EU would be because they were classed as our 'friends'.

Had both sides co-operated with each other, the DUP would not have got the hump, would they?

Good luck getting treated in A&E for the whiplash caused by that complete change of direction… :D

1andrew1 31-08-2022 23:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36132893)
Good luck getting treated in A&E for the whiplash caused by that complete change of direction… :D

I thought the addition of 10 years on the streaming thread was substantive but nothing compared to this handbrake U-turn! :shocked:

---------- Post added at 21:55 ---------- Previous post was at 21:42 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36132881)
I didn’t take you for an Irish nationalist Andrew.

Mainland GB may be beyond the usual election territory of the DUP but as I’m sure you’re very well aware, a referendum is not an election and the DUP does not consider Great Britain to be another country.

Were I an Irish nationalist, I would have advocated Brexit as the fastest route to achieving unification.

The purchase of the wrap-around by the DUP in GB where it does not field any candidates was very strange. As the article says
Quote:

Geoghegan contends in Democracy for Sale that the money was channelled to the DUP through the official Vote Leave campaign because Vote Leave had almost used up its permitted spending of £7 million. Vote Leave and the DUP have denied the claim.

To prop up his Vote Leave-DUP connection conviction, Geoghegan writes, "Two months before the referendum, Matthew Elliott, Vote Leave's chief executive, wrote in an email to senior staff: 'The DUP also have a £700k spending limit, which can be spent nationwide!' "

“At that stage the DUP had yet to register as a referendum participant,” Geoghegan writes. “It only did so in late May. When the CRC started giving money to the DUP, Vote Leave had almost completely exhausted its spending allowance.”

Geoghegan writes how the DUP’s Brexit “spending spree began on June 9th, exactly two weeks before the vote, when the DUP bought £100,000 worth of placards, bags, window stickers, T-shirts and badges from a small branding agency called Soopa Doopa”.

This company was based in the Cambridgeshire cathedral town of Ely. The location and the company was a “surprising choice” for the DUP, thought Geoghegan. The fact that it published more than £800,000 of material for various Leave-supporting groups reinforced his belief that this was part of the alleged Vote Leave-DUP nexus.
https://www.irishtimes.com/news/irel...aign-1.4320055

---------- Post added at 22:04 ---------- Previous post was at 21:55 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36132888)
Some people didn't realise how childish and awkward the EU would be because they were classed as our 'friends'.

Had both sides co-operated with each other, the DUP would not have got the hump, would they?

Johnson was just pandering to the right-wing of the Conservative Party instead of holding normal negotiations. No amount of throwing our toys out of the pram will alter our geography or the importance of the EU as a trading partner. In fact, recent figures show a decline in non-EU trade. Not saying the EU is perfect as it's not.

The DUP are just using this as an excuse in the same way that Johnson blamed cake for his transgressions. As Hugh says, the're behaving in an undemocratic manner and it's disappointing that you fail to condemn this.

Chris 31-08-2022 23:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36132894)
The purchase of the wrap-around by the DUP in GB where it does not field any candidates was very strange.

Again … where it fields election candidates is irrelevant. This was not an election. It was a single question referendum with a single UK-wide outcome.

I did read the article but I didn’t see any evidence of lawbreaking. Quite possibly loophole-exploiting, but not lawbreaking.

This looks just like another load of remoaner wailing.

1andrew1 01-09-2022 00:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36132897)
Again … where it fields election candidates is irrelevant. This was not an election. It was a single question referendum with a single UK-wide outcome.

I did read the article but I didn’t see any evidence of lawbreaking. Quite possibly loophole-exploiting, but not lawbreaking.

This looks just like another load of remoaner wailing.

It's a bit of a stretch to pretend that advertising outside Northern Ireland is irrelevant for an NI-only political party. It's unprecedented, unusual and the source of the funding is opaque.

Chris 01-09-2022 10:37

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36132898)
It's a bit of a stretch to pretend that advertising outside Northern Ireland is irrelevant for an NI-only political party. It's unprecedented, unusual and the source of the funding is opaque.

It’s no more relevant than Leanne Wood and Nicola Sturgeon appearing in UK-wide debates during the referendum campaign, which they both did, on the basis that a single decision taken by the entire UK would affect their own jurisdictions.

I totally understand where you’re coming from - you want to cry foul because the political funding rules seem to have allowed nationwide campaigning by an organisation regulated by a process that only anticipated them operating within a certain legal jurisdiction. That, however, is because those rules were designed on the assumption that they were regulating election spending. This was not an election.

If they found and exploited a weakness in the rules, then boo flipping hoo …

ianch99 01-09-2022 11:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36132897)
Again … where it fields election candidates is irrelevant. This was not an election. It was a single question referendum with a single UK-wide outcome.

I did read the article but I didn’t see any evidence of lawbreaking. Quite possibly loophole-exploiting, but not lawbreaking.

This looks just like another load of remoaner wailing.

Still using the childish name calling? I thought we have moved on from this.

Chris 01-09-2022 11:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36132911)
Still using the childish name calling? I thought we have moved on from this.

It’s pretty clear from the above that there are still those bent on delegitimising the referendum result. That is the very essence of remoaning (as opposed to simply having campaigned for remain, or believing the UK should rejoin, which is not remoaning). When they move on from that, there will no longer be a need for a handy shorthand name for it.

1andrew1 01-09-2022 11:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36132915)
It’s pretty clear from the above that there are still those bent on delegitimising the referendum result. That is the very essence of remoaning (as opposed to simply having campaigned for remain, or believing the UK should rejoin, which is not remoaning). When they move on from that, there will no longer be a need for a handy shorthand name for it.

Not in my case. Hugh pointed out how the DUP was behaving in an undemocratic nature. I pointed out how to my mind its unprecedented GB-only advertising with an unclear funding source was undemocratic too. That doesn't make other parties perfect.

Sephiroth 01-09-2022 20:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36132911)
Still using the childish name calling? I thought we have moved on from this.

There are Remoaners and there are Remainers.

Damien 01-09-2022 23:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36132974)
There are Remoaners and there are Remainers.

What are people who are critical of what has happened since?

Sephiroth 01-09-2022 23:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36133006)
What are people who are critical of what has happened since?

Depends on how they come across.

ianch99 02-09-2022 00:09

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36132974)
There are Remoaners and there are Remainers.

This has no meaning. We have left the EU so you need to move on.

OLD BOY 02-09-2022 00:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
It has a meaning until people stop bleating on about the decision of the electorate.

jfman 02-09-2022 00:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133010)
It has a meaning until people stop bleating on about the decision of the electorate.

Ah fascism. I’ll be honest I did have it on my political and economic decline of the UK bingo card.

I realise I was a little harsh on what we gave the world in another thread. Culturally, we have the literary greats of Orwell and Dickens. I doubt even they believed 1984 and Oliver Twist would be considered aspirational in 21st century Britain.

OLD BOY 02-09-2022 00:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36133013)
Ah fascism. I’ll be honest I did have it on my political and economic decline of the UK bingo card.

Perhaps you shouldn’t post when you’ve been on the booze - or was it the opioids?

jfman 02-09-2022 00:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133014)
Perhaps you shouldn’t post when you’ve been on the booze - or was it the opioids?

You know OB is out of ammo when it’s petty insults before bed.

ianch99 02-09-2022 00:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133010)
It has a meaning until people stop bleating on about the decision of the electorate.

So stop bleating then. You need to move on. We need to discuss the consequences of the decision and those who are responsible for it. Accountability is a bedrock of democracy.

OLD BOY 02-09-2022 09:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36133018)
So stop bleating then. You need to move on. We need to discuss the consequences of the decision and those who are responsible for it. Accountability is a bedrock of democracy.

Or even better, discuss what now needs to be done to make it work. You are labelling it a failure before we have even revised the laws and bureaucracy that was getting in the way of our success.

papa smurf 02-09-2022 09:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133023)
Or even better, discuss what now needs to be done to make it work. You are labelling it a failure before we have even revised the laws and bureaucracy that was getting in the way of our success.

I think that is known as remoaning.

1andrew1 02-09-2022 11:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133023)
Or even better, discuss what now needs to be done to make it work. You are labelling it a failure before we have even revised the laws and bureaucracy that was getting in the way of our success.

Ian hasn't labelled it a failure - you have implied it is by using that word. Are you perchance a closet remoaner, Old Boy? Ian said "We need to discuss the consequences of the decision and those who are responsible for it. Accountability is a bedrock of democracy."

Which laws and bureaucracy are getting in the way of our success? Currently, I'm hearing from business that it's post-Brexit red tape that is impacting their export efforts.

Sephiroth 02-09-2022 14:31

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by papa smurf (Post 36133024)
I think that is known as remoaning.


Nice one Papa.

1andrew1 02-09-2022 14:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36133006)
What are people who are critical of what has happened since?

British electorate?

jfman 02-09-2022 15:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133023)
Or even better, discuss what now needs to be done to make it work. You are labelling it a failure before we have even revised the laws and bureaucracy that was getting in the way of our success.

Can you name any specific law or bureaucracy (and propose amendments to it) and quantify the extent to which it moves us forwards to 'success'?

ianch99 02-09-2022 16:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36133073)
Can you name any specific law or bureaucracy (and propose amendments to it) and quantify the extent to which it moves us forwards to 'success'?

He can't, you are wasting your time. All he can promise is illusion, the reality is all around in plain site. We really are at the point where the small boy says to the Emperor he's wearing nothing at all:

Quote:

Two swindlers arrive at the capital city of an emperor who spends lavishly on clothing at the expense of state matters. Posing as weavers, they offer to supply him with magnificent clothes that are invisible to those who are stupid or incompetent. The emperor hires them, and they set up looms and go to work. A succession of officials, and then the emperor himself, visit them to check their progress. Each sees that the looms are empty but pretends otherwise to avoid being thought a fool.

Finally, the weavers report that the emperor's suit is finished. They mime dressing him and he sets off in a procession before the whole city. The townsfolk uncomfortably go along with the pretense, not wanting to appear inept or stupid, until a child blurts out that the emperor is wearing nothing at all. The people then realize that everyone has been fooled. Although startled, the emperor continues the procession, walking more proudly than ever.

Sephiroth 02-09-2022 19:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36133078)
He can't, you are wasting your time. All he can promise is illusion, the reality is all around in plain site. We really are at the point where the small boy says to the Emperor he's wearing nothing at all:

What's your point? We all know that there are serious problems with Brexit cause by Boris' government.

So, how do you suggest things should change without in any way reversing our divorce from the EU?

jfman 02-09-2022 19:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36133097)
What's your point? We all know that there are serious problems with Brexit cause by Boris' government.

So, how do you suggest things should change without in any way reversing our divorce from the EU?

With the best will in the world to ianch99, Mr K, 1andrew1 and myself we’re not the experts in this. We’ve no buy in.

OB on the other hand wants to move the conversation on to discuss what now needs to be done to make it work and, since he referenced it, I’ve invited him to name specific laws and bureaucracy that have to change to make it a success.

If he’s stumped you’ve no chance of us having the answer.

OLD BOY 02-09-2022 20:04

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36133050)
Ian hasn't labelled it a failure - you have implied it is by using that word. Are you perchance a closet remoaner, Old Boy? Ian said "We need to discuss the consequences of the decision and those who are responsible for it. Accountability is a bedrock of democracy."

Which laws and bureaucracy are getting in the way of our success? Currently, I'm hearing from business that it's post-Brexit red tape that is impacting their export efforts.

Well, that’s twisting it even further than you normally twist things, Andrew. I’ve been consistent in saying all along that we are in a transitional stage and that the adjustments we need to make Brexit a success have hardly even begun.

I was saying to Ian that he was labelling it a failure, as indeed are you and far too many others on here. The bureaucracy businesses are co mplaining of are those the EU is insisting on. The benefits of Brexit will not be discovered in practice until we do something about that.

---------- Post added at 19:04 ---------- Previous post was at 19:01 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36133018)
So stop bleating then. You need to move on. We need to discuss the consequences of the decision and those who are responsible for it. Accountability is a bedrock of democracy.

I’m not theone still moaning about Brexit. We’re you focussed when you wrote this?;)

ianch99 02-09-2022 20:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36133097)
What's your point? We all know that there are serious problems with Brexit cause by Boris' government.

So, how do you suggest things should change without in any way reversing our divorce from the EU?

The point is obvious to all but the faithful. You are deluded if you think it is just this executive that has caused the project's rapid demise. The whole proposition was doomed from the onset. The modern world does not work like it did 40 years ago.

Brexit is/will cause permanent economic damage to this country, not forgetting the societal divisions it created and the racism/xenophobia it validated. The only pragmatic action is to target EFTA membership and then work from there.

OLD BOY 02-09-2022 20:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36133078)
He can't, you are wasting your time. All he can promise is illusion, the reality is all around in plain site. We really are at the point where the small boy says to the Emperor he's wearing nothing at all:

What do you know about what I think? This thread has nothing in it to say about benefits, it’s all negativism - pretty well all of it.

I have already given some examples of EU legislation that needs to be taken out to free up business. Remember the GDPR, Working Time Directive and Acquired Rights Directive?

It’s about time there was constructive talk about making this work. What is the purpose of constantly inserting links and opinions about things that have gone wrong or have not happened? Does that actually help anyone if we don’t then look at how to put it right?

It’s just pointless moaning and wingeing, predominantly by people who were on the wrong side of the referendum and don’t wish to respect the result.

---------- Post added at 19:12 ---------- Previous post was at 19:11 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36133104)
The point is obvious to all but the faithful. You are deluded if you think it is just this executive that has caused the project's rapid demise. The whole proposition was doomed from the onset. The modern world does not work like it did 40 years ago.

Brexit is/will cause permanent economic damage to this country, not forgetting the societal divisions it created and the racism/xenophobia it validated. The only pragmatic action is to target EFTA membership and then work from there.

The electorate voted for Brexit. Get over it.

jfman 02-09-2022 20:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36133105)
I have already given some examples of EU legislation that needs to be taken out to free up business. Remember the GDPR, Working Time Directive and Acquired Rights Directive?

It’s about time there was constructive talk about making this work. What is the purpose of constantly inserting links and opinions about things that have gone wrong or have not happened? Does that actually help anyone if we don’t then look at how to put it right?

The floor if yours, OB. Tell us how the erosion of workers rights will raise living standards? :rofl:


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 15:35.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum