Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   *ALL* ntl 10Mb Discussion (Part 3) (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=42062)

Tragedy 20-11-2005 01:43

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dobbo
I have phoned ntl for upgrade get no faster than 4-6 meg

my config file says ntlhm120_ntl0002.cpr

im on ntl home 100 modem anything i need to do to get a new modem or do i need to wait until december?

New modem.

Paul 20-11-2005 03:40

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
I have created a new Speed Test (based on Robins) which uses a larger sample size - as the current one was never intended for such high speeds and can give odd results on some machines. I've also added a couple of bits for Mbps and average speed across the four tests. It can be accessed via the "New Speed Test" link in the navbar "Quick Links". Please test it out.

markmarkymark 20-11-2005 06:58

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Nice one Paul...

This is what I got:

1st 512K took 641 ms = 817922 KB/sec, approx 6646 Kbps, 6.49 Mbps
2nd 512K took 640 ms = 819200 KB/sec, approx 6656 Kbps, 6.5 Mbps
3rd 512K took 641 ms = 817922 KB/sec, approx 6646 Kbps, 6.49 Mbps
4th 512K took 688 ms = 762047 KB/sec, approx 6192 Kbps, 6.05 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 6535 Kbps, 6.38 Mbps


I have a Ambit 100 modem and assume thatâ₠¬Ã¢â€žÂ¢s why my performance is not better. I do hope NTL can do a firmware tweak - from a resource point of view it seems an enormous waste of money to have to replace modems that can, quite frankly reach very good speeds, but not enough to match the advertised maximum. In reality I would be quite happy with the current speed - but human nature dictates I will be asking for a replacement in due course!

gaffer_gump 20-11-2005 07:02

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Nice job Paul works for me :)

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 08:01:15 UTC

1st 512K took 296 ms = 1771243 KB/sec, approx 14391 Kbps, 14.05 Mbps
2nd 512K took 438 ms = 1197005 KB/sec, approx 9726 Kbps, 9.5 Mbps
3rd 512K took 452 ms = 1159929 KB/sec, approx 9424 Kbps, 9.2 Mbps
4th 512K took 406 ms = 1291350 KB/sec, approx 10492 Kbps, 10.25 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 11008 Kbps, 10.75 Mbps

Dobbo 20-11-2005 07:16

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 08:16:06 UTC

1st 512K took 906 ms = 578684 KB/sec, approx 4702 Kbps, 4.59 Mbps
2nd 512K took 875 ms = 599186 KB/sec, approx 4868 Kbps, 4.75 Mbps
3rd 512K took 891 ms = 588426 KB/sec, approx 4781 Kbps, 4.67 Mbps
4th 512K took 953 ms = 550145 KB/sec, approx 4470 Kbps, 4.37 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 4705 Kbps, 4.6 Mbps

=( is ntl cs/ts open on a sunday?

robtufts 20-11-2005 07:30

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Sun, 20 Nov 2005 08:29:36 GMT

1st 512K took 453 ms = 1157369 KB/sec, approx 9404 Kbps, 9.18 Mbps
2nd 512K took 422 ms = 1242389 KB/sec, approx 10094 Kbps, 9.86 Mbps
3rd 512K took 438 ms = 1197005 KB/sec, approx 9726 Kbps, 9.5 Mbps
4th 512K took 437 ms = 1199744 KB/sec, approx 9748 Kbps, 9.52 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 9743 Kbps, 9.52 Mbps

Slyder 20-11-2005 08:21

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Tragedy
New modem.

But my 100 works fine on 10meg.

Could some 100's be lukcy do you think ?

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:23:08 UTC

1st 512K took 438 ms = 1197005 KB/sec, approx 9726 Kbps, 9.5 Mbps
2nd 512K took 437 ms = 1199744 KB/sec, approx 9748 Kbps, 9.52 Mbps
3rd 512K took 438 ms = 1197005 KB/sec, approx 9726 Kbps, 9.5 Mbps
4th 512K took 422 ms = 1242389 KB/sec, approx 10094 Kbps, 9.86 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 9824 Kbps, 9.6 Mbps

Tuftus 20-11-2005 08:26

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Nice job Paul M!

This is what I got...

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:24:54 UTC

1st 512K took 437 ms = 1199744 KB/sec, approx 9748 Kbps, 9.52 Mbps
2nd 512K took 438 ms = 1197005 KB/sec, approx 9726 Kbps, 9.5 Mbps
3rd 512K took 422 ms = 1242389 KB/sec, approx 10094 Kbps, 9.86 Mbps
4th 512K took 437 ms = 1199744 KB/sec, approx 9748 Kbps, 9.52 Mbps

Overall Average Speed = approx 9829 Kbps, 9.6 Mbps

Dobbo 20-11-2005 08:41

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
what time is ntl tech or cs open on sundays?
and what would be the best option to go through to go get a new modem?

ssdd 20-11-2005 08:52

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dobbo
what time is ntl tech or cs open on sundays?
and what would be the best option to go through to go get a new modem?

According to the service status page there will be limited support until 7am Monday
"Please be aware due to essential maintenance to our systems between Midnight on Saturday the 19th of November and 7 AM on Monday 21st of November, we will only be able to provide limited support."

Stop It 20-11-2005 09:18

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Nice one Paul, much more accurate test :)

Sun, 20 Nov 2005 10:17:36 GMT

1st 512K took 469 ms = 1117885 KB/sec, approx 9083 Kbps, 8.87 Mbps
2nd 512K took 422 ms = 1242389 KB/sec, approx 10094 Kbps, 9.86 Mbps
3rd 512K took 453 ms = 1157369 KB/sec, approx 9404 Kbps, 9.18 Mbps
4th 512K took 406 ms = 1291350 KB/sec, approx 10492 Kbps, 10.25 Mbps

/me happy :)

Overall Average Speed = approx 9768 Kbps, 9.54 Mbps

J@ffa 20-11-2005 10:00

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ssdd
According to the service status page there will be limited support until 7am Monday
"Please be aware due to essential maintenance to our systems between Midnight on Saturday the 19th of November and 7 AM on Monday 21st of November, we will only be able to provide limited support."

:O Maybe they're going to start actually talking to their staff about 10MB!

Panhandle 20-11-2005 11:17

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dwabbit
Rebooted mine as well now getting nearly 10meg actually 9.5 but its a busy time of night
looking at the logs of the modem it nolonger shows the name of config file loaded

This is probably the most invaluable forum I've encountered (and the first time that I have joined one). I also have the SB4100 through ethernet, of course, but still appear to have the 3mb service. Grimsby area has always been excellent for speed and connectivity and I have often seeen people suffer in other areas of the country while the service here has remained phenomenal. Probably only had 7 days downtime in 5 years.
However, once you do see a higher speed available, you want it.

051120095714 8-Debug M571.6 CM Cert Upgrade Enabled. Initiate via SNMP 051120095714 8-Debug M571.9 Missing CM Cert Upgrade TLVs. 051120095714 8-Debug M570.1 Motorola CM certificate required ************ 8-Debug T503.1 Acquire US with status OK, powerLevel 44, tempSid 2711 ************ 8-Debug T505.0 Acquired Upstream with status OK ************ 7-Information T501.0 Acquired Downstream (402750000 Hz)........ SUCCESS ************ 8-Debug T509.0 Acquired DS with status OK, DS Freq 402750000, US Id 5 ************ 7-Information I510.0 *** BOOTING *** SB4100-0.4.9.4-SCM02-NOSH
I have cut and paste a few entries from the log file of the SB4100 to see if anyone could shed any light on this situation regarding my continued 3mb service in the same area and on the same modem as others on the 10mb speed?

Thanks

Alleni 20-11-2005 11:36

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Hi,

Is anyone in Bromley on 10mb?

Thanks!

Paul 20-11-2005 11:50

Re: *ALL* ntl 10MB Discussion (Part 3)
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Panhandle
I have cut and paste a few entries from the log file of the SB4100 to see if anyone could shed any light on this situation regarding my continued 3mb service in the same area and on the same modem as others on the 10mb speed?

You will not be on 10M unless you have requested it, and been told it's done - there is no automatic upgrade atm.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:40.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum