Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   50M : Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say! (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33676964)

Kymmy 17-01-2012 10:20

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
Weird how this post came about when I'm just looking at designs for a 1.09Ghz collinear..

My worry with replacing a dipole for a collinear would be an impedance mismatch especially when running duplex on a single antenna, last thing you need is the transmit power to be feeding down the line to the receiver or causing oscillation further into the PCB.

Begall 17-01-2012 13:04

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
Superhub has worked well for me up until Sunday. On Sunday the wireless connection suddenly became very unstable, dropping connection and offering extremely erratic speeds when it was connected. Wired connections were still 100% ok.

Seeing the classic signs of interference, and with people recently moved into the flat next door I assumed that they'd turned on a router to the same channel as mine and changed from 7 to 13. This fixed the problem until Monday. On Monday the connection speed remained normal but started to flat out stop working every 5 minutes or so, until the client (iPhone/laptop internal/PC external dongle) was disconnected then reconnected, but the problem would return a few minutes later.

This prompted me to change channel again (to 12), even though I could see through my PC's software that there weren't many competing networks and certainly none on CH13. This returned stability for the next hour or so until I went to bed.

Then this morning while browsing the net on my phone it returned, requiring me to turn off wifi and then back on in order to regain the connection. Faulty hardware, or what?

kwikbreaks 17-01-2012 13:12

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
I have seen at least one report where a Superhub on auto apparently followed the frequency used by other Superhubs. It seems far fetched to me but so does a year waiting for a diagnosis and fix of a memory leak when there are supposedly half a million of the wretched things in operation.

As has been mentioned before there are only actually 3 non-overlapping channels in the 2.4GHz band - 1 6 and 11. Running on (say) 7 when there is another strong signal on 6 doesn't mean you will avoid all degradation.

Sephiroth 17-01-2012 13:21

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
Possibly next door are on Auto-channel or have one of these BT HH3s that bugger everyone else up at random.

Kymmy 17-01-2012 13:30

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
All the BT hubs round here seem to be on ch10 so I normally manually put myself down in the lower ranges. Mind you I only bother with a G rated kindle and laptop on wifi as the whole house is wired for gigabit ethernet

qasdfdsaq 17-01-2012 15:45

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
This is why my network runs across channel 1, 5, 9, 13, 36, and 40.

kwikbreaks 17-01-2012 16:57

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
Greedy boy :)

---------- Post added at 17:57 ---------- Previous post was at 17:55 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 35364014)
... or have one of these BT HH3s that bugger everyone else up at random.

can you confirm that Infinity comes with a modem so there's no need to use a HH at all please...

stairpotato 17-01-2012 17:30

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
Loving the thread title.

The superhub is awful.

1 - To achieve 100 meg I need to be on 5ghz
2 - If i'm on 5ghz my iphones won't work on wifi
3 - The superhub doesn't support simultaneous 2.5 and 5ghz

....so....

Ditch the superhub for wifi - invest in an airport and.....

1 - Get 5 and 2.4 ghz
2 - Immediate wifi speed increase from 70 meg to 95 meg down.

Sorted.

The Superhub was costing be 25 meg down!!!!!

qasdfdsaq 17-01-2012 17:50

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kwikbreaks (Post 35364207)
Greedy boy :)

Unlicensed spectrum is unlicensed.

Bite me :p:

Chrysalis 17-01-2012 18:17

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
the rev03 for me seems improved on latency over the rev01 superhub.

rmwebs 18-01-2012 19:48

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by stairpotato (Post 35364281)
Loving the thread title.

The superhub is awful.

1 - To achieve 100 meg I need to be on 5ghz
2 - If i'm on 5ghz my iphones won't work on wifi
3 - The superhub doesn't support simultaneous 2.5 and 5ghz

....so....

Ditch the superhub for wifi - invest in an airport and.....

1 - Get 5 and 2.4 ghz
2 - Immediate wifi speed increase from 70 meg to 95 meg down.

Sorted.

The Superhub was costing be 25 meg down!!!!!

Whilst I have no doubt you're having major issues with the shub, many people's works fine. I get a very solid 120mbps on mine without any dropouts. It's on 2.5ghz with a ton of people in our local area channel hopping daily.

---------- Post added at 20:48 ---------- Previous post was at 20:47 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by qasdfdsaq (Post 35364327)
Unlicensed spectrum is unlicensed.

Bite me :p:

Quick query, how did you go about getting access to ch 36 and 40? DD-WRT/OpenWRT?

Cheers :)

qasdfdsaq 18-01-2012 20:18

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
Any 5Ghz device should be able to do those channels by default.

thenry 18-01-2012 21:09

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
5GHz is immense :D

qasdfdsaq 18-01-2012 21:22

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
BFWA is immenser. Range wise that is.

thenry 18-01-2012 21:31

Re: Superhub is nowhere near as bad as people say!
 
:shocked:


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:23.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum