Re: Vmng300
 

The plooperhub had a nappy though!!!:D:D:D

Re: Vmng300
 

So was Betamax.:D

Re: Vmng300
 

Some will say Betamax was superior!:D

Re: Vmng300
 

But VHS won out in the end, I knew you would post that.https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2012/04/8.gifhttps://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2012/04/8.gifhttps://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2012/04/8.gif

Re: Vmng300
 

But VHS only won out due to the lesser cost to the consumer. No comparison!

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/local/2011/05/1.gif

Re: Vmng300
 

Maybe that is why 50Mb and 100Mb are now so cheap and popular.:D

Re: Vmng300
 

Cheap and tacky seems to be a better description.:D:D

Re: Vmng300
 

Re: Vmng300
 

Why it works perfectly for the majority and the is a very large majority of satisfied customers.;)

Re: Vmng300
 

Up until October last year it was a premium service at a very good price considering. Then it was reduced in price for the masses without a premium replacement suitably priced. 100Mb is priced towards the masses.

Re: Vmng300
 

gven that VM claim faults are down with the superhub, can they explain what is the reason of the doubling of broadband related complaints since oct 2010? source is ofcom.

Re: Vmng300
 

...source is the superhub

Re: Vmng300
 

Anecdotal evidence from a front line tech would appear to show that the problems are being recorded as other than hub problems.

I do realise that one techs experiences are not indicative as a whole but it does make you wonder. I have no reason to disbelieve him.

Re: Vmng300
 

Massive up take in bbi customer..

Re: Vmng300
 

Does that mean VM overselling yet again?:D