![]() |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Well Glasgow has been done Iâ₠¬ÃƒÆ’¢â€žÂ¢m downloading at 280KBS, but I knew when I came on as the net just burst from page to page with all the pictures. Browsing looks to be so much better, Iâ₠¬ÃƒÆ’¢â€žÂ¢ll have to try a download instead of the two tests I ran which are Dans and the one below.
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 11:48:36 UTC1st 128K took 3594 ms = 36470 Bytes/sec = approx 303 kbits/sec2nd 128K took 3641 ms = 35999 Bytes/sec = approx 300 kbits/sec3rd 128K took 3718 ms = 35253 Bytes/sec = approx 293 kbits/sec4th 128K took 3610 ms = 36308 Bytes/sec = approx 302 kbits/sec Happy days.:cool: |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
Sometimes it's safer to under promise and over deliver...... |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
Yes. There are now adverts on ntlworld.com, there will be IVR messages on appropriate telephone lines, and there will be inserts with bills. |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
well if anyone on the winersh section of ntls network gets the speed upgrade let me know :)
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
I was upgraded overnight in Leicester 150k to 300k now.
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Mon, 2 Aug 2004 12:11:30 UTC
1st 128K took 703 ms = 186447 Bytes/sec = approx 1551 kbits/sec 2nd 128K took 782 ms = 167611 Bytes/sec = approx 1395 kbits/sec 3rd 128K took 703 ms = 186447 Bytes/sec = approx 1551 kbits/sec 4th 128K took 703 ms = 186447 Bytes/sec = approx 1551 kbits/sec woooot :D |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
For a start, they need to ensure the network in each area is upgraded to ensure it can take the extra load. This may involve many things including installing new cards in the UBRs and may take a long time. It would be pointless promising everyone the speeds only to find that everyone switches on, and the network slows to the speed of a 56K modem under the strain. Second, if there are any users in your area connecting to the internet via a 1 Meg connection on a Pace 1000 or 2000 STB, then these need to be upgraded. Depending on how many Pace STBs that need to be replaced, this can also take a long time. Then, they need to ensure adequate supplies of both STBs and SACMs in each areas, as upgrading always seems to cause some to fail. Finally, they introduce the upgrades area by area (well, several areas each night). This is because, as is discussed earlier in the thread, if something happens during the upgrade and there is a problem, it's better that that problem only affects people in one area rather than across the country. And, as OB said, would you rather they promised the speed in August and delivered in September, or that they had promised the speed in November and delivered in September? It's better for them to promise the service later then deliver it earlier rather than the other way around. |
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
I'd rather they specified a time and delivered ontime. Rather than this drizzle effect.
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] BB Speed Upgrades
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:32. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum