![]() |
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
Neil Berkett accidentally told the truth about the TiVo increase FOR ALL earlier this month. In his his carefully prepared, not 'off the cuff' statement, to investors he said 'Existing customer would be 'rolled out' onto new £5 TiVo charge when their contracts come to an end'. Strangely I don't think he thought existing customers would pick up on this. The hurried retraction (not from NB, but on the support forum) contradicting him saying it wouldn't happen to existing customers contained the 'reserve the right' proviso. i.e. no guarantee. Personally I believe a statement to investors from the head guy more than a posting on the support forum. It's going to happen at some point, just a matter of when. If Vm are increasing prices of course it's up to them and people can make a decision, however they need to be open and honest. Customers can then make an informed choice without feeling ripped off or tied into another 12 month contract. VM might retain more customers by not taking them for fools. |
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
In my area however sky can only offer 1mb broadband and no on demand due to pathetically low broadband speed so for me virgin offer a much better serivce, virgin is better value IMO especially since they let me keep my V+ for free multiroom.:) VM in all my years with them and before that NTL and before that Anglia Cable, have always been reliable. |
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Thirded (fourthed?). I had no end of trouble with unreliable Sky equipment, but have had just one call out with Virgin. In addition I can't get much more than 2 or 3mb broadband from BT or one of it's resellers, and there are as yet no plans for infinity. Coupled with the fact that I actually prefer the TV offering from Virgin there would need to be a substantial difference in price for me to even consider going back.
|
Re: TV price rises
Of course we all have different experiences of each provider and that colours our judgement.
We had no issues with Sky in 4 years and have had numerous problems with VM in 5 months, so you can see why I feel the way I do. Plus, we are in a Sky unbundled area so get good ADSL speeds and Infinity is up and running so we can probably take Sky Fibre when we move back. I wanted to like VM, I really did. Fast Broadband and the TiVo should be a winner at the right price, unfortunately for us one thing or another has always had a fault at least once a week. VM's biggest threat isn't Sky it's the stability of it's own network! They could offer me the whole package for £20 a month and I wouldn't stay because there is always something wrong. Sure Sky might put prices up again in September, but then again, they might not and our experience is that their products work consistently for us and that is the most important thing. You can have the fastest broadband and snazziest PVR in the world, but if it doesn't work consistently to the customer's satisfaction then it ain't worth jack. |
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
1mb BB would not be enough even to stream you tube let alone sky VOD where i live. Yes Sky do have a greater channel range, but even friends who do have sky will look at the EPG when i am around and they like me with VM will say all these channels and nothing to watch tonight. In my area Sky certainly do not beat VM by a country mile.:( |
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
I did see you said skys service is a country mile ahead of VMs as a general comment and was really only reacting to that as in my area its clearly not.:) |
Re: TV price rises
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum