Cable Forum - 125M Vmng300

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)

- Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)

- - 125M : Vmng300 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33676152)

Quote:

Originally Posted by jb66 (Post 35238902)

It must be a network issue then, ive had 4 superhubs and all drop connections. Even when just on my iphone and nothing else connected. Could it be a UBR issue? Failing to correct bad codewords?

As a tech you're not helping us convince everyone that the Superhub is perfect ..

Didn't you do your Virginmedia chant this morning ?

Super ... Super .... Super ... Superhub

(Theme of thundercats)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nopanic (Post 35238904)

As a tech you're not helping us convince everyone that the Superhub is perfect ..

Didn't you do your Virginmedia chant this morning ?

Super ... Super .... Super ... Superhub

(Theme of thundercats)

Perhaps because it isn't?:D

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35238917)

That's old news!

lol I know .. but I wanted to mix things up ..

am I supporter or a hater ...

Did they ever fix the hubs inability to count bandwidth usage correctly on its bandwidth usage page?

My Tomato router gives me this (that I can split by week/day and even see the last 24hr's graph or a live graph)

Code:

Date        Download        Upload        Total

2011-05        38.93 GB        8.38 GB        47.31 GB

2011-04        26.83 GB        7.32 GB        34.16 GB

While the superhub would have just picked a figure between 0MB and 3GB :monkey:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nopanic (Post 35238900)

System Up Time 4 days 23h:30m:59s :D

VMNG and Superhub sitting on the same drop, side by side, neither drop connection or see slow speeds ..

( I felt I needed to say that as Masque isn't here ) :)

And whyever not? One must do whatever one must do whenever one feels they must do it. :D

Actually sharing information is positive, so thanks. :tu:

Much better than the repetitive and somewhat unhelpful response of 'my hub's OK so why are you moaning' or similar. :dunce:

However if your Hub is on 24/7, an up time 4 days 23h:30m:59s isn't anything to write home about. Assuming of course that the activity timer gives more reliable readings that the Data Counter. :D

Reading at 12.01pm today: Measurement Period: 0days 3h:26m:44s :(

---------- Post added at 12:13 ---------- Previous post was at 12:05 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skie (Post 35238930)

Did they ever fix the hubs inability to count bandwidth usage correctly on its bandwidth usage page?

My Tomato router gives me this (that I can split by week/day and even see the last 24hr's graph or a live graph)

Code:

Date    Download    Upload    Total

2011-05    38.93 GB    8.38 GB    47.31 GB

2011-04    26.83 GB    7.32 GB    34.16 GB

While the superhub would have just picked a figure between 0MB and 3GB :monkey:

Geez, I don't know. My Hub can't stay up long enough to make a meaningful test. :D

Just gotta hope R27 will contain some virtual viagra for the poor thing. :D

Quote:

Originally Posted by Masque (Post 35238845)

Well this thread is just a VMNG300 worship thread which in reality is going nowhere.

That's pure exaggeration; most of the previous half a dozen pages have been stating categorically that the VMNG300 is better than the Super Hub because it works perfectly. That's all. It's hardly lauding it as the be-all, end-all of networking equipment.

Besides, even if it were that kind of thread you could choose not to read it. That would solve the problem, rather than your unrelenting broken record restatement of VM policy facts, or self-important "well I think it should be done this way" rhetoric.

If the Super Hub worked properly no-one would care for the VMNG300, I'm sure. But it doesn't. So here we are.

If I had a choice of the 2 pieces of kit to worship guess which it would be?:D:D:D

With the speed test which server do you choose?

London namesco seems to be the most consistant.

The superhub is fine. It just need a few more options for configuration but for the average user i bet its perfect. EG- Will do what they want it to out of the box.

---------- Post added at 16:46 ---------- Previous post was at 16:45 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35239433)

If I had a choice of the 2 pieces of kit to worship guess which it would be?:D:D:D

Can you use them on BT though?

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35239439)

London namesco seems to be the most consistant.

Which is best site to use?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Skie (Post 35238930)

Code:

Date        Download        Upload        Total

2011-05        38.93 GB        8.38 GB        47.31 GB

2011-04        26.83 GB        7.32 GB        34.16 GB

While the superhub would have just picked a figure between 0MB and 3GB :monkey:

https://www.cableforum.co.uk/images/...2011/05/88.png

4 days uptime is down to a power-cut;

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hot_slim_buxom (Post 35239441)

Can you use them on BT though?

Why would I want to? At least with BT I can use my own superior router without any problems.

If you are trying to wind me up carry on wasting your time!