Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Britain outside the EU (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709659)

Pierre 09-06-2022 16:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36124785)
Boris warning higher wages mean higher inflation.

So the high skill, high wage economy was another lie?

That's pretty much the way inflation works. The clue is in the word itself.

Maggy 09-06-2022 17:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36124787)
How much skill does it take to mop a floor or push a letter through a post box, you can't pay high wages to everyone and those jobs still need doing



And letting them get away with it via cop outs such as this is why we're in this mess, besides which even if you accept politicians lie you wouldn't expect every single thing they said would be questionable like it is with bozo

And those workers still have rent,mortgage,travel,energy and food to buy but this is stuff Boris has never had to worry about or pay for when he can get others to do so.

Chris 09-06-2022 17:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36124785)
Boris warning higher wages mean higher inflation.

So the high skill, high wage economy was another lie?

Careful … you’re exposing your limited understanding of economics a bit here.

A high skill, high wage economy (sans high inflation) is achieved by productivity improvements and rebalancing the economy so more of its output is high-value goods and services. Much easier to say than to do, but it is possible and it is a valid policy objective.

A wage-inflation spiral is a different beast altogether, with each measure increasing in response to the other. We spent a chunk of the 1970s and 80s stuck there. Avoidance of that is another valid policy objective.

There is no inevitable link between high wages and inflation. It’s the cause of the high wages that’s of interest.

Naturally, you may take issue with how likely present government policy is to deliver an economy whose productivity levels and goods values could support high wages. Low productivity is a British disease, which with regards to the latest OECD forecasts, has been a persistent problem of ours for decades.

jfman 09-06-2022 17:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
I fail to see how it’s a limited understanding of economics to point out that it’s a complete pipe dream and this Government has no interest in developing a high wage economy that benefits the vast majority of people in it. However that’s no real surprise. As long as London is alright I suppose. They can keep the proles distracted with culture wars.

I’m intrigued at how they propose to stimulate the market for “high value goods and services” while trade barriers increase and the UK gets poorer.

Chris 09-06-2022 18:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36124797)
I fail to see how it’s a limited understanding of economics to point out that it’s a complete pipe dream and this Government has no interest in developing a high wage economy that benefits the vast majority of people in it. However that’s no real surprise. As long as London is alright I suppose. They can keep the proles distracted with culture wars.

I’m intrigued at how they propose to stimulate the market for “high value goods and services” while trade barriers increase and the UK gets poorer.

Except you didn’t point that out - you drew a false equivalence between two related but distinct policy objectives, in a perfunctory, Twitter-friendly, two sentence post that, if it didn’t expose your own ignorance, sought to exploit that of others.

Discussion of how likely the present government is to achieve its high-wage aim is legitimate but besides the point you were trying to make. Whatever that was.

jfman 09-06-2022 18:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36124801)
Except you didn’t point that out - you drew a false equivalence between two related but distinct policy objectives, in a perfunctory, Twitter-friendly, two sentence post that, if it didn’t expose your own ignorance, sought to exploit that of others.

Discussion of how likely the present government is to achieve its high-wage aim is legitimate but besides the point you were trying to make. Whatever that was.

I’m not sure it can legitimately be described as a false equivalence. As you describe they are absolutely related policy objectives. Neither policy exists in a vacuum.

If the Government position is that the vast majority of workers should accept real terms pay reductions to reduce inflation longer term then that’s the exact opposite of creating a high skill, high wage economy. It’s a race to the bottom. Which you well know.

Chris 09-06-2022 18:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36124802)
I fail to see how it can be considered a false equivalence. As you describe they are absolutely related policy objectives.

If the Government position is that the vast majority of workers should accept real terms pay reductions to reduce inflation longer term then that’s the exact opposite of creating a high skill, high wage economy. It’s a race to the bottom. Which you well know.

Ok, once more …

Pursuing high wages as a result of an economy exhibiting high productivity of high value products and services, and resisting wage demands resulting from inflationary pressure, are not contradictory positions. It really is that simple. You are the only one here that seems confused about it.

jfman 09-06-2022 18:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36124803)
Ok, once more …

Pursuing high wages as a result of an economy exhibiting high productivity of high value products and services, and resisting wage demands resulting from inflationary pressure, are not contradictory positions. It really is that simple. You are the only one here that seems confused about it.

And giving workers pay cuts in real terms puts downward pressure on wages in these hypothetical “high wage, high skilled” jobs. These jobs don’t exist in isolation exempt from the rules of the employment market.

Pursuing high wages as a result of an economy exhibiting high productivity of high value products and services is merely a soundbite if the underlying economic conditions don’t support it and the rising cost of living erodes any benefit.

Chris 09-06-2022 19:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36124805)
And giving workers pay cuts in real terms puts downward pressure on wages in these hypothetical “high wage, high skilled” jobs. These jobs don’t exist in isolation exempt from the rules of the employment market.

Pursuing high wages as a result of an economy exhibiting high productivity of high value products and services is merely a soundbite if the underlying economic conditions don’t support it and the rising cost of living erodes any benefit.

As I said - discussion of how likely this government is to deliver on that policy aim is perfectly valid. Just besides the narrow point you tried to make earlier.

jfman 09-06-2022 19:20

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36124806)
As I said - discussion of how likely this government is to deliver on that policy aim is perfectly valid. Just besides the narrow point you tried to make earlier.

I’m at a loss why you replied at all given you acknowledge the link a few posts later.

The pretence that living standards across the board are unrelated to high wage jobs does little for your own economic literacy.

Pierre 09-06-2022 19:41

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
:banghead:

This exchange has been as painful as watching a Labour MP try to explain how a woman can have a penis. ( you can guess who this is aimed at)

1andrew1 09-06-2022 20:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Reports coming out of a Cabinet split between Johnson and Truss on her plans - inspired by the European Research Group - to tear up parts of the Brexit Treaty with the EU.

ianch99 09-06-2022 22:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36124785)
Boris warning higher wages mean higher inflation.

So the high skill, high wage economy was another lie?

You are right. This lie is structurally impossible given the nature of our economy and the priorities of Tory government. They are in power for one reason and one reason only and that is to continue the unequal distribution of wealth to the ultra-wealthy.

A high skill, high wage economy is inconsistent with their goals, and the goals of their wealthy donors. Look the failing NHS, the low state pension, the crumbling state infrastructure and then ask yourself who are they working for?

Yes, you will get the useful idiots who will claim that it will be "fine" and they will "level up". More lies so the morons who believed them last time will do so again.

1andrew1 10-06-2022 08:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36124785)
Boris warning higher wages mean higher inflation.

So the high skill, high wage economy was another lie?

Johnson has swapped highly-skilled jobs in science via the EU Horizon programme for low-paid farm and service sector jobs.

He wants to pander to the DUP more than he wants a high wage economy.

ianch99 10-06-2022 10:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36124826)
Johnson has swapped highly-skilled jobs in science via the EU Horizon programme for low-paid farm and service sector jobs.

He wants to pander to the DUP more than he wants a high wage economy.

In summary, he does not have a clue. He is more concerned on saving his own skin and pandering to his own ego than doing what is the country's best interest.

Here's a visual of the OECD growth projections:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FUwB5_xX...jpg&name=small

The bottom is the country that the world has sanctioned and the one next to bottom is the one that imposed sanctions on itself :)

jonbxx 10-06-2022 10:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
A high skill, high wage economy is a noble aim but there is a problem - who does the low wage, low skill jobs? This has been a problem since the Blair years where many more people went to university and got those high skills and corresponding high wages. We were told to get an education or we would be flipping burgers. The problem is now who is going to flip the burgers?

EU immigration was a useful sticking plaster that covered this gap and (whisper it quietly) successive governments were quite happy to let this continue, especially as EU immigrants were the only personal net contributors to UK taxation over the period of their life in the UK.

Education in this country seems to be doing well in doing more vocational courses. My eldest has just picked her A levels but the choices for vocational education looked really good too. However, there needs to be a sea change in how jobs like building, care, etc. are seen in this country. In Germany, these jobs aren't seen as jobs for people not smart enough to get higher education but true vocations in themselves. I am not sure sure careers are so well respected in the UK

Sephiroth 10-06-2022 10:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36124837)
A high skill, high wage economy is a noble aim but there is a problem - who does the low wage, low skill jobs? This has been a problem since the Blair years where many more people went to university and got those high skills and corresponding high wages. We were told to get an education or we would be flipping burgers. The problem is now who is going to flip the burgers?

EU immigration was a useful sticking plaster that covered this gap and (whisper it quietly) successive governments were quite happy to let this continue, especially as EU immigrants were the only personal net contributors to UK taxation over the period of their life in the UK.

Education in this country seems to be doing well in doing more vocational courses. My eldest has just picked her A levels but the choices for vocational education looked really good too. However, there needs to be a sea change in how jobs like building, care, etc. are seen in this country. In Germany, these jobs aren't seen as jobs for people not smart enough to get higher education but true vocations in themselves. I am not sure sure careers are so well respected in the UK

A sound analysis, above. Again, we are being offered sound bites (high skill/high wage) by that liar Boris but no prospect of achieving it because there is no structural plan.

ianch99 10-06-2022 10:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jonbxx (Post 36124837)
A high skill, high wage economy is a noble aim but there is a problem - who does the low wage, low skill jobs? This has been a problem since the Blair years where many more people went to university and got those high skills and corresponding high wages. We were told to get an education or we would be flipping burgers. The problem is now who is going to flip the burgers?

EU immigration was a useful sticking plaster that covered this gap and (whisper it quietly) successive governments were quite happy to let this continue, especially as EU immigrants were the only personal net contributors to UK taxation over the period of their life in the UK.

Education in this country seems to be doing well in doing more vocational courses. My eldest has just picked her A levels but the choices for vocational education looked really good too. However, there needs to be a sea change in how jobs like building, care, etc. are seen in this country. In Germany, these jobs aren't seen as jobs for people not smart enough to get higher education but true vocations in themselves. I am not sure sure careers are so well respected in the UK

Really good points esp. about societal respect for non-academic careers. As I mentioned before, this country is not structured for the same career journey an Electrician might have in Germany for example. The class system we have here demands that people like Electricians, Builders, Plumbers, etc are labelled as "Working Class" and should be treated as such.

The high profit, low wage economy we are moving further towards is inconsistent with the high wage, high skill PR pitch. You look at the graduates leaving Uni and trying to find jobs and tell me most get high wage jobs. Not in my experience they don't esp. if they are not skilled in the "right" ones. Got an Arts degree? Good luck ..

---------- Post added at 09:33 ---------- Previous post was at 09:32 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36124839)
A sound analysis, above. Again, we are being offered sound bites (high skill/high wage) by that liar Boris but no prospect of achieving it because there is no structural plan.

An exact précis

Sephiroth 10-06-2022 10:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36124818)
You are right. This lie is structurally impossible given the nature of our economy and the priorities of Tory government. They are in power for one reason and one reason only and that is to continue the unequal distribution of wealth to the ultra-wealthy.

A high skill, high wage economy is inconsistent with their goals, and the goals of their wealthy donors. Look the failing NHS, the low state pension, the crumbling state infrastructure and then ask yourself who are they working for?

Yes, you will get the useful idiots who will claim that it will be "fine" and they will "level up". More lies so the morons who believed them last time will do so again.

It is a pity that Boris's failings allow you to get away with what you've written above.

In truth, politicians want their slice of power more than anything else. Political donations play their part for both Labour and Conservatives; the former by way of union donations with their agenda, and latter with business interests that feel they'll prosper better under the Tories.

Then there's Boris's lot who came under fire for the express lane when trying to obtain masks and the like. I could justify that particular instance (and will if you ask me to), but the press didn't make it look good.

ianch99 10-06-2022 10:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36124842)
It is a pity that Boris's failings allow you to get away with what you've written above.

In truth, politicians want their slice of power more than anything else. Political donations play their part for both Labour and Conservatives; the former by way of union donations with their agenda, and latter with business interests that feel they'll prosper better under the Tories.

Then there's Boris's lot who came under fire for the express lane when trying to obtain masks and the like. I could justify that particular instance (and will if you ask me to), but the press didn't make it look good.

Some context to underline my point:

In 2010, there were 29 billionaires in the UK. In 2021, there are now 171. Despite the economic turmoil, 24 people became billionaires in UK during pandemic. These are the true winners from Tory government.

I am surprised you are willing to justify & support visible corruption. The VIP lane was just that.

https://www.transparency.org.uk/cour...vid-19-inquiry

Quote:

High Court ruling that the VIP lane was unlawful, and urges the UK government to include public contracting during the pandemic within the terms of the COVID-19 Inquiry, due to start in Spring 2022, as soon as possible.

The judgement ruled that the VIP lane conferred preferential treatment on bids and that the approach for allocating offers to the VIP lane was flawed. In April 2021, our Track and Trace report highlighted concerns over what we found to be ‘systemic bias’. Overall, the research found that one in five PPE contracts awarded from February to November 2020 raised one or more red flags for corruption.

jonbxx 10-06-2022 12:11

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36124840)
Really good points esp. about societal respect for non-academic careers. As I mentioned before, this country is not structured for the same career journey an Electrician might have in Germany for example. The class system we have here demands that people like Electricians, Builders, Plumbers, etc are labelled as "Working Class" and should be treated as such.

The high profit, low wage economy we are moving further towards is inconsistent with the high wage, high skill PR pitch. You look at the graduates leaving Uni and trying to find jobs and tell me most get high wage jobs. Not in my experience they don't esp. if they are not skilled in the "right" ones. Got an Arts degree? Good luck ..[COLOR="Silver"]

There was of course a very different appreciation in the last couple of years as a lot of the people we are talking about here were key workers, keeping the country running. The applause didn't really last long did it...

That is a good point about degrees but I guess it depends on what you class the degree as being for. You could argue that degrees with an obvious end point such as medicine and law are almost vocational courses in their own right while other are education for the sake of learning. It doesn't mean that those degrees are worthless unless you want to work directly in the field of art history for example as they show that the graduate has the drive to learn independently. I mean, if someone who studies classics can get to the top spot, there must be some value..

In Ireland, non-'vocational' degrees do not get much funding these days as there is a continuing drive to boost the skills of the Irish population. The country of James Joyce and Brendan Behan has no one studying their works at a high level

tweetiepooh 10-06-2022 12:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Fiscal "policy" needs to apply to everyone. In the good times you save a bit so in the hard times you have something to help you through, that is you don't increase your spending to match your income. (Now please I do understand that there will be some who can't do this.) We have only really been able to put a good bit aside since 2019 when the mortgage was paid off but once it was we didn't spend all the surplus other than when every goes wrong at once - new car, boiler, washing machine, solar panel inverter etc. Plus children off to uni and my participating in some training.


The same is true on the macro scale, in the good years you save so in the bad times you have that resource to use but (generally) the Labour crew like to spend and the Tories don't like to collect.

1andrew1 13-06-2022 19:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
As Crime Minister of the UK, how do you distract from being found guilty of breaking British laws that you made? Maybe have a crack at breaking some international ones?

Quote:

EU to take legal action over UK bill to rip up Northern Ireland protocol

Boris Johnson defends ‘trivial’ adjustments, saying Good Friday Agreement trumps Brexit deal

Brussels is to launch legal action against the UK as early as Monday, as a chorus of criticism greeted Boris Johnson’s plan to unilaterally rip up his 2020 Brexit deal with the EU covering trade with Northern Ireland.

Simon Coveney, Ireland’s foreign minister, said Johnson’s unilateral approach marked a “new low”, while a majority of elected members of Northern Ireland’s assembly also attacked the move.

If the UK refuses to pay and comply with its judgment, the EU could end parts of its post-Brexit trade deal, applying tariffs to British goods. Brussels has already indicated it will exclude British scientists from the €95bn Horizon Europe research project, in its first economic reprisal.

The US has also urged Johnson to negotiate with Brussels a settlement to the Northern Ireland problem. Joe Biden, US president, and EU leaders are likely to confront Johnson on the issue at a G7 summit in Germany later this month.

In response to the legislation, Maroš Šefčovič, the European commissioner for Brexit, is expected on Monday afternoon to ask the commission to issue an opinion on the paused legal case — on a unilateral UK decision to delay checks on goods and pets — the final step before going to court.
https://www.ft.com/content/02891815-...1-31c7b592aeef

Of course, signing the original deal was a bit awkward when you had promised no checks to NI back in 2019!
Quote:

There will not be checks, and I speak as the prime minister of the United Kingdom, and a passionate unionist. There will not be checks on goods going from Northern Ireland to Great Britain because we’re the government of the United Kingdom and we will not institute or implement or enact such checks.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics...checked-brexit

1andrew1 14-06-2022 00:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
The absurdity of the government's actions is neatly summarised in this Tweet.
Quote:

I am confused. The Protocol represents such a threat to the stability of the UK that it is legal to breach the international treaty which created it, yet the threat is not serious enough to trigger the clause within the treaty specifically to deal with such a threat, Article 16?
https://twitter.com/arthistorynews/s...04598751043585

Some good analysis here from David Allen Green. Another waste of taxpayers' money by this government.

Quote:

There are no possible circumstances where the United Kingdom can resort to the the principle of “necessity” under international law without going through the Article 16 process first.

And the government – despite many threats – has not triggered the Article 16 process.

The “position” published today even admits the government believes that the Article 16 were met:

“In July 2021, however, the Government assessed in the Command Paper that, as a result of both diversion of trade and serious societal and economic difficulties occasioned by the Protocol, the conditions for the exercise of the rights provided for under Article 16 of the Protocol were already met.”

But the government then did nothing under Article 16 on that basis.

For the government to not trigger Article 16 instead of resorting to the the principle of “necessity” under international law is beyond rational comprehension.

Wookies coming from Endor makes more sense.

And there is even more.

So “necessary” is this proposal that the legislation will take at least months, if not a year to pass into statute.

Such a leisurely timeline does not indicate urgency – and it does not show that the problem is “grave and imminent”.
https://davidallengreen.com/

Pierre 14-06-2022 00:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36125158)
As Crime Minister of the UK…………

Who’d you steal that from?

1andrew1 14-06-2022 01:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36125182)
Who’d you steal that from?

I think that's been his unofficial title since the FPN.

1andrew1 16-06-2022 13:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Lack of EU workers is proving problematical. We've heard about farming. Now it's the turn of travel and broadband.

Quote:

Boris' 'Brexit rules' to blame for airport disruption - 'Not enough EU workers in the UK'

Speaking to Times Radio, he [Paul Charles, former Virgin Atlantic and Eurostar director] pinpointed the issue: "Well, one of the big failings, I’m afraid, is the government not letting enough European workers into the UK.

"Our analysis shows that nearly a third of jobs in the travel industry in this country are traditionally filled by European workers. And of course, since Brexit, those rules have changed, which have prevented European workers coming in, in the main, to work in the industry.

"So, that’s why it’s struggling. It can’t find enough workers from overseas as well as in the UK."

Mr Charles continued: "And I appreciate, absolutely, the industry is not always paying well enough. The wages are not high enough, the baggage handlers or security processes. And the industry has got to take a good, long, hard look at that.

"But fundamentally, government rules not only during the pandemic, but since Brexit, have disabled the sector. They really haven’t helped the sector at all to recover."
https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...workers-uk/amp

Quote:

BT executive says Brexit is slowing superfast broadband rollout

Openreach head hits out at ‘tortuous’ process of hiring skilled workers from the EU

Clive Selley, chief executive of BT’s Openreach, the division leading the rollout of fibre optic networks to homes, said countries such as Portugal and Spain have plenty of people with the necessary skills to accelerate the delivery of superfast broadband.

“They want the work, we want the skills and the Home Office have a process that is tortuous,” Selley said in an interview. “We are constraining the rate of fibre build in the UK through the process.”

“If it was easier getting people in, I would take a thousand tomorrow,” he said, referring to contractors rather than full-time staff. Portugal and Spain have the skilled labour required because the countries are close to finishing their rollout, he added.

The delivery of superfast broadband is central to the Conservative government’s pledge to bridge the digital divide and level up the economy. Its last manifesto outlined plans to deliver “full fibre and gigabit-capable broadband to every home and business across the UK by 2025”.
https://www.ft.com/content/6038500d-...e-d884a6fcc907

Pierre 16-06-2022 18:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36125471)
Lack of EU workers is proving problematical. We've heard about farming. Now it's the turn of travel and broadband.


https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...workers-uk/amp


https://www.ft.com/content/6038500d-...e-d884a6fcc907

I work in the telecoms sector and I call bullshit from BT on this one. That’s pure deflection from BT on the failure to build rurally - because there’s no money in it.

OLD BOY 19-06-2022 14:07

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36125471)
Lack of EU workers is proving problematical. We've heard about farming. Now it's the turn of travel and broadband.


https://www.express.co.uk/news/polit...workers-uk/amp


https://www.ft.com/content/6038500d-...e-d884a6fcc907

Don’t worry, Andrew. When the new trade agreement with India is signed, we’ll get our overseas labour from there. :D

1andrew1 19-06-2022 14:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36125656)
Don’t worry, Andrew. When the new trade agreement with India is signed, we’ll get our overseas labour from there. :D

Do you really think that we'll be signing a trade deal with Putin's chums in the near future? You must clearly be joking! :D

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...w/92303530.cms
https://theprint.in/opinion/buying-r...-hands/998913/

OLD BOY 19-06-2022 14:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36125659)
Do you really think that we'll be signing a trade deal with Putin's chums in the near future? You must clearly be joking! :D

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/...w/92303530.cms
https://theprint.in/opinion/buying-r...-hands/998913/

If we expect all our trading partners to be squeaky clean, we won’t be able to trade with anyone.

1andrew1 19-06-2022 15:57

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36125661)
If we expect all our trading partners to be squeaky clean, we won’t be able to trade with anyone.

It appears you're suggesting that we sign a trade deal with a country dependent on Russia both for its defence infrastructure and energy. Not that there's any such trade deal waiting to be signed, of course!

How well do you think this would sit with our allies, particularly Zelensky who Johnson calls every time he's in political trouble.

Dave42 19-06-2022 17:00

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36125661)
If we expect all our trading partners to be squeaky clean, we won’t be able to trade with anyone.

of course UK dont care about them being squeaky clean just look with our arms deal with one of the most vile counties in the world in Saudi that is just one example

Mick 19-06-2022 17:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36125665)
of course UK dont care about them being squeaky clean just look with our arms deal with one of the most vile counties in the world in Saudi that is just one example

Nonsensical one sided rubbish from you as usual, given many EU member states still paying billions in to Russia, for its gas. You’re always conveniently forgetting the whole picture Dave42.

Dave42 19-06-2022 17:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
it all bad for Eu to get gas from Russia but all good for tories to get Russian money and make a former KGB agent son a lord right

Mick 19-06-2022 21:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36125668)
it all bad for Eu to get gas from Russia but all good for tories to get Russian money and make a former KGB agent son a lord right

Yeah because Labour have never done that right?

Wrong!

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...russian-riches

Your precious Labour just as bad. :rolleyes:

mrmistoffelees 20-06-2022 07:58

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36125677)
Yeah because Labour have never done that right?

Wrong!

https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/...russian-riches

Your precious Labour just as bad. :rolleyes:

Justifying immoral. unethical or potentially criminal behaviour with

‘Well, if they’ve done it, it’s ok for us to do it too.’

No the wonder that all of our political parties aren’t worth tuppence ha’penny

Seems to be a view spreading further into wider society as well

1andrew1 20-06-2022 09:25

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36125688)
Justifying immoral. unethical or potentially criminal behaviour with

‘Well, if they’ve done it, it’s ok for us to do it too.’

No the wonder that all of our political parties aren’t worth tuppence ha’penny

Seems to be a view spreading further into wider society as well

I think it's also important to draw a distinction before and after key revelatory events like the invasion of Crimea and Donbas in 2014 and the Salisbury Novichock poisonings in 2018.

Trade with Russia and donations from Russian entities was increasingly cynical since 2018's poisonings which left few in doubt about Russia's way of working.

Mick 20-06-2022 11:06

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36125688)
Justifying immoral. unethical or potentially criminal behaviour with

‘Well, if they’ve done it, it’s ok for us to do it too.’

No the wonder that all of our political parties aren’t worth tuppence ha’penny

Seems to be a view spreading further into wider society as well

It’s not about that, it’s about certain folk like you, always portraying one side as bad, when the full picture is both sides are just as bad, but the real crux of this issue, you and certain others, can’t stomach that your precious Labour Party is just as corrupt.

mrmistoffelees 20-06-2022 11:14

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36125710)
It’s not about that, it’s about certain folk like you, always portraying one side as bad, when the full picture is both sides are just as bad, but the real crux of this issue, you and certain others, can’t stomach that your precious Labour Party is just as corrupt.

Certain people like me portraying one side as bad ? When the post you’ve just quoted references ALL parties ?

The same me who said that if found guilty Starmer & Rayner should be gone?

PS I’m not a staunch Labour voter, I’ve voted for them once in my entire life

1andrew1 21-06-2022 00:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Brexit benefit finally identified by the government!
Quote:

No 10 planning to tear up restrictions on City bosses’ pay amid cost of living crisis

Downing Street has asked ministers to ease restrictions on City bosses’ pay in a bid to show overseas companies the “benefits of Brexit”, i can reveal.

Steve Barclay, the Prime Minister’s chief of staff, wrote to Chancellor Rishi Sunak with a plan for “deregulatory measures to reduce the overall burden on business” and attract more firms to the UK.

One key plank of the plan included “removing restrictions on director (and specifically NED [non-executive director]) remuneration as suggested by the London Stock Exchange Group to improve London’s attractiveness for listings”.

But with the cost of living crisis and a squeeze on earnings hitting millions of ordinary workers, the proposal may spark controversy.

It followed intense talks between the PM’s Minister for Policy Andrew Griffith, the No 10 Policy Unit, Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng and Minister for Brexit Opportunities Jacob Rees-Mogg.

A copy of the confidential letter from Cabinet Office minister Mr Barclay to the Chancellor has been seen by i. It says: “I trust you’ll agree this is a more proportionate regulatory response and reflective of the new approach to regulation outlined in the ‘Benefits of Brexit’ publication in January.”
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/othe...?ocid=msedgntp

tweetiepooh 21-06-2022 11:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
But if "city bosses" make more moolah and then spend it in the UK that is a positive. (They will probably find a way to avoid tax).



True it is divisory in one sense and like will cause problems looking at the disparity between the top and bottom earners but that disparity is always going to be there. As a Christian I believe that God will call to account those who "have" on what they've done with what He has given them. I have no problem with people having lots but they need to be generous and not only to those who can "pay it back".

ianch99 21-06-2022 12:36

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36125855)
But if "city bosses" make more moolah and then spend it in the UK that is a positive. (They will probably find a way to avoid tax).



True it is divisory in one sense and like will cause problems looking at the disparity between the top and bottom earners but that disparity is always going to be there. As a Christian I believe that God will call to account those who "have" on what they've done with what He has given them. I have no problem with people having lots but they need to be generous and not only to those who can "pay it back".

I am no theologian but I thought Christ was quite explicit in his preachings that excessive wealth was an anathema to him?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ...th#The_Gospels

Of course, later on when man reinterpreted his original message to "allow" wealth as long you are "generous" did we arrive at the normalising of obscene wealth and the illusion of trickle down economics.

papa smurf 21-06-2022 12:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36125866)
I am no theologian but I thought Christ was quite explicit in his preachings that excessive wealth was an anathema to him?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ...th#The_Gospels

Of course, later on when man reinterpreted his original message to "allow" wealth as long you are "generous" did we arrive at the normalising of obscene wealth and the illusion of trickle down economics.

You'd need a degree in Science fiction to sort that one out.

1andrew1 21-06-2022 13:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36125866)
I am no theologian but I thought Christ was quite explicit in his preachings that excessive wealth was an anathema to him?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christ...th#The_Gospels

Of course, later on when man reinterpreted his original message to "allow" wealth as long you are "generous" did we arrive at the normalising of obscene wealth and the illusion of trickle down economics.

Paging Chris!

TheDaddy 21-06-2022 16:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36125855)
But if "city bosses" make more moolah and then spend it in the UK that is a positive. (They will probably find a way to avoid tax).



True it is divisory in one sense and like will cause problems looking at the disparity between the top and bottom earners but that disparity is always going to be there.

The disparity is growing daily, the workers pay has stagnated since the seventies when I believe the 'bosses' pay was 40 times the average worker, it's now 300 times the average, it trickles one way and it ain't down, so much for high skill, high wage economy, the first time the little man asks for a pay rise he's told that's not for you and has to threaten strikes

ianch99 21-06-2022 18:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36125884)
The disparity is growing daily, the workers pay has stagnated since the seventies when I believe the 'bosses' pay was 40 times the average worker, it's now 300 times the average, it trickles one way and it ain't down, so much for high skill, high wage economy, the first time the little man asks for a pay rise he's told that's not for you and has to threaten strikes

2010: 20 billionaires
2021: 170 billionaires

I'd say your analysis is spot on. One big con trick ..

OLD BOY 21-06-2022 21:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36125892)
2010: 20 billionaires
2021: 170 billionaires.

That’s inflation for you! :D

1andrew1 21-06-2022 21:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36125892)
2010: 20 billionaires
2021: 170 billionaires

I'd say your analysis is spot on. One big con trick ..

I blame Starmer. :D

nomadking 21-06-2022 21:21

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36125892)
2010: 20 billionaires
2021: 170 billionaires

I'd say your analysis is spot on. One big con trick ..

How much of that money was earned outside the UK? Nothing to do with the UK.
Their wealth is not in the form of cash in the bank. It also depends on there being other billionaires who can afford to give them billions if they were going to sell.

ianch99 21-06-2022 21:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36125908)
That’s inflation for you! :D

OB, I commend you! Brilliant :D

---------- Post added at 20:28 ---------- Previous post was at 20:27 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36125910)
How much of that money was earned outside the UK? Nothing to do with the UK.
Their wealth is not in the form of cash in the bank. It also depends on there being other billionaires who can afford to give them billions if they were going to sell.

Shilling for the ultra wealthy is not a good look

Hugh 21-06-2022 22:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36125892)
2010: 20 billionaires
2021: 170 billionaires

I'd say your analysis is spot on. One big con trick ..

Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36125908)
That’s inflation for you! :D

If it had been in line with U.K. inflation, there would be 25 billionaires…

;)

nomadking 21-06-2022 22:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36125912)
OB, I commend you! Brilliant :D

---------- Post added at 20:28 ---------- Previous post was at 20:27 ----------



Shilling for the ultra wealthy is not a good look

Just facts. There were more than 10 in 2010. The financial crash lowered the number by 2010.

What have businesses outside the UK got to do with any "trickle down" in the UK?:rolleyes:

Hugh 21-06-2022 23:22

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36125920)
Just facts. There were more than 10 in 2010. The financial crash lowered the number by 2010.

What have businesses outside the UK got to do with any "trickle down" in the UK?:rolleyes:

He said 20…

nomadking 22-06-2022 06:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36125921)
He said 20…

Still more than 20, 30, 40.

ianch99 22-06-2022 10:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
What is interesting, as well as inevitable, is the increasing number of articles & reports detailing the role of Brexit in the problems we see today.

Brexit will leave workers poorer than they would have been and has damaged Britain's competitiveness, new study says

Quote:

Brexit has damaged Britain's competitiveness, will reduce productivity and leave the average worker poorer than they otherwise would have been, according to a new study.

The Resolution Foundation said leaving the EU has reduced how open and competitive Britain's economy is.

And it goes further to say it has also led to an increase in cost of living and the level of business investment falling.

The report, in collaboration with the London School of Economics, said this was all as a result of a "depreciation-driven inflation spike" following Brexit.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1539170022295277568

Quote:

Boss of @Ryanair, O'Leary: "This gov't couldn't run a sweet shop. We are fully staffed. But we are hide-bound and hamstrung by a gov't so desperate to show #Brexit has been a success, when it's been an abject failure, it won't allow us to bring in EU workers to do these jobs."
and yes, even Piers Morgan is discussing it:

Quote:

At some stage, Brexit needs to start working - because so far, I see no evidence it is doing anything other than making British lives more difficult.
I say this as someone who voted Remain but accepted the result & now wants to see Brexit work the way we were promised it would.
You know its a real problem for the Tories when the Express starts whinging:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FU2EIJDX...png&name=small

This will become more of an issue for the Tories as the pain of Brexit seen in inflation, etc. starts to bite people who, previously, may not of cared too much.

1andrew1 22-06-2022 11:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36125940)
What is interesting, as well as inevitable, is the increasing number of articles & reports detailing the role of Brexit in the problems we see today.

Brexit will leave workers poorer than they would have been and has damaged Britain's competitiveness, new study says

https://twitter.com/i/status/1539170022295277568

and yes, even Piers Morgan is discussing it:

You know its a real problem for the Tories when the Express starts whinging:

[img]Download Failed (1)[/img]

This will become more of an issue for the Tories as the pain of Brexit seen in inflation, etc. starts to bite people who, previously, may not of cared too much.

I think one indication is that Brexit is not working is the fact that the government acknowledges that customs imports checks add increased costs so it is postponing these for years.

The Resolution Report which generated the Evening Standard headline Brexit will hit workers’ real wages by nearly £500-a-year is a powerful way of demonstrating the downside of Brexit in a way that a reduction in GDP does not.

I'm sure there will be many cynics who think you spent the day searching for bad news stories on Brexit. The reality is apart from bankers' bonuses, there are no genuine Brexit benefit stories. We could have had blue passports and crown marks on pints before Brexit, to take some of the more talked-about benefits.

Sephiroth 22-06-2022 11:45

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Our sovereignty in the right hands would have worked wonders with Brexit.

Still, sovereignty trumps GDP in my eyes, so long as it's for the short term while we adjust and develop.

Sadly, even COVID can't protect this shambles of a government from the accusation that they are doing little if not nothing to make Brexit worthwhile, particularly as regards the tax regime.

1andrew1 22-06-2022 11:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36125947)
Our sovereignty in the right hands would have worked wonders with Brexit.

Still, sovereignty trumps GDP in my eyes, so long as it's for the short term while we adjust and develop.

Sadly, even COVID can't protect this shambles of a government from the accusation that they are doing little if not nothing to make Brexit worthwhile, particularly as regards the tax regime.

It's permanent due to increased costs rendering the country less productive.

I think the original report is worth reading. It's a calm, a-political and evidence-based read.

https://www.resolutionfoundation.org...he-big-brexit/

Pierre 22-06-2022 14:30

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Of course, everything is just fine in the land of milk and honey

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe...ke-2022-06-20/

https://apnews.com/article/germany-p...igher%20prices.

https://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/...is-mounts.html

Dave42 22-06-2022 16:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Brexit will leave workers poorer than they would have been and has damaged Britain's competitiveness, new study says

https://news.sky.com/story/brexit-wi...-says-12638190

---------- Post added at 15:10 ---------- Previous post was at 15:06 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36125972)

if brexit is so great why is it only Russia is a worse place that UK in the G20 clue Russia is sanctioned by lots of word UK only country in word to impose economic sanctions on itself

1andrew1 22-06-2022 16:19

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36125972)

The nuanced report is not about the rest of the World being just fine or not. It's about the impact of Brexit on the UK in the long-term.

ianch99 22-06-2022 17:13

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36125947)
Our sovereignty in the right hands would have worked wonders with Brexit.

Still, sovereignty trumps GDP in my eyes, so long as it's for the short term while we adjust and develop.

Sadly, even COVID can't protect this shambles of a government from the accusation that they are doing little if not nothing to make Brexit worthwhile, particularly as regards the tax regime.

Maybe the permanent reduction of GDP was on the backside of the bus ;) Pity you can't eat "sovereignty" ..

TheDaddy 22-06-2022 17:27

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by ianch99 (Post 36125940)
This will become more of an issue for the Tories as the pain of Brexit seen in inflation, etc. starts to bite people who, previously, may not of cared too much.

Well people should have cared

the price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men

Plato said that thousands of years ago and it's as true now as it was then, that's not saying I think bozo and his chums are evil but whose interests are they acting in, that's the price of indifference today imho

---------- Post added at 16:27 ---------- Previous post was at 16:26 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36125947)
Our sovereignty in the right hands would have worked wonders with Brexit.

Still, sovereignty trumps GDP in my eyes, so long as it's for the short term while we adjust and develop.

Sadly, even COVID can't protect this shambles of a government from the accusation that they are doing little if not nothing to make Brexit worthwhile, particularly as regards the tax regime.

Not really what was promised though was it, could have worked wonders

Pierre 22-06-2022 19:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36125991)
if brexit is so great why is it only Russia is a worse place that UK in the G20 clue Russia is sanctioned by lots of word UK only country in word to impose economic sanctions on itself

The Ruble has actually bounced back and is performing very well at the moment, as Russian fuel sales are up.

Dave42 22-06-2022 23:23

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Brexit’s Legacy Is Hotter UK Inflation Risk for Years Ahead
‘The economy is extremely fragile,’ says Citigroup strategist
Brexit is a key reason why investors are still avoiding the UK

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic..._medium=social

Pierre 23-06-2022 08:28

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36125994)
The nuanced report is not about the rest of the World being just fine or not. It's about the impact of Brexit on the UK in the long-term.

I would always treat a “study” that try’s to “predict” anything, and is based on “estimates” with a healthy dose of scepticism.

Mick 23-06-2022 09:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36126001)
Well people should have cared

the price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men

Plato said that thousands of years ago and it's as true now as it was then, that's not saying I think bozo and his chums are evil but whose interests are they acting in, that's the price of indifference today imho

---------- Post added at 16:27 ---------- Previous post was at 16:26 ----------



Not really what was promised though was it, could have worked wonders

Yes it could, if there had not been Brexit saboteurs in the ranks. Problem with Remainiacs (A Remainiac is a vote remainer, who has never accepted the result and follows a ridiculous cult like belief that the result was due to lies, despite there being several democratic exercises that showed, the country wanted Brexit) that they desperately want it to fail, so we can rejoin a corrupted EU. The EU have not played ball at all. Punishing a country to dare leave its midst.

I still do not regret my vote to leave 6 years ago today. I was not lied to, or deceived and would still vote leave again and again. We have the democratic right to self determination. I was always prepared to accept any economic pain for our right to be an independent self governing nation. We are still coming through the economic pain of a global pandemic, but there is no doubt the naysayers and anti democratic folk want failure to validate their justification to be part of the EU.

1andrew1 23-06-2022 10:59

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36126062)
I would always treat a “study” that try’s to “predict” anything, and is based on “estimates” with a healthy dose of scepticism.

I agree it's also worth putting your critical thinking hat on when reading anything and looking at the organisation publishing the report. In this instance, it's the well-respected and very transparent Resolution Foundation whose stated aim is to improve the standard of living of low- and middle-income families.

tweetiepooh 23-06-2022 11:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
On my personal wealth I love this scripture :
'I ask you, God, to let me have two things before I die: keep me from lying, and let me be neither rich nor poor. So give me only as much food as I need. If I have more, I might say that I do not need you. But if I am poor, I might steal and bring disgrace on my God. '



More generally I don't see anywhere condemnation of wealth but only on how it is used. He also makes it clear that our first love should be for God and we can't serve both God and wealth.

Sephiroth 23-06-2022 11:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tweetiepooh (Post 36126068)
On my personal wealth I love this scripture :
'I ask you, God, to let me have two things before I die: keep me from lying, and let me be neither rich nor poor. So give me only as much food as I need. If I have more, I might say that I do not need you. But if I am poor, I might steal and bring disgrace on my God. '



More generally I don't see anywhere condemnation of wealth but only on how it is used. He also makes it clear that our first love should be for God and we can't serve both God and wealth.

Hmmm. God is little better than Boris:

Quote:

HEBREWS 13:5
Keep your life free from love of money, and be content with what you have, for he has said, “I will never leave you nor forsake you.”

Chris 23-06-2022 12:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
If we’re trading Bible verses, “Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” - Matthew 19:24.

ianch99 23-06-2022 12:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36126072)
If we’re trading Bible verses, “Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” - Matthew 19:24.

Exactly. IMO, ultra-wealth is incompatible with the original (not re-interpreted) teachings of Christ.

Sephiroth 23-06-2022 12:56

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris (Post 36126072)
If we’re trading Bible verses, “Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God.” - Matthew 19:24.

I certainly buy that one. And it has so many applications given that the EU considers itself to be akin to "the kingdom of God".


Hugh 23-06-2022 13:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36126077)
I certainly buy that one. And it has so many applications given that the EU considers itself to be akin to "the kingdom of God".


Strangely enough, if one Googles "EU Kingdom of God”, nothing to be seen…

Or to put it Biblically

Quote:

first cast out the beam out of thine own eye;
and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother's eye
;)

Mick 23-06-2022 13:10

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Any chance we can end the biblical talk?

1andrew1 23-06-2022 13:12

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Stepping away from theology, it's the time of Wall Street to take a look at the British economy's prospects. It makes for a somewhat sobering read.

Quote:

Brexit’s Legacy Is Hotter UK Inflation Risk for Years Ahead
  • ‘The economy is extremely fragile,’ says Citigroup strategist
  • Brexit is a key reason why investors are still avoiding the UK

The UK will be stuck with searing inflation for years because of Brexit, according to strategists at Wall Street’s top banks.

Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp. and Standard Bank all see the UK as a outlier in the developed world because of the economic damage wrought by the decision to cut ties with the European Union. Even as price pressures start to fade elsewhere, they say UK inflation will be higher-than-normal because of immigration controls and supply chain disruption. A report Wednesday showed price pressures hitting a fresh four-decade high.

Inflation is a big reason why investors are bearish on the pound, even with the currency trading near a two-year low to the dollar. The view among experts is that Brexit isn’t the cause of the cost-of-living crisis, but it will make solving the problem harder in the UK than anywhere else.

To Bank of America’s Kamal Sharma, there’s a long list of reasons to still be negative on the pound. The economy is in poor shape and the BOE’s decisions are the subject of politicized attacks.

“As the pandemic headwind starts to fade, the UK will be left with this one big idiosyncratic shock,” he said. “For an economy that’s very reliant on domestic demand to drive the economy, that means you’re heading into a period of sub-trend growth, which is negative for the pound.”

Replacing access to the EU’s single market with labor and goods from elsewhere remains a challenge for the UK government, which has struggled to make headway on trade agreements. While the UK signed its first agreement with a US state last month, the piecemeal approach shows talks are failing to progress.
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic..._medium=social

Mick 23-06-2022 13:16

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
On second thoughts, now Andy pandy’s shown up with more misery Brexit prediction, the biblical talk was more comforting. :D

Pierre 23-06-2022 13:32

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36126082)
Stepping away from theology, it's the time of Wall Street to take a look at the British economy's prospects. It makes for a somewhat sobering read.


https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic..._medium=social

I read this yesterday.

Seems to gloss over that the current wave of inflation is pretty much a western global issue, not just a UK issue

Also

Quote:

Replacing access to the EU’s single market with labor and goods from elsewhere remains a challenge for the UK government
I wasn't aware we had lost "access" to the single market. We're no longer in it but we still have access to it.

1andrew1 23-06-2022 13:43

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36126083)
On second thoughts, now Andy pandy’s shown up with more misery Brexit prediction, the biblical talk was more comforting. :D

Soz, I was just trying to help you out there! :D

---------- Post added at 12:43 ---------- Previous post was at 12:38 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36126085)
I read this yesterday.

Seems to gloss over that the current wave of inflation is pretty much a western global issue, not just a UK issue

The key part on UK inflation is:
Quote:

The view among experts is that Brexit isn’t the cause of the cost-of-living crisis, but it will make solving the problem harder in the UK than anywhere else.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36126085)
Also
I wasn't aware we had lost "access" to the single market. We're no longer in it but we still have access to it.

We've lost it for labour and it's now harder for goods.

OLD BOY 23-06-2022 16:38

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
We didn’t have an inflation problem until Russia invaded Ukraine and put fuel prices up. After 12 months from the start of the higher level of inflation, the numbers will come down by themselves unless energy costs continue their upward trend or pay rises get out of control.

Sephiroth 23-06-2022 16:44

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36126107)
I think the word ‘camel’ has been mistranslated. It is very similar to the word ‘rope’ in the original language. Or so I was told decades ago.

Apparently a conflict about whether it was an Aramaic word or Assyrian.

https://www.neverthirsty.org/bible-q...be-thick-rope/

1andrew1 23-06-2022 16:54

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36126107)
We didn’t have an inflation problem until Russia invaded Ukraine and put fuel prices up.

It was 6% in February before the invasion - three times the Bank of England's target of 2%.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...3&d=1655996028
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/22/b...tion-rate.html

Hugh 23-06-2022 17:18

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLD BOY (Post 36126107)
We didn’t have an inflation problem until Russia invaded Ukraine and put fuel prices up. After 12 months from the start of the higher level of inflation, the numbers will come down by themselves unless energy costs continue their upward trend or pay rises get out of control.

Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36126110)
It was 6% in February before the invasion - three times the Bank of England's target of 2%.

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...3&d=1655996028
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/22/b...tion-rate.html


Source data…

https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/infla...lation/may2022

https://www.cableforum.uk/board/atta...4&d=1655997462

1andrew1 23-06-2022 17:24

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
To pre-empt replies, demonstrating to Old Boy that the UK had an inflation rate problem before Russia invaded Ukraine and put fuel prices up, does not mean that other countries did not have inflation rate problems too.

Pierre 23-06-2022 18:05

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36126113)
To pre-empt replies, demonstrating to Old Boy that the UK had an inflation rate problem before Russia invaded Ukraine and put fuel prices up, does not mean that other countries did not have inflation rate problems too.

Indeed, Old Boy is clearly incorrect as the above shows. But, yes we sleepwalked into an inflationary crisis because Western central banks printed money to enable spending, because they all thought it was great idea to shut down Western economies for a very survivable respiratory illness.

Welcome to your lockdown reward.

TheDaddy 23-06-2022 19:33

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mick (Post 36126063)
Yes it could, if there had not been Brexit saboteurs in the ranks. Problem with Remainiacs (A Remainiac is a vote remainer, who has never accepted the result and follows a ridiculous cult like belief that the result was due to lies, despite there being several democratic exercises that showed, the country wanted Brexit) that they desperately want it to fail, so we can rejoin a corrupted EU. The EU have not played ball at all. Punishing a country to dare leave its midst.

I still do not regret my vote to leave 6 years ago today. I was not lied to, or deceived and would still vote leave again and again. We have the democratic right to self determination. I was always prepared to accept any economic pain for our right to be an independent self governing nation. We are still coming through the economic pain of a global pandemic, but there is no doubt the naysayers and anti democratic folk want failure to validate their justification to be part of the EU.

The result was due to lies, the fact we're here talking about it proves it, where are the sunlit uplands, where is the German car industry not standing for it, what's happened to the fishermen and farmers who were promised the earth and now don't have jobs or businesses, I'm no remaniac as I don't want us going back in after all this but at the same time I want the people responsible to be held account, Where's the 40 million Turks that were on their way here, they get lost or something and the government was given such a democratic mandate to get this sorted, Where's the oven ready deal, instead all we're getting is it's the EUs fault because we never expected then to sign the deal, wtf what sort of reckless incompetent cretin would take a chance like that, we're only going to break international law in a limited way, wtf it's still breaking it cretin, that victorian hat stand has spent months looking for a brexit dividend and got so desperate he resorted to asking The Sun readers for their's but he made sure he got his dividend by opening up an office in the EU.

You might have been prepared for economic pain but how many of the 52% were, they were promised no pain, they were only promised better and this is not better

Hugh 23-06-2022 19:50

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36126114)
Indeed, Old Boy is clearly incorrect as the above shows. But, yes we sleepwalked into an inflationary crisis because Western central banks printed money to enable spending, because they all thought it was great idea to shut down Western economies for a very survivable respiratory illness.

Welcome to your lockdown reward.

I know you probably posted this to get a reaction, but I’m pretty sure the 180,000 (and their families and friends) who didn’t survive this "survivable respiratory illness" may disagree with your definition of "survivable"…

Actual definition
Quote:

survivable - (of an accident or injury) very serious but not causing death

Dave42 23-06-2022 19:55

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36126120)
The result was due to lies, the fact we're here talking about it proves it, where are the sunlit uplands, where is the German car industry not standing for it, what's happened to the fishermen and farmers who were promised the earth and now don't have jobs or businesses, I'm no remaniac as I don't want us going back in after all this but at the same time I want the people responsible to be held account, Where's the 40 million Turks that were on their way here, they get lost or something and the government was given such a democratic mandate to get this sorted, Where's the oven ready deal, instead all we're getting is it's the EUs fault because we never expected then to sign the deal, wtf what sort of reckless incompetent cretin would take a chance like that, we're only going to break international law in a limited way, wtf it's still breaking it cretin, that victorian hat stand has spent months looking for a brexit dividend and got so desperate he resorted to asking The Sun readers for their's but he made sure he got his dividend by opening up an office in the EU.

You might have been prepared for economic pain but how many of the 52% were, they were promised no pain, they were only promised better and this is not better

:clap::clap::clap:

exactly well said before election oven ready deal best deal since sliced bread soon after election is won worse deal we need to change it as it is EU's fault for sticking to the deal we signed

GrimUpNorth 23-06-2022 20:03

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by TheDaddy (Post 36126120)
The result was due to lies, the fact we're here talking about it proves it, where are the sunlit uplands, where is the German car industry not standing for it, what's happened to the fishermen and farmers who were promised the earth and now don't have jobs or businesses, I'm no remaniac as I don't want us going back in after all this but at the same time I want the people responsible to be held account, Where's the 40 million Turks that were on their way here, they get lost or something and the government was given such a democratic mandate to get this sorted, Where's the oven ready deal, instead all we're getting is it's the EUs fault because we never expected then to sign the deal, wtf what sort of reckless incompetent cretin would take a chance like that, we're only going to break international law in a limited way, wtf it's still breaking it cretin, that victorian hat stand has spent months looking for a brexit dividend and got so desperate he resorted to asking The Sun readers for their's but he made sure he got his dividend by opening up an office in the EU.

You might have been prepared for economic pain but how many of the 52% were, they were promised no pain, they were only promised better and this is not better

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave42 (Post 36126125)
:clap::clap::clap:

exactly well said before election oven ready deal best deal since sliced bread soon after election won worse deal we need to change it it EU's fault for sticking to the deal we signed

I think I've said more than once that Boza is just a snake oil salesman (in a posh suit probably paid for by someone else). Well I suppose we've ended up with what minority majority voted for and deserve all we get. One day things will change and it'll get better.

daveeb 23-06-2022 21:52

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by GrimUpNorth (Post 36126126)
I think I've said more than once that Boza is just a snake oil salesman (in a posh suit probably paid for by someone else). Well I suppose we've ended up with what minority majority voted for and deserve all we get. One day things will change and it'll get better.

I hope that day is sooner rather than later :erm: In complete agreement with you, Dave42 and theDaddy.

Pierre 23-06-2022 23:17

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36126123)
I know you probably posted this to get a reaction, but I’m pretty sure the 180,000 (and their families and friends) who didn’t survive this "survivable respiratory illness" may disagree with your definition of "survivable"…

I didn’t but….just for the U.K……a disease that kills just 0.26% of the population over two years or so ……..is by any definition “survivable”………statistically.

I mean if a doctor said to me, “I’m afraid it’s bowel cancer - but the survival rate is 99.74% ……I’d take those odds……..I’d call that “survivable”.

So no, I didn’t post it to get a “reaction” and it’s very sad a lot people died….for a variety of reasons and mistakes…………but it doesn’t change the fact that COVID for the vast majority of the population was very much “survivable”.

My position on this, and lockdowns, I think you will agree has been consistent throughout.

1andrew1 23-06-2022 23:53

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Labour unveil plans to seek limited changes to Brexit deal

On the sixth anniversary of the Brexit referendum, the shadow foreign secretary, David Lammy, confirmed the party would seek only limited changes and would not seek to rejoin the single market.

Lammy pledged the party would seek to sign an agrifood agreement; to restore visa-free business travel for touring musicians and performers, and seek to improve haulage arrangements.

It would also seek to restore mutual recognition for professional qualifications such as accountants and architects, seal a deal on financial equivalence for the City of London and secure associate membership of the EU’s £80bn Horizon Europe science funding network, something the EU is delaying because of the row over the Northern Ireland protocol.

Without rejoining the single market or customs union, Labour’s approach amounts to a renegotiation of the trade deal which will come under regular review by both sides.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...8b21b49182dcb1

Hugh 29-06-2022 19:01

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
https://committees.parliament.uk/com...ustralia-deal/

Quote:

Committee calls on Government to delay ratification of Australia deal

The International Trade Committee calls on the Government to delay the ratification of the UK’s trade deal with Australia to enable additional scrutiny of the agreement.

International agreements must be brought before Parliament under the Constitutional Reform and Governance Act, which gives MPs 21 sitting days to scrutinise the deal. Earlier this month, the Government triggered this process, despite previously committing there would be “sufficient time for relevant Select Committees to produce reports” beforehand.

In the first of two reports on the trade deal, the cross-party Committee of MPs concludes that, by failing to uphold this commitment, the Government has shown great discourtesy to Parliament.

The Committee calls on the Government to extend the 21-day period to give MPs more time to examine the advantages and disadvantages of the agreement. Should they fail to do so, the Committee recommends that MPs vote against ratification, which would extend the scrutiny period.

The report follows eight requests for the Secretary of State to agree a date to answer MPs’ questions on the deal. The Committee outlines that these delays have hampered its ability to conduct timely analysis, as it calls for the Secretary of State to commit to giving oral evidence on trade agreements before triggering the Parliamentary scrutiny period in future.

The MPs argue that any potential disadvantages of the deal could be overlooked or disregarded if the Government ratifies it too hastily. The Committee calls for MPs to be given the opportunity to debate the agreement – and vote on it – in the coming weeks.

The Committee also stresses the importance of being able to respond properly to the Government’s statutory ‘section 42 report’, which outlines how a trade agreement affects health, animal welfare and the environment. The MPs repeat their call for a guaranteed ‘window’ of 15 sitting days between the publication of this report and the triggering of the statutory scrutiny process. This would give the Committee time to take the Government’s report fully into account before publishing its own report on the agreement.
Quote:

The Committee was due to question the Secretary of State for International Trade, Rt. Hon. Anne-Marie Trevelyan MP, on the UK-Australia free trade agreement at 10am on Wednesday 29 June but it was cancelled at short notice.

nomadking 29-06-2022 20:49

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
:confused: I thought shortages of airport and other workers was down to Brexit.
When did Germany leave the EU?
Link
Quote:

Germany is planning to launch a temporary foreign workers scheme to offset acute staff shortages at the country’s airports over the summer months, ministers have said.
Link
Quote:

However, the shortages are particularly large in the health, social services, teaching and education sectors, as well as in the construction, architecture, engineering, surveying, and building services.

Pierre 29-06-2022 23:08

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36126538)
:confused: I thought shortages of airport and other workers was down to Brexit.
When did Germany leave the EU?
Link
Link

Any point in a storm.

The global position following COVID, and now Russia Ukraine, is all over the shop. But it won’t stop the usual suspects trying to pin our ills on Brexit.

Brexit May, or may have not, helped our position but it is irrelevant. Brexit happened, trying to judge how things may have been different achieves nothing and means nothing. It is pretty much agreed we’re not going back in.

1andrew1 29-06-2022 23:35

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nomadking (Post 36126538)
:confused: I thought shortages of airport and other workers was down to Brexit.
When did Germany leave the EU?
Link
Link

It's possible for labour shortages to occur in different countries for different reasons.
It's good to see Germany trying to sort its airports problem out.

nomadking 29-06-2022 23:48

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36126551)
It's possible for labour shortages to occur in different countries for different reasons.
It's good to see Germany trying to sort its airports problem out.

It has the whole of the EU to call upon, yet it still has to go outside the EU.
What about all the other shortages of workers that they have?

OLD BOY 30-06-2022 00:26

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36126136)

Simplistic at best

1andrew1 02-07-2022 00:42

Re: Britain outside the EU
 
Good deal for EU know who!
Quote:

Britain must pay EU £9.4bn this year as weak pound swells Brexit divorce bill

The bumper bill will still leave the UK with a massive £26.6 billion left to pay under the terms of the withdrawal deal, the Commission says.

It will swell the bloc’s coffers at a time when the UK and other European states are battling rising inflation and a cost of living crisis.

Brussels’s calculation for this year’s payment is almost £3 billion higher than that forecast by the Office for Budget Responsibility.

It had been expected the cost would rise because of the weakening of the pound against the euro, which the settlement is paid in.

The Treasury puts the final tally of the divorce bill at £35 billion to £39 billion, whilst the Commission has priced it slightly higher at £41 billion.

It was agreed in 2019 and covers money that the UK had already pledged to EU schemes as a member, plus the pensions of British officials.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/money/othe...29031ab0c8d951


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 17:13.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum