![]() |
Re: Online Safety Bill
I didn't mean for every post, I meant for those identified as neuro diverse who has previously made innapropriate comments.
This would satisfy both the Online Safety Act & the Equality Act. ---------- Post added at 21:44 ---------- Previous post was at 21:42 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
How does one differentiate someone self identifying as neurodiverse from someone who is just an asshole?
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
---------- Post added at 01:03 ---------- Previous post was at 00:59 ---------- Quote:
Action of some sort would still be needed to prevent them continuing to do this. |
Re: Online Safety Bill
No two brains work the same, so technically everyone is "neurodiverse".
Seems like just another "buzzword" used by people to excuse them being an asshole. |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Well I suppose if you make too many inappropriate comments regardless of being neurodiverse or not, you'd get warnings first probably and then mostly likely end up being banned from such site(s). Or would that kind of action be discriminate towards such people?
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Then we can work out which group is the oppressor and which group is the oppressed. The oppressed can then claim victimhood and, ironically, status. |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Totally unworkable. A data protection nightmare too. |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
Neurodiversity is a word used to explain the unique ways people's brains work. While everyone's brain develops similarly, no two brains function just alike. Being neurodivergent means having a brain that works differently from the average or “neurotypical” person.2 Jun 2022 ---------- Post added at 11:24 ---------- Previous post was at 11:16 ---------- Quote:
they are 'snowflakes'? For goodness sake, think about what you're saying. ---------- Post added at 11:34 ---------- Previous post was at 11:24 ---------- Quote:
Perhaps a question regarding this could be asked at the sign up stage?? If what they have posted becomes a legal matter (and they have chosen or been unable to notify the website by the very nature of their cindition) it may not transpire that they are neurodiverse until late in the day if this is to be used as a defence. |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
@peanut Sorry, I omitted to say that one of the problems has been that websites weren't taking down inappropriate posts in a timely manner or (frequently) at all. At one point facebook sacked a load of moderators, I assume to increase their profits. Now that the owners could face sanctions for not running their business in a fit & proper manner, more moderators have been taken on. ---------- Post added at 11:49 ---------- Previous post was at 11:44 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Online Safety Bill
So you can be a pain in the backside and there's nothing anyone can do about it?? If you get banned you can take action and claim discrimination is that right?
What if you have to declare at sign up (never going to happen), and then you get refused, what rights do site owners have? |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
For example, people with dementia may ask a question, receive an answer and go on to ask the very same question 30 times more. This isn't being done to be annoying (even if it comes across as being so), nor is it being done on purpose, it's because their brain is dying and not functioning correctly as it does so. Those who work in dementia care homes understand & accept this as part of the condition. Refusal to supply goods & services based on an individuals protected status would be unlawful. If refusal is based on any other reason then it may not be. |
Re: Online Safety Bill
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:40. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum