Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Virgin Media Internet Service (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=12)
-   -   125M : Vmng300 (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33676152)

craigj2k12 16-05-2011 21:51

Re: Vmng300
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35238221)
Just to throw a spanner in the works and to add to the topic.

It has been said that the VMNG300 can only operate on 4 downstream bonded channels. It must be disposed of because of this due to the way VM wish to go with bonding more channels for higher speed (future proofing! ).

All the VMNG300 needs is a firmware upgrade to enable 8 downstream channnel bonding.

Unless Ben, Masque or Nopanic would care to say different.

we established the other day it only needs a firmware update, but there is no-one there to do the updates, as its not a supported piece of kit, a waste of space, all the money they are investing in the new kit that people dont want

BenMcr 16-05-2011 22:00

Re: Vmng300
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by zekeisaszekedoes (Post 35238186)
Kinda like the way there is a legacy network for the Ambit 250/255/256 and an overlay for the hub/superhub/VMNG300. Shouldn't be too hard for VM to run different configs in tandem since they already do it, I agree. I know far less about it than you but it makes perfect sense.

Which network the CPE is on has got nothing to do with what model it is

The 250/255/256 can run on the overlay network if required for 20Mbit, and the SuperHub will run on the legacy network if supplied to someone with 2 or 10Mbit

All DOCSIS 3 is is channel bonding, not which network it is.

General Maximus 16-05-2011 22:03

Re: Vmng300
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by craigj2k11 (Post 35238227)
we established the other day it only needs a firmware update, but there is no-one there to do the updates, as its not a supported piece of kit, a waste of space, all the money they are investing in the new kit that people dont want

so they could have kept a good piece of kit and done one fireware update to make it 100/200mbit compatible! But instead they impose something new and rubbish on us which needs multiple fireware updates to get it to work :banghead:

pip08456 16-05-2011 22:03

Re: Vmng300
 
Hey, it was only a spanner in the works in an attempt to get Nopanic or Ben to bite!

It's no where near Masque's remit as he is just support.

BenMcr 16-05-2011 22:06

Re: Vmng300
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by craigj2k11 (Post 35238227)
all the money they are investing in the new kit that people dont want

Some people don't want.

At this point, I can see this thread is going nowhere very slowly.

pip08456 16-05-2011 22:07

Re: Vmng300
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by General Maximus (Post 35238261)
so they could have kept a good piece of kit and done one fireware update to make it 100/200mbit compatible! But instead they impose something new and rubbish on us which needs multiple fireware updates to get it to work :banghead:

Yes General. A firmware upgrade is all thats necessary and what was planned for.(when originally released).

I note although Ben answered craig he has neither confirmed (nor denied) my earlier post!

Is a firmware update all that is needed or not???????????????????????????????????????????

BenMcr 16-05-2011 22:12

Re: Vmng300
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35238264)
Hey, it was only a spanner in the works in an attempt to get Nopanic or Ben to bite!

It's no where near Masque's remit as he is just support.

Personally I this point, I don't see what good it will do.

Even if the VMNG300 could do 1000Mbit, Virgin have taken the decision to stop supplying it.

We get you don't like the SuperHub, but endless posts saying so isn't going to change things

If that's all this thread is going to be 'what if Virgin did X' then I might as well unsubscribe as it's pointless

---------- Post added at 23:09 ---------- Previous post was at 23:08 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35238274)
Yes General. A firmware upgrade is all thats necessary and what was planned for.

How do you know what is necessary? Do you work for Ambit or VM have proof of what you say? Or is it speculation and guesswork on your part?

---------- Post added at 23:12 ---------- Previous post was at 23:09 ----------

I would point out that at this stage Ubee Interactive (who are what Ambit now are) only offer a 3 channel modem. They have no 8 channel product http://www.ubeeinteractive.com/index.php/productsae

pip08456 16-05-2011 22:23

Re: Vmng300
 
Oh Ben, I merely state for discussion as I think itis healthy.

I do not condone those who seem to continually have a go at staff.

I am no longer a VM custromer but am sure I saw somewhere that the trusty VMNG300 would operate on 8 downstram channels with a firmware upgrade no matter what the company wants

I have no problem with anyone saying that the superhub is the way forward for VM as that is a corperate decision. I do have a problem with some staff saying the VMNG300 can't perform when it quite clearly can until such time as VM increase their channel bonding!

It can and will!!!

Hugh 16-05-2011 22:27

Re: Vmng300
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35238264)
Hey, it was only a spanner in the works in an attempt to get Nopanic or Ben to bite!

It's no where near Masque's remit as he is just support.

You appear to be contradicting yourself.....

Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35238304)
Oh Ben, I merely state for discussion as I think itis healthy.

I do not condone those who seem to continually have a go at staff.

I am no longer a VM custromer but am sure I saw somewhere that the trusty VMNG300 would operate on 8 downstram channels with a firmware upgrade no matter what the company which needs to supply to other companies.

IO have no problem with anyone saying that the ******hub is the way forward for VM as that is a corperate decision. I do have a problem with some staff saying the VMNG300 can't perform when it quite clearly can until such time as VM increase their channel bonding!

It can and will!!!


BenMcr 16-05-2011 22:28

Re: Vmng300
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35238304)
It can and will!!!

And the circular argument starts once again

Chrysalis 16-05-2011 23:01

Re: Vmng300
 
ive plugged in my vmng300 back in now since if a script does lose me a mac I dont want it to dump the vmng300 one because it sees the superhub one in use. Also somewhat annoyed nothing happened on the beta firmware so I will likely deliberatly wait until all superhub beta testers get it to try it or wait for release to try it.

Peter_ 17-05-2011 04:39

Re: Vmng300
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 35238304)
Oh Ben, I merely state for discussion as I think itis healthy.

I do not condone those who seem to continually have a go at staff.

I am no longer a VM custromer but am sure I saw somewhere that the trusty VMNG300 would operate on 8 downstram channels with a firmware upgrade no matter what the company wants

I have no problem with anyone saying that the superhub is the way forward for VM as that is a corperate decision. I do have a problem with some staff saying the VMNG300 can't perform when it quite clearly can until such time as VM increase their channel bonding!

It can and will!!!

what you have stated is of little consequence as the VMNG300 is no longer supplied by Virginmedia and nor will it be making a return as the hub ans Superhub are the way forward, so no money will ever be spent on something that is no longer in the supply chain as it would be a waste of money.

Also we have no way of knowing if what you say may have even been possible and nor will we ever find out.

Nopanic 17-05-2011 05:33

Re: Vmng300
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 35238310)
You appear to be contradicting yourself.....

If you quote someone and make their text bold, does that mean you are making a mod decision using their post :D

Stephen 17-05-2011 07:38

Re: Vmng300
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Nopanic (Post 35238440)
If you quote someone and make their text bold, does that mean you are making a mod decision using their post :D

It just means you are highlighting part of the post :p:

Nopanic 17-05-2011 09:08

Re: Vmng300
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 35238468)
It just means you are highlighting part of the post :p:

Ah but his Sig says other wise ....


Lol I'm messing with you.


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:26.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum