![]() |
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Quote:
You are taking that signal, decrypting it without permission on an illegal basis and not intending to pay for it, its theft, no matter what way you look at it. |
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Quote:
As you said, your decrypting the signal, your not taking it anywhere, the signal is already going into the house, the only illegal thing your doing is decrypting the signals, which is not theft, no matter what way you look at it. How can you steal a signal to which is already being transmitted to the house/any box you may have? you cant. |
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Quote:
|
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Does it really matter whether you call it 'theft' or 'unauthorised use of services' - the principle is the same, whatever label you put on it ?
|
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Quote:
|
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Quote:
Stealing cable service is just that stealing and for that you should be up before the judge. NO If's NO But's. Makes me wonder WHY some here defend this stealing so hard ?. |
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Quote:
The theft act is VERY clear on the definition of theft. Quote:
That's not to say it's not illegal (is it) it's just covered by different laws. |
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Quote:
|
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Sections 125 and 126 of the Communications Act 2003 (dishonestly obtaining an electronic communications service).
I think that might point you in the right direction especially as TV/Radio/Internet is covered under that act. Kymmy PS...full text for the act is at http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2003..._20030021_en_1 ---------- Post added at 12:27 ---------- Previous post was at 12:07 ---------- Actually my mistake... The previous act covers Internet only and not broadcast services, which instead is covered under Fraudulent reception of transmissions which is sections 297, 298 and 299 of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 (c. 48) Kymmy |
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Quote:
I doubt as many people would use these boxes if they knew that if they got caught they'd possibly be doing hard time rather than just having to pay a fine that will be nowhere near as high as the maximum. |
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Interesting discussion
Does this mean that if NTL intercept my communications with web sites and use them for their own benefit (ie providing them to a third party at an agreed price so that adverts can be targetted at me) that this can be classed as unapproved interception of communication, and can, under the same argument, be considered theft? (or "fraudulent reception of transmissions") just a thought |
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Quote:
You need to buy a licence whatever service you subscribe to ;) |
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Quote:
|
Re: All Chipped Cable Boxes Going Down
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:17. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum