![]() |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
ntl are hard to understand, their aup is designed just for web browsing, then they turn on proxies that remove the advantage of having a faster connection in the first place.
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Except that by switching en masse you're merely transferring the problem. I don't particularly want to get into an argument about it, apart from anything else I'm beginning to think there might be a problem here, but it won't get fixed except by people biting the bullet and ringing up about it.
Oh, and that link doesn't show you which proxy you're on, it merely shows the proxy caching content from the IP address of that particular web server. Different thing entirely. You're on a set of proxies, not a single one, it's important to remember that when it comes to diagnosing problems* *apart from anything else, if you can see that page it indicates that there *isn't* a problem with the cache it thinks you are on, as you have been served a page by it, thus giving the opposite diagnosis to what's really happening. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Having read this thread I am also suffering a similar problem here is Surrey. I am/was on "cache1-herm.server.ntli.net". When I sent a document via IE to the Open Uni it couldn't be opened, but when I sent it via mail it was fine. I have changed the proxie all is fine.
I do agree with BB King that changing masks the problem, but I needed to resolve my problem pronto or I lose marks |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
I'm in the South mate. I will be phoning Crawley Court NMC and DTOC Langley (IP Sur) in the morning. Its ****e TBH, this happened last year and no one wanted to know!.
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
I have a theory that in the NW people have more than one PC connected therefore the proxies need to handle up to three times the normal load.
Thats why they fall over as they are only speced to handle assumed load not x3 |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
They would have three times the load if they were all being used simultaneously. Mind you it's a good point, the average BB equipped household these days will have >1 PC, although possibly not much greater.
Quote:
Ringing DTOC will just annoy them, partly because they aren't customer facing but mainly because they're the wrong people - they look after proxies for STB interactive, but have nothing to do with broadband apart from STB registration and provisioning. NMC do look after them though, but aren't customer facing either. |
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
Quote:
|
Re: [Merged] Manchester Proxies.
AHEM can anybody retrieve their msn hotmail thru msn messenger and btw im on cache 10 in Lovely Bolton :pp
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:52. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum