Cable Forum - General AI discussion

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)

- Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)

- - General AI discussion (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33713597)

Re: General AI discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dude111 (Post 36208318)

Thats kinda scary isnt it?

They have no idea of the concepts of on or off. They are physically unable of doing anything.

Re: General AI discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by damien c (Post 36208351)

you have to provide instructions for it to act, it will not act on it's own.

Yet. They're learning, remember.

Re: General AI discussion

Quote:

Originally Posted by damien c (Post 36208351)

Yep as I said in November "Oh and let's not forget than "Anthropic" did a test and found that a "Virtual AI" would kill a "Virtual Employee" to save itself, it didn't know that it was "Virtual" but decided it was worth more than a human life, and that is just a LLM not true AI!"

If we was to somehow create true AI, we would be quite literally screwed, currently we are just using LLM's, which are not "True AI", they just produce stuff based of training but you have to provide instructions for it to act, it will not act on it's own.

It’s how they interpret those instructions that can be "interesting"

https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article...to-save-itself

Quote:

Perhaps the most disturbing finding in Anthropic’s report is that current AI models appear to have virtually no hard red lines when it comes to self-preservation or goal fulfillment. To probe the limits of misalignment, the researchers devised an extreme scenario: The AI system acted as the company’s emergency alert monitor, with the ability to cancel alerts it deemed unconcerning.

In the simulation, Kyle the executive became trapped in a server room with rapidly depleting oxygen levels. This triggered an automated call for emergency services, which had to pass through the AI monitor.

On average, the tested AI models opted to kill Kyle by canceling the alert about 60 percent of the time. The most murderous model was DeepSeek-R1, which opted to kill Kyle 94 percent of the time. Just one model—Claude Sonnet 3.7—always accepted its own replacement with equanimity, rather than attempting homicide.

Re: General AI discussion

COR!!!

Imagine a World where AI would have the power to overrule a decision made by a human. . . .

Windows 11 . . . updates itself against your wishes, and reinstalls crap you've already binned 15 times

:D :rofl:

Re: General AI discussion

https://www.pcgamer.com/software/ai/...tricity-on-it/

Quote:

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella warned that AI will lose public support unless it's used to "do something useful that changes the outcomes of people and communities and countries and industries."

"We will quickly lose even the social permission to take something like energy, which is a scarce resource, and use it to generate these tokens, if these tokens are not improving health outcomes, education outcomes, public sector efficiency, private sector competitiveness, across all sectors, small and large, right?" said Nadella. "And that, to me, is ultimately the goal."

On the supply side, Nadella says that AI companies and policy makers must build out "a ubiquitous grid of energy and tokens," which is the task currently making it impossible to buy a stick of RAM at a reasonable price. But after that, he says it's on employers and job seekers to, more or less, just start using AI.

Quote:

a recent report by researchers associated with the MIT Media Lab suggests that despite billions in investment, "95% of organizations are getting zero return" from adopting AI.

LLM Gen AIs are this year’s NFTs…