Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36168797)

And I've made myself clear too. For all I know, as I said in my post is that you want something in black and white to make a claim. That's what you do isn't it? Isn't that why you continuously state laws etcs as in threats. Now see why people consider you as a liability and unpleasant as well as for other reasons stated.

So for my last time, understand that multiple people here have stated that you're unpleasant so please accept and let that sink in. Ask your facilitator if you don't understand. Then maybe you can change your ways to be more acceptable. Win win don't you think....

Please don't quote anymore from here on in as I really don't give a .....

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36168811)

It seems that you having nothing to contribute to the subject under discussion other than nonsense and repeated personal insults that are upsetting. Please desist.

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36168812)

You keep quoting so I'll keep posting. You couldn't dispute what I said. Says it all doesn't it.

Get a life you joke.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36168814)

I have asked you to leave me alone, yet you continue. Any more of these insults and I will make a complaint about you.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36168814)

I have asked you to leave me alone, yet you continue. Any more of these insults and I will make a complaint about you.

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36168815)

I hope they close this thread down as it's pointless.

Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36168706)

The law is clear in that if someone gets upset by your comments, then they must stop. It matters not if they were genuinely not meant to be offensive.

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36168815)

Go for it. I asked you to stop quoting me. I hope they close this thread down as it's pointless.

Originally Posted by mrmistoffelees (Post 36168854)

Source ?

Or, are you just being an odious little twonk again & showcasing your complete lack of knowledge on the subject yet still trying to twist to suit your own agenda.

There are, I suspect many people (myself included) who have what could be classed as a hidden disability, but people generally don’t need to bang on about it over and over and over and over again. We just get on with life I don’t expect people to make allowances for me and I’m not going to take offence if someone whom I’ve never met nor am I likely to meet says something knowingly or unknowingly about it.

You need a waaaambulance

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36168855)

Presumably Richard can point to the sections of the relevant laws and prosecutions of individuals or companies that have caused mere “offence” to a single individual?

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36168878)

Have anyone seen second part of this week's silent witness, didn't think BBC would let the " prof" make such a lecture. Not disagreeing with it mine you

Originally Posted by 1701-e (Post 36168880)

Why not? They generally are quite balanced. Leave it to the viewers to decide if he's talking from his backside or not.

Originally Posted by Itshim (Post 36168878)

Have anyone seen second part of this week's silent witness, didn't think BBC would let the " prof" make such a lecture. Not disagreeing with it mine you

Originally Posted by pip08456 (Post 36168887)

As I don't watch silent witness on BBC would you care to expand on what it has to do with this tread and the point you wish to make?