Cable Forum

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Royal Family (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33712257)

peanut 29-11-2023 10:44

Re: Royal Family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165309)

What colour hair does Archie have?


Ginger afro? :shocked:

Sephiroth 29-11-2023 10:51

Re: Royal Family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36165310)
Ginger afro? :shocked:

At last - someone else with a sense of humour.

Pierre 29-11-2023 11:09

Re: Royal Family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36165299)
Only for some people - never occurred to me….

Nor me, I didn't know Megan was mixed race.

Sephiroth 29-11-2023 11:18

Re: Royal Family
 
Were Putin to arrange the offing of William and his children, then Harry would be next in line, Meghan would be Queen in waiting and Archie would eventually become Prince of Wales.

"No shit" I just heard someone say.

jfman 29-11-2023 12:53

Re: Royal Family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Sephiroth (Post 36165318)
Were Putin to arrange the offing of William and his children, then Harry would be next in line, Meghan would be Queen in waiting and Archie would eventually become Prince of Wales.

"No shit" I just heard someone say.

It’s the monarchy bit that’s preposterous, not his skin colour.

Sephiroth 29-11-2023 13:06

Re: Royal Family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36165320)
It’s the monarchy bit that’s preposterous, not his skin colour.

Nobody has suggested that Archie's skin colour is preposterous. The monarchy is not as preposterous as you suggest. Charlie Farley is preposterous, but the institution provides constitutional stability.

Paul 29-11-2023 22:33

Re: Royal Family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36165315)
Nor me, I didn't know Megan was mixed race.

Ditto, I think I even mentioned that at the time [on here].

jfman 30-11-2023 00:15

Re: Royal Family
 
Piers Morgan naming and shaming Charlie and Katie on his show.

1andrew1 30-11-2023 00:22

Re: Royal Family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36165371)
Piers Morgan naming and shaming Charlie and Katie on his show.

In his video here at 8 minutes 25 seconds
https://twitter.com/PiersUncensored/...57308665336235

Ms NTL 30-11-2023 00:40

Re: Royal Family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by peanut (Post 36165310)
Ginger afro? :shocked:


https://www.cableforum.uk/images/local/2023/11/4.jpg

Maggy 30-11-2023 10:36

Re: Royal Family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr K (Post 36163793)
Ah one of those threads that keep coming back just like ones about the BBC licence fee ;)

Anyway, here goes, not particularly anti Royal but they've failed at the job over the last 30 or so years. Its well paid, not particularly tough and has plenty of fringe benefits . So like anyone who doesn't deliver the goods they should be on their last warning. At least they could trim it all own in terms of budget and people by 80%.

As for the Kings speech it's not his speech it's the Govts. You could tell he didn't believe anything he was being forced to say about climate u turns. Coupled with all the ludicrous ceremony, and stupid clothes it's an incredible waste of time and money that this country should have dumped decades ago. Could have bought a few dialysis machines for the cost.

:clap:

---------- Post added at 09:34 ---------- Previous post was at 09:33 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36164790)
Yes, they sound like a trustworthy independant source. :erm:

Meanwhile, this from last year ;
https://www.investmentmonitor.ai/fea...ing-to-the-uk/



More recent figures for the contribution to the UK economy rise as high as £2.5bn per year, either way, the country makes quite a profit out of them overall.

As to 1p per day, well thats £3.65 per year, a little higher than 77p or £1.29, but still pretty insignificant, it wouldnt even get you a pint of beer these days.

:clap::clap::clap:

---------- Post added at 09:36 ---------- Previous post was at 09:34 ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hugh (Post 36165299)
Only for some people - never occurred to me….

Or me.:rolleyes:

Kursk 30-11-2023 18:16

Re: Royal Family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by jfman (Post 36165371)
Piers Morgan naming and shaming Charlie and Katie on his show.

Certainly he named them but he didn't 'shame' them did he?

Ms NTL 30-11-2023 22:45

Re: Royal Family
 
I watched "Suits" for years -Megan was an actor there. I did not query her race for years.

When she married Harry, her bum was significantly reduced. Then, I found out she is half black. I thought she was South African - Zulu women have a condition called "Steatopygia", two watermelons as bum cheeks. Then by accident ,I found Megan is 43% Nigerian.

It is not uncommon for black babies to be born white. It takes time for melanin to kick in, more so in Nigerians.

Curiosity killed the cat :rolleyes:

Paul 30-11-2023 22:45

Re: Royal Family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Kursk (Post 36165429)
Certainly he named them but he didn't 'shame' them did he?

He did not, and has he noted, without evidence (and context), its all meaingless hearsay.

Ms NTL 30-11-2023 22:55

Re: Royal Family
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul (Post 36165449)
He did not, and has he noted, without evidence (and context), its all meaingless hearsay.

It is not racist to be curious.

As somebody said they might have whether the baby will have ginger hair --gingerhairphobia?


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 13:04.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum