Cable Forum
Page 4 of 11 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)
-   Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)
-   -   Meghan/Harry (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33709866)

1andrew1 09-03-2021 12:15
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
Snowflake of the Week!
Quote:
Piers Morgan storms off Good Morning Britain after cohost suggests he's obsessed with Meghan Markle
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/polit...rtan-ntp-feeds

jfman 09-03-2021 12:22
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36073627)
Piers getting people talking about Piers. He's a parody of himself, a pantomime villain. Vince McMahon probably writes his storylines.

denphone 09-03-2021 12:54
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1andrew1 (Post 36073627)
Good as l bet that dented his mighty ego...:tu:

Mick 09-03-2021 13:50
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
I don't particularly agree with Piers muchly, but his response to this is how it should be, towards Meagain, her father says she has ghosted her side of the family, moans constantly about how her life should be private but then goes and gets interviewed by a major Billionaire talk host that is broadcast around the World.

jfman 09-03-2021 14:51
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
Well if the press are going to intrude on her life in any case and tell lies about her she might as well coin it in while setting the record straight and enjoy a life of luxury.

Hugh 09-03-2021 15:02
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
What they are actually asking for...

Quote:
she and Harry were not asking for complete privacy, nor were they cordoning themselves from their roles as public figures, as some have claimed. "They've created a false narrative. I've never talked about privacy," Meghan said.

Instead, she said, the couple was just asking to share the "parts of their lives" they were "comfortable" with giving the public access to—just like the rest of us.

"There's no one who's on Instagram or social media that would say, 'Because I shared this one picture, that entitles you to have my entire camera roll. Go ahead and look through it.' No one would want that. So it's about boundaries. And it's about respect."
But, newspaper editors who have built a business model on invasive, often made up, stories about celebrities aren’t going to be happy with that, are they?

1andrew1 09-03-2021 15:16
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pierre (Post 36073617)
I look forward to this disappearing through lack of interest very quickly, they're not Royal, they no longer (well she never) serve the country. They should be of no interest to the UK.

They are essentially a couple of Beverley Hills B-listers.

There was nothing said in that interview that was in any way controversial, the media can try and spin it but there's nothing there to spin. She's a grifter, and has managed to get a payday for not very much content.
She did engage in royal duties including a tour of Australia so it's incorrect to say she never served the UK.

RichardCoulter 09-03-2021 15:18
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Damien (Post 36073621)
I am surprised how many people want to pick sides in a family/institutional squabble they know little about.I don't think the interview with Oprah was a good idea as it comes across as playing the celebrity game, if they wanted to be taken more seriously in the U.K they should have done it with a U.K interviewer from BBC or Sky. This was designed for a U.S audience.

That said I also don't give much benefit of the doubt to the institution itself especially when see the stuff around Prince Andrew.
Yup, facebook is now full of people almost arguing and falling out over which side they support.

papa smurf 09-03-2021 15:35
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RichardCoulter (Post 36073647)
Yup, facebook is now full of people almost arguing and falling out over which side they support.
what a sad world we live in.

Pierre 09-03-2021 18:25
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
Anyway this whole spat is just make few quit and get back at the royal family for not allowing them to develop their “Sussex Royal” business brand.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-51593708

They didn’t want to be part of the Royal family, but they wanted to trade off the back of it and were quite rightly told to do one..............

Que big family fight, dummies are spat out and here we are.

Hugh 09-03-2021 18:27
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
Lot of assumptions, not backed up by evidence, there...

papa smurf 09-03-2021 18:32
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
Piers Morgan gets the boot from itv



https://news.sky.com/story/piers-mor...ments-12241082

denphone 09-03-2021 18:34
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
He went over the line not once but time and time again...

papa smurf 09-03-2021 18:37
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36073675)
He went over the line not once but time and time again...
He's an obnoxious gob shyte, he made the program impossible to watch.
must have been hell working with him.

mrmistoffelees 09-03-2021 18:38
Re: Meghan/Harry
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by denphone (Post 36073675)
He went over the line not once but time and time again...
Just the latest in a long long list of many in his career....


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 00:57.
Page 4 of 11 123 4 5678 Last »
Show 100 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum