![]() |
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
He gets condemned on a daily basis by the left and liberal media, so another day won't matter. |
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
|
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. ---------- Post added at 21:12 ---------- Previous post was at 21:09 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qKCl9NL1Cg http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/201...y-trump-melee/ |
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
And yes those flags only deserve one place to be, kept in history. |
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
|
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
---------- Post added at 06:11 ---------- Previous post was at 06:09 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
Where, during this march, 'the left' were carrying flags (swastikas) and repeating slogans (Blood and Soil) from a discredited political philosophy that resulted in 'The Final Solution'? Where, during this march, 'the left' drove a car deliberately into a crowd killing 1 and injuring 19 others? |
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
|
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
The left have had incidents of violence and you can look at obstinately left-wing governments in Venezuela to see plenty of things that should also be unequivocally condemned. Corbyn was rightfully criticised for this attempts to portray an oppressive government in Venezuela as equal to the people protesting them even though it's true that the opposition seem to have committed questionable acts as well. That is because one side was so clearly worse that it's wrong to draw equivalence between them. We rarely look back on WW2 and say the French Resistance were as bad as the Nazis they were resisting.
The same is true here. There should be apologism or deflection from the fact that there was a Neo-nazi rally. They were not as bad as each other at the weekend. There was one group that were literal Nazis and that should be taken seriously. Someone was killed, it seems, by one of these Nazis. This wasn't a ambiguous alt-right group that object to being called Nazis either. They were proud Nazis waving Nazi flags and quoting Nazis slogans. One reason I would suggest they're so bold is because the average resistance to them isn't as strong which is shown by a President reluctant to single them out for special rebuke. This isn't about left vs right. It's about Nazis vs everyone else. If there was a pro-ISIS march that resulted in a death we wouldn't concern ourselves with questioning those who opposed them. ---------- Post added at 09:22 ---------- Previous post was at 08:51 ---------- And to highlight that comparison Illinois Senate have passed a bill calling for Neo-Nazis to be classed as a terrorist group: http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/l...ion-story.html |
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
|
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
|
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
Of course there are incidents extreme left and right wing trouble, but that shouldn't be used to ignore what happened there, or to excuse the people responsible. |
Re: US: Violent clashes Charlottesville
Quote:
No. The people responsible are those who took part and organised it. The person who ran people over is responsible , not those who got hit. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 23:09. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum