![]() |
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
Quote:
|
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Not really the same.
|
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Thing is you don't know how long HTC were fixing the issue. It could have been known about but since it would only affect a few users was released anyway. They then released a fix fairly quickly that was already in the pipeline when they got complaints. Maybe they found how to isolate the fix and release it early. So many maybe's.
With any release like this there is always the trade off that a bug fix in one area would impact another. It may sort your issue but suddenly another group of users is affected adversely and if that second group is larger than the new "happy" group the vendor is in bigger doo-doo that before. |
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
---------- Post added at 11:19 ---------- Previous post was at 11:16 ---------- Quote:
Quote:
|
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
|
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Perhaps on the hardware side, not on the software (firmware).
VM depends on Netgear to produce the OS code and Broadcom to produce the drivers, but depend on Netgear for the hardware HTC depends on Google to produce the OS code and Qualcomm to produce the drivers, but design the hardware themselves But in neither case is the hardware actually the problem. |
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
I hope they learned from that and will listen to testers information better. |
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
HTC-Google HTC-Qualcomm i.e. they have a direct path to both Whereas for the SuperHub it's: Virgin Media - Netgear - Broadcom |
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
That's how it stands now, yes, however HTC *could* rely on Google to integrate the Qualcomm drivers into the OS, they choose not to. They decided Google's solution wasn't good enough and improved on it themselves.
VM could do the same if they wanted to, but made a business decision to rely on Netgear to do all the work. |
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
As far as I know, none of the broadband CPE released by Virgin or any previous incarnation has had the firmware maintained in house
So it's not a case of a decision to let Netgear do the work, it's a continuation of the support model that applies. |
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
While I'll agree it's consistent with what VM have done in the past, I don't believe that's adequate justification to continue the practice indefinitely. Particularly if it means it takes VM years to fix something that others can do in a month.
|
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
From my post of four days ago...
Quote:
|
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
Well i registered for the beta just hope i get picked. |
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Off topic post removed - can post focus on the R35 Firmware beta test, or posters can expect them to be deleted.
|
re: R36 Firmware Beta Test (was R35)
Quote:
Didn't it go through several "release candidate" style versions, all with a new RXX version number but only with show-stopping bugs found at the last minute? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:20. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum