![]() |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
I have been very worried by this problem for the last 20 years.There have been very many high profile cases that I do not consider that the defendants truly had a fair trial because the case had been examined,speculated over and prejudged by journalists and papers readers all in the public eye.
Sadly I don't see the situation improving unless the Attorney General redefines what is acceptable news coverage in such cases and makes it stick. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
The thing is to sell copies the newspapers love to play up to people's stereotypes. They love to tell you that Muslims wants to impose Sharia Law in the UK. They love to tell you that some work-shy couple with 10 kids are moaning that their 8 bedroom council house isn't big enough. And they love to tell you an odd-looking and strange-acting man who apparently makes some females feel uncomfortable is guilty of killing a 25 year oild woman living in his property.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Oh absolutely and I'm not suggesting it's right. Just pointing out that many journos have no morals whatsoever when it means getting a story and selling papers.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
I firmly believe that papers do a good job in one sense, but do a bad job in another.
What do right, is to alirt people to the fact that there is a killer in there area, and dig up as much evidence as possible for the police, which they don't tell us about, What they should be allowed to do, is to tell us if there are people that have commited serious crimes in your area. On the bad side, they do blow things up. But in this crime, l have follwed various papers and they all have the same, and that is concerning the school master and a nieghbour - could they be linked, the most amaxing thing l have found is WHY, nothing has come up with anything on the CCTV on the bridge - or are they covering that up ? |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
They could just be investigating the evidence, Arthur - we (the public) don't actually have a right to know all the details, especially if by giving away the details, the culprit may evade capture.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
[QUOTE=Arthurgray50@blu;35146361]I firmly believe that papers do a good job in one sense, but do a bad job in another.
the one's you read are good for keeping chips warm and checking the lotto results :) most papers are full of exaggerated drivel its what sells . |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
The problem is arthur when the press get the idea that a killer of pedophile is in a certain area they are more likely to spark vigilante justice. Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
If he denied crossing it then CCTV came to light showing driving over then that could be seen as attempting to cover up the fact he was driving over. |
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
What IF the killer was walking over the bridge with Joanna, as according to the landlord, she was with TWO adults.
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
|
re: Vincent Tabak found guilty of murdering Jo Yeates
Quote:
http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...9i9pwPuAi17C5l |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:14. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum