![]() |
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
Quote:
---------- Post added at 21:29 ---------- Previous post was at 21:27 ---------- Quote:
|
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
Quote:
|
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
Quote:
Average speed limit SPECS along road works are obviously a good safety device, although if the road conditions allow (ie only one lane closed, no traffic cone slaloms) the should be turned off when the workers aren't there. Many cameras are placed where they should, but there many which are hidden/obvuscated/on straight flat roads simply designed to make money. ---------- Post added at 21:42 ---------- Previous post was at 21:37 ---------- Quote:
Something like rumble strips, or road narrowing markings, or straighten the nasty bend, or put up a barrier, chop down that tree etc :) It is not acceptable for the "safety partnerships" to sit back and make money while road safety hasn't been increased, if you see what I mean. Have more ANPR cameras instead :) |
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
Quote:
|
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
I am, like most motorists, 100% behind things which have a practical and effective impact on the number of accidents on our roads.
What I will object too, again like most motorists, are things done in the name of safety when they have little of no impact other than on driver's wallets, and are to the detriment of actual safety improvements. Driving home from Northampton the back way last night there were signs of two cars going off the roads on two bends, into ditches/trees/fields. There's not even a kerb or bank to stop it, just tarmac then grass, then a drop into the ditch/field. |
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
Quote:
|
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
I think it would be nice to find a way to make driving short distances less economically viable without punishing people who go further than that. I can't really think of a way to make that possible but parents taking their kids to their local school in sodding great land rovers is absurd, how much inner-town/city rush hour traffic is for short journeys?
Now I am on it I would tax such cars heavy anyway. On my daily drive back from the tube there is a road which always has a lot of cars parked on either side. Being a narrow road it leaves little space for traffic to maneuver and you need to take it slowly, find space, and negotiate carefully when meeting traffic. Usually 3 or 4 times until the end of the road. Now imagine a massive land rover (or bigger!!) coming at you in that situation. I live near London, what possible reason could you have for such a ridiculous car? Last time I checked there was no wild beasts roaming the suburbs, no cross-terrain driving. Just busy streets. You can fit the same amount of people into a nice, large family car. If I had a lot of money to waste on such a monstrosity then I would rather go for a luxury BMW or other such car. /Rant |
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
Vehicle excise duty should be scrapped & the money raised by a levy on fuel used, instead. This would be directly proportional to the vehicle fuel efficiency & the distance travelled.
The 'tax disc' could be replaced by an 'insurance disc' , confirming the legality of the vehicle, including a yearly cross check of the VPN versus the registration to help deter cloning plates? |
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
Quote:
|
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
Quote:
LOL - until a mileage check was built into the MOT, anyway :angel: - and yes, a new car doesn't have an MOT until 3 years old - but would you risk voiding a warranty by running it on bio-diesel to avoid fuel tax ;) |
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
Quote:
2000L duty free limit is about 20000 miles on veg. |
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
Quote:
Naive, I know ;) |
Re: Think petrol tax is high right now?
Quote:
http://www.vegetableoildiesel.co.uk/customs.html The DVLA themselves have put forward that road tax should be scrapped and the money recovered via a slight increase in fuel tax, and they are obviously right when they say that income would be higher as naughty people without tax disks would have to pay at the pumps. They also floated the idea of a combined MOT/Insurance disk for cars as they hold all that information already. I find it odd that their ideas are ignored by HMG time and again.... especially now when reduced use of vehicles/more efficient engines = reduced tax to pay = cleaner environment. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:05. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum