Cable Forum - Will you miss her?

Cable Forum (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/index.php)

- Current Affairs (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/forumdisplay.php?f=20)

- - Will you miss her? (https://www.cableforum.uk/board/showthread.php?t=33628502)

Re: Will you miss her?

With over Ãƒâ€šÃ‚Â£24million in the bank can anyone give me her phone number?

Will I miss her? I say no no no

Re: Will you miss her?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nugget (Post 34508750)

In fact, I have it on good authority that you'd have paid him :)

The wall in the gents toilet is not 'good authority' :p:

Re: Will you miss her?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_love_monkey (Post 34508759)

The wall in the gents toilet is not 'good authority' :p:

No, but the picture of you writing on that wall is :PP:

Re: Will you miss her?

Damnit, part of the settlement is money to buy a house in London... why doesn't she just p*** off out of the country for good?

Re: Will you miss her?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taf (Post 34508790)

Damnit, part of the settlement is money to buy a house in London... why doesn't she just p*** off out of the country for good?

'Cus no country will let her in... :p:

Re: Will you miss her?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stuart C (Post 34508721)

I always remember when she first got married to Sir Paul. Channel 4 showed a documentary that showed a less than favourable picture of her (it showed her to be a money grabber). IIRC, She sued them. Now, however, it seems they have been proved right.

As for fading into obscurity, she can do that easily enough. Stop courting the media.

So, while she got a lot less than she intended, what do you guys think would be an adequate payoff? Not specifically for Heather Mills, but generally.

I personally think that the parent who gets custody should get enough money that the children can live comfortably. They should also be offered a fair payout for any property/businesses or joint projects they were involved in (so, if a husband and wife set up a company that makes massive profits, then they split, one partner should give a fair payout to the other).

If the parent without custody wants to offer more, they should be able to, but it should not be expected.

Sorry if all this seems a little harsh, but I don't see why one parent should automatically be entitled to a percentage of what the other owned before they were married.

Also (although this doesn't apply in the McCartney/Mills case as Paul is hardly on his uppers even after the settlement), people should remember that if they get too much money from their estranged partner, that partner may not have enough money to support any future families he/she might have. A friend of mine earns a very nice wage, as does her fiance, but they pay so much in child support for his child that they have to cut a lot of corners.

She shouldn't be allowed one penny of Macca's money, she didn't contribute to the millions he amassed through his Beatles days, his solo days, and his late wifes cookery. Mills is just a money grabbing whore.

Macca should contribute to his young childs up bringing which he's not backing away from but 20 odd million quid for a few years marriage is not bad going. The first thing she'll do is write a book telling all the world how cruel Macca was to her, I hope she rots in hell because she gives decent women a bad name.

Re: Will you miss her?

[Admin Edit:-(Mick)-Objectional post deleted-Please note terms of use especially:-

You agree that you will not:-

Post, transmit, upload, email or otherwise make available any content that is illegal, abusive, harassing, defamatory, confidential, harmful, threatening, vulgar, libellous, invasive of another’s privacy, or ethnically, racially or otherwise objectionable.

Use excessive and unnecessary use of bad language.]

Re: Will you miss her?

Well said Nidge, shame some other posters seem to have no grip on either reality or common sense ;)

Re: Will you miss her?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nidge (Post 34508900)

In my own,roundabout way, that's exactly what I was saying. She shouldn't be entitled to any more money that she has either helped Sir Paul earn (so nothing there then) or that required to give their child a good standard of living.

Re: Will you miss her?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nidge (Post 34508900)

Macca should contribute to his young childs up bringing which he's not backing away from but 20 odd million quid for a few years marriage is not bad going. The first thing she'll do is write a book telling all the world how cruel Macca was to her, I hope she rots in hell because she gives decent women a bad name.

And part of that in this case is providing the childs mother suitable accomodation to live in.
She is probably gagged from writing that book and the revenue that will have generated, part of this settlement is the cost of that gag.
From the predictions of 80M this is a fairly low settlement and lower than Charmans so does in the light of things seem reasonable.
I don't think Macca wants his kid growing up in a Semi in Surbiton and 2.4m does not buy much inside the circle line, then there are those pesky council taxes and running costs of a property suitable for a beatles daughter.
Unless she plans to give up custody leaving the country will be more of a challenge than she thinks.
The complaints about 35k a year for the daughter, gimmie a break, that is what he is compelled to pay to her, not what he will be spending on her.

If you want someone to complain about try this case.
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/to...cle1837936.ece

Re: Will you miss her?

She should have got a single figure percentage of what he has earnt since they got together excluding interest on monies earnt prior to the relationship. Another side of me thinks maybe she should get a walloping payout not because she deserves it but because he was so stupid in marrying her in the first place. I know he was still grieving for linda and all that but everyone else saw her for what she was so i can't believe he was totally ignorant of the possibility and therefore shoulld have protected himself better. Easy to slag her off but she has only done the modern british trick of taking whatever for all you can get.

Re: Will you miss her?

They way she walked down the High Court steps today, she was really hot, a bit too thin, confident, her mouth rounder, the way she played with her hair during the interview ... I was thinking about the wealth of her experience: her sex manual, or working as a hooker.... Hmmmm, I could not figure out her accent...

On a serious note::rolleyes:
Would you put bolts and metal on your body to have Paul's baby for 24.3m?
After all, she had to sleep with the guy;)

Re: Will you miss her?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7302736.stm

She didn't tell the whole truth???? Now there's a surprise......... :rolleyes:

Re: Will you miss her?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Osem (Post 34509309)

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/7302736.stm

She didn't tell the whole truth???? Now there's a surprise......... :rolleyes:

Let's examine the evidence:-
She's female and it's a divorce hearing.... case proven!:D

Re: Will you miss her?

Amongst other things it's alleged that she claimed McCartney effectively stifled her lucrative 'career' (:rofl:) whereas the judge said the reverse was true if anything.

Anyway anyone who's interested can read how wonderful she is here:

http://www.heathermills.org/news.php?id=26

:sick:

and the truth here:

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle3575582.ece

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...e_id=1770&ct=5