![]() |
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Quote:
|
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Well NTL is creaking at the seams what will happen when the mythical 20 and 50 meg are supplied :angel:
|
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Quote:
It will fall over :D |
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Regarding fibre to the home, see here:
http://www.telecommagazine.com/newsg...?HH_ID=AR_2576 Paul Reynolds the CEO of BT Wholesale is quoted as saying "I really don’t see a business case for widespread FTTH. It is not immediately apparent where the incremental revenue would come from that investment." Looks like the unbundled operators will have to stump up the cash to put fibre into the local loop. |
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Quote:
|
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Quote:
I'm currently paying £21 just for Sky TV so its a no brainer to pay an extra £5 per month for 8MB BB and Sky Talk Freetime. http://www.sky.com/portal/site/skycom/offers/bundles |
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Quote:
|
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Swings and roundabouts really. Sky don't get you a great mobile deal and PC security though do they?
|
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Quote:
|
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Quote:
|
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
1 Attachment(s)
Quote:
Everyone seems to think they are going to have some sort of super high speed connection out of this. Never going to happen. 21cn is all to do with switches and ip. Nothing at all to do with the customer end. BTW The DSL gang always shout VDSL well i suggest they read up on it and smell the coffee Quote:
Note the drawing is in Feet not Meters |
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Quote:
But with regards to the BT quote and they can afford FTTH. I would point out to BT, can they afford not to make that investment when a competitor like ntl can offer 20mb, 50mb etc. Look at the States, the Baby Bells said no to FTTH until cable started offering faster broadband speeds, then they had a rethink and places like New York are getting/have already been fully fibered up. I always look to the US, because what they do there always crosses over here several years later. Although, as I said on another thread, perhaps technologies like WIMAX may make this FTTH debate irrelevant anyway. Even ntl has publically said that they see the operation of using underground cables as becoming a thing of the past in the future. And wireless becoming the defacto broadcast/broadband medium. I guess at that point Cable Forum will need to find a new name:) ---------- Post added at 04:23 ---------- Previous post was at 04:19 ---------- A rather relevant article re ntl vs Sky Broadband and other ISPs here: http://www.trustedreviews.com/editor...s-the-Limit/p1 |
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Quote:
That has been stated by many on here but nearly always after they have left and have been installed via one of the AMAZING deals :erm:. The person who wrote that article had obviously not had many dealing's with $ky's India customer service call centre's. I have spent a few hour's on to them trying to understand there 3- 4 four week wait for an engineer or there ability to change the brand of your receiver even when you paid extra for a better brand, Its just a case of keeping :banghead: until like me your at the end of your contract and can cancel. I am happy with what i have and noway am i changing to what is as far as broadband goes inferior technology in dinosaur land. |
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Quote:
You failed to mention that though :rolleyes: |
Re: NTL v Sky v Talktalk
Quote:
They too gave me a hard time. However i have never had to wait 3-4 weeks for a engineer to fix anything else. only $ky win that award. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 21:21. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
All Posts and Content are © Cable Forum